Volume 22, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1384-6647
  • E-ISSN: 1569-982X
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Baddeley, A.
    (2000) The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory?Trends in Cognitive Sciences4 (11), 417–423. 10.1016/S1364‑6613(00)01538‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2 [Google Scholar]
  2. Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J. & Munafò, M. R.
    (2013) Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience14, 365–376. 10.1038/nrn3475
    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3475 [Google Scholar]
  3. Cohen, J.
    (1994) The earth is round (p<.05). American Psychologist49 (12), 997–1003. 10.1037/0003‑066X.49.12.997
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.49.12.997 [Google Scholar]
  4. Darò, V. & Fabbro, F.
    (1994) Verbal memory during simultaneous interpretation: Effects of phonological interference. Applied Linguistics15 (4), 365–381. 10.1093/applin/15.4.365
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/15.4.365 [Google Scholar]
  5. Denner, J., Marsh, E. & Campe, S.
    (2017) Approaches to reviewing research in education. InD. Wyse, N. Selwyn, E. Smith & L. E. Suter (Eds.), The BERA/SAGE handbook of educational research. London: Sage, 143–164. 10.4135/9781473983953.n7
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473983953.n7 [Google Scholar]
  6. Dong, Y. & Cai, R.
    (2015) Working memory and interpreting: A commentary on theoretical models. InZ. Wen, M. B. Mota & A. McNeill (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing. Toronto: Multilingual Matters, 63–81. 10.21832/9781783093595‑008
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783093595-008 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dong, Y. & Zhong, F.
    (2019) The intense bilingual experience of interpreting and its neurocognitive consequences. InJ. Schwieter (Ed.), The handbook of the neuroscience of multilingualism. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 685–700. 10.1002/9781119387725.ch33
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119387725.ch33 [Google Scholar]
  8. Duval, S. & Tweedie, R.
    (2000) Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics56 (2), 455–463. 10.1111/j.0006‑341X.2000.00455.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x [Google Scholar]
  9. García, A.
    (2014) The interpreter advantage hypothesis: Preliminary data patterns and empirically motivated questions. Translation and Interpreting Studies9 (2), 219–238. 10.1075/tis.9.2.04gar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.9.2.04gar [Google Scholar]
  10. Gile, D.
    (1997) Conference interpreting as a cognitive management problem. InF. Pöchhacker & M. Shlesinger (Eds.), The interpreting studies reader. London: Routledge, 162–176.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Jääskeläinen, R.
    (2010) Are all professionals experts? Definitions of expertise and reinterpretation of research evidence in process studies. InG. M. Shreve & E. Angelone (Eds.), Translation and cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 213–227. 10.1075/ata.xv.12jaa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ata.xv.12jaa [Google Scholar]
  12. Köpke, B. & Signorelli, T. M.
    (2012) Methodological aspects of working memory assessment in simultaneous interpreters. International Journal of Bilingualism16 (2), 183–197. 10.1177/1367006911402981
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006911402981 [Google Scholar]
  13. Liberati, A.
    (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanations and elaboration. BMJ339: b2700. 10.1136/bmj.b2700
    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700 [Google Scholar]
  14. McCloskey, D. N. & Ziliak, S.
    (2008) The cult of statistical significance. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.186351
    https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.186351 [Google Scholar]
  15. Mellinger, C. D. & Hanson, T. A.
    (2016) Confidence intervals and effect sizes in T&I studies: The case for meta-analysis. EST Congress 2016. Paper presented at the8th Congress of the European Society for Translation Studies, Aarhus, Denmark.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (2017) Quantitative research methods in translation and interpreting studies. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (2019) Meta-analyses of simultaneous interpreting and working memory. Interpreting21 (2), 165–195. 10.1075/intp.00026.mel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.00026.mel [Google Scholar]
  18. Rosenthal, R. & DiMatteo, M. R.
    (2001) Meta-analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature review. InS. T. Fiske, D. Schacter & C. Zahn-Waxler (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (Vol.52). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, 59–82.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Shelby, L. B. & Vaske, J. J.
    (2008) Understanding meta-analysis: A review of the methodological literature. Leisure Sciences30, 96–110. 10.1080/01490400701881366
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400701881366 [Google Scholar]
  20. Timarová, Š.
    (2008) Working memory and simultaneous interpreting. InP. Boulogne (Ed.), Translation and its others: Selected papers of the CETRA Research Seminar in Translation Studies 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang, J.
    (2016) The relationship between working memory capacity and simultaneous interpreting performance. Interpreting18 (1), 1–33. 10.1075/intp.18.1.01wan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.18.1.01wan [Google Scholar]
  22. Wen, H. & Dong, Y.
    (2019) How does interpreting experience enhance working memory and short-term memory: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. doi:  10.1080/20445911.2019.1674857
    https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2019.1674857 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Discussion
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error