1887
Volume 1, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2542-3851
  • E-ISSN: 2542-386X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

With the advent of the internet and social media, car and vanpooling have become easily available alternatives to public transport in many parts of the world. This paper draws on publicly available data from a Facebook car and vanpooling group used by Slovenian cross-border commuters to make their journeys to and from Austria more economically sustainable. It examines public displays of moral indignation following allegations of malpractice by relatively new members whose whole purpose in joining the group was to earn a living from driving vans across borders. Vanpool users collaboratively denounce van service providers for transgressing some of the social responsibilities that ought to bind members of the group together and for their lack of accountability. The accusations which entail exaggerations, complaints, insults and threats, among other hostile verbal attacks, convey moral indignation and are similarly resisted and challenged by the drivers. They offer a window into conflicting behavioural expectations at a time of socioeconomic change and transition. The alleged lack of van providers’ accountability which, in turn, informs the van users’ displays of moral indignation is indicative of the moral relativism that emerges as a result of the relocalisation and, the nature of a contemporary global practice at a time when changes in social life are underway. The primacy of the economic return that car and vanpooling offers service providers and cross-commuters with is oriented to by the former as outstripping the social responsibilities typically related to the provision of the regulated services, and by the latter, as morally unjustifiable despite acknowledging its economic value.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00012.mar
2019-01-10
2019-08-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Androutsopoulos, Jannis
    2014 “Moments of sharing: Entextualization and linguistic repertoires in social networking.” Journal of Pragmatics73: 4–18. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.07.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.07.013 [Google Scholar]
  2. Berger, Roni
    1996 “Group work with adolescent immigrants.” Journal of Child and Adolescent Group Theory6(4): 169–179. 10.1007/BF02548415
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02548415 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bizovičar, Milka
    2016 “Top delodajalci: Pri največjih je pogodb o zaposlitvi manj.” [Top employers: The biggest companies are hiring fewer workers]. Delo, Monday, 6June 2016 www.delo.si/gospodarstvo/podjetja/pri-najvecjih-je-pogodb-o-zaposlitvi-manj.html (accessed30 October 2017).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Boltanski, Luc
    2011On Critique: A Sociology of Emancipation (trans. byGregory Elliott). Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Boot, Nuria, and Guntram Wolff
    2015 “Cross-border commuters and trips: the relevance of Schengen.” bruegel.org/2015/12/cross-border-commuters-and-trips-the-relevance-of-schengen/ (accessed15 November 2017).
  6. Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
    2014 “Conflict management in massive polylogues: A case study from YouTube.” Journal of Pragmatics73: 19–36. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  7. boyd, danah
    2010 “Social network sites as networked public: Affordances, dynamics and implications.” InNetworked Self: Identity, Community and Culture on Social Network Sites, ed. byZizi Papacharissi, 39–58. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Brody, Nicholas, and Vangelisti, Anita L.
    2016 “Bystander intervention in cyberbullying.” Communication Monographs83(1): 94–119. 10.1080/03637751.2015.1044256
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2015.1044256 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bruxelles, Sylvie, and Catherine Kerbrat-Orecchioni
    2004 “Coalitions in polylogues.” Journal of Pragmatics36: 75–113. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(03)00037‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00037-7 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cetinski, Andrej
    2013 “Zakaj kriza v Sloveniji ne pojenjuje.” Dnevnik, published on1June 2013 https://www.dnevnik.si/1042592326.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Champoux, Valerie, Julia Dugree, and Lauren McGlynn
    2012 “Corporate Facebook pages: when ‘fans’ attack.” Journal of Business Strategy22(2): 22–30. 10.1108/02756661211206717
    https://doi.org/10.1108/02756661211206717 [Google Scholar]
  12. Charles, Kerwin K., and Patrick Kline
    2001 “Love thy neighbor? – Carpooling, relational costs, and the production of social capital.” Working Paper. fordschool.umich.edu/research/papers/PDFfiles/01-010.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Christiaens, Jan
    2014 “Car use and ownership in Vienna declines, public transport benefits (Austria).” Eltis: The urban mobility observatory. www.eltis.org/discover/news/car-use-and-ownership-vienna-declines-public-transport-benefits-austria-0.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2011Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
  15. Danesi, Marcel
    2016The Semiotics of Emoji: The Rise of Visual Language in the Age of the Internet. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Dayter, Daria, and Sofia Rüdiger
    2014 “‘Speak your mind, but watch your mouth’: Complaints in CouchSurfing references.” InFace Work and Social Media, ed. byKristina Bedijs, Gudrun Held, and Christiane Maaß, 193–212. Münster: LIT Verlag GmbH.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Delaney, Tim
    2008Shameful Behaviours. Lanham: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Desivilya, Helena. S., and Dana Yagil
    2005 “The role of emotions in conflict management: The case of work teams.” International Journal of Conflict Management16(1): 55–69. 10.1108/eb022923
    https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022923 [Google Scholar]
  19. Dynel, Marta
    2012 “Swearing methodologically: The impoliteness of expletives in anonymous commentaries on YouTube.” Journal of English Studies10: 25–50. 10.18172/jes.179
    https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.179 [Google Scholar]
  20. Edwards, Derek
    2005 “Moaning, whinging and laughing: the subjective side of complaints.” Discourse Studies7 (1): 5–29. 10.1177/1461445605048765
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605048765 [Google Scholar]
  21. Garfinkel, Harold
    1956 “Conditions of successful degradation ceremonies.” American Journal of Sociology61(5): 420–424. 10.1086/221800
    https://doi.org/10.1086/221800 [Google Scholar]
  22. Georgakopoulou, Alexandra
    2004 “To tell or not to tell? Email stories between on- and offline interactions.” [email protected]1, article 1.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Gibson, James J.
