oa Tentative questioning turns and their responses

References

1. Chevalier, F., & Clift, R.
   (2008) Unfinished turns in French conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Clayman, S. & Heritage, J.
   (2002) Questioning presidents. Journal of Communication, (), –.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Couper-Kuhlen, E.
   (2012) Some truths and untruths about final intonation in conversational questions. InJ. P. de Ruiter (Ed.), Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives (pp.–). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. de Ruiter, J. P.
   (Ed.) (2012) Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. De Stefani, E.
   (2021) Embodied responses to questions-in-progress. Discourse Processes, (), –.
   [Google Scholar]
6. de Vos, C., Torreira, F., & Levinson, S.
   (2015) Turn-timing in signed conversations. Frontiers in Psychology, , .
   [Google Scholar]
7. Deppermann, A., Mondada, L., & Pekarek Doehler, S.
   (2021) Early responses: An introduction. Discourse Processes, (), –.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Deppermann, A., & Schmidt, A.
   (2021) Micro-sequential coordination in early responses. Discourse Processes, (), –.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Fónagy, I., & Bérard, E.
   (1973) Questions totales simples et implicatives en français parisien. InA. Grundstrom & P. Léon (Eds.), Interrogation et intonation (pp.–). Montreal: Didier.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Ford, C., & Thompson, S.
    (1996) Interactional units in conversation. InE. Ochs, E. Schegloff, & S. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar (pp.–). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hayano, K.
    (2013) Question design in conversation. InJ. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp.–). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Heinemann, T.
    (2006) `Will you or can’t you?’. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Heritage, J.
    (2003) Designing questions and setting agendas in the news interview. InP. Glenn, C. LeBaron, & J. Mandelbaum (Eds.), Studies in Language and Social Interaction (pp.–). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Heritage, J.
    (2012) Epistemics in action. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Heritage, J., & Raymond, G.
    (2012) Navigating epistemic landscapes. InJ. P. de Ruiter (Ed.), Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives (pp.–). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Jefferson, G.
    (1983) Notes on some orderlinesses of overlap onset. Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Jefferson, G.
    (1990) List-construction as a task and resource. InG. Psathas (Ed.), Interaction Competence (pp.–). Washington: IIEMCA & University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Jefferson, G.
    (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. InG. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation (pp.–). Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
19. Kendrick, K., & Torreira, F.
    (2015) The timing and construction of preference. Discourse Processes, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Koivisto, A.
    (2024) Enabling elaboration and offering candidate understandings. Contrastive Pragmatics, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Lerner, G.
    (2002) Turn-sharing. InC. Ford, B. Fox, & S. Thompson (Eds.), The Language of Turn and Sequence (pp.–). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Levinson, S., & Torreira, F.
    (2015) Timing in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of language. Frontiers in Psychology, , .
    [Google Scholar]
23. Lindström, A.
    (1999) Language as social action. Uppsala: Uppsala University.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Linell, P., Hofvendahl, J., & Lindholm, C.
    (2003) Multi-unit questions in institutional interactions. Text, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Mondada, L.
    (2021) How early can embodied responses be?Discourse Processes, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Mosegaard Hansen, M.-B.
    (2001) Syntax in interaction. Studies in Language, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Pekarek Doehler, S.
    (2021a) How grammar grows out of social interaction. Open Linguistics, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Pekarek Doehler, S.
    (2021b) Word order affects response latency. Discourse Processes, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Persson, R.
    (2017a) Fill-in-the-blank questions in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Persson, R.
    (2017b) La prosodie comme ressource pour l’organisation de l’interaction. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Pomerantz, A.
    (1988) Offering a candidate answer. Communication Monographs, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Portes, C., Bertrand, R., & Espesser, R.
    (2007) Contribution to a grammar of intonation in French. Nouveaux Cahiers de Linguistique Française, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Robinson, J.
    (2020) Revisiting preference organization in context. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Sacks, H.
    (1987) On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. InG. Button & J. Lee (Eds.), Talk and Social Organisation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G.
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Schegloff, E.
    (2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Selting, M.
    (2007) Lists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction as an interactional resource. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Steensig, J., & Drew, P.
    (2008) Introduction: Questioning and affiliation/disaffiliation in interaction. Discourse Studies, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Stivers, T., & Enfield, N.
    (2010) A coding scheme for question–response sequences in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Stivers, T., Enfield, N., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., Hoymann, G., Rossano, F., de Ruiter, J. P., Yoon, K.-E., & Levinson, S.
    (2009) Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. PNAS, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Stivers, T., Enfield, N., & Levinson, S.
    (Eds.) (2010) Question-Response Sequences in Conversation Across Ten Languages. [Special issue]. Journal of Pragmatics, ().
    [Google Scholar]
42. Stivers, T., & Robinson, J.
    (2006) A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Vatanen, A.
    (2018) Responding in early overlap. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Vatanen, A., Endo, T., & Yokomori, D.
    (2021) Cross-linguistic investigation of projection in overlapping agreements to assertions. Discourse Processes, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Walker, G.
    (2013) Phonetics and prosody in conversation. InJ. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp.–). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]