Relational work in multimodal networked interactions on Facebook

References

1. Androutsopoulos, Jannis
   2014a “Moments of sharing: Entextualization and linguistic repertoires in social networking.” Journal of Pragmatics73: 4–18. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.07.013
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.07.013 [Google Scholar]
2. Androutsopoulos, Jannis
   2014b “Languaging when contexts collapse: Audience design in social networking.” Discourse, Context and Media4–5: 62–73.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Androutsopoulos, Jannis
   2015 “Networked multilingualism: Some language practices on Facebook and their implications.” International Journal of Bilingualism19(2): 185–205. doi: 10.1177/1367006913489198
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006913489198 [Google Scholar]
4. Blommaert, Jan , and Malgorzata Szabla
   2017 “Does context really collapse in social media interaction?” Plenary paper presented at theconference on Moving Texts: Mediations and Transculturations . Aveiro, 12 July 2017.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bou-Franch, Patricia , and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
   2014 “Conflict management in massive polylogues: A case study from YouTube.” Journal of Pragmatics73: 19–36. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.001
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.001 [Google Scholar]
6. Bou-Franch, Patricia , Nuria Lorenzo-Dus , and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
   2012 “Social interaction in YouTube text-based polylogues: A study of coherence.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication17(4): 501–521. doi: 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2012.01579.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01579.x [Google Scholar]
7. Bousfield, Derek
   2007 “Beginnings, middles and ends: A biopsy of the dynamics of impolite exchanges.” Journal of Pragmatics39(12): 2185–2216. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.005
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.005 [Google Scholar]
8. boyd, danah , and Alice E. Marwick
   2011 “Social privacy in networked publics: Teens’ attitudes, practices, and strategies.” Work‐in‐progress paper for discussion at the Privacy Law Scholars Conference on June 2, 2011in Berkeley, CA.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Brown, Penelope , and Stephen C. Levinson
   1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Castells, Manuel
    2000 “Toward a sociology of the network society.” Contemporary Sociology29(5): 693–699. doi: 10.2307/2655234
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2655234 [Google Scholar]
11. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2005 “Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show the weakest link.” Journal of Politeness Research1: 35–72. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35 [Google Scholar]
12. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2011 Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
13. Culpeper, Jonathan , Derek Bousfield , and Anne Wichmann
    2003 “Impoliteness revisited with special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics35(10–11): 1545–1579. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00118‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00118-2 [Google Scholar]
14. Danet, Brenda
    2013 “Flaming and linguistic impoliteness on a listserv.” InPragmatics of Computer- Mediated Communication, ed. by Susan C. Herring , Dieter Stein , and Tuija Virtanen , 639–664. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110214468.639
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214468.639 [Google Scholar]
15. Eelen, Gino
    2001 A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St Jerome’ Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
    2009 “Impoliteness and identity in the American news media: the culture wars.” Journal of Politeness Research5: 273–304.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
    2010a “The YouTubification of politics, impoliteness and polarization.” InHandbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction, ed. by Rotimi Taiwo , 540–563. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi: 10.4018/978‑1‑61520‑773‑2.ch035
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-773-2.ch035 [Google Scholar]
18. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
    2010b “A genre approach to the study of im-politeness.” International Review of Pragmatics2(1): 46–94. doi: 10.1163/187731010X491747
    https://doi.org/10.1163/187731010X491747 [Google Scholar]
19. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
    2012 “Politics, ‘lies’ and YouTube: A genre approach to assessments of im/politeness on Obama’s 9/9/2009 presidential address.” InNew Perspectives on (Im)politeness and Interpersonal Communication, ed. by Lucía Fernández-Amaya , Maria de la O Hernández López , Reyes Gómez Morón , Manuel Padilla Cruz , Manuel Mejias Borrero , and Mariana Relinque Barranca , 62–90. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
    2013 Face, identity, and im/politeness: Looking backwards, moving forward – From Goffman to practice theory.” Journal of Politeness Research9(1): 1-33.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Georgakopoulou, Alexandra , and Tereza Spilioti
    2016 “Introduction.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. by Alexandra Georgakopoulou , and Tereza Spilioti , 1–15. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Georgalou, Mariza
    2016 “‘I make the rules on my wall’: Privacy and identity management practices on Facebook.” Discourse & Communication10(1): 40–64. doi: 10.1177/1750481315600304
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481315600304 [Google Scholar]
