1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Interactional Linguistics
  4. Volume 5, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 5, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN 2666-4224
  • E-ISSN: 2666-4232
PDF
EPUB

Abstract

Abstract

This paper analyzes how non-lexical vocalizations, understood as sounds and syllables without a coded lexical meaning, may be used to mark the accomplishment of an ongoing bodily action under scrutiny. In particular, a bipartite instructional format used in dance instruction in Argentine Spanish is considered. The first part of the format presents a verbal description of an embodied action (e.g. ). The second part consists of a non-lexical vocalization (e.g. ) targeted to be produced in synchrony with an actual performance of the previously described action. Thus, the action description projects a bodily performance that is (expected to be) temporally coordinated with the vocalization. Depending on the instructional context, the bodily action is carried out by different participants. Whereas in ‘demonstrations’ the instructors perform the bodily action themselves, when used as a ‘local action directive’ the students are expected to perform it. The analysis will address differences in the multimodal realization of the format as well as specific functions in these two contexts. The general function of the vocalization — to signal the accomplishment of a currently focused action — will be argued to present a case of marking ‘aspectuality’ under the conditions of embodied interaction.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/il.25001.ehm
2025-06-05
2025-12-06

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/il.25001.ehm
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/il.25001.ehm.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/il.25001.ehm&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Albert, S., & vom Lehn, D.
    (2023) Non-lexical vocalizations help novices learn joint embodied actions. Language & Communication, 881, 1–13. 10.1016/j.langcom.2022.10.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2022.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Auer, P.
    (1988) On deixis and displacement. Folia Linguistica, XXII(3–4), 263–292. 10.1515/flin.1988.22.3‑4.263
     https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.1988.22.3-4.263 [Google Scholar]
  3. (2005) Projection in interaction and projection in grammar. TEXT, 25(1), 7–36.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bertinetto, P. M.
    (2001) On a frequent misunderstanding in the temporal-aspectual domain: The ‘Perfective = Telic Confusion’. InC. Cecchetto, G. Chierchia, & M. T. Guasti (Eds.), Semantic Interfaces. Reference, Anaphora and Aspect (pp.177–210). CSLI Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Binnick, R. I.
    (2006) Aspect and Aspectuality. InB. Aarts & A. McMahon (Eds.), The Handbook of English Linguistics (pp.244–268). Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470753002.ch11
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753002.ch11 [Google Scholar]
  6. Booij, G.
    (2008) Constructional idioms as products of linguistic change: the aan het + INFINITIVE construction in dutch. InA. Bergs & G. Diewald (Eds.), Constructions and Language Change (pp.81–106). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110211757.81
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211757.81 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W.
    (1994) The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Clark, H. H.
    (1996) Using language. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620539 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2016) Depicting as a Method of Communication. Psychological Review, 123(3), 324–347. 10.1037/rev0000026
     https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000026 [Google Scholar]
  10. Comrie, B.
    (1976) Aspect. An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Curl, T. S., & Drew, P.
    (2008) Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(2), 129–153. 10.1080/08351810802028613
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810802028613 [Google Scholar]
  12. Deppermann, A.
    (2018a) Changes in turn-design over interactional histories — the case of instructions in driving school lessons. InA. Deppermann & J. Streeck (Eds.), Time in Embodied Interaction. Synchronicity and sequentiality of multimodal resources (pp.293–324). John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.293.09dep
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.293.09dep [Google Scholar]
  13. (2018b) Instruction practices in German driving lessons: Differential uses of declaratives and imperatives. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28(2). 10.1111/ijal.12198
     https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12198 [Google Scholar]
  14. Depraetere, I.
    (2007) (A)telicity and intentionality. Linguistics, 45(2), 243–269. 10.1515/LING.2007.008
     https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2007.008 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dessì Schmid, S.
    (2019) Aspectuality. An Onomasiological Model Applied to the Romance Languages. De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110562088
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110562088 [Google Scholar]
  16. Edmonds, D. M., & Greiffenhagen, C.
    (2021) Configuring Prospective Sensations: Experimenters Preparing Participants for What They Might Feel. Symbolic Interaction, 44(1), 183–210. 10.1002/symb.485
     https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.485 [Google Scholar]
  17. Ehmer, O., & Brône, G.
    (2021) Instructing embodied knowledge: multimodal approaches to interactive practices for knowledge constitution. Linguistics Vanguard, 7(s4), 1–12. 10.1515/lingvan‑2021‑0012
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2021-0012 [Google Scholar]
  18. Ehmer, O., Satti, L. I., Martínez, A., & Pfänder, S.
    (2019) Un sistema para transcribir el habla en la interacción: GAT 2. Gesprächsforschung — Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, 201, 64–114.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Evans, B., & Reynolds, E.
