1887
Volume 1, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2542-3851
  • E-ISSN: 2542-386X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

We investigate whether facial attractiveness, as one source of positive/negative attitudes towards one’s conversational partner, affects the degree and type of opinion convergence online, even in the absence of physical co-presence. Our hypothesis is that when you interact with someone you find attractive, opinion convergence will occur even if you are not physically co-present with them. Additionally, we tracked different types of opinion convergence (one-sided or mutual) and how convergence is linguistically negotiated in these different circumstances. Our hypothesis was confirmed, to a point. Opinion convergence was most frequent among Attracted pairs; however, opinion convergence was greatest among Neutral pairs. Opinion convergence was qualitatively different in the 3 conditions. This research adds to previous studies which highlighted aspects of communication unique to online environments (anonymity, invisibility) to explain the heightened tendency for face-threatening behaviours to occur online, by showing how implicit biases (operationalized here as facial attractiveness) can be an additional factor influencing online behaviour.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00005.ter
2018-05-28
2019-10-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bamman, David , Jacob Eisenstein , and Tyler Schnoebelen
    2014 “Gender identity and lexical variation in social media.” Journal of Sociolinguistics18(2): 135–160. doi: 10.1111/josl.12080
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12080 [Google Scholar]
  2. Brownstein, Michael
    2017 “Implicit bias.” InThe Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. by Edward N. Zalta . Available online at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/implicit-bias/
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cloutier, Jasmin , Todd F. Heatherton , Paul J. Whalen , and William M. Kelley
    2008 “Are attractive people rewarding? Sex differences in the neural substrates of facial attractiveness.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience20(6): 941–951. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20062
    https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20062 [Google Scholar]
  4. Coetzee, Vinet , Jaco M. Greeff , Ian D. Stephen , and David I. Perrett
    2014 “Cross-cultural agreement in facial attractiveness preferences: The role of ethnicity and gender.” PLoS ONE9(7): e99629. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099629
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099629 [Google Scholar]
  5. Jang, Hyunseok , Juyoung Song , and Ramhee Kim
    2014 “Does the offline bully-victimization influence cyberbullying behavior among youths? Application of general strain theory.” Computers in Human Behavior31: 85–93. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.007 [Google Scholar]
  6. Kwan, Samantha , and Mary Nell Trautner
    2009 “Beauty work: Individual and institutional rewards, the reproduction of gender, and questions of agency.” Sociology Compass3(1): 49–71.10.1111/j.1751‑9020.2008.00179.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00179.x [Google Scholar]
  7. Langlois, Judith H. , Lisa Kalakanis , Adam J. Rubenstein , Andrea Larson , Monica Hallam , and Monica Smoot
    2000 “Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review.” Psychological Bulletin126: 390–423. doi: 10.1037/0033‑2909.126.3.390
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390 [Google Scholar]
  8. Leech, Geoffrey
    1983Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 2014The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  10. Lipinski-Harten, Maciek , and Romin Tafarodi
    2013 “Attitude moderation: A comparison of online chat and face-to-face conversation.” Computers in Human Behavior29: 2490–2493. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.004 [Google Scholar]
  11. Liu, Wendy , and Derek Ruths
    2013 “What’s in a name? Using first names as features for gender inference in Twitter.” Analyzing Microtext: Papers from the 2013 AAAI Spring Symposium. www.ruthsresearch.org/static/publication_files/LiuRuths_AM2013.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria , Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich , and Patricia Bou-Franch
    2011 “On-line polylogues and impoliteness: the case of postings sent in response to the Obama Reggaeton YouTube video.” Journal of Pragmatics43: 2578–2593. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.005 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ma, Qingguo , Da Qian , Linfeng Hu , and Lei Wang
    2017 “Hello handsome! Male’s facial attractiveness gives rise to female’s fairness bias in Ultimatum Game scenarios – An ERP study.” PLoS ONE12(7): e0180459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180459
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180459 [Google Scholar]
  14. Misoch, Sabina
    2015 “Stranger on the internet: Online self-disclosure and the role of visual anonymity.” Computers in Human Behavior48: 535–541. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.027
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.027 [Google Scholar]
  15. Moor, Peter , Ard Heuvelman , and Ria Verleur
    2010 “Flaming on YouTube.” Computers in Human Behavior26: 1536–1546. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.023
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.023 [Google Scholar]
  16. Nithyanand, Rishab , Brian Schaffner , and Phillipa Gill
    2017 “Measuring offensive speech in online political discourse.” InUSENIX Workshop on Free and Open Communications on the Internet (FOCI). Vancouver, Canada. August 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Park, Sora , Eun-Yeong Na , and Eun-mee Kim
    2014 “The relationship between online activities, netiquette and cyberbullying.” Children and Youth Services Review42: 74–81. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.04.002 [Google Scholar]
  18. Reicher, Steve , Russell Spears , and Tom Postmes
    1995 “A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena.” European Review of Social Psychology6: 161–198. doi: 10.1080/14792779443000049
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779443000049 [Google Scholar]
  19. Rustagi, Mayur , R. Rajendra Prasath , Sumit Goswami , Sudeshna Sarkar , Santanu Chaudhury , Sushmita Mitra , C. A. Murthy , P. S. Sastry , and Sankar K. Pal
    2009 “Learning age and gender of blogger from stylistic variation.” InPattern Recognition and Machine Intelligence: Third International Conference, PReMI 2009, ed. by Santanu Chaudhury , Sushmita Mitra , C. A. Murthy , P. S. Sastry , and Sankar Kumar Pal , 205–212. New York: Springer.10.1007/978‑3‑642‑11164‑8_33
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11164-8_33 [Google Scholar]
  20. Satz, Samantha , David L. Pogge , and Philip D. Harvey
    2017 “Cyberbullying and adolescent mental health: A study of adolescents on an acute inpatient psychiatric unit.” Presented at theAmerican Psychiatric Association Annual Meeting, May 23, 2017, San Diego, CA.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Scott, Craig R.
    2004 “Benefits and drawbacks of anonymous online communication: Legal challenges and communicative recommendations.” InFree Speech Yearbook, Vol.41, ed. by S. Drucker , 127–141. Washington, DC: National Communication Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Stein, Joel
    2016 “Tyranny of the mob.” TIME108(8): 27–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Suler, John
    2004 “The online disinhibition effect.” Cyberpsychology and Behavior7(3): 321–326. doi: 10.1089/1094931041291295
    https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295 [Google Scholar]
  24. Truong, Dan
    2015 “The great equalizer 2.0”. Available online at: www.huffingtonpost.com/dan-truong/the-great-equalizer-20_b_7157662.html
  25. Wilcox, Keit , and Andrew T. Stephen
    2013 “Are close friends the enemy? Online social networks, self-esteem, and self-control.” Journal of Consumer Research40: 90–103. doi: 10.1086/668794
    https://doi.org/10.1086/668794 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00005.ter
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00005.ter
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): anonymity , facial attractiveness , implicit bias and opinion convergence
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error