23. Graham, Sage G.
    2007 “Disagreeing to agree: Conflict, (im)politeness and identity in a computer-mediated community.” Journal of Pragmatics39(4): 742–759. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.017 [Google Scholar]
24. Haugh, Michael , and Dereck Bousfield
    2012 “Mock impoliteness, jocular mockery and jocular abuse in Australian and British English.” Journal of Pragmatics44(9): 1099–1114. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.02.003 [Google Scholar]
25. Haugh, Michael
    2007 “The discursive challenge to politeness research: An interactional alternative.” Journal of Politeness Research3(2): 295–317. doi: 10.1515/PR.2007.013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/PR.2007.013 [Google Scholar]
26. Haugh, Michael
    2010 “Jocular mockery, (dis)affiliation and face.” Journal of Pragmatics42: 2106–2119. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.018
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.018 [Google Scholar]
27. Haugh, Michael
    2014 “Jocular mockery as interactional practice in everyday Anglo-Australian conversation.” Australian Journal of Linguistics34(1): 76–99. doi: 10.1080/07268602.2014.875456
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2014.875456 [Google Scholar]
28. Herring, Susan C. , and Jannis Androutsopoulos
    2015 “Computer-mediated discourse 2.0.” InThe Handbook of Discourse Analysis, (2nd edn.), ed. by Deborah Tannen , Heidi E. Hamilton , and Deborah Schiffrin , 128–151. Chichester: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
    2004 “Introducing polylogue.” Journal of Pragmatics36(1): 1–24. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(03)00034‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00034-1 [Google Scholar]
30. Kozinets, Robert V.
    2010 Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Kress, Gunther , and Theo Van Leeuwen
    2006 Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Lee, Carmen K. M.
    2011 “Micro-blogging and status updates on Facebook: Texts and practices.” InDigital Discourse: Language in the New Media, ed. by Crispin Thurlow , and Kristine Mroczek , 110–128. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.003.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
33. Locher, Miriam A.
    2010 “Introduction: Politeness and impoliteness in computer-mediated communication.” Journal of Politeness Research6(1): 1–5. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2010.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.001 [Google Scholar]
34. Locher, Miriam A. , and Richard Watts
    2005 “Politeness theory and relational work.” Journal of Politeness Research1: 9–33. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9 [Google Scholar]
35. Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria , Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich , and Patricia Bou-Franch
    2011 “On-line polylogues and impoliteness: The case of postings sent in response to the Obama Reggaeton YouTube video.” Journal of Pragmatics43(10): 2578–2593. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.005 [Google Scholar]
36. Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen
    2013 ““Just click ‘Like’”: Computer-mediated responses to Spanish compliments.” Journal of Pragmatics51: 47–67. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.03.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.03.003 [Google Scholar]
37. Maíz Arévalo, Carmen
    2015 “Jocular mockery in computer-mediated communication: A contrastive study of a Spanish and English Facebook community.” Journal of Politeness Research11(2): 289–327. doi: 10.1515/pr‑2015‑0012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2015-0012 [Google Scholar]
38. Markham, Annette , and Elizabeth Buchanan
    2012 Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (Version 2.0). aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
39. Marwick, Alice E. , and dannah boyd
    2011 “I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience.” New Media & Society13(1): 114–133. doi: 10.1177/1461444810365313
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313 [Google Scholar]
40. Mills, Sara
    2003 Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511615238
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615238 [Google Scholar]
41. Milroy, James , and Lesley Milroy
    1985 “Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation.” Journal of Linguistics21: 339–384. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700010306
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700010306 [Google Scholar]
42. Norris, Sigrid
    2004 Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Page, Ruth E.
    2010 “Revisiting narrativity: Small stories in status updates.” Text and Talk30 (4): 423–444.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Page, Ruth E.
    2012 Stories and Social Media. Identities and Interaction. Oxford: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Papacharissi, Zizi
    2011 “Conclusion: A networked self.” InA Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites, ed. by Zizi Papacharissi , 304–318. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Seargeant, Philip , and Caroline Tagg
    2014 “Introduction: The language of social media.” InThe Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet, ed. by Philip Seargeant , and Caroline Tagg , 1–20. London: Palgrave-Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9781137029317.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137029317.0004 [Google Scholar]
47. Tagg, Caroline , and Philip Seargeant
    2014 “Audience design and language choice in the construction and maintenance of translocal communities on social network sites.” InThe Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet, ed. by Philip Seargeant , and Caroline Tagg , 161–185. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9781137029317.0013
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137029317.0013 [Google Scholar]
48. Tagg, Caroline , and Philip Seargeant
    2016 “Facebook and the discursive construction of the social network.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. by Alexandra Georgakopoulou , and Tereza Spilioti , 339–353. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Terkourafi, Marina
    2005 “Beyond the micro-level in politeness research.” Journal of Politeness Research1(2): 237–262. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.237
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.237 [Google Scholar]
50. Watts, Richard
    2003 Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511615184
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184 [Google Scholar]
51. West, Laura , and Anna M. Trester
    2013 “Facework on Facebook.” InDiscourse 2.0: Language and New Media, ed. by Deborah Tannen , and Anna M. Trester , 133–154. Washington, D.A.: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Zimmer, Michael
    2010 “But the data is already public: On the ethics of research in Facebook.” Ethics & Information Technology12(4): 313–325. doi: 10.1007/s10676‑010‑9227‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9227-5 [Google Scholar]