“Ya bloody drongo!!!”

References

1. Aiken, Milam, and Bennie Waller
   2000 “Flaming among first-time group support system users.” Information & Management37(2): 95–100. 10.1016/S0378‑7206(99)00036‑1
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(99)00036-1 [Google Scholar]
2. Allan, Keith, and Kate Burridge
   2006 Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511617881
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617881 [Google Scholar]
3. Anderson, Benedict
   1991 Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London and New York: Verso.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Androutsopoulos, Jannis
   2006 “Introduction: Sociolinguistics and computer-mediated communication.” Journal of Sociolinguistics10 (4): 419–438. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2006.00286.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2006.00286.x [Google Scholar]
5. Angouri, Jo, and Theodora Tseliga
   2010 “‘You HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!’: From e-disagreement to e-impoliteness in two online fora.” Journal of Politeness Research6: 57–82. 10.1515/jplr.2010.004
   https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.004 [Google Scholar]
6. Åse, Cecilia
   2015 “Crisis narratives and masculinist protection.” International Feminist Journal of Politics17(4): 595–610. 10.1080/14616742.2015.1042296
   https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2015.1042296 [Google Scholar]
7. Beer, David
   2008 “Social network (ing) sites… revisiting the story so far: A response to danah boyd & Nicole Ellison.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication13(2): 516–529. 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2008.00408.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00408.x [Google Scholar]
8. Bernal, María
   2008 “Do insults always insult? Genuine impoliteness versus non-genuine impoliteness in colloquial Spanish.” Pragmatics18(4): 775–802. 10.1075/prag.18.4.10ber
   https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.18.4.10ber [Google Scholar]
9. Bieswanger, Markus
   2013 “Micro-linguistic structural features of computer-mediated communication.” InPragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication, ed. bySusan Herring, Dieter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen, 463–485. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214468.463
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214468.463 [Google Scholar]
10. Blackledge, Adrian
    2002 “The discursive construction of national identity in multilingual Britain.” Journal of Language, Identity & Education1(1): 67–87. 10.1207/S15327701JLIE0101_5
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327701JLIE0101_5 [Google Scholar]
11. Blommaert, Jan, and Jef Verschueren
    1998 Debating Diversity: Analysing the Discourse of Tolerance. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bolander, Brook
    2012 “Disagreements and agreements in personal/diary blogs: A closer look at responsiveness.” Journal of Pragmatics44(12): 1607–1622. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.008 [Google Scholar]
13. Boltanski, Luc, and Laurent Thévenot
    2000 “The reality of moral expectations: A sociology of situated judgement.” Philosophical Explorations3(3): 208–231. 10.1080/13869790008523332
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13869790008523332 [Google Scholar]
14. Bou-Franch, Patricia, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
    2012 “Social interaction in YouTube text-based polylogues: A study of coherence.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication17(4): 501–521. 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2012.01579.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01579.x [Google Scholar]
15. Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
    2018 “Relational work in multimodal networked interactions on Facebook.” Internet Pragmatics1(1): 134–160. 10.1075/ip.00007.bou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00007.bou [Google Scholar]
16. Bousfield, Derek
    2006 “The grand debate: Where next for politeness research?” Cultura, Lenguaje y Representación/Culture, Language and Representation3(3): 9–15.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Bousfield, Derek
    2008 Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.167
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.167 [Google Scholar]
18. boyd, danah m., and Nicole B. Ellison
    2008 “Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication13: 210–230. 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2007.00393.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x [Google Scholar]
19. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
20. Brem, Meagan J., Laura C. Spiller, and Michael A. Vandehey
    2015 “Online mate-retention tactics on Facebook are associated with relationship aggression.” Journal of interpersonal violence30(16): 2831–2850. 10.1177/0886260514554286
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514554286 [Google Scholar]