    1979The Ecological Approach to Perception. London: Houghton Mifflin.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Goffman, Erving
    1967Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Garden City, N. Y.: Doubleday.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 1981Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Haugh, Michael, and Valeria Sinkeviciute
    2018 “Accusations and interpersonal conflict in televised multi-party interactions amongst speakers of (Argentinian and Peninsular) Spanish.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict6(2): 246–268. 10.1075/jlac.00012.hau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00012.hau [Google Scholar]
  27. Hernández-López, Maria de la O.
    2019 “What makes a positive experience? Offline/online communication and rapport enhancement in Airbnb positive reviews.” Pragmatics & Society10(2).
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Herring, Susan. C.
    2008 “Virtual community.” InEncyclopaedia of Qualitative Research Methods, ed. byLisa M. Given, 920–921. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Janicki, Karol
    2017 “What is conflict? What is aggression? Are these challenging questions?” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict5(1): 156–166. 10.1075/jlac.5.1.07jan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.5.1.07jan [Google Scholar]
  30. Kádár, Dániel Z.
    2017Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781107280465
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107280465 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kádár, Dániel Z., and Rosina Márquez Reiter
    2015 “(Im)politeness and (im)morality: Insights from intervention.” Journal of Politeness Research11(2): 239–260.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Labov, William
    1972Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Langlotz, Andreas, and Miriam Locher
    2012 “Ways of communicating emotional stance in online disagreements.” Journal of Pragmatics44(12): 1591–1606. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.04.002 [Google Scholar]
  34. Márquez Reiter, Rosina
    2005 “Complaint calls to a caregiver service company: The case of desahogo.” Intercultural Pragmatics2(4): 481–514.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 2009 “How to get rid of a telemarketing agent? Facework strategies in an intercultural service call.” InFace, Communication and Social Interaction, ed. byFrancesca Bargiela-Chiappini, and Michael Haugh, 55–77. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Márquez Reiter, Rosina, and Michael Haugh
    2018 “Denunciation, blame and the moral turn in public life.” Discourse, Context & Media. doi:  10.1016/j.dcm.2018.09.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  37. Márquez Reiter, Rosina, Sara Orthaber, and Dániel. Z. Kádár
    2015 “Disattending customer dissatisfaction on Facebook: A case study of a Slovenian public transport company.” InInternational Management and Intercultural Communication: A Collection of Case Studies, ed. byElizabeth Christopher, 108–127. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑47991‑4_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-47991-4_7 [Google Scholar]
  38. Meredith, Joanne
    2014 “Chatting online: Comparing spoken and online written interaction between friends.” PhD dissertation, Loughborough University.
  39. Nežmah, Bernard
    2011Kletvice in psovke [Curses and Swear-Words]. Ljubljana: Družba Piano d.o.o.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Orthaber, Sara
    2017 “(Im)politeness at a Slovenian call centre.” PhD dissertation, University of Surrey. epubs.surrey.ac.uk/813994/1/THESIS%20-%20Sara%20Orthaber%20-%20April%202017.pdf.
  41. Orthaber, Sara, and Rosina Márquez Reiter
    2011 “‘Talk to the hand’. Complaints to a public transport company.” Journal of Pragmatics43(15): 3860–3876. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.10.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.10.004 [Google Scholar]
  42. 2016 “When routine calls for information become interpersonally sensitive.” Pragmatics & Society7(4): 639–664. 10.1075/ps.7.4.06ort
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.7.4.06ort [Google Scholar]
  43. Sparks, Beverly A., and Victoria Browning
    2010 “Complaining in cyberspace: The motives and forms of hotel guests’ complaints online.” Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management19(7): 797–818. 10.1080/19368623.2010.508010
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2010.508010 [Google Scholar]
  44. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
    (ed.) 2000Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport Through Talk Across Cultures (1st edn.) London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. (ed.) 2008Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory (2nd edn.) London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Trosborg, Anna
    1995Interlanguage Pragmatics: Requests, Complaints and Apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110885286
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110885286 [Google Scholar]
  47. Vásquez, Camila
    2011 “Complaints online: The case of TripAdvisor.” Journal of Pragmatics43(6): 1707–1717. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.007 [Google Scholar]
  48. 2014 “‘Usually not one to complain but…’: Constructing identities in user-generated online reviews.” InThe Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Interneted. byPhillip Seargeant, and Caroline Tagg, 65–90. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137029317_4
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137029317_4 [Google Scholar]
  49. 2016 “Intertextuality and authorized transgression in parodies of online consumer reviews.” [email protected]13, article 6. www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2016/vaquez.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Wooffitt, Robin
    1992Telling Tales of the Unexpected. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00012.mar
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00012.mar
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): (im)politeness , moral indignation , relocalisation and social media
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error