1887
Volume 1, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2542-3851
  • E-ISSN: 2542-386X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Drawing on our previous work on the role of small stories in social-mediatized engagements with the Greek socio-economic crisis (Georgakopoulou 20142015), in this article, we set out to shed light on impoliteness on social media through the lens of small stories research. We explore how Facebook and YouTube commenters “bash” political leaders and perceived political opponents and attribute blame to them for the crisis, through comments that attest to specific links of doing impoliteness with storying the crisis. Bashing has been previously related to the affective reactions of participants in online comments on current affairs. In this case, we bring to the fore a salient combination in our data of (mainly on-record) impoliteness strategies for bashing politicians with specific narrating positions in stories about the crisis: the narrator as sufferer, as witness of suffering, and as spokesperson for collective suffering. We argue that in all these cases, on-record impoliteness is normally placed at the end of a small story and presented as legitimated and justified by the preceding account. We conclude with the implications of the association of impoliteness targeting public figures with social-mediatized processes of personalizing and constructing expertise on the basis of experience on the one hand and, on the other hand, of jointly (re)asserting moral order in political affairs.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00011.geo
2019-01-10
2019-09-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arendholz, Jenny
    2013(In) appropriate Online Behavior: A Pragmatic Analysis of Message Board Relations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.229
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.229 [Google Scholar]
  2. Arundale, Robert
    2009 “Face as emergent in interpersonal communication: an alternative to Goffman.” InFace, Communication and Social Interaction, ed. byFrancesca Bargiela-Chiappini, and Michael Haugh, 33–54. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bamberg, Michael, and Alexandra Georgrakopoulou
    2008 “Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis.” Text & Talk28(3): 377–396. 10.1515/TEXT.2008.018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2008.018 [Google Scholar]
  4. Behar, Ruth
    1990 “Rage and redemption: Reading the life story of a mexican marketing woman.” Feminist Studies16(2): 223–258. 10.2307/3177849
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3177849 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
    2014 “Conflict management in massive polylogues: A case study from YouTube.” Journal of Pragmatics73: 19–36. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bou-Franch, Patricia
    2015 “Revisiting online conflict in social networking sites: The role of anonymity/familiarity.” Paper presented at the9th International Impoliteness Conference, Athens, Greece, 1–3 June 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. boyd, danah, and Alice Marwick
    2011 “Social steganography: Privacy in networked publics.” Paper presented at theInternational Communications Association, Boston, USA, 28 May 2011. www.danah.org/papers/2011/Steganography-ICAVersion.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bousfield, Derek
    2008Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.167
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.167 [Google Scholar]
  9. Conover, Michael D., Jacob Ratkiewicz, Matthew Francisco, Bruno Gonçalves, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer
    2011 “Political polarization on Twitter.” InProceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ed. byLada Adamic, Ricardo Baeza-Yates, and Scott Counts, 89–096. Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2011Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
  11. Culpeper, Jonathan, Paul Iganski, and Abe Sweiry
    2017 “Linguistic impoliteness and religiously aggravated hate crime in England and Wales.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict5(1): 1–29. 10.1075/jlac.5.1.01cul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.5.1.01cul [Google Scholar]
  12. Dalton, Eric
    2013 “Impoliteness in computer mediated communication.” Unpublished Master Thesis, San Diego State University.
  13. Drayton, Katherine
    2017 “Impoliteness and conflict in an online football fandom.” Paper presented at the15th International Pragmatics Conference, Belfast, Ireland, 16–21 June 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Dynel, Marta
    2012 “Swearing methodologically: The (im) politeness of expletives in anonymous commentaries on Youtube.” Journal of English Studies (10): 25–50. 10.18172/jes.179
    https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.179 [Google Scholar]
  15. 2014 “Participation framework underlying YouTube interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics73: 37–52. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  16. Eastmond, Marita
    2007 “Stories as lived experience: Narratives in forced migration research. Journal of Refugee Studies20(2): 248–264. 10.1093/jrs/fem007
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fem007 [Google Scholar]
  17. el-Nawawy, Mohammed, and Sarah Khamis
    2013Egyptian Revolution 2.0: Political Blogging, Civic Engagement, and Citizen Journalism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137020925
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137020925 [Google Scholar]
  18. Eriksson, Göran
    2014 “See the error of your ways: Belligerent expertise and the curative power of ‘tough love’.” International Journal of Cultural Studies17(6): 573–589. 10.1177/1367877913519312
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877913519312 [Google Scholar]
  19. Feldman, Carol Fleisher, Bruner Jerome, Renderer Bobby, and Sally Spitzer
    1990 “Narrative comprehension.” InNarrative Thought and Narrative Language, ed. byBruce Britton, and Anthony Pellegrini, 1–79. New York: Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
