1887
Volume 2, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2542-3851
  • E-ISSN: 2542-386X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper sets out a new, multimodal account (both visual and verbal analysis) of how self-denigration is conveyed through ‘ugly selfies’ as posted to the photo-sharing site Instagram. Drawing on 226 Instagram posts categorised by the poster themselves with the hashtag #uglyselfie, the visual analysis compared the persons and setting in the selfie, the person’s facial expression (eye brow position, mouth expression), eye gaze and camera angle. The verbal analysis included the self-denigration found in the image caption and the rapport enhancing or threatening responses found in the comments to the image posted by others. Ugly selfies are found to convey various types of self-denigration, including self-deprecation and self-mockery. The difference between self-deprecation and self-mockery are explained by the types of ‘mixed messages’ generated by the images. In self-deprecation, the mixed messages arise from a contrast between the visual image and the verbal caption. In self-mockery, the mixed messages arise from contrasts within the image itself, where visual exaggeration and incongruity lead to a jocular interpretation of the ugly selfie. Although the focus in this paper is on self-denigration and selfie-taking, the analysis of mixed messages can be used to analyse many different forms of politeness strategies and many kinds of images shared with increasing frequency and importance on social media sites.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00035.pag
2019-09-20
2019-12-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abidin, Crystal
    2016 “Aren’t these just young, rich women doing vain things online ? Influencer selfies as subversive frivolity.” Social Media and Society2(2): 1–17. doi:  10.1177/2056305116641342
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116641342 [Google Scholar]
  2. Adami, Elisabetta, and Carey Jewitt
    2016 “Special issue: Social media and the visual.” Visual Communication15(3): 263–270. 10.1177/1470357216644153
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357216644153 [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson, Monica, and Jingjing Jiang
    2018 “Teens’ social media habits and experiences.” Pew Research Center. Available at: www.pewinternet.org/2018/11/28/teens-and-their-experiences-on-social-media/ (accessed10 January 2019).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Androutsopoulos, Jannis
    2013 “Networked multilingualism: Some language practices on Facebook and their implications.” International Journal of Bilingualism19(2): 185–205. doi:  10.1177/1367006913489198
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006913489198 [Google Scholar]
  5. Attardo, Salvatore, Jodi Eisterhold, Jennifer Hay, and Isabella Poggi
    2003 “Multimodal markers of irony and sarcasm.” Humor16(2): 243–260. 10.1515/humr.2003.012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2003.012 [Google Scholar]
  6. Balakrishnan, Janarthanan, and Mark D. Griffiths
    2018 “An exploratory study of selfitis and the development of the selfitis behavior scale.” International Journal of Mental Health Addiction16: 722–736. 10.1007/s11469‑017‑9844‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9844-x [Google Scholar]
  7. Bennett, Jessica
    2014 “With some selfies, the uglier the better.” New York Times, 21 February 2014. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/23/fashion/selfies-the-uglier-the-better-technology.html (accessed26 November 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, Patricia Bou-Franch, and Nuria Lorenzo-Dus
    2013 “Identity and impoliteness: The expert in the talent show Idol.” Journal of Politeness Research9(1): 97–120. 10.1515/pr‑2013‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2013-0005 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bolander, Brook, and Miriam Locher
    2014 “Doing sociolinguistic research on computer-mediated data: A review of four methodological issues.” Discourse, Context & Media3: 14–26. 10.1016/j.dcm.2013.10.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2013.10.004 [Google Scholar]
  10. Culpeper, Jonathan, Michael Haugh, and Valeria Sinkeviciute
    2017 “(Im)politeness and mixed messages”. InThe Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness, ed. byJonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 323–355. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑37508‑7_13
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_13 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dayter, Daria
    2014 “Self-praise in microblogging.” Journal of Pragmatics61: 91–102. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.021
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.021 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dynel, Marta
    2016 “‘I has seen Image Macros!’ Advice Animal memes as visual-verbal jokes.” International Journal of Communication10: 660–688.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Forceville, Charles
    2005 “Visual representations of the idealized cognitive model of anger in the Asterix album La Zizanie.” Journal of Pragmatics37(1): 69–88. 10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  14. Francesconi, Sabrina
    2011 “Multimodally expressed humour shaping Scottishness in tourist postcards.” Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change9(1): 1–17. 10.1080/14766825.2010.521561
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14766825.2010.521561 [Google Scholar]
  15. Fuoli, Matteo
    2018 “A stepwise method for annotating APPRAISAL.” Functions of Language25(2): 229–258. 10.1075/fol.15016.fuo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.15016.fuo [Google Scholar]
  16. Goffman, Erving
    1959The Presentation of the Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Haugh, Michael
    2010 “Jocular mockery, (dis)affiliation, and face.” Journal of Pragmatics42(8): 2106–2119. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.018
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.018 [Google Scholar]