    (2016) The organization of corrective demonstrations using embodied action in sports coaching feedback. Symbolic Interaction, 39(4), 525–556. 10.1002/symb.255
     https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.255 [Google Scholar]
  20. Fox, B. A., & Robles, J.
    (2010) It’s like mmm: Enactments with it’s like. Discourse Studies, 12(6), 715–738. 10.1177/1461445610381862
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445610381862 [Google Scholar]
  21. Goffman, E.
    (1986 [1974]) Frame analysis. An essay on the organization of experience (Reprint ed.). North Eastern University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. González Temer, V.
    (2014) Clicks In Chilean Spanish Conversation. York Papers in Linguistics. PARLAY Proceedings, 11, 74–99.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Goodwin, C.
    (1997) The blackness of black. Color categories as situated practice. InL. B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (pp.111–140). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑662‑03362‑3_6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03362-3_6 [Google Scholar]
  24. Heritage, J., & Sorjonen, M.-L.
    (1994) Constituting and Maintaining Activities across Sequences: And-Prefacing as a Feature of Question Design. Language in Society, 23(1), 1–29. 10.1017/S0047404500017656
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500017656 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hofstetter, E.
    (2020) Nonlexical “Moans”: Response Cries in Board Game Interactions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 42–65. 10.1080/08351813.2020.1712964
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1712964 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hopper, P. J.
    (1979) Aspect and Foregrounding in Discourse. InT. Givón (Ed.), Discourse and Syntax (pp.213–241). Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368897_010
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368897_010 [Google Scholar]
  27. (1982) Aspect Between Discourse and Grammar: An Introductory Essay for the Volume. InP. Hopper (Ed.), Tense-Aspect: Between Semantics and Pragmatics (pp.3–18). Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.1.04hop
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.1.04hop [Google Scholar]
  28. Hsu, H.-C., Brône, G., & Feyaerts, K.
    (2021) In other gestures: Multimodal iteration in cello master classes. Linguistics Vanguard, 7(s4), 1–11. 10.1515/lingvan‑2020‑0086
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2020-0086 [Google Scholar]
  29. Keevallik, L.
    (2010) Bodily Quoting in Dance Correction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(4), 401–426. 10.1080/08351813.2010.518065
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2010.518065 [Google Scholar]
  30. (2014) Turn organization and bodily-vocal demonstrations. Journal of Pragmatics, 651, 103–120. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.01.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.01.008 [Google Scholar]
  31. (2015) Coordinating the temporalities of talk and dance. InA. Deppermann & S. Günthner (Eds.), Temporality in Interaction (pp.309–336). Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.27.10kee
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.27.10kee [Google Scholar]
  32. (2020a) Linguistic structures emerging in the synchronization of a Pilates class. InC. Taleghani-Nikazm, E. Betz, & P. Golato (Eds.), Mobilizing Others: Grammar and Lexis within Larger Activities (pp.147–173). Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.33.06kee
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.33.06kee [Google Scholar]
  33. (2020b) Multimodal noun phrases. InT. Ono & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), The ‘Noun Phrase’ across languages: An emergent unit in interaction (pp.154–177). benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.128.07kee
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.128.07kee [Google Scholar]
  34. (2021) Vocalizations in dance classes teach body knowledge. Linguistics Vanguard, 7(s4), 1–10. 10.1515/lingvan‑2020‑0098
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2020-0098 [Google Scholar]
  35. (2022) Grammatical coordination of embodied action: The Estonian ja ‘and’ as a temporal organizer of Pilates moves. InY. Maschler, S. Pekarek Doehler, J. Lindström, & L. Keevallik (Eds.), Emergent Syntax for Conversation: Clausal patterns and the organization of action (pp.221–244). Benjamins.10.1075/slsi.32.08kee
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.32.08kee [Google Scholar]
  36. Keevallik, L., Hofstetter, E., Löfgren, A., & Wiggins, S.
    (2024) Repetition for real-time coordination of action: Lexical and non-lexical vocalizations in collaborative time management. Discourse Studies, 26(3), 334–357. 10.1177/14614456231224079
     https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456231224079 [Google Scholar]
  37. Keevallik, L., & Ogden, R.
    (2020) Sounds on the Margins of Language at the Heart of Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 1–18. 10.1080/08351813.2020.1712961
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1712961 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kornfeld, L., & Rossi, G.