21. Chang, Yanrong
    2004 “Courtroom questioning as a culturally situated persuasive genre of talk.” Discourse & Society15 (6): 705–722. 10.1177/0957926504046501
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504046501 [Google Scholar]
22. Crystal, David
    2006 Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511487002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487002 [Google Scholar]
23. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2005 “Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakest Link.” Journal of Politeness Research1(1): 35–72. 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35 [Google Scholar]
24. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2011 Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
25. Danet, Brenda
    2013 “Flaming and linguistic impoliteness on a listserv.” InPragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication, ed. bySusan Herring, Dieter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen, 639–664. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214468.639
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214468.639 [Google Scholar]
26. Darics, Erika
    2010 “Politeness in computer-mediated discourse of a virtual team.” Journal of Politeness Research6: 129–150. 10.1515/jplr.2010.007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.007 [Google Scholar]
27. De Cillia, Rudolf, Martin Reisigl, and Ruth Wodak
    1999 “The discursive construction of national identities.” Discourse & Society10 (2): 149–173. 10.1177/0957926599010002002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010002002 [Google Scholar]
28. Dooley, Julian J., Jacek Pyżalski, and Donna Cross
    2009 “Cyberbullying versus face-to-face bullying: A theoretical and conceptual review.” Zeitschrift für Psychologie217(4): 182–188. 10.1027/0044‑3409.217.4.182
    https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.182 [Google Scholar]
29. Dynel, Marta
    2012 “Swearing methodologically: The (im)politeness of expletives in anonymous commentaries on YouTube.” Journal of English studies10: 25–50. 10.18172/jes.179
    https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.179 [Google Scholar]
30. Dynel, Marta
    2016 “‘Trolling is not stupid’: Internet trolling as the art of deception serving entertainment.” Intercultural Pragmatics13(3): 353–381. 10.1515/ip‑2016‑0015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2016-0015 [Google Scholar]
31. Dynel, Marta
    2017 “Participation as audience design.” InPragmatics of Social Media, ed. byChristian R. Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 61–82. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110431070‑003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431070-003 [Google Scholar]
32. Edwards, Derek
    2000 “Extreme case formulations: Softeners, investment, and doing nonliteral.” Research on Language and Social Interaction33(4): 347–373. 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3304_01
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3304_01 [Google Scholar]
33. Eisenlauer, Volker
    2017 “Social network sites/Facebook.” InPragmatics of Social Media, ed. byChristian R. Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 225–242. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110431070‑009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431070-009 [Google Scholar]
34. Ellison, Nicole B., Charles Steinfield, and Cliff Lampe
    2007 “The benefits of Facebook ‘friends’: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication12(4): 1143–1168. 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2007.00367.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x [Google Scholar]
35. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
    2010 “The YouTubification of politics, impoliteness and polarization.” InHandbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction, ed. byRotimi Taiwo, 540–563. Hershey: IGI Global. 10.4018/978‑1‑61520‑773‑2.ch035
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-773-2.ch035 [Google Scholar]
36. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus, and Patricia Bou-Franch
    2013 “Relational work in anonymous, asynchronous communication: A study of (dis)affiliation in YouTube.” InResearch Trends in Intercultural Pragmatics, ed. byIstvan Kecskes, and Jesus Romero-Trillo, 343–366. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781614513735.343
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614513735.343 [Google Scholar]
37. Georgakopoulou, Alexandra
    2006 “Postscript: Computer-mediated communication in sociolinguistics.” Journal of Sociolinguistics10(4): 548–557. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2006.00292.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2006.00292.x [Google Scholar]
38. Graham, Sage Lambert
    2007 “Disagreeing to agree: Conflict, (im)politeness and identity in a computer-mediated community.” Journal of Pragmatics39(4): 742–759. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.017 [Google Scholar]
