Review of Roy, Brunson & Stone (2018): The academic foundations of interpreting studies: An introduction to its theories

References

1. Felt, U.
   (2009) Knowing and living in academic research. InU. Felt (Ed.), Knowing and living in academic research: Convergence and heterogeneity in research cultures in the European context. Prague: Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 17-39.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Gambier, Y. & van Doorslaer, L.
   (2016) Disciplinary dialogues with translation studies: The background chapter. In: Y. Gambier & L. van Doorslaer (Eds.), Border crossings: Translation studies and other disciplines. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–22. 10.1075/btl.126.01gam
   https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.126.01gam [Google Scholar]
3. Grbić, N.
   (2007) Where do we come from? What are we? Where are we going? A bibliometrical analysis of writing and research on sign language interpreting. The Sign Language Translator and Interpreter1 (1), 15-51.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Grbić, N.
   (2014) Interpreters in the making: Habitus as a conceptual enhancement of boundary theory?InG. M. Vorderobermeier (Ed.), Remapping habitus in translation studies. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 91–109. 10.1163/9789401210867_008
   https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401210867_008 [Google Scholar]
5. Holmes, J. S.
   (1972/1994) The name and nature of translation studies. In: J. S. Holmes, Translated! Papers on literary translation and translation studies. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 67–80.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Pym, A.
   (1998) Method in translation history. Manchester: St Jerome.
   [Google Scholar]