Volume 1, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2542-3851
  • E-ISSN: 2542-386X
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


We investigate whether facial attractiveness, as one source of positive/negative attitudes towards one’s conversational partner, affects the degree and type of opinion convergence online, even in the absence of physical co-presence. Our hypothesis is that when you interact with someone you find attractive, opinion convergence will occur even if you are not physically co-present with them. Additionally, we tracked different types of opinion convergence (one-sided or mutual) and how convergence is linguistically negotiated in these different circumstances. Our hypothesis was confirmed, to a point. Opinion convergence was most frequent among Attracted pairs; however, opinion convergence was greatest among Neutral pairs. Opinion convergence was qualitatively different in the 3 conditions. This research adds to previous studies which highlighted aspects of communication unique to online environments (anonymity, invisibility) to explain the heightened tendency for face-threatening behaviours to occur online, by showing how implicit biases (operationalized here as facial attractiveness) can be an additional factor influencing online behaviour.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bamman, David , Jacob Eisenstein , and Tyler Schnoebelen
    2014 “Gender identity and lexical variation in social media.” Journal of Sociolinguistics18(2): 135–160. doi: 10.1111/josl.12080
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12080 [Google Scholar]
  2. Brownstein, Michael
    2017 “Implicit bias.” InThe Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. by Edward N. Zalta . Available online at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/implicit-bias/
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cloutier, Jasmin , Todd F. Heatherton , Paul J. Whalen , and William M. Kelley
    2008 “Are attractive people rewarding? Sex differences in the neural substrates of facial attractiveness.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience20(6): 941–951. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20062
    https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20062 [Google Scholar]
  4. Coetzee, Vinet , Jaco M. Greeff , Ian D. Stephen , and David I. Perrett
    2014 “Cross-cultural agreement in facial attractiveness preferences: The role of ethnicity and gender.” PLoS ONE9(7): e99629. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099629
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099629 [Google Scholar]
  5. Jang, Hyunseok , Juyoung Song , and Ramhee Kim
    2014 “Does the offline bully-victimization influence cyberbullying behavior among youths? Application of general strain theory.” Computers in Human Behavior31: 85–93. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.007 [Google Scholar]
  6. Kwan, Samantha , and Mary Nell Trautner
    2009 “Beauty work: Individual and institutional rewards, the reproduction of gender, and questions of agency.” Sociology Compass3(1): 49–71.10.1111/j.1751‑9020.2008.00179.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00179.x [Google Scholar]
  7. Langlois, Judith H. , Lisa Kalakanis , Adam J. Rubenstein , Andrea Larson , Monica Hallam , and Monica Smoot
    2000 “Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review.” Psychological Bulletin126: 390–423. doi: 10.1037/0033‑2909.126.3.390
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390 [Google Scholar]
  8. Leech, Geoffrey
    1983Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 2014The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  10. Lipinski-Harten, Maciek , and Romin Tafarodi
    2013 “Attitude moderation: A comparison of online chat and face-to-face conversation.” Computers in Human Behavior29: 2490–2493. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.004 [Google Scholar]
  11. Liu, Wendy , and Derek Ruths
    2013 “What’s in a name? Using first names as features for gender inference in Twitter.” Analyzing Microtext: Papers from the 2013 AAAI Spring Symposium. www.ruthsresearch.org/static/publication_files/LiuRuths_AM2013.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria , Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich , and Patricia Bou-Franch
    2011 “On-line polylogues and impoliteness: the case of postings sent in response to the Obama Reggaeton YouTube video.” Journal of Pragmatics43: 2578–2593. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.005 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ma, Qingguo , Da Qian , Linfeng Hu , and Lei Wang
    2017 “Hello handsome! Male’s facial attractiveness gives rise to female’s fairness bias in Ultimatum Game scenarios – An ERP study.” PLoS ONE12(7): e0180459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180459
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180459 [Google Scholar]
  14. Misoch, Sabina
    2015 “Stranger on the internet: Online self-disclosure and the role of visual anonymity.” Computers in Human Behavior48: 535–541. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.027
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.027 [Google Scholar]
  15. Moor, Peter , Ard Heuvelman , and Ria Verleur
    2010 “Flaming on YouTube.” Computers in Human Behavior26: 1536–1546. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.023
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.023 [Google Scholar]
  16. Nithyanand, Rishab , Brian Schaffner , and Phillipa Gill
    2017 “Measuring offensive speech in online political discourse.” InUSENIX Workshop on Free and Open Communications on the Internet (FOCI). Vancouver, Canada. August 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Park, Sora , Eun-Yeong Na , and Eun-mee Kim
    2014 “The relationship between online activities, netiquette and cyberbullying.” Children and Youth Services Review42: 74–81. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.04.002 [Google Scholar]
  18. Reicher, Steve , Russell Spears , and Tom Postmes
    1995 “A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena.” European Review of Social Psychology6: 161–198. doi: 10.1080/14792779443000049
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779443000049 [Google Scholar]
  19. Rustagi, Mayur , R. Rajendra Prasath , Sumit Goswami , Sudeshna Sarkar , Santanu Chaudhury , Sushmita Mitra , C. A. Murthy , P. S. Sastry , and Sankar K. Pal
    2009 “Learning age and gender of blogger from stylistic variation.” InPattern Recognition and Machine Intelligence: Third International Conference, PReMI 2009, ed. by Santanu Chaudhury , Sushmita Mitra , C. A. Murthy , P. S. Sastry , and Sankar Kumar Pal , 205–212. New York: Springer.10.1007/978‑3‑642‑11164‑8_33
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11164-8_33 [Google Scholar]
  20. Satz, Samantha , David L. Pogge , and Philip D. Harvey
    2017 “Cyberbullying and adolescent mental health: A study of adolescents on an acute inpatient psychiatric unit.” Presented at theAmerican Psychiatric Association Annual Meeting, May 23, 2017, San Diego, CA.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Scott, Craig R.
    2004 “Benefits and drawbacks of anonymous online communication: Legal challenges and communicative recommendations.” InFree Speech Yearbook, Vol.41, ed. by S. Drucker , 127–141. Washington, DC: National Communication Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Stein, Joel
    2016 “Tyranny of the mob.” TIME108(8): 27–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Suler, John
    2004 “The online disinhibition effect.” Cyberpsychology and Behavior7(3): 321–326. doi: 10.1089/1094931041291295
    https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295 [Google Scholar]
  24. Truong, Dan
    2015 “The great equalizer 2.0”. Available online at: www.huffingtonpost.com/dan-truong/the-great-equalizer-20_b_7157662.html
  25. Wilcox, Keit , and Andrew T. Stephen
    2013 “Are close friends the enemy? Online social networks, self-esteem, and self-control.” Journal of Consumer Research40: 90–103. doi: 10.1086/668794
    https://doi.org/10.1086/668794 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): anonymity; facial attractiveness; implicit bias; opinion convergence
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error