1887
Volume 1, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2542-3851
  • E-ISSN: 2542-386X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In recent years, eSports, online gaming, and live computer game streaming have grown into a global, multi-million dollar industry. In the context of online gaming, however, there is a prevailing (Kádár 2017) that allows and perhaps even encourages impoliteness against female gamers, positioning them as inferior, unwelcome, or peripheral. Drawing from a corpus of over 150 hours of live game streams and concurrent open-forum chat, this paper identifies rituals and tropes (such as spam and banter) that reinforce gendered practices as they relate to the moral order in the online gaming setting. It then explores strategies used by one female gamer to manipulate the expectations of the online gaming medium and its hegemonic notions of femininity. In this way, she can resist a moral order which positions her as disempowered, and thereby gain social capital within the community.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00014.lam
2019-01-10
2019-10-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Brehm, Audrey
    2013 “Navigating the feminine in massive multiplayer online games: Gender in World of Warcraft.” Frontiers in Psychology4 (Article 903): 1–12. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00903
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00903 [Google Scholar]
  2. Cote, Amanda C.
    2017 “‘I can defend myself’: Women’s strategies for coping with harassment while gaming online.” Games and Culture12(2): 136–155. 10.1177/1555412015587603
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412015587603 [Google Scholar]
  3. D’Anastacio, Cecilia
    2016 “The mum who moderates her daughter’s Rowdy Twitch chat.” Kotaku UK. www.kotaku.co.uk/2016/07/28/the-mum-who-moderates-her-daughters-rowdy-twitch-chat (accessed8 January 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Eckert, Penelope, and Sally McConnell-Ginet
    1992 “Communities of practice: Where language, gender and power all live.” InLocating Power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference, ed. byKira Hall, Mary Buchholtz, and Birch Moonwomon, 89–99. Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group, University of California.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ensslin, Astrid
    2012The Language of Gaming. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑0‑230‑35708‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-35708-2 [Google Scholar]
  6. Entertainment Software Association
    Entertainment Software Association 2017 “Essential facts about the computer and video game industry.” www.theesa.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/EF2017_FinalDigital.pdf (accessed2 February 2018).
  7. Gee, John P.
    2015Unified Discourse Analysis: Language, Reality, Virtual Worlds, and Video Games. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Graham, Sage L.
    2008 “A manual for impoliteness?: The impact of the FAQ in an electronic community of practice.” InImpoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. byDerek Bousfield, and Miriam A. Locher, 281–304. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 2016 “Relationality, friendship and identity.” InRoutledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. byAlexandra Georgakopoulou, and Tereza Spilioti, 305–320. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 2017 “Politeness and impoliteness.” InPragmatics of Social Media, ed. byChristian R. Hoffman, and Wolfram Bublitz, 459–491. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110431070‑017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431070-017 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2019 “Interaction and conflict in digital communication.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Conflict, ed. byLeslie Jeffries, and Jim O’Driscoll. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Graham, Sage L., and Scott Dutt
    2019 “‘Watch the potty mouth’: Negotiating impoliteness in online gaming.” InApproaches to Videogame Discourse: Lexis, Interaction, Textuality, ed. byAstrid Ensslin, and Isabel Balteiro. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gray, Kishonna L.
    2012 “Intersecting oppressions and online communities: Examining the experiences of women of color in Xbox Live.” Information, Communication and Society15(3): 411–428. 10.1080/1369118X.2011.642401
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.642401 [Google Scholar]
  14. Heyd, Teresa
    2013 “Email hoaxes.” InPragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication, ed. bySusan Herring, Deiter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen, 387–410. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214468.387
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214468.387 [Google Scholar]
  15. Kádár, Dániel Z.
    2017Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781107280465
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107280465 [Google Scholar]
  16. Lavé, Jean, and Ettienne Wenger
    1991Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511815355
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355 [Google Scholar]