    (2023) Enforcing Rules During Play: Knowledge, Agency, and the Design of Instructions and Reminders. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 56(1), 42–64. 10.1080/08351813.2023.2170637
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2023.2170637 [Google Scholar]
  39. Leipzig Glossing Rules
    Leipzig Glossing Rules (2015) Conventions for interlinear morpheme-by-morpheme glosses. Department of Linguistics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, https://www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/pdf/Glossing-Rules.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Lieber, R.
    (2004) Morphology and Lexical Semantics. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Lindström, J., Lindholm, C., Grahn, I.-L., & Huhtamäkiet, M.
    (2020) Consecutive clause combinations in instructing activities. Directives and accounts in the context of physical training. InY. Maschler, S. Pekarek Doehler, J. Lindström, & L. Keevallik (Eds.), Emergent Syntax for Conversation: Clausal patterns and the organization of action (Vol.321, pp.245–274). Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.32.09lin
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.32.09lin [Google Scholar]
  42. Löfgren, A.
    (2023) Relocating to Depict: Managing the Interactional Agenda at Opera Rehearsals. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 56(3), 209–230. 10.1080/08351813.2023.2235968
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2023.2235968 [Google Scholar]
  43. Löfgren, A., & Hofstetter, E.
    (2023) Introversive semiosis in action: depictions in opera rehearsals. Social Semiotics, 33(3), 601–620. 10.1080/10350330.2021.1907180
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2021.1907180 [Google Scholar]
  44. Lynch, M.
    (2013) Seeing fish. InP. Tolmie & M. Rouncefield (Eds.), Ethnomethodology at Play (pp.89–104). Ashgate.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Mehan, H.
    (1979) Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Harvard University Press. 10.4159/harvard.9780674420106
     https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674420106 [Google Scholar]
  46. Merleau-Ponty, M.
    (1962) Phenomenology of perception. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Meyer, C., Streeck, J., & Jordan, J. S.
    (Eds.) (2017) Intercorporeality. Emerging Socialities in Interaction. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210465.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210465.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  48. Mondada, L.
    (2018) Multiple Temporalities of Language and Body in Interaction: Challenges for Transcribing Multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 85–106. 10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878 [Google Scholar]
  49. (2023) Demonstrating and guiding how to smell in tasting sessions: .nhHHHhh and the audible-visible production of sensorial intersubjectivity. Language & Communication, 881, 111–128. 10.1016/j.langcom.2022.11.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2022.11.006 [Google Scholar]
  50. Nishizaka, A.
    (2017) The Perceived Body and Embodied Vision in Interaction. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 24(2), 110–128. 10.1080/10749039.2017.1296465
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2017.1296465 [Google Scholar]
  51. Parry, R.
    (2013) Giving Reasons for Doing Something Now or at Some Other Time. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 46(2), 105–124. 10.1080/08351813.2012.754653
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.754653 [Google Scholar]
  52. Peirce, C. S.
    (1932) The icon, index, and symbol. InC. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. 2 (pp.156–173). Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Råman, J., & Haddington, P.
    (2018) Demonstrations in Sports Training: Communicating a Technique through Parsing and the Return-Practice in the Budo Class. Multimodal Communication, 7(2). 10.1515/mc‑2018‑0001
     https://doi.org/10.1515/mc-2018-0001 [Google Scholar]
  54. Reed, D.
    (2015) Relinquishing in musical masterclasses: Embodied action in interactional projects. Journal of Pragmatics, 891, 31–49. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.09.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.09.006 [Google Scholar]
  55. Reed, D., & Szczepek Reed, B.
    (2013) Building an instructional project: Actions as components of music masterclasses. InB. Szczepek Reed & G. Raymond (Eds.), Units of Talk — Units of Action (pp.313–342). Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.25.10ree
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.25.10ree [Google Scholar]
  56. Reichenbach, H.
    (1947) Elements of Symbolic Logic. MacMillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Schindler, L.
    (2009) The production of “vis-ability”: An ethnographic video analysis of a martial arts class. InU. T. Kismann (Ed.), Video interaction analysis (pp.135–153). Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Sidnell, J.
