Conference interpreters’ technology readiness and perception of digital technologies

References

1. ATLAS.ti
   ATLAS.ti (2023) ATLAS.ti (23.2.1) [Qualitative data analysis software]. https://atlasti.com (accessed31 July 2024).
2. Baigorri-Jalón, J.
   (2014) From Paris to Nuremberg: The birth of conference interpreting (H. Mikkelson & B. Slaughter Olsen, trans.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.111
   https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.111 [Google Scholar]
3. Baigorri-Jalón, J., Fernández-Sánchez, M. M. & Payàs, G.
   (2022) Historical developments in conference interpreting: An overview. InM. Albl-Mikasa & E. Tiselius (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of conference interpreting. London/New York: Routledge, 9–18. 10.4324/9780429297878‑3
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429297878-3 [Google Scholar]
4. Bernardi, R. & Exworthy, M.
   (2020) Clinical managers’ identity at the crossroad of multiple institutional logics in IT innovation: The case study of a health care organization in England. Information Systems Journal30 (3), 566–595. 10.1111/isj.12267
   https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12267 [Google Scholar]
5. Cheung, A. K. & Li, T.
   (2022) Machine aided interpreting: An experiment of automatic speech recognition in simultaneous interpreting. Translation Quarterly1041, 1–20.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Corpas Pastor, G. & Defrancq, B.
   (Eds.) (2023) Interpreting technologies — current and future trends. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ivitra.37
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.37 [Google Scholar]
7. Defrancq, B.
   (2023) Technology in interpreter education and training: A structured set of proposals. InG. Corpas Pastor & B. Defrancq (Eds.), Interpreting technologies — current and future trends. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 302–320. 10.1075/ivitra.37.12def
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.37.12def [Google Scholar]
8. Defrancq, B. & Corpas Pastor, G.
   (2023) Introduction. InG. Corpas Pastor & B. Defrancq (Eds.), Interpreting technologies — current and future trends. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–5. 10.1075/ivitra.37.intro
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.37.intro [Google Scholar]
9. Deysel, E.
   (2023) Investigating the use of technology in the interpreting profession: A comparison of the Global South and Global North. InG. Corpas Pastor & B. Defrancq (Eds.), Interpreting technologies — current and future trends. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 142–168. 10.1075/ivitra.37.06dey
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.37.06dey [Google Scholar]
10. Downie, J.
    (2020) Interpreters vs machines: Can interpreters survive in an AI-dominated world?London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Downie, J.
    (2023) Where is it all going? Technology, economic pressures and the future of interpreting. InG. Corpas Pastor & B. Defrancq (Eds.), Interpreting technologies — current and future trends. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 277–301. 10.1075/ivitra.37.11dow
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.37.11dow [Google Scholar]
12. Fantinuoli, C.
    (2017) Computer-assisted preparation in conference interpreting. Translation and Interpreting9 (2), 24–37. 10.12807/ti.109202.2017.a02
    https://doi.org/10.12807/ti.109202.2017.a02 [Google Scholar]
13. Fantinuoli, C.
    (2018a) Interpreting and technology: The upcoming technological turn. InC. Fantinuoli (Ed.), Interpreting and technology. Berlin: Language Science Press, 1–12. 10.5281/zenodo.1493289
    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1493289 [Google Scholar]
14. Fantinuoli, C.
    (Ed.) (2018b) Interpreting and technology (Translation and Multilingual Natural Language Processing 11). Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Fantinuoli, C.
    (2019) The technological turn in interpreting: The challenges that lie ahead. InW. Baur & F. Mayer (Eds.), Übersetzen und Dolmetschen 4.0: Neue Wege im Digitalen Zeitalter. Berlin: BDÜ Fachverlag, 334–354.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Fantinuoli, C.
    (2022) Conference interpreting and new technologies. InM. Albl-Mikasa & E. Tiselius (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of conference interpreting. London/New York: Routledge, 508–522.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Fantinuoli, C. & Prandi, B.
    (2021) Towards the evaluation of automatic simultaneous speech translation from a communicative perspective. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.08364 (accessed31 July 2024). 10.18653/v1/2021.iwslt‑1.29
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.iwslt-1.29 [Google Scholar]
18. Frittella, F. M. & Rodríguez, S.
    (2022) Putting SmartTerp to test: A tool for the challenges of remote interpreting. INContext2 (2), 137–166. 10.54754/incontext.v2i2.21
    https://doi.org/10.54754/incontext.v2i2.21 [Google Scholar]
19. Germain, M.-L. & Grenier, R. S.
    (Eds.) (2022) Expertise at work: Current and emerging trends. Berlin: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Goto, M.