  17. Locher, Miriam A.
    2013 “Relational work and interpersonal pragmatics.” Journal of Pragmatics58: 138–151. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.09.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.09.014 [Google Scholar]
  18. Locher, Miriam, and Sage L. Graham
    2010 “Introduction to interpersonal pragmatics.” InInterpersonal Pragmatics, ed. byMiriam A. Locher, and Sage L. Graham, 1–13. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214338.1.225
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214338.1.225 [Google Scholar]
  19. Locher, Miriam A., and Richard J. Watts
    2005 “Politeness theory and relational work.” Journal of Politeness Research1(1): 9–33. 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2008 “Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating norms of linguistic behaviour.” InImpoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. byDerek Bousfield, and Miriam A. Locher, 77–99. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110208344
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208344 [Google Scholar]
  21. Maher, Brenden
    2016 “Can a video game company tame toxic behavior?” Nature531: 568–571. 10.1038/531568a
    https://doi.org/10.1038/531568a [Google Scholar]
  22. Marsden, Elizabeth, and Daniel Z. Kádár
    2017 “The pragmatics of mimesis: A case study of intercultural email communication.” Scandinavian Journal of Intercultural Theory and Practice4(1): 1–29. 10.7577/fleks.2434
    https://doi.org/10.7577/fleks.2434 [Google Scholar]
  23. Massanari, Adrienne
    2017 “#Gamergate and The Fappening: How Reddit’s algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures.” New Media and Society19(3): 329–346. 10.1177/1461444815608807
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815608807 [Google Scholar]
  24. Murphy, Meghan
    2015 “Anita Sarkeesian’s new video takes on male entitlement.” Feminist Current. https://www.feministcurrent.com/2015/09/08/anita-sarkeesians-new-video-takes-on-male-entitlement/ (accessed9 February 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Newon, Lisa
    2011 “Multimodal creativity and identities of expertise in the digital ecology of a World of Warcraft guild.” InDigital Discourse: Language in the New Media, ed. byCrispin Thurlow, and Kristine Mroczek, 131–153. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.003.0007
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
  26. 2016 “Online multiplayer games.” InRoutledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. byAlexandra Georgakopoulou, and Tereza Spilioti, 289–304. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Ong, Walter J.
    1981Fighting for Life: Contest, Sexuality, and Consciousness. Ithica, NY: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Patrick, Aston
    2018 “Ur so hawt: The presentation of gender in online streaming.” Quaesitum Undergraduate Research Journal5: 162–191.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Riot Games
    Riot Games 2015–2017League of Legends. Los Angeles: Riot Games, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Rockstar
    Rockstar 1997–2009Grand Theft Auto. New York: Rockstar Games.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Salter, Michael
    2018 “From geek masculinity to Gamergate: the technological rationality of online abuse.” Crime Media Culture14(2): 247–264. 10.1177/1741659017690893
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659017690893 [Google Scholar]
  32. Salter, Anastasia, and Bridget Blodgett
    2017Toxic Geek Masculinity in Media: Sexism, Trolling, and Identity Policing. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑66077‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66077-6 [Google Scholar]
  33. Sarkar, Patricia
    2014 “Business of being a female gamer.” Geeks. https://geeks.media/business-of-being-a-female-gamer (accessed8 January 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Sarkeesian, Anita
    2016 “All the slender ladies: Body diversity in video games.” https://feministfrequency.com/video/all-the-slender-ladies-body-diversity-in-video-games (accessed1 April 2018).
  35. Shaw, Adrienne
    2011 “Do you identify as a gamer? Gender, race, sexuality, and gamer identity.” New Media and Society14(1): 28–44. 10.1177/1461444811410394
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811410394 [Google Scholar]
  36. Tannen, Deborah
    2002 “Agonism in academic discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics34: 1651–1669. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00079‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00079-6 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00014.lam
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00014.lam
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): computer-mediated communication , digital communication , gender , impoliteness , moral order and multimodal
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error