    (2006) Coordinating Gesture, Talk, and Gaze in Reenactments. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39(4), 377–409. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3904_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3904_2 [Google Scholar]
  59. Simone, M., & Galatolo, R.
    (2021) Timing and Prosody of Lexical Repetition: How Repeated Instructions Assist Visually Impaired Athletes’ Navigation in Sport Climbing. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 54(4), 397–419. 10.1080/08351813.2021.1974742
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2021.1974742 [Google Scholar]
  60. Skogmyr Marian, K.
    (2021) Assessing Without Words: Verbally Incomplete Utterances in Complaints [Original Research]. Frontiers in Psychology, 121. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689443
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689443 [Google Scholar]
  61. Smith, R. J.
    (2019) Visually available order, categorisation practices, and perception-in-action: a running commentary. Visual Studies, 34(1), 28–40. 10.1080/1472586X.2019.1622445
     https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2019.1622445 [Google Scholar]
  62. (2020) Seeing the trouble: a mountain rescue training scenario in its circumstantial and situated detail in three frames. Ethnographic Studies, 171, 41–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Stevanovic, M.
    (2020) Mobilizing student compliance: On the directive use of Finnish second-person declaratives and interrogatives during violin instruction. InC. Taleghani-Nikazm, E. Betz, & P. Golato (Eds.), Mobilizing Others: Grammar and Lexis within Larger Activities (pp.115–145). Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.33.05ste
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.33.05ste [Google Scholar]
  64. Strauss, S.
    (2003) Completive aspect, emotion, and the dynamic eventive: the case of Korean V-a/e pelita, Japanese V-te shimau, and Spanish se. Linguistics, 41(4), 653–679. 10.1515/ling.2003.021
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2003.021 [Google Scholar]
  65. Streeck, J.
    (1995) On projection. InE. N. Goody (Ed.), Social intelligence and interaction: expressions and implications of the social bias in human intelligence (pp.87–110). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621710.007
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621710.007 [Google Scholar]
  66. Stukenbrock, A.
    (2014) Take the words out of my mouth: Verbal instructions as embodied practices. Journal of Pragmatics, 65(Supplement C), 80–102. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.017
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.017 [Google Scholar]
  67. (2018) Forward-looking: Where do we go with multimodal projections?InA. Deppermann & J. Streeck (Eds.), Time in Embodied Interaction: Synchronicity and sequentiality of multimodal resources (pp.31–68). Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.293.01stu
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.293.01stu [Google Scholar]
  68. (2021) Multimodal Gestalts and Their Change Over Time: Is Routinization Also Grammaticalization? [Original Research]. Frontiers in Communication, 61. 10.3389/fcomm.2021.662240
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.662240 [Google Scholar]
  69. Szczepek Reed, B.
    (2021) Singing and the body: body-focused and concept-focused vocal instruction. Linguistics Vanguard, 7(s4). 10.1515/lingvan‑2020‑0071
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2020-0071 [Google Scholar]
  70. Szczepek Reed, B., Reed, D., & Haddon, E.
    (2013) NOW or NOT NOW: Coordinating Restarts in the Pursuit of Learnables in Vocal Master Classes. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 46(1), 22–46. 10.1080/08351813.2013.753714
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2013.753714 [Google Scholar]
  71. Tolins, J.
    (2013) Assessment and Direction Through Nonlexical Vocalizations in Music Instruction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 46(1), 47–64. 10.1080/08351813.2013.753721
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2013.753721 [Google Scholar]
  72. Vendler, Z.
    (1967) Linguistics in philosophy. Cornell University Press. 10.7591/9781501743726
     https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501743726 [Google Scholar]
  73. Verkuyl, H. J.
    (1993) A Theory of Aspectuality: The Interaction between Temporal and Atemporal Structure. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511597848
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597848 [Google Scholar]
  74. Wiggins, S., & Keevallik, L.
    (2021) Enacting Gustatory Pleasure on Behalf of Another: The Multimodal Coordination of Infant Tasting Practices. Symbolic Interaction, 44(1), 87–111. 10.1002/symb.527
     https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.527 [Google Scholar]
  75. Yasui, E.
    (2023) Japanese onomatopoeia in bodily demonstrations in a traditional dance instruction: A resource for synchronizing body movements. Journal of Pragmatics, 2071, 45–61. 10.1016/j.pragma.2023.02.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  76. Zinken, J., & Ogiermann, E.
    (2011) How to propose an action as an objective necessity. The case of Polish trzeba x (‘one needs to x’). Research on Language and Social Interaction, 11(1), 263–287. 10.1080/08351813.2011.591900
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2011.591900 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/il.25001.ehm
Loading
Marking action accomplishment with non‑lexical vocalizations
Interactional Linguistics 5, 22 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1075/il.25001.ehm
/content/journals/10.1075/il.25001.ehm
/content/journals/10.1075/il.25001.ehm
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): aspect and aspectuality; demonstration; instructed action; local action directive; perception-in-action

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error