39. Graham, Sage L., and Claire Hardaker
    2017 “(Im)politeness in digital communication.” InPalgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ed. byJonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 785–814. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑37508‑7_30
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_30 [Google Scholar]
40. Gramsci, Antonio
    1971 Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. New York: International Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Greene, Joshua, and Jonathan Haidt
    2002 “How (and where) does moral judgment work?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences6(12): 517–523. 10.1016/S1364‑6613(02)02011‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)02011-9 [Google Scholar]
42. Haidt, Jonathan, and Selin Kesebir
    2010 “Morality.” InHandbook of Social Psychology, ed. bySusan T. Fiske, Daniel T. Gilbert, and Gardner Lindzey, 797–852. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley. 10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002022
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002022 [Google Scholar]
43. Hall, Stuart
    1990 “Cultural identity and diaspora.” InIdentity: Community, Culture, Difference, ed. byJonathan Rutherford, 222–237. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Hampel, Elisabeth
    2015 “‘Mama Zimbi, pls help me!’: Gender differences in (im) politeness in Ghanaian English advice-giving on Facebook.” Journal of Politeness Research11(1): 99–130. 10.1515/pr‑2015‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2015-0005 [Google Scholar]
45. Hardaker, Claire
    2015 “An overview of responses to (perceived) trolling.” Corpora10(2): 201–229. 10.3366/cor.2015.0074
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2015.0074 [Google Scholar]
46. Hardaker, Claire, and Mark McGlashan
    2016 “‘Real men don’t hate women’: Twitter rape threats and group identity.” Journal of Pragmatics91: 80–93. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.11.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.11.005 [Google Scholar]
47. Haugh, Michael
    2010 “When is an email really offensive?: Argumentativity and variability in evaluations of impoliteness.” Journal of Politeness Research6: 7–31. 10.1515/jplr.2010.002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.002 [Google Scholar]
48. Haugh, Michael
    2015 “Impoliteness and taking offence in initial interactions.” Journal of Pragmatics86: 36–42. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.018
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.018 [Google Scholar]
49. Herring, Susan C.
    2000 “Gender differences in CMC: Findings and implications.” CPSR Newsletter18(1). cpsr.org/issues/womenintech/herring.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Herring, Susan, Dieter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen
    2013 “Introduction to the pragmatics of computer-mediated communication.” InPragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication, ed. bySusan Herring, Dieter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen, 3–32. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214468
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214468 [Google Scholar]
51. Huebner, Bryce, Susan Dwyer, and Marc Hauser
    2008 “The role of emotion in moral psychology.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences13(1): 1–6. 10.1016/j.tics.2008.09.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.09.006 [Google Scholar]
52. Huffaker, David A., and Sandra L. Calvert
    2005 “Gender, identity, and language use in teenage blogs.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication10(2). 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2005.tb00238.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00238.x [Google Scholar]
53. Kádár, Dániel Z.
    2017 Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781107280465
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107280465 [Google Scholar]
54. Kádár, Dániel Z., and Rosina Márquez-Reiter
    2015 “(Im)politeness and (im)morality: Insights from intervention.” Journal of Politeness Research11(2): 239–260.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Kádár, Dániel Z., Michael Haugh, and Wei-Lin Melody Chang
    2013 “Aggression and perceived national face threats in Mainland Chinese and Taiwanese CMC discussion boards.” Multilingua32(3): 343–372. 10.1515/multi‑2013‑0016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2013-0016 [Google Scholar]
56. Kalman, Yoram M., and Darren Gergle
    2014 “Letter repetitions in computer-mediated communication: A unique link between spoken and online language.” Computers in Human Behavior34: 187–193. 10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.047
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.047 [Google Scholar]
57. Kaul, Asha, and Vaibhavi Kulkarni
    2010 “Gender and politeness in Indian emails.” InThe Handbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction, ed. byRotimi Taiwo, 389–410. Hershey: IGI Global. 10.4018/978‑1‑61520‑773‑2.ch025