    2010 “The YouTubification of politics, impoliteness and polarization.” InHandbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction, ed. byRotimi Taiwo, 540–563. New York: ICL Global. 10.4018/978‑1‑61520‑773‑2.ch035
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-773-2.ch035 [Google Scholar]
  21. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, Patricia Bou-Franch, and Nuria Lorenzo-Dus
    2011 “On-line polylogues and impoliteness: The case of postings sent in response to the Obama Reggaeton Youtube video.” Journal of Pragmatics43(10): 2578–2593. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.005 [Google Scholar]
  22. 2013 “Identity and impoliteness: The expert in the talent show Idol.” Journal of Politeness Research9(1): 97–121. 10.1515/pr‑2013‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2013-0005 [Google Scholar]
  23. Garfinkel, Harold
    1964 “Studies of the routine grounds of everyday activities.” Social Problems11(3): 225–250. 10.2307/798722
    https://doi.org/10.2307/798722 [Google Scholar]
  24. Georgakopoulou, Alexandra
    2009 “Reflecton and self-disclosure from the small stories perspective: A study of identity claims in interview and conversational data.” InTelling Stories, ed. byDeborah Schiffrin, Anna De Fina, and Anastasia Nylund, 226–247. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Georgakopoulou, Alexandra
    2013 “Small stories and identities analysis as a framework for the study of im/politeness-in-interaction.” Journal of Politeness Research9(1): 55–74. 10.1515/pr‑2013‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2013-0003 [Google Scholar]
  26. 2014 “Small stories transposition and social media: A microperspective on the ‘Greek crisis’.” Discourse & Society25(4): 519–539. 10.1177/0957926514536963
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514536963 [Google Scholar]
  27. 2015 “Sharing as rescripting: Place manipulations on YouTube between narrative and social media affordances.” Discourse, Context & Media9: 64–72. 10.1016/j.dcm.2015.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2015.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  28. 2016a “From narrating the self to posting self (ies): A small stories approach to selfies.” Open Linguistics2: 300–317. 10.1515/opli‑2016‑0014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2016-0014 [Google Scholar]
  29. 2016b “‘Friendly’ comments: Interactional displays of alignment on Facebook and YouTube.” InSocial Media Discourse,(Dis)identifications and Diversities, ed. bySirpa Leppanen, Elina Westinen, and Samu Kytola, 189–218. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 2017 “Sharing the moment as small stories: The interplay between practices & affordances in the social media-curation of lives.” Narrative Inquiry27: 311–333. 10.1075/ni.27.2.06geo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.27.2.06geo [Google Scholar]
  31. Georgakopoulou, Alexandra, and Cedric Deschrijver
    eds. forthcoming. “The social mediatization of the economy: Texts, discourses and participation” [Special issue]. [email protected].
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Georgakopoulou, Alexandra, and Korina Giaxoglou
    . forthcoming. “Emplotment in the social mediatization of the economy: The poly-storying of economist Yanis Varoufakis.” [email protected].
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Goudet, Laura
    2010 “Alternative spellings and censhorship: The treatment of profanities in virtual communities.” InAspects of Linguistic Impoliteness, ed. byDenis Jamet, and Dennis Jobert, 209–223. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Hardaker, Claire
    2010 “Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions.” Journal of Politeness Research6(2): 215–242. 10.1515/jplr.2010.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.011 [Google Scholar]
  35. Haugh, Michael
    2013 “Im/politeness, social practice and the participation order.” Journal of Pragmatics58: 52–72. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  36. Hinsliff, Gaby
    2010 “Web 2.0: the new election superweapon.” The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2010/apr/11/new-media-election-campaign (accessed20 July 2017).
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Hopkinson, Chris
    2014 “Face effects of verbal antagonism in online discussions.” Brno Studies in English40(1): 65–87. 10.5817/BSE2014‑1‑4
    https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2014-1-4 [Google Scholar]
  38. Jefferson, Gail
    1978 “Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation.” InStudies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, ed. byJim Schenkein, 219–248. New York: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50016‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50016-1 [Google Scholar]
  39. Kádár, Daniel, and Michael Haugh
    2013Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139382717
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139382717 [Google Scholar]
  40. Kádár, Daniel, Michael Haugh, and Wei-Ling Melody Chang
    2013 “Aggression and perceived national face threats in mainland Chinese and Taiwanese CMC discussion boards.” Multilingua32(3): 343–372. 10.1515/multi‑2013‑0016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2013-0016 [Google Scholar]
  41. Klofstad, Casey, Anand Edward Sokhey, and Scott D. McClurg
    2013 “Disagreeing about disagreement: How conflict in social networks affects political behavior.” American Journal of Political Science57(1): 120–134. 10.1111/j.1540‑5907.2012.00620.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00620.x [Google Scholar]
  42. Kopf, Martina
    2010 “Trauma, narrative and the art of witnessing.” InSlavery in Art and Literature: Approaches to Trauma, Memory and Visuality, ed. byBirgit Haehnel, and Melanie Ulz, 41–58. Berlin: Frank & Timm.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Labov, William
    1972Sociolinguistic Patterns. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Lange, Patricia G.
