1887
image of Marking pedagogical saliency with honh in Taiwan Mandarin interaction
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

is a pervasive particle in Taiwan Mandarin interaction. While prior pragmatic research has identified as “signaling negotiation invitation” (Li 1999, p. 90) in Taiwanese Southern Min and Hakka, its specific interactional functions in Taiwan Mandarin remain underexplored. This paper addresses this gap by exploring the interactional imports of in Taiwan Mandarin instructional settings.

Using conversation analysis (CA; Sacks et al. 1974) and interactional linguistics (IL; Couper-Kuhlen & Selting 2018; Selting & Couper-Kuhlen 2001), we analyzed 15.5 hours of video-recorded interactions from a self-discovery art facilitator training workshop and a cooking class. While is found to exhibit a multitude of interactional functions, in this paper, we focus particularly on how it is used as an emphatic device in reformulated or repeated instructions (45 cases).

Findings reveal teachers predominantly attach to reformulated elements in TCU-final or TCU-independent positions to emphasize a prior instructional point (31 cases), while 14 cases occur in repeated instructions when an important pedagogical point is first introduced. Accompanying embodiment (e.g., raising eyebrows or pointing to relevant objects) further contributes to highlighting the -marked points as pedagogically salient. Through detailing the multimodal practices and sequential organization of , our findings expand the limited literature on Taiwan Mandarin particles.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/il.24023.cho
2025-12-10
2026-01-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Brito Rivera, H. A., Alby, F., & Zucchermaglio, C.
    (2021) Group membership and social identities in a formative intervention in a Mexican hospital. Frontiers in Psychology, : . 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.786054
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.786054 [Google Scholar]
  2. Burch, A. R., & Kasper, G.
    (2016) ‘Like Gozilla’: Enactments and formulations in telling a disaster story in Japanese. InM. T. Prior & G. Kasper (Eds.), Emotion in multilingual interaction (pp.–). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.266.03bur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.266.03bur [Google Scholar]
  3. (2021) Task Instruction in OPI Roleplays. InM. R. Salaberry & A. R. Burch (Eds.), Assessing speaking in context: Expanding the construct and its applications (pp.–). De Gruyter Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chao, Y. R.
    (1968) A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cheng, R-L.
    (1985) A Comparison of Taiwanese, Taiwan Mandarin, and Peking Mandarin. Language, (), –. 10.2307/414149
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414149 [Google Scholar]
  6. Christodoulidou, M.
    (2014) The meaning of discourse markers in classroom interaction. InMajor Trends in Theoretical and Applied Linguistics (pp.–). De Gruyter Open Poland. 10.2478/9788376560885.p11
    https://doi.org/10.2478/9788376560885.p11 [Google Scholar]
  7. Clayman, S. E.
    (2024) Working with collections in conversation analysis. InJ. D. Robinson, R. Clift, K. H. Kendrick, & C. W. Raymond (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Methods in Conversation Analysis (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108936583.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108936583.008 [Google Scholar]
  8. Constant, N.
    (2014) Contrastive topic: Meanings and realizations [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Massachusetts.
  9. Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M.
    (2018) Interactional linguistics: Studying language in social interaction. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fagan, D.
    (2012) Okay as a multifunctional resource for giving feedback in classrooms. Language & Information Society, (), –. 10.29211/soli.2012.16..002
    https://doi.org/10.29211/soli.2012.16..002 [Google Scholar]
  11. Fukuda, C., & Burdelski, M.
    (2019) Multimodal demonstrations of understanding of visible, imagined, and tactile objects in guided tours. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2019.1572857
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1572857 [Google Scholar]
  12. Gardner, R.
    (2007) The right connections: Acknowledging epistemic progression in talk. Language in Society, , –. 10.1017/S0047404507070169
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404507070169 [Google Scholar]
  13. Goffman, E.
    (1964) The neglected situation. American Anthropologist, (), –. 10.1525/aa.1964.66.suppl_3.02a00090
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1964.66.suppl_3.02a00090 [Google Scholar]
  14. Haddington, P., Nevile, M., Mondada, L., & Keisanen, T.
    (2014) Multiactivity in social interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.187
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.187 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hauser, E.
    (2019) Upgraded self-repeated gestures in Japanese interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.04.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.04.004 [Google Scholar]
  16. Heritage, J.
    (1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. InJ. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp.–). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (2012) Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684 [Google Scholar]
  18. Huang, S. Y.
    (2025) Establishing joint attention to embodied actions with zheyang (zi) in Taiwan Mandarin cooking demonstrations. Chinese Language and Discourse, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Huang, S-Y., & Lin, Y-H.
    (2022) Exploring dangran ‘of course’ responses to polar questions in Taiwan Mandarin talk-in-interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2022.08.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.08.009 [Google Scholar]
  20. Jefferson, G.
    (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. InG. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
  21. Jing-Schmidt, Z.
    (2022) Sentence-final particles: Sociolinguistic and discourse perspectives. InC-R. Huang, Y-H. Lin, I-H. Chen, & Y-Y. Hsu (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of Chinese linguistics (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108329019.031
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108329019.031 [Google Scholar]
  22. Keevallik, L.
    (2018) What does embodied interaction tell us about grammar?Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2018.1413887
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413887 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kendrick, K. H.
    (2018) Adjusting epistemic gradients: The final particle ba in Mandarin Chinese conversation. East Asian Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1558/10.1558/eap.36120
    https://doi.org/10.1558/10.1558/eap.36120 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kubler, C. C.
    (1985) The influence of Southern Min on the Mandarin of Taiwan. Anthropological Linguistics, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lee, J. M.
