1887
Volume 2, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2542-3851
  • E-ISSN: 2542-386X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article examines a corpus of private text messages collected in Birmingham and surrounding towns in 2015. We look specifically at pragmatic roles played by the vocatives we find in the corpus. Since text messages are sent to targeted recipients, vocatives are structurally redundant, and we review literature concerning vocatives in spoken and written data to first see what categories others have proposed for these functions. We then challenge some of these categorisations, identifying a new category of ‘focuser’ which we argue is akin to a summons in spoken language. We also examine the pragmatic value of vocatives in performing identity work for both sender and receiver. We finish by looking at gendered performance of identity as a case study in our corpus of how text producers construct themselves and others.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00024.asp
2019-05-20
2019-10-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Androutsopoulos, Jannis, and Andreas Staehr
    2018 “Moving methods online: Researching digital language practices.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Superdiversity, ed. byAngela Creese, and Adrian Blackledge, 118–132. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315696010‑10
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315696010-10 [Google Scholar]
  2. Astruc-Aguilera, Lluisa
    2005 “The form and function of extra-sentential elements.” Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics2: 1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baron, Naomi
    2008Always On: Language in an Online and Mobile World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195313055.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195313055.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bell, Allan
    1984 “Language style as audience design.” Language in Society13(2): 145–204. 10.1017/S004740450001037X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001037X [Google Scholar]
  5. boyd, danah
    2001 “Sexing the Internet: Reflections on the role of identification in online communities.” Paper presented at theconference ‘Sexualities, Medias, Technologies’, University of Surrey, 21-22 June 2001. citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.58.4412&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed12 December 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. boyd, danah, and Alice E. Marwick
    2011 “I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience.” New Media & Society13(1): 114–133. 10.1177/1461444810365313
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313 [Google Scholar]
  7. Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan
    1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cameron, Deborah
    Cameron, Deborah 1995Verbal Hygiene. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Church, Karen, and Rodrigo de Oliveira
    2013 “What’s up with WhatsApp?: Comparing mobile instant messaging behaviors with traditional SMS.” InProceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI ’13), 352–361. New York: ACM Publications. 10.1145/2493190.2493225
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2493190.2493225 [Google Scholar]
  10. Clark, Herbert H., and Thomas B. Carlson
    1982 “Hearers and speech acts.” Language58(2): 332–373. 10.1353/lan.1982.0042
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1982.0042 [Google Scholar]
  11. Creese, Angela, and Adrian Blackledge
    2010 “Translanguaging in the bilingual classroom: A pedagogy for learning and teaching?” The Modern Language Journal94: 103–115. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2009.00986.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00986.x [Google Scholar]
  12. Danesi, Marcel
    2017The Semiotics of Emoji: The Rise of Visual Language in the Age of the Internet. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Darics, Erika
    2013 “Non-verbal signalling in digital discourse: the case of letter repetition.” Discourse, Context and Media2(3): 141–148. 10.1016/j.dcm.2013.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2013.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  14. 2014 “The blurring boundaries between synchronicity and asynchronicity: New communicative situations in work-related instant messaging.” International Journal of Business Communication51(4): 337–358. 10.1177/2329488414525440
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488414525440 [Google Scholar]
  15. Davies, Bronwyn, and Rom Harré
    1990 “Positioning: The discursive production of selves.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour20(1): 43–63. 10.1111/j.1468‑5914.1990.tb00174.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x [Google Scholar]
  16. Eckert, Penny
    1995 “Gender and sociolinguistic variation.” InLanguage and Gender: A Reader, ed. byJennifer Coates, 64–77. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Frobenius, Maximiliane
    2014 “Audience design in monologues: How vloggers involve their viewers.” Journal of Pragmatics72: 59–72. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.008 [Google Scholar]
  18. Georgakopoulou, Alexandra
    1997 “Self-presentation and interactional alliances in e-mail discourse: the style and code-switches of Greek messages.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics7(2): 141–164. 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.1997.tb00112.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.1997.tb00112.x [Google Scholar]
  19. Gillies, William
    1993 “Scottish Gaelic.” InThe Celtic Languages, ed. byMartin Ball, 230–304. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Goffman, Erving
    1975 “Replies and responses.” Language in Society5: 257–313. 10.1017/S0047404500007156
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500007156 [Google Scholar]
  21. Gunraj, Danielle N., April M. Drumm-Hewitt, Erica M. Dashow, Sri Siddhi N. Updadhyay, and Ceila M. Kin
    2016 “Texting insincerely: The role of the period in text messaging.” Computers in Human Behavior55(B): 1067–1075. 10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.003 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hammond, Lila
    2005Serbian: An Essential Grammar. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203338025
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203338025 [Google Scholar]
  23. Harré, Rom, and Luk Van Langenhove
    (eds.) 1999Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Herring, Susan E.
