1887
Volume 1, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2542-3851
  • E-ISSN: 2542-386X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper overviews the phenomenon of the meta-conventionalisation of interpersonal practices in the context of computer-mediated communication. The term ‘meta-conventionalisation’ refers to the coding of the conventional interpersonal practices of a particular group, or various groups, in the form of entertainment as films and novels. The word ‘meta’ refers to the fact that such pieces of artwork narrate a set of conventional practices from a quasi-observer point of view, without involving their audience in these practices as language users – in this sense they are different from good practice guides (typically described as ‘netiquette, in the context of e-pragmatics), which assume that readers will internalise the practices they describe. Meta-conventionalisation has been an understudied phenomenon, in spite of representing an important aspect of our daily lives. We illustrate how this phenomenon operates by examining a Japanese case study: a popular novel which features the online interactions of a group of otaku, that is, asocial young people who lock themselves up and interact in highly specific ways.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00016.kad
2019-01-10
2019-10-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aida, Miho
    2005 “Otaku o meguru gensetsu no kousei: 1983nen-2005nen sabu karuchaa shi.” [Constituents of remarks on otaku: History of sub-culture 1983–2005]. Hiroshima Shudai Ronshu46: 17–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brooks, Max
    2012World War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie War. London: Cuckworth Overlook.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bucholtz, Mary
    1999 “‘Why to be normal?’: Language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls.” Language in Society28(2): 203–223. 10.1017/S0047404599002043
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404599002043 [Google Scholar]
  4. Calhoun, Cheshire
    2009 “What good is commitment?” Ethics: An International Journal of Social, Political, and Legal Philosophy119(4): 613–641. 10.1086/605564
    https://doi.org/10.1086/605564 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cook, Haruko
    2008Socializing Identities through Speech Styles: Learners of Japanese as a Foreign Language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847691026
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691026 [Google Scholar]
  6. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2010 “Conventionalised impoliteness formulae.” Journal of Pragmatics42: 3232–3245. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.007 [Google Scholar]
  7. Culpeper, Jonathan, and Jane Demmen
    2011 “”Nineteenth century English politeness: Negative politeness, conventional indirect requests and the rise of the individual self.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics12(1/2): 49–81. 10.1075/jhp.12.1‑2.03cul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.03cul [Google Scholar]
  8. Danet, Brenda, Susan C. Herring
    2007 “Introduction: Welcome to the multilingual Internet.” InThe Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture and Communication Online, ed. byBrenda Danet, and Susan C. Herring, 3–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195304794.003.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195304794.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
    2010 “A genre approach to the study of im-politeness.” International Review of Pragmatics2(1): 46–94. 10.1163/187731010X491747
    https://doi.org/10.1163/187731010X491747 [Google Scholar]
  10. Goffman, Erving
    1981Forms of Talk. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Graham, Sage Lambert
    2008 “A manual for (im)politeness?: The impact of the FAQ in an electronic community of practice.” InImpoliteness in Language: Studies on Its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. byDerek Bousfield, and Miriam A. Locher, 281–304. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hirai, Tomohisa
    2007 “channeru no komyunikeeshon ni kansuru kousatsu: intaa netto to senron keisei ni kansuru giron e no hihan.” [Communication in ‘2 Channel’: A critical approach to the internet and public opinion arguments]. Media Communication57: 163–174.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Holt, Richard
    2004Dialogue on the Internet: Language, Civic Identity, and Computer-mediated Communication. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hung, David W. L., and Maich Nichani
    2000 “Constructivism and e-learning: Balancing between the individual and social levels of cognition.” InNew ‘Literacies’: Educational Response to a Knowledge-based Society: Proceedings of the ERA-AME-AMIC Joint Conference 2000, ed. byJessie Ee, Berinderjeet Kaur, Ngan Hoe Lee, and Yeap Ban Har, 144–150. Singapore: Educational Research Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Inoue, Ippei
    2006 “Netto shakai no wakamono kotoba.” [Youth language in network society]. Gengo [Language] 35(3): 60–67.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Jucker, Andreas H.
    2008 “Historical pragmatics.” Language and Linguistics Compass2(5): 894–906. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2008.00087.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00087.x [Google Scholar]
  17. 2014 “Courtesy and politeness in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight.” Studia Anglica Posnaniensia: The Journal of Adam Mickiewicz University49(3): 5–28. 10.1515/stap‑2015‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/stap-2015-0007 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kádár, Dániel Z.
    2013Relational Rituals and Communication: Ritual Interaction in Groups. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230393059
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230393059 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2017Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781107280465
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107280465 [Google Scholar]
  20. forthcoming. The Language of Ritual. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kádár, Dániel Z., and Marcel Bax
    2013 “In-group ritual and relational work.” Journal of Pragmatics58: 73–86. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.03.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.03.011 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kádár, Dániel Z., and Michael Haugh
    2013Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139382717
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139382717 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kádár, Dániel Z., Michael Haugh, and Melody Wei-Lin Chang
    2013 “Aggression and perceived national face threats in Mainland Chinese and Taiwanese discussion boards.” Multilingua32(3): 343–372. 10.1515/multi‑2013‑0016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2013-0016 [Google Scholar]
  24. Katsuno, Hirofumi, and Christine Yano
    2007 “ Kaomoji and expressivity in a Japanese housewives’ chat room.” InThe Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture and Communication Online, ed. byBrenda Danet, and Susan C. Herring, 278–300. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195304794.003.0012
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195304794.003.0012 [Google Scholar]