    (2017) The multifunctional use of a discourse marker okay by Korean EFL teachers. Foreign Language Education Research, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A.
    (1981) Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. University of California Press. 10.1525/9780520352858
    https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520352858 [Google Scholar]
  27. Li, Y.
    (1999) Utterance-final particles in Taiwanese: A discourse-pragmatic analysis. Wenhe Publisher.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Lin, C-H.
    (2014) Utterance-final particles in Taiwan Mandarin: Contact, context, and core functions [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.
  29. Luke, K. K.
    (1990) Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.9 [Google Scholar]
  30. Ochs, E.
    (1979) Transcription as theory. InE. Ochs & B. B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp.–). Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Ogden, R.
    (2012) Making sense of outliers. Phonetica, , –. 10.1159/000343197
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000343197 [Google Scholar]
  32. Pekarek Doehler, S., Keevallik, L., & Li, X.
    (2022) Editorial: The grammar-body interface in social interaction. Frontiers. in Psychology, , . 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.875696
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.875696 [Google Scholar]
  33. Pfänder, S., & Couper-Kuhlen, E.
    (2019) Turn-sharing revisited: An exploration of simultaneous speech in interactions between couples. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.010 [Google Scholar]
  34. Psathas, G.
    (1994) Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, (), –. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  36. Schegloff, E. A.
    (1993) Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2601_5
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2601_5 [Google Scholar]
  37. Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H.
    (1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica, (), –. 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 [Google Scholar]
  38. Selting, M.
    (1994) Emphatic speech style — with special focus on the prosodic signaling of heightened emotive involvement in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)90116‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90116-3 [Google Scholar]
  39. Selting, M., & Couper-Kuhlen, E.
    (Eds.) (2001) Studies in interactional linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.10 [Google Scholar]
  40. Streeck, J.
    (2009) Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/gs.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.2 [Google Scholar]
  41. Teng, S-H.
    (2002) Defining Taiwanese Mandarin. InW. C. So & G. M. Jones (Eds.), Education and society in plurilingual contexts (pp.–). VUB Brussels University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Tian, J.
    (2024) Co-constructing translanguaging space to facilitate participation in a novice CFL classroom. Chinese Language and Discourse, (), –. 10.1075/cld.24006.tia
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.24006.tia [Google Scholar]
  43. Tsai, I-N.
    (2008) Projecting the unanticipatory: The Mandarin particle ei and its projectability in daily conversation. Proceedings of the 20th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang, W.
    (2018) Discourse uses and prosodic properties of ranhou in spontaneous Mandarin conversation. Chinese Language and Discourse, (), –. 10.1075/cld.00006.wan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.00006.wan [Google Scholar]
  45. Wang, Y-F., & Tsai, P-H.
    (2007) Textual and contextual contrast connection: A study of Chinese contrastive markers across different text types. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.011 [Google Scholar]
  46. Wang, Y-F., Tsai, P-H., & Yang, Y-T.
    (2010a) Objectivity, subjectivity and intersubjectivity: Evidence from qishi (‘actually’) and shishishang (‘in fact’) in spoken Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.07.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.07.011 [Google Scholar]
  47. Wang, Y-F., Tsai, P-H., Goodman, D., & Lin, M-Y.
    (2010b) Agreement, acknowledgment, and alignment: The discourse-pragmatic functions of hao and dui in Taiwan Mandarin conversation. Discourse Studies, (), –. 10.1177/1461445609346922
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445609346922 [Google Scholar]
  48. Waring, H-Z.
    (2008) Using explicit positive assessment in the language classroom: IRF, feedback, and learning opportunities. The Modern Language Journal, , –. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2008.00788.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00788.x [Google Scholar]
  49. (2012) Doing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterances. Language & Communication, , –. 10.1016/j.langcom.2012.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2012.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  50. Wu, J-C.
    (2018) Utterance-Final Particle honn in Hakka. Global Hakka Studies, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Wu, R-J. R.
    (2004) Stance in talk: A conversation analysis of Mandarin final particles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.117
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.117 [Google Scholar]
  52. (2014) Managing turn entry: The design of EI-prefaced turns in Mandarin conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.03.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.03.003 [Google Scholar]
  53. Wu, R-J. R., & Heritage, J.
    (2017) Particles and epistemics: Convergences and divergences between English and Mandarin. InA. H. King (Ed.), Enabling human conduct: Studies of talk-in-interaction in honor of Emanuel A. Schegloff (pp.–). Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.273.14wu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.273.14wu [Google Scholar]
  54. Wu, Y., & Yang, S.
    (2022) Power plays in action formation: The TCU-final particle ba (吧) in Mandarin Chinese conversation. Discourse Studies, (), –. 10.1177/14614456221099166
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456221099166 [Google Scholar]
  55. Xu, J.
    (2019) An analysis of Mandarin Chinese final particle ba in dispreferred responses. East Asian Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1558/eap.38007
    https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.38007 [Google Scholar]
  56. Yang, S.
    (2024) Downgrading commitment: The final particle ba in complying responses to directives in Mandarin Chinese conversation. Discourse Studies, (), –. 10.1177/14614456241285903
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456241285903 [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhang, S., & Dong, B.
    (2023) Adjusting entitlement degrees in inappropriate requests: TCU-final particle bei (呗) in Mandarin Chinese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2023.08.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.08.010 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/il.24023.cho
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/il.24023.cho
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error