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-773-2.ch025 [Google Scholar]
58. Kleinke, Sonja, and Birte Bös
    2015 “Intergroup rudeness and the metapragmatics of its negotiation in online discussion fora.” Pragmatics25(1): 47–71. 10.1075/prag.25.1.03kle
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.25.1.03kle [Google Scholar]
59. Landert, Daniela
    2017 “Participation as user involvement.” InPragmatics of Social Media, ed. byChristian R. Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 31–59. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110431070‑002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431070-002 [Google Scholar]
60. Lea, Martin, Russell Spears, and Daphne de Groot
    2001 “Knowing me, knowing you: Anonymity effects on social identity processes within groups.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin27(5): 526–537. 10.1177/0146167201275002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201275002 [Google Scholar]
61. Locher, Miriam A., Brook Bolander, and Nicole Höhn
    2015 “Introducing relational work in Facebook and discussion boards.” Pragmatics25(1): 1–21. 10.1075/prag.25.1.01loc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.25.1.01loc [Google Scholar]
62. Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, and Patricia Bou-Franch
    2011 “On-line polylogues and impoliteness: The case of postings sent in response to the Obama Reggaeton YouTube video.” Journal of Pragmatics43(10): 2578–2593. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.005 [Google Scholar]
63. Magistro, Elena
    2011 “National face and national face threatening acts: politeness and the European constitution.” InSituated Politeness, ed. byBethan L. Davies, Michael Haugh, and Andrew John Merrison, 232–252. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen
    2013 ““Just click ‘Like’”: Computer-mediated responses to Spanish compliments.” Journal of Pragmatics51: 47–67. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.03.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.03.003 [Google Scholar]
65. Mak, Bernie Chun Nam, and Hin Leung Chui
    2014 “Impoliteness in Facebook status updates: Strategic talk among colleagues ‘outside’ the workplace.” Text & Talk34(2): 165–185. 10.1515/text‑2013‑0042
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2013-0042 [Google Scholar]
66. Mak, Bernie Chun Nam, and Carmen Lee
    2015 “Swearing is e-business: Expletives in instant messaging in Hong Kong workplaces.” InDigital Business Discourse, ed. byErika Darics, 122–141. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Mak, Bernie Chun Nam, and Erika Darics
    2017 “Swearing and instant messaging: Changing norms of social interaction in the Hong Kong workplace context.” InAdvances in Swearing Research: New languages and New Contexts, ed. byKristy Beers Fägersten, and Karyn Stapleton, 43–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.282.03mak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.282.03mak [Google Scholar]
68. Markman, Kris M.
    2013 “Conversational coherence in small group chat.” InPragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication, ed. bySusan Herring, Dieter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen, 539–564. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214468.539
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214468.539 [Google Scholar]
69. Mateo, José, and Francisco Yus
    2013 “Towards a cross-cultural pragmatic taxonomy of insults.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict1(1): 87–114. 10.1075/jlac.1.1.05mat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.1.1.05mat [Google Scholar]
70. Mills, Sara
    2002 “Rethinking politeness, impoliteness and gender identity.” InGender Identity and Discourse Analysis, ed. byLia Litosseliti, and Jane Sunderland, 69–89. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.2.04mil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.2.04mil [Google Scholar]
71. Neurauter-Kessels, Manuela
    2011 “Im/polite reader responses on British online news sites.” Journal of Politeness Research7(2): 187–214. 10.1515/jplr.2011.010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2011.010 [Google Scholar]
72. Nishimura, Yukiko
    2010 “Impoliteness in Japanese BBS interactions: Observations from message exchanges in two online communities.” Journal of Politeness Research6(1): 35–55. 10.1515/jplr.2010.003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.003 [Google Scholar]
73. O’Driscoll, Jim
    2013 “Situational transformations: The offensive-izing of an email message and the public-ization of offensiveness.” Pragmatics and Society4(3): 369–387. 10.1075/ps.4.3.05odr
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.4.3.05odr [Google Scholar]
74. O’Sullivan, Patrick B., and Andrew J. Flanagin
    2003 “Reconceptualizing ‘flaming’and other problematic messages.” New Media & Society5(1): 69–94. 10.1177/1461444803005001908
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444803005001908 [Google Scholar]