    (2021) Collective professional role identity in the age of artificial intelligence. Journal of Professions and Organization8 (1), 86–107. 10.1093/jpo/joab003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joab003 [Google Scholar]
21. Jayes, T.
    (2023) Conference interpreting and technology: An institutional perspective. InG. Corpas Pastor & B. Defrancq (Eds.), Interpreting technologies — current and future trends. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 217–240. 10.1075/ivitra.37.09jay
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.37.09jay [Google Scholar]
22. Kalina, S. & Ziegler, K.
    (2015) Technology. InF. Pöchhacker (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of interpreting studies. London/New York: Routledge, 410–412.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Lewis, W. D. & Niehues, J.
    (2023) Automatic speech translation in the classroom and lecture setting: Challenges, approaches, and future directions. InG. Corpas Pastor & B. Defrancq (Eds.), Interpreting technologies — current and future trends. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 241–276. 10.1075/ivitra.37.10lew
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.37.10lew [Google Scholar]
24. Liu, M.
    (2019) In search of a cognitive model for interpreting expertise. InZ. Wen, P. Skehan, A. Biedroń, S. Li & R. L. Sparks (Eds.), Language aptitude: Advancing theory, testing, research and practice. London/New York: Routledge, 299–315. 10.4324/9781315122021‑15
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315122021-15 [Google Scholar]
25. Mellinger, C. D.
    (2023) Embedding, extending, and distributing interpreter cognition with technology. InG. Corpas Pastor & B. Defrancq (Eds.), Interpreting technologies — current and future trends. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 195–216. 10.1075/ivitra.37.08mel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.37.08mel [Google Scholar]
26. Mellinger, C. D. & Hanson, T. A.
    (2018) Interpreter traits and the relationship with technology and visibility. Translation and Interpreting Studies13 (3), 366–392. 10.1075/tis.00021.mel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.00021.mel [Google Scholar]
27. Mirbabaie, M., Brünker, F., Möllmann, N. R. J. & Stieglitz, S.
    (2022) The rise of artificial intelligence — understanding the AI identity threat at the workplace. Electronic Markets321, 73–99. 10.1007/s12525‑021‑00496‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00496-x [Google Scholar]
28. Moser-Mercer, B.
    (2022) Conference interpreting and expertise. InM. Albl-Mikasa & E. Tiselius (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of conference interpreting. London/New York: Routledge, 386–400. 10.4324/9780429297878‑35
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429297878-35 [Google Scholar]
29. OpenAI
    OpenAI (2023, April). ChatGPT. https://chat.openai.com/chat (accessed31 July 2024).
    [Google Scholar]
30. Parasuraman, A.
    (2000) Technology Readiness Index (TRI): A multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research2 (4), 307–320. 10.1177/109467050024001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050024001 [Google Scholar]
31. Parasuraman, A. & Colby, C. L.
    (2015) An updated and streamlined Technology Readiness Index: TRI 2.0. Journal of Service Research18 (1), 59–74. 10.1177/1094670514539730
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670514539730 [Google Scholar]
32. Prandi, B.
    (2023) Computer-assisted simultaneous interpreting: A cognitive-experimental study on terminology. Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Simon, F. M.
    (2022) Uneasy bedfellows: AI in the news, platform companies and the issue of journalistic autonomy. Digital Journalism10 (10), 1832–1854. 10.1080/21670811.2022.2063150
    https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2063150 [Google Scholar]
34. Tiselius, E. & Hild, A.
    (2017) Expertise and competence in translation and interpreting. InJ. W. Schwieter & A. Ferreira (Eds.), The handbook of translation and cognition. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 423–444. 10.1002/9781119241485.ch23
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119241485.ch23 [Google Scholar]
35. Zhang, X., Corpas Pastor, G. & Zhang, J.
    (2023) Videoconference interpreting goes multimodal: Some insights and a tentative proposal. InG. Corpas Pastor & B. Defrancq (Eds.), Interpreting technologies — current and future trends. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 169–194. 10.1075/ivitra.37.07zha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.37.07zha [Google Scholar]
36. Zhao, S., Koh, S. N. & Luke, K. K.
    (2012) Accent reduction for computer-aided language learning. InEUSIPCO 2012: 20th European Signal Processing Conference, 27–31 August 2012, Bucharest, Romania, 335–339. https://www.eurasip.org/Proceedings/Eusipco/Eusipco2012/Conference/authors.html (accessed31 July 2024).