Volume 1, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2542-3851
  • E-ISSN: 2542-386X
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


Internet memes are an example of the trend of replicability and spread of discourses through the Net within today’s participatory culture. On paper, memes are instances of humorous discourse that abound on the internet, are replicated or altered, and then transmitted to other users. However, in this paper the focus is not on its humorous side, but on how every single stage of meme communication entails a greater or lesser impact on the user’s self-concept, self-awareness and overall identity. The paper addresses five stages of meme communication and possible ways in which these stages influence the user’s identity.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Ballesteros Doncel, Esmeralda
    2016 “Circulación de memes en WhatsApp: Ambivalencias del humor desde la perspectiva de género.” Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales35: 21–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Blackmore, Susan
    1998 “Imitation and the definition of a meme.” Journal of Memetics2(2). Available atcfpm.org/jom-emit/1998/vol2/blackmore_s.html.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 1999The Meme Machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 2001 “Evolution and memes: The human brain as a selective imitation device.” Cybernetics and Systems32(1): 225–255. doi: 10.1080/019697201300001867
    https://doi.org/10.1080/019697201300001867 [Google Scholar]
  5. Dawkins, Richard
    1976The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. du Preez, Amanda , and Elanie Lombard
    2014 “The role of memes in the construction of Facebook personae” Communicatio40(3): 253–270. doi: 10.1080/02500167.2014.938671
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02500167.2014.938671 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dynel, Marta
    2016 “‘I has seen image macros!’ Advice animal memes as visual-verbal jokes.” International Journal of Communication10: 660–688.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Forceville, Charles
    2014 “Relevance Theory as model for analyzing visual and multimodal communication.” InVisual Communication, ed. by David Machin , 51–70. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110255492.51
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110255492.51 [Google Scholar]
  9. Forceville, Charles , and Billy Clark
    2014 “Can pictures have explicatures?” Linguagem em (Dis)curso (special issue on relevance theory) 14(3): 451–472. doi: 10.1590/1982‑4017‑140301‑0114
    https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4017-140301-0114 [Google Scholar]
  10. Gal, Noam , Limor Shifman , and Zohar Kampf
    2015 “‘It Gets Better’: Internet memes and the construction of collective identity.” New Media & Society18(8): 1698–1714. doi: 10.1177/1461444814568784
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814568784 [Google Scholar]
  11. Gofton, Pete
    2017 “Music, memes and meaning: A semiotic analysis.” Musicology Research2: 27–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Guadagno, Rosanna E. , Daniel M. Rempala , Shannon Murphy , and Bradley M. Okdie
    2013 “What makes a video go viral? An analysis of emotional contagion and Internet memes.” Computers in Human Behavior29: 2312–2319. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.016 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hempelmann, Christian F. , and Andrea C. Samson
    2008 “Cartoons: Drawn jokes?” InThe Primer of Humor Research, ed. by Victor Raskin , 609–640. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110198492.609
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198492.609 [Google Scholar]
  14. Kanai, Akane
    2016 “Sociality and classification: Reading gender, race, and class in a humorous meme.” Social Media + SocietyOctober-December: 1–12. doi: 10.1177/2056305116672884
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116672884 [Google Scholar]
  15. Knobel, Michele , and Colin Lankshear
    2007 “Online memes, affinities, and cultural production.” InA New Literacies Sampler, ed. by Michele Knobel , and Colin Lankshear , 199–227. Berlin: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Konstantineas, Charalambos , and George Vlachos
    2012 “Internet Memes: Humor in late modernity and encroachment upon the mainstream.” Inter-disciplinary.net.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Laineste, Liisi , and Piret Voolaid
    2016 “Laughing across borders: Intertextuality of internet memes.” European Journal of Humour Research4(4): 26–49. doi: 10.7592/EJHR2016.4.4.laineste
    https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2016.4.4.laineste [Google Scholar]
  18. Meikle, Graham
    2016Social Media. Communication, Sharing and Visibility. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Milner, Ryan M.
    2012The World Made Meme: Discourse and Identity in Participatory Media. PhD Thesis. University of Kansas.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Miltner, Kate M.