75. Pabian, Sara, Charlotte J. S. De Backer, and Heidi Vandebosch
    2015 “Dark Triad personality traits and adolescent cyber-aggression.” Personality and Individual Differences75: 41–46. 10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.015 [Google Scholar]
76. Panyametheekul, Siriporn, and Susan C. Herring
    2003 “Gender and turn allocation in a Thai chat room.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication9(1). 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2003.tb00362.x.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2003.tb00362.x [Google Scholar]
77. Parvaresh, Vahid, and Tahmineh Tayebi
    2018 “Impoliteness, aggression and the moral order.” Journal of Pragmatics132: 91–107. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.010 [Google Scholar]
78. Planchenault, Gaëlle
    2010 “Virtual community and politeness: The use of female markers of identity and solidarity in a transvestites’ website.” Journal of Politeness Research6(1): 83–103. 10.1515/jplr.2010.005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.005 [Google Scholar]
79. Pomerantz, Anita
    1986 “Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims.” Human Studies9(2): 219–229. 10.1007/BF00148128
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148128 [Google Scholar]
80. Prinz, Jesse
    2006 “The emotional basis of moral judgments.” Philosophical Explorations9(1): 29–43. 10.1080/13869790500492466
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13869790500492466 [Google Scholar]
81. Rachoene, Matjorie, and Toks Oyedemi
    2015 “From self-expression to social aggression: Culture among South African youth on Facebook.” Communicatio41(3): 302–319. 10.1080/02500167.2015.1093325
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02500167.2015.1093325 [Google Scholar]
82. Reicher, Stephen D., Russell Spears, and Tom Postmes
    1995 “A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena.” European Review of Social Psychology6(1): 161–198. 10.1080/14792779443000049
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779443000049 [Google Scholar]
83. Sacks, Harvey
    1987 “On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation.” InTalk and Social Organisation, ed. byGraham Button, and John R. E. Lee, 54–69. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
84. Schiffrin, Deborah
    1984 “Jewish argument as sociability.” Language in Society13(3): 311–335. 10.1017/S0047404500010526
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500010526 [Google Scholar]
85. Shifman, Limor
    2013 “Memes in a digital world: Reconciling with a conceptual troublemaker”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication18: 362–377. 10.1111/jcc4.12013
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12013 [Google Scholar]
86. Shum, Winnie, and Cynthia Lee
    2013 “(Im)politeness and disagreement in two Hong Kong Internet discussion forums.” Journal of Pragmatics50(1): 52–83. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.01.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.01.010 [Google Scholar]
87. Sinkeviciute, Valeria
    2015 “‘There’s definitely gonna be some serious carnage in this house’ or how to be genuinely impolite in Big Brother UK.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict3(2): 317–348. 10.1075/jlac.3.2.04sin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.3.2.04sin [Google Scholar]
88. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
    2002 “Managing rapport in talk: Using rapport sensitive incidents to explore the motivational concerns underlying the management of relations.” Journal of Pragmatics34 (5): 529–545. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)00039‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00039-X [Google Scholar]
89. Taylor, Charlotte
    2016 Mock Politeness in English and Italian: A Corpus-Assisted Metalanguage Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.267
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.267 [Google Scholar]
90. Thurlow, Crispin, and Michele Poff
    2013 “Text messaging.” InPragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication, ed. bySusan Herring, Dieter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen, 163–189. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214468.163
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214468.163 [Google Scholar]
91. Turnage, Anna K.
    2008 “Email flaming behaviors and organizational conflict.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication13(1): 43–59. 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2007.00385.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00385.x [Google Scholar]
92. Upadhyay, Shiv R.
    2010 “Identity and impoliteness in computer-mediated reader responses.” Journal of Politeness Research6: 105–127. 10.1515/jplr.2010.006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.006 [Google Scholar]
93. Watts, Richard J.
    2003 Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615184
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184 [Google Scholar]