    2014 “Commenting on YouTube rants: Perceptions of inappropriateness or civic engagement?” Journal of Pragmatics73: 53–65. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.07.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.07.004 [Google Scholar]
  45. Letts, Marcus
    2009 “Obama’s discourse of ‘hope’: Making rhetoric work politically.” Bsc Dissertation, University of Bristol.
  46. Lindholm, Maiju
    2012 “Identity construction in a pwnage video on YouTube.” Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Jyväskylä.
  47. Livingstone, Sonia, and Peter Lunt
    1994Talk on Television: Audience Participation and Public Debate. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203310243
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203310243 [Google Scholar]
  48. Ljung, Magnus
    2011Swearing: A Cross-Cultural Linguistic Study. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Loader, Brian D., Ariadne Vromen, and Michael Xenos
    2014 “The networked young citizen: Social media, political participation and civic engagement.” Information, Communication and Society17(2): 143–150. 10.1080/1369118X.2013.871571
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.871571 [Google Scholar]
  50. McKee, Heidi
    2002 “‘YOUR VIEWS SHOWED TRUE IGNORANCE!!!’: (Mis)communication in an online interracial discussion forum.” Computers and Composition19: 411–434. 10.1016/S8755‑4615(02)00143‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(02)00143-3 [Google Scholar]
  51. Meinl, Marja E.
    2013Electronic Complaints: An Empirical Study on British English and German Complaints on eBay. Berlin: Frank & Timme.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Page, Ruth
    2015 “The Narrative Dimensions of Social Media Storytelling.” InThe Handbook of Narrative Analysis, ed. byAnna De Fina, and Alexandra Georgakopoulou, 329–349. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Page, Ruth, Barton David, Johann Unger, and Michele Zappavigna
    2014Researching Language and Social Media: A Student Guide. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315771786
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315771786 [Google Scholar]
  54. Park, Namsu, Kerk F. Kee, and Sebastian Valenzuela
    2009 “Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes.” CyberPsychology & Behavior12(6): 729–733. 10.1089/cpb.2009.0003
    https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2009.0003 [Google Scholar]
  55. Papacharissi, Zizi
    2009 “The virtual sphere 2.0: The internet, the public sphere, and beyond.” InRoutledge Handbook of Internet Politics, ed. byAndrew Chadwick, and Philip N. Howar, 230–245. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. 2015 “Affective publics and structures of storytelling: Sentiment, events and mediality.” Information, Communication & Society19(3): 307–324. 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1109697
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1109697 [Google Scholar]
  57. Pennanen, Satu Pauliina
    2013 “The structure of impolite events in computer-mediated communication: Insulting adjectives in comments on a discussion board of CNN US news piece.” Unpublished Pro Gradu Thesis, University of Helsinki.
  58. Perelmutter, Renee
    2013 “Klassika Zhanra: The flamewar as a genre in the Russian blogosphere.” Journal of Pragmatics45(1): 74–89. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.10.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.10.006 [Google Scholar]
  59. Pihlaja, Stephen
    2014Antagonism on YouTube: Metaphor in Online Discourse. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Qiu, Lin, Han Lin, Leung Angela, and William Tov
    2012 “Putting their best foot forward: Emotional disclosure on Facebook.” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking15(10): 569–572. 10.1089/cyber.2012.0200
    https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0200 [Google Scholar]
  61. Rowe, Ian
    2014 “Civility 2.0: A comparative analysis of incivility in online political discussion.” Information, Communication & Society18 (2): 121–138. 10.1080/1369118X.2014.940365
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.940365 [Google Scholar]
  62. Sifianou, Maria, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
    2017 “(Im) politeness and identity.” InThe Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im) politeness, ed. byJonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 227–256. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑37508‑7_10
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_10 [Google Scholar]
  63. Tagg, Caroline, and Philip Seargeant
    2016 “Facebook and the discursive construction of the social network.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. byAlexandra Georgakopoulou, and Teresa Spilioti, 339–353. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Taylor, Carol
    2016Mock Politeness in English and Italian: A Corpus-Assisted Metalanguage Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.267
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.267 [Google Scholar]
  65. Turner, Graeme
    2010Οrdinary People and the Media: The Demotic Turn. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Vásquez, Camilla
    2014 “‘Usually not one to complain but…’: Constructing identities in user-generated online reviews.” InThe Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet, ed. byPhilip Seargeant, and Caroline Tagg, 65–90. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137029317_4
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137029317_4 [Google Scholar]
  67. Vasilaki, Maria
    . forthcoming. “Impoliteness strategies in the comments of Greek political posts: The case of Facebook and YouTube.” PhD Dissertation, King’s College London.
  68. Wodak, Ruth
    2009Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Young, Sally
    2001 “Why Australians hate politicians: Exploring the new public discontent.” InFor the People: Reclaiming Our Government: Labor Essays, ed. byDennis Glover, and Glenn Patmore, 171–182. London: Pluto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00011.geo
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00011.geo
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): bashing , Greek crisis , narrating positions , on-record impoliteness , online comments and small stories
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error