    2014 “‘There’s no place for lulz on LOLCats’: The role of genre, gender, and group identity in the interpretation and enjoyment of an Internet meme.” First Monday19(8). doi: 10.5210/fm.v19i8.5391
    https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i8.5391 [Google Scholar]
  21. Naughton, John
    2012From Gutenberg to Zuckerberg: What You Really Need to Know about the Internet. London: Quercus.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Nissenbaum, Asaf , and Limor Shifman
    2017 “Internet memes as contested cultural capital: The case of 4chan’s /b/ board.” New Media & Society19(4): 483–501. doi: 10.1177/1461444815609313
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815609313 [Google Scholar]
  23. Postmes, Tom , and Nancy Baym
    2005 “Intergroup dimensions of the internet.” InIntergroup Communication: Multiple Perspectives, ed. by Jake Harwood , and Howard Giles , 213–238. New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Segev, Elad , Asaf Nissenbaum , Nathan Stolero , and Limor Shifman
    2015 “Families and networks of Internet memes: The relationship between cohesiveness, uniqueness, and quiddity concreteness.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication20: 417–433. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12120
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12120 [Google Scholar]
  25. Shifman, Limor
    2014Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Shophocleous, Andry , and Christiana Themistocleus
    2014 “Projecting social and discursive identities through code-switching on Facebook: The case of Greek Cypriots.” Language@Internet11.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Sperber, Dan
    1984 “Anthropology and psychology: Towards an epidemiology of representations.” Man20: 73–89. doi: 10.2307/2802222
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2802222 [Google Scholar]
  28. 1996Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Taecharungroj, Viriya , and Pitchganut Nueangjamnong
    2014 “The effect of humour on virality: The study of Internet memes on social media.” Paper presented at 7th International Forum on Public Relations and Advertising Media Impacts on Culture and Social Communication . Bangkok, August.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Tsakona, Villy
    2009 “Language and image interaction in cartoons: Towards a multimodal theory of humor.” Journal of Pragmatics41: 1171–1188. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.12.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.12.003 [Google Scholar]
  31. Wharton, Tim
    2009Pragmatics and Non-Verbal Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511635649
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635649 [Google Scholar]
  32. Wiggins, Bradley E. , and G. Bret Bowers
    2015 “Memes as genre: A structurational analysis of the memescape.” New Media & Society17(11): 1886–1906. doi: 10.1177/1461444814535194
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814535194 [Google Scholar]
  33. Yoon, InJeon
    2016 “Why is it not just a joke? Analysis of Internet memes associated with racism and hidden ideology of colorblindness.” Journal of Cultural Research in Art Education33: 92–123.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Yus, Francisco
    1997 “La teoría de la relevancia y la estrategia humorística de la incongruencia-resolución.” Pragmalingüística3–4: 497–508.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 2002 “Stand-up comedy and cultural spread: The case of sex roles.” Babel A.F.I.A.L., special issue on humour studies, p.245–292.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 2004 “Pragmatics of humorous strategies in El club de la comedia. InCurrent Trends in the Pragmatics of Spanish, ed. by Rosina Márquez-Reiter , and María E. Placencia , 320–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.123.25yus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.123.25yus [Google Scholar]
  37. 2005 “Dave Allen’s stand-up monologues: An epidemiological approach.” InThistles. A homage to Brian Hughes. Volume 2: Essays in Memoriam, ed. by José Mateo , and Francisco Yus , 317–344. Alicante: University of Alicante, Department of English Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 2007 “Weblogs: Web pages in search of a genre?” InThe Texture of Internet. Netlinguistics in Progress, ed. by. Santiago Posteguillo , María José Esteve , and M. Lluïsa Gea-Valor , 118–142. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 2009 “Visual metaphor versus verbal metaphor: A unified account.” InMultimodal Metaphor, ed. by Charles Forceville , and Eduardio Uriós-Aparisi , 145–172. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110215366.3.147
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366.3.147 [Google Scholar]
  40. 2011Cyberpragmatics. Internet-Mediated Communication in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.213
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.213 [Google Scholar]
  41. 2014 “El discurso de las identidades en línea: El caso de Facebook.” Discurso & Sociedad8(3): 398–426.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 2016aHumour and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/thr.4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.4 [Google Scholar]
  43. 2016b “Towards a cyberpragmatics of mobile instant messaging.” InYearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2016: Global Implications for Culture and Society in the Networked Age, ed. by Jesús Romero-Trillo , 7–26. Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑41733‑2_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41733-2_2 [Google Scholar]
  44. 2016c “Discourse, contextualization and identity shaping. The case of social networking sites and virtual worlds.” InTechnology Implementation in Higher Education for Second Language Teaching and Translation Studies, ed. by María Luisa Carrió-Pastor , 71–88. Singapore: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑981‑10‑0572‑5_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0572-5_5 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2016d “Propositional attitude, affective attitude and irony comprehension.” Pragmatics & Cognition23(1): 92–116. doi: 10.1075/pc.23.1.05yus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.23.1.05yus [Google Scholar]
  46. 2107a “Contextual constraints and non-propositional effects in WhatsApp communication.” Journal of Pragmatics114: 66–86. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.04.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.04.003 [Google Scholar]
  47. 2017b “Incongruity-resolution cases in jokes.” Lingua197: 103–122. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2017.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2017.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  48. 2018 “Positive non-humorous effects of humor on the Internet.” InThe Dynamics of Interactional Humor. Creating and Negotiating Humor in Everyday Encounters, ed. by Villy Tsakona , and Jan Chovanec , 283–303. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/thr.7.12yus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.7.12yus [Google Scholar]
  49. . forthcoming a. “Relevance from and beyond propositions. The case of online identity.” InRelevance and Irrelevance: Theories, Factors and Challenges ed. by Hishashi Nasu , and Jan Strassheim . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. . forthcoming b. “The interface between pragmatics and Internet-mediated communication: Applications, extensions and adjustments.” InPragmatics and its Interfaces ed. by Cornelia Ilie , and Neal Norrick . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): cyberpragmatics; image macros; meme communication; memes; online identity
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error