    2007 “A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse.” [email protected]4, article 1. www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2007/761 (accessed5 April 2017).
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hill, Jane
    1995 “Mock Spanish: A site for the indexical reproduction of racism in American English.” Language and Culture: Symposium2. languageculture.binghamton.edu/symposia/2/part1/index.html (accessed5 April 2017).
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 1998 “Language, race, and white public space.” American Anthropologist100(3): 680–689. 10.1525/aa.1998.100.3.680
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1998.100.3.680 [Google Scholar]
  27. Holmes, Janet
    2008Gendered Talk at Work: Constructing Gender Identity Through Workplace Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hultgren, Anna Kristina
    2017 “Vocatives as rationalized politeness: Theoretical insights from emerging norms in call centre service calls.” Journal of Sociolinguistics21(1): 90–111. 10.1111/josl.12224
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12224 [Google Scholar]
  29. Ito, Mizuko, and Daisuke Okabe
    2005 “Technosocial situations: Emergent structurings of mobile email use.” InPersonal, Portable, Intimate: Mobile Phones in Japanese Life, ed. byMizuko Ito, Daisuke Okabe, and Misa Matsuda, 257–276. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Jaworski, Adam, and Dariusz Galasiñski
    2000 “Vocative address forms and ideological legitimazation in political debates.” Discourse Studies2(1): 35–53. 10.1177/1461445600002001002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445600002001002 [Google Scholar]
  31. Katz, James E., and Mark Aakhus
    2002Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511489471
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489471 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kiesling, Scott
    2004 “Dude.” American Speech79(3): 281–305. 10.1215/00031283‑79‑3‑281
    https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-79-3-281 [Google Scholar]
  33. Laursen, Ditte
    2005 “Please reply! The replying norm in adolescent SMS communication.” InThe Inside Text: Social, Cultural and Design Perspectives on SMS, ed. byRichard Harper, Leysia Palen, and Alex Taylor, 53–73. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/1‑4020‑3060‑6_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3060-6_4 [Google Scholar]
  34. Leppänen, Sirpa, Samu Kytölä, Henna Jousmäki, Saija Peuronen, and Elina Westinen
    2014 “Entextualisation and resemiotization as resources for identification in social media.” InThe Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet, ed. byPhilip Seargeant, and Caroline Tagg, 112–138. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137029317_6
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137029317_6 [Google Scholar]
  35. Leppänen, Sirpa, Elina Westinen, and Samu Kytölä
    (eds.) 2017Social Media Discourse, (Dis)identifications and Diversities. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Leech, Geoffrey
    1999 “The distribution and function of vocatives in American and British English conversation.” InOut of Corpora: Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson, ed. byHilde Hasselgård, and Signe Oksefjell, 107–120. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Littlemore, Jeannette, and Caroline Tagg
    2018 “Metonymy and text-messaging: A framework for understanding creative uses of metonymy.” Applied Linguistics39(4): 481–507.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Lyons, Agnieszka
    2014 “Self-Presentation and self-positioning in text-messages: Embedded multimodality, deixis, and reference frame.” Unpublished PhD thesis, Queen Mary University of London.
