@article{jbp:/content/journals/10.1075/intp.12.2.02hor, author = "Horváth, Ildikó", title = "Creativity in interpreting", journal= "Interpreting", year = "2010", volume = "12", number = "2", pages = "146-159", doi = "https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.12.2.02hor", url = "https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/intp.12.2.02hor", publisher = "John Benjamins", issn = "1384-6647", type = "Journal Article", keywords = "convergent thinking", keywords = "spontaneity", keywords = "problem-solving", keywords = "interpreting", keywords = "creativity", keywords = "adaptation", abstract = "The objective of this paper is to examine how the findings of psychological research concerning creativity can be explored within the framework of interpreting studies. I will begin by reviewing the literature on the psychology of creativity, followed by the presentation and analysis of an empirical survey. Finally, I will suggest that creativity in interpreting can be examined on three levels, depending on the aspect we are focusing on: (1) the products; (2) mental processes; or (3) the behaviour of the interpreter. In the first case, the primary object is the product, while in the second and third, it is the process. What makes interpreting a special area of study in terms of creativity is not only the creative nature of the mental processes involved, but also, and perhaps even primarily, the creativity required of interpreters in terms of their professional behaviour in a communicational situation, where they are present but in which they are not natural participants.", }