Volume 1, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2542-3851
  • E-ISSN: 2542-386X
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


The paper argues that the notion of Relational Work ( Locher and Watts 2005 ) needs to be expanded to be able to account for sociability in the networked interactions afforded by social platforms such as Facebook. Thus, the aim of this paper is to explore how the nature of networked interactions impacts the emergence of relational practices therein. Importantly, Relational Work is a language based framework whereas networked interactions are highly multimodal. By applying Norris’ (2004) multimodal framework to the analysis of a Facebook wall event, we show how key sociability functions are carried out by semiotic modes other than language. Furthermore, the analysis shows how relational behaviors (such as politeness, impoliteness, etc.) are highly intertwined and should not be compartmentalized, as has traditionally been the case.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Androutsopoulos, Jannis
    2014a “Moments of sharing: Entextualization and linguistic repertoires in social networking.” Journal of Pragmatics73: 4–18. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.07.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.07.013 [Google Scholar]
  2. 2014b “Languaging when contexts collapse: Audience design in social networking.” Discourse, Context and Media4–5: 62–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 2015 “Networked multilingualism: Some language practices on Facebook and their implications.” International Journal of Bilingualism19(2): 185–205. doi: 10.1177/1367006913489198
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006913489198 [Google Scholar]
  4. Blommaert, Jan , and Malgorzata Szabla
    2017 “Does context really collapse in social media interaction?” Plenary paper presented at theconference on Moving Texts: Mediations and Transculturations . Aveiro, 12 July 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bou-Franch, Patricia , and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
    2014 “Conflict management in massive polylogues: A case study from YouTube.” Journal of Pragmatics73: 19–36. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bou-Franch, Patricia , Nuria Lorenzo-Dus , and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
    2012 “Social interaction in YouTube text-based polylogues: A study of coherence.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication17(4): 501–521. doi: 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2012.01579.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01579.x [Google Scholar]
  7. Bousfield, Derek
    2007 “Beginnings, middles and ends: A biopsy of the dynamics of impolite exchanges.” Journal of Pragmatics39(12): 2185–2216. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.005 [Google Scholar]
  8. boyd, danah , and Alice E. Marwick
    2011 “Social privacy in networked publics: Teens’ attitudes, practices, and strategies.” Work‐in‐progress paper for discussion at the Privacy Law Scholars Conference on June 2, 2011in Berkeley, CA.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown, Penelope , and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Castells, Manuel
    2000 “Toward a sociology of the network society.” Contemporary Sociology29(5): 693–699. doi: 10.2307/2655234
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2655234 [Google Scholar]
  11. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2005 “Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show the weakest link.” Journal of Politeness Research1: 35–72. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2011Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
  13. Culpeper, Jonathan , Derek Bousfield , and Anne Wichmann
    2003 “Impoliteness revisited with special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics35(10–11): 1545–1579. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00118‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00118-2 [Google Scholar]
  14. Danet, Brenda
    2013 “Flaming and linguistic impoliteness on a listserv.” InPragmatics of Computer- Mediated Communication, ed. by Susan C. Herring , Dieter Stein , and Tuija Virtanen , 639–664. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110214468.639
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214468.639 [Google Scholar]
  15. Eelen, Gino
    2001A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St Jerome’ Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
    2009 “Impoliteness and identity in the American news media: the culture wars.” Journal of Politeness Research5: 273–304.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 2010a “The YouTubification of politics, impoliteness and polarization.” InHandbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction, ed. by Rotimi Taiwo , 540–563. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi: 10.4018/978‑1‑61520‑773‑2.ch035
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-773-2.ch035 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2010b “A genre approach to the study of im-politeness.” International Review of Pragmatics2(1): 46–94. doi: 10.1163/187731010X491747
    https://doi.org/10.1163/187731010X491747 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2012 “Politics, ‘lies’ and YouTube: A genre approach to assessments of im/politeness on Obama’s 9/9/2009 presidential address.” InNew Perspectives on (Im)politeness and Interpersonal Communication, ed. by Lucía Fernández-Amaya , Maria de la O Hernández López , Reyes Gómez Morón , Manuel Padilla Cruz , Manuel Mejias Borrero , and Mariana Relinque Barranca , 62–90. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 2013 Face, identity, and im/politeness: Looking backwards, moving forward – From Goffman to practice theory.” Journal of Politeness Research9(1): 1-33.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Georgakopoulou, Alexandra , and Tereza Spilioti
    2016 “Introduction.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. by Alexandra Georgakopoulou , and Tereza Spilioti , 1–15. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Georgalou, Mariza
    2016 “‘I make the rules on my wall’: Privacy and identity management practices on Facebook.” Discourse & Communication10(1): 40–64. doi: 10.1177/1750481315600304
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481315600304 [Google Scholar]