  25. Locher, Miriam. A.
    2010 “Introduction: Politeness and impoliteness in computer-mediated communication.” Journal of Politeness Research6: 1–5. 10.1515/jplr.2010.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.001 [Google Scholar]
  26. Marsden, Liz, and Dániel Z. Kádár
    2017 “The pragmatics of mimesis: A case study of intercultural email communication.” FLEKS: The Scandinavian Journal of Intercultural Theory and Practice4(1): 1–29. 10.7577/fleks.2434
    https://doi.org/10.7577/fleks.2434 [Google Scholar]
  27. McIntosh, Janet
    2009 “Stance and distance: Social boundaries, self-lamination, and metalinguistic anxiety in white Kenyan narratives about African occult.” InStance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, ed. byAlexandra Jaffe, 72–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
  28. Miller, Laura
    2004 “You are doing Burriko! Censoring/scrutinizing artificers of cute femininity in Japanese.” InJapanese Language, Gender, and Ideology: Cultural Models and Real People, ed. byShigeko Okamoto, and Janet Shibamoto-Smith, 148–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Morrow, Phillip R.
    2012 “Online advice in Japanese: Giving advice in an Internet discussion board.” InAdvice in Discourse, ed by. Holger Limberg, and Miriam A. Locher, 255–280. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.221.16mor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.221.16mor [Google Scholar]
  30. Nishimura, Yukiko
    2003a “Establishing a community of practice on the internet: Linguistic behavior in online Japanese communication.” InProceedings of the Twenty-ninth Meeting of the Berkley Linguistics Society, ed. byPawel M. Nowak, David Mortensen, and Corey Yoquelet, 337–348. Berkeley, CA: Berkley Linguistics Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 2003b “Linguistic innovations and interactional features of casual online communication in Japanese.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication9(1). jcmc.indiana.edu/vol9/issue1/nishimura.html (accessed17 May 2017). 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2003.tb00356.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2003.tb00356.x [Google Scholar]
  32. 2007 “Linguistic innovations and interactional features in Japanese BBS communication.” InThe Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture and Communication Online, ed. byBrenda Danet, and Susan C. Herring, 163–183. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195304794.003.0007
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195304794.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2008 “Japanese BBS websites as online communication: (Im)politeness perspectives.” Language @Internet5. www.language@internet.de (accessed3 March 2017).
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 2010a “Impoliteness in Japanese BBS interactions: Observations from message exchanges in two online communities.” Journal of Politeness Research6(1): 33–55. 10.1515/jplr.2010.003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.003 [Google Scholar]
  35. 2010b “Linguistic and sociocultural studies of Japanese computer-mediated communication: A literature review.” Toyogakuen University Kiyo18: 329–345.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Ohta, Amy Synder
    1999 “Interactional routines and the socialization of interactional style in adult learners of Japanese.” Journal of Pragmatics31(11): 1493–1512. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00115‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00115-5 [Google Scholar]
  37. Okamoto, Shigeko
    2016 “Variability and multiplicity in the meanings of stereotpyical gendered speech in Japanese.” East Asian Pragmatics1(1): 5-37. 10.1558/eap.v1i1.28747
    https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.v1i1.28747 [Google Scholar]
  38. Okamoto, Takeshi
    2014 “Otaku tourism and the anime pilgrimage in Japan.” Japan Forum27(1): 12–36. 10.1080/09555803.2014.962565
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09555803.2014.962565 [Google Scholar]
  39. Paternoster, Annick
    2015Cortesi e scortesi. Percorsi di pragmatica storica da Castiglione a Collodi. Rome: Carocci.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Pérez-Sabater, Carmen
    2012 “The linguistics of social networking: A study of writing conventions of Facebook.” Linguistik Online56(6). https://bop.unibe.ch/linguistik-online/article/view/257/347.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Planchenault, Gaëlle
    2010 “Virtual community and politeness: The use of female markers identity and solidarity in a transvestites’ website.” Journal of Politeness Research6(1): 83–104. 10.1515/jplr.2010.005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.005 [Google Scholar]
  42. Scheuermann, Larry, and Gary Taylor
    1997 “Netiquette.” Internet Research7(4): 269–273. 10.1108/10662249710187268
    https://doi.org/10.1108/10662249710187268 [Google Scholar]
  43. Spencer-Oatey, Helen, and Dániel Z. Kádár
    2016 “The bases of (im)politeness evaluations: Culture, the moral order and the East-West debate.” East Asian Pragmatics1(1): 73–106. 10.1558/eap.v1i1.29084
    https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.v1i1.29084 [Google Scholar]
  44. Terkourafi, Marina
    2001 “Politeness in Cypriot Greek: A frame-based approach.” Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge.
  45. Terkourafi, Marina, and Dániel Z. Kádár
    2017 “Convention and ritual (im)politeness.” The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic Politeness, ed. byJonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 171–195. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑37508‑7_8
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_8 [Google Scholar]
  46. Tobin, Joseph
    1998 “An American otaku (or a boy’s virtual life on the net).” InDigital Diversions: Youth Culture in the Age of Multimedia, ed. byJulian Sefton-Green, 106–127. London: University College of London Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Wenger, Etienne
    1998Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511803932
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932 [Google Scholar]
  48. Wuthnow, Robert
    1989Meaning and Moral Order: Explorations in Cultural Analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Whyte, William F.
    (ed.) 1991Participatory Action Research. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781412985383
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985383 [Google Scholar]
  50. Yokoya, Sumikazu
    2006 “‘Densha otoko’ de yomi toku intaa netto komyunikeeshon.” [A sociological study of the Internet communication on Densha otoko]. Sugiyama Jogakuen University Kenkyu Ronshuu37: 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00016.kad
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00016.kad
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error