  39. Madianou, Mirca, and Daniel Miller
    2012Migration and New Media: Transnational Families and Polymedia. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. McAdam, Noel
    2014 “Gregory Campbell banned in absentia over ‘curry my yoghurt’ Irish language stunt.” Belfast Evening Telegraph, 5November 2014 www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/politics/gregory-campbell-banned-in-absentia-over-curry-my-yoghurt-irish-language-stunt-30719543.html (accessed5 April 2017).
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Madsen, Lian Malai
    2013 “High and low in urban Danish speech styles.” Language in Society42(2): 115–138. 10.1017/S0047404513000018
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404513000018 [Google Scholar]
  42. Marwick, Alice E., and danah boyd
    2014 “Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media.” New Media & Society16(7): 1051–1067. 10.1177/1461444814543995
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814543995 [Google Scholar]
  43. McCarthy, Michael, and Anne O’ Keeffe
    2003 “What’s in a Name? – Vocatives in casual conversations and radio phone-in calls.” InCorpus Analysis: Language Structure and Language Use, ed. byPepi Leistyna, and Charles Meyer, 153–185. Amsterdan: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Murphy, Brona, and Fiona Farr
    2012 “‘I’m fine girl, and how are you?’: The use of vocatives in spoken Irish English.” InNew Perspectives on Irish English, ed. byBettina Migge, and Maíre Ní Chiosáin, 203–224. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/veaw.g44.10mur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g44.10mur [Google Scholar]
  45. O’Rahilly, Tomás
    1921 “The vocative in Modern Irish.” Ériu9: 85–91.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Rainie, Lee, and Barry Wellman
    2012Networked: The New Social Operating System. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/8358.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8358.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  47. Rettie, Ruth
    2007 “Texters not talkers: Phone call aversion among mobile phone users.” PsychNology Journal5(1): 33–57.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Sacks, Harvey, and Emanuel Schegloff
    1973 “Opening up closings.” Semiotica8: 289–327.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Schegloff, Emanuel
    1993 “Telephone conversation.” InThe Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed. byR. E. Asher, and J. M. Y. Simpson, 4547–4549. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. 2002 “Beginnings in the telephone.” InPerpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performanceed. byJames Katz, and Mark Aarhus, 284–300. Oxford: Pergamon Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511489471.022
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489471.022 [Google Scholar]
  51. Skovholt, Karianne
    2015 “Doing leadership in a virtual team: analysing addressing devices, requests, and emoticons in a leader’s e-mail messages.” InDigital Business Discourseed. byErika Darics, 101–121. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Tagg, Caroline
    2012The Discourse of Text Messaging. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Tagg, Caroline, and Esther Asprey
    2017 “Messaging in the Midlands: Exploring digital literacy repertoires in a superdiverse region.” IRiS Working Paper Series16. www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/college-social-sciences/social-policy/iris/2017/IRiS-WP-16-2017.pdf (accessed8 September 2017).
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Tagg, Caroline, and Philip Seargeant
    2014 “Audience design and language choice in the construction and maintenance of translocal communities on social network sites.” InThe Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet, ed. byPhilip Seargeant, and Caroline Tagg, 161–185. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137029317_8
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137029317_8 [Google Scholar]
  55. Tannen, Deborah
    2007Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse (2nd edn.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618987
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618987 [Google Scholar]
  56. Thurlow, Crispin, and Alex Brown
    2003 “Generation Txt? Exposing the sociolinguistics of young people’s text-messaging.” Discourse Analysis Online1(1). https://extra.shu.ac.uk/daol/articles/v1/n1/a3/thurlow2002003.html (accessed8 September 2017).
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Wollaston, Sam
    2017 “How to send GIFs to your friends and groups on WhatsApp.” Wired25March 2017 www.wired.co.uk/article/whatsapp-gifs-videos (accessed18 September 2017).
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Zappavigna, Michele
    2012Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00024.asp
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00024.asp
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): categorisation , gender , identity , pragmatic function , text messaging and vocatives
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error