  23. Graham, Sage G.
    2007 “Disagreeing to agree: Conflict, (im)politeness and identity in a computer-mediated community.” Journal of Pragmatics39(4): 742–759. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.017 [Google Scholar]
  24. Haugh, Michael , and Dereck Bousfield
    2012 “Mock impoliteness, jocular mockery and jocular abuse in Australian and British English.” Journal of Pragmatics44(9): 1099–1114. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  25. Haugh, Michael
    2007 “The discursive challenge to politeness research: An interactional alternative.” Journal of Politeness Research3(2): 295–317. doi: 10.1515/PR.2007.013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/PR.2007.013 [Google Scholar]
  26. 2010 “Jocular mockery, (dis)affiliation and face.” Journal of Pragmatics42: 2106–2119. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.018
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.018 [Google Scholar]
  27. 2014 “Jocular mockery as interactional practice in everyday Anglo-Australian conversation.” Australian Journal of Linguistics34(1): 76–99. doi: 10.1080/07268602.2014.875456
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2014.875456 [Google Scholar]
  28. Herring, Susan C. , and Jannis Androutsopoulos
    2015 “Computer-mediated discourse 2.0.” InThe Handbook of Discourse Analysis, (2nd edn.), ed. by Deborah Tannen , Heidi E. Hamilton , and Deborah Schiffrin , 128–151. Chichester: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
    2004 “Introducing polylogue.” Journal of Pragmatics36(1): 1–24. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(03)00034‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00034-1 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kozinets, Robert V.
    2010Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kress, Gunther , and Theo Van Leeuwen
    2006Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Lee, Carmen K. M.
    2011 “Micro-blogging and status updates on Facebook: Texts and practices.” InDigital Discourse: Language in the New Media, ed. by Crispin Thurlow , and Kristine Mroczek , 110–128. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.003.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
  33. Locher, Miriam A.
    2010 “Introduction: Politeness and impoliteness in computer-mediated communication.” Journal of Politeness Research6(1): 1–5. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2010.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.001 [Google Scholar]
  34. Locher, Miriam A. , and Richard Watts
    2005 “Politeness theory and relational work.” Journal of Politeness Research1: 9–33. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9 [Google Scholar]
  35. Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria , Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich , and Patricia Bou-Franch
    2011 “On-line polylogues and impoliteness: The case of postings sent in response to the Obama Reggaeton YouTube video.” Journal of Pragmatics43(10): 2578–2593. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.005 [Google Scholar]
  36. Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen
    2013 ““Just click ‘Like’”: Computer-mediated responses to Spanish compliments.” Journal of Pragmatics51: 47–67. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.03.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.03.003 [Google Scholar]
  37. Maíz Arévalo, Carmen
    2015 “Jocular mockery in computer-mediated communication: A contrastive study of a Spanish and English Facebook community.” Journal of Politeness Research11(2): 289–327. doi: 10.1515/pr‑2015‑0012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2015-0012 [Google Scholar]
  38. Markham, Annette , and Elizabeth Buchanan
    2012Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (Version 2.0). aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Marwick, Alice E. , and dannah boyd
    2011 “I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience.” New Media & Society13(1): 114–133. doi: 10.1177/1461444810365313
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313 [Google Scholar]
  40. Mills, Sara
    2003Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511615238
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615238 [Google Scholar]
  41. Milroy, James , and Lesley Milroy
    1985 “Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation.” Journal of Linguistics21: 339–384. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700010306
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700010306 [Google Scholar]
  42. Norris, Sigrid
    2004Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Page, Ruth E.
    2010 “Revisiting narrativity: Small stories in status updates.” Text and Talk30 (4): 423–444.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. 2012Stories and Social Media. Identities and Interaction. Oxford: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Papacharissi, Zizi
    2011 “Conclusion: A networked self.” InA Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites, ed. by Zizi Papacharissi , 304–318. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Seargeant, Philip , and Caroline Tagg
    2014 “Introduction: The language of social media.” InThe Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet, ed. by Philip Seargeant , and Caroline Tagg , 1–20. London: Palgrave-Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9781137029317.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137029317.0004 [Google Scholar]
  47. Tagg, Caroline , and Philip Seargeant
    2014 “Audience design and language choice in the construction and maintenance of translocal communities on social network sites.” InThe Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet, ed. by Philip Seargeant , and Caroline Tagg , 161–185. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9781137029317.0013
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137029317.0013 [Google Scholar]
  48. 2016 “Facebook and the discursive construction of the social network.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. by Alexandra Georgakopoulou , and Tereza Spilioti , 339–353. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Terkourafi, Marina
    2005 “Beyond the micro-level in politeness research.” Journal of Politeness Research1(2): 237–262. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.237
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.237 [Google Scholar]
  50. Watts, Richard
    2003Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511615184
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184 [Google Scholar]
  51. West, Laura , and Anna M. Trester
    2013 “Facework on Facebook.” InDiscourse 2.0: Language and New Media, ed. by Deborah Tannen , and Anna M. Trester , 133–154. Washington, D.A.: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Zimmer, Michael
    2010 “But the data is already public: On the ethics of research in Facebook.” Ethics & Information Technology12(4): 313–325. doi: 10.1007/s10676‑010‑9227‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9227-5 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Facebook; im/politeness; multimodality; networked interactions; Relational Work
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error