How plagiarism passes peer review

References

1. Basu, R.
   (2021) Top 15 best plagiarism detection and remover tools in 2021. https://www.techjockey.com/blog/top-7-best-plagiarism-checker-software-2019 (accessed7 October 2021).
2. Bontempo, K. & Napier, J.
   (2011) Evaluating emotional stability as a predictor of interpreter competence and aptitude for interpreting. Interpreting13 (1), 85–105. 10.1075/intp.13.1.06bon
   https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.13.1.06bon [Google Scholar]
3. Cui, Y. & Zhao, W.
   (Eds.) (2015) Handbook of research on teaching methods in language translation and interpretation. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. 10.4018/978‑1‑4666‑6615‑3
   https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6615-3 [Google Scholar]
4. Kriegeskorte, N.
   (2014) What lesson do rising retraction rates hold for peer review?The Conversation (9July 2014) https://theconversation.com/what-lesson-do-rising-retraction-rates-hold-for-peer-review-28823 (accessed18 October 2021).
   [Google Scholar]
5. Mahamud, A. A.
   (2021) Plagiarism checker best free tools. https://www.thedevline.com/plagiarism-checker-best-free-tools (accessed7 October 2021).
6. Penet, J.-C.
   (2015) Review ofY. Cui and W. Zhao (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching methods in language translation and interpretation (IGI Global, 2015). JoSTrans: The Journal of Specialised Translation24, 262–264.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Plagiarism.org
   Plagiarism.org (2017) What is plagiarism?https://www.plagiarism.org/article/what-is-plagiarism (accessed23 June 2021).
8. Pöchhacker, F. & Liu, M.
   (2021) Interpreting research in print: A quarter-century update. Interpreting23 (1), 1–17. 10.1075/intp.00060.edi
   https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.00060.edi [Google Scholar]
9. Van Noorden, R.
   (2011) Science publishing: The trouble with retractions. Nature478, 26–28. 10.1038/478026a
   https://doi.org/10.1038/478026a [Google Scholar]