  18. Holmes, Janet
    1986 “Compliments and compliment responses in New Zealand English.” Anthropological Linguistics28(4): 485–508.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hu, Yuheng, Lydia Makikonda, and Subbarao Kambhampati
    2014 “What we Instagram: A first analysis of Instagram photo content and user types.” InProceedings of the Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 595–598. Palo Alto: The AAAI Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hymes, Dell
    1972 “Models of the interaction of language and social life.” InDirections in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, ed. byJohn Gumperz, and Dell Hymes, 35–71. New York: Holt, Rhinehart, and Winston, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kim, Mary Shin
    2015 “The complexity and variability of self-deprecation in Korean conversation.” Pragmatics and Society6(3): 398–420. doi:  10.1075/ps.6.3.04kim
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.6.3.04kim [Google Scholar]
  22. Kofoed, Jette, and Malene Charlotte Larsen
    2016 “A snap of intimacy: Photo-sharing practices among young people on social media.” First Monday21(11). Available at: https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/6905/5648 (accessed20 April 2018). 10.5210/fm.v21i11.6905
    https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i11.6905 [Google Scholar]
  23. Landis, J. Richard, and Gary G. Koch
    1977 “The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.” Biometics33(1): 159–174. 10.2307/2529310
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310 [Google Scholar]
  24. Leech, Geoffrey
    2014The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  25. Maíz-arévalo, Carmen
    2013 “‘Just click “Like”’ : Computer-mediated responses to Spanish compliments.” Journal of Pragmatics51: 47–67. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2013.03.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.03.003 [Google Scholar]
  26. Machin, David, Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard, and Tommaso Milani
    2016 “Doing critical multimodality in research on gender, language and discourse.” Gender and Language10(3): 301–308. 10.1558/genl.v10i3.32037
    https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.v10i3.32037 [Google Scholar]
  27. Matley, David
    2018a “‘This is NOT a #humblebrag, this is just a #brag’: The pragmatics of self-praise, hashtags and politeness in Instagram posts.” Discourse, Context & Media22: 30–38. doi:  10.1016/j.dcm.2017.07.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.07.007 [Google Scholar]
  28. 2018b “‘Let’s see how many of you mother fuckers unfollow me for this’: The pragmatic function of the hashtag #sorrynotsorry in non-apologetic Instagram posts.” Journal of Pragmatics133: 66–78. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2018.06.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.06.003 [Google Scholar]
  29. Page, Ruth
    2019 “Group selfies and snapchat: From sociality to synthetic collectivisation.” Discourse, Context & Media28: 79–92. 10.1016/j.dcm.2018.10.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.10.003 [Google Scholar]
  30. Placencia, María Elena, Amanda Lower, and Hebe Powell
    2016 “Complimenting behaviour on Facebook: Responding to compliments in American English.” Pragmatics and Society7(3): 339–365. doi:  10.1075/ps.7.3.01pla
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.7.3.01pla [Google Scholar]
  31. Pomerantz, Anita
    1984 “Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes.” InStructures of Social Action, ed. byJ. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Schnurr, Stephanie, and Angela Chan
    2011 “When laughter is not enough. Responding to teasing and self-denigrating humour at work.” Journal of Pragmatics43(1): 20–35. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  33. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
    2002 “Managing interpersonal rapport: Using rapport sensitive incidents to explore the motivational concerns underlying the management of relations.” Journal of Pragmatics34: 529–545. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)00039‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00039-X [Google Scholar]
  34. Tabacaru, Sabina, and Maarten Lemmens
    2014 “Raised eyebrows as gestural triggers in humour: The case of sarcasm and hyper-understanding.” European Journal of Humour Research2(2): 11–31. 10.7592/EJHR2014.2.2.tabacaru
    https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2014.2.2.tabacaru [Google Scholar]
  35. Tiggeman, Marika, and Mia Zaccardo
    2018 “‘Strong is the new skinny’: A content analysis of #fitspiration images on Instagram.” Journal of Health Psychology23(8): 1003–1011. 10.1177/1359105316639436
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316639436 [Google Scholar]
  36. Veum, Aslaug, and Linda Victoria Moland Undrum
    2018 “The selfie as a global discourse.” Discourse & Society29(1): 86–103. 10.1177/0957926517725979
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926517725979 [Google Scholar]
  37. Walkinshaw, Ian, Nathaniel Mitchell, and Sophiaan Subhan
    2019 “Self-denigration as a relational strategy in lingua franca talk: Asian English speakers.” Journal of Pragmatics139: 40–51. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2018.10.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.10.013 [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang, Ruoxu, Fan Yang, and Michel M. Haigh
    2017 “Let me take a selfie: Exploring the psychological effects of posting and viewing selfies and groupies on social media.” Telematics and Informatics34(4): 274–283. doi:  10.1016/j.tele.2016.07.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.07.004 [Google Scholar]
  39. Yu, Changrong
    2013 “Two interactional functions of self-mockery in everyday English conversations : A multimodal analysis.” Journal of Pragmatics50(1): 1–22. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2013.01.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.01.006 [Google Scholar]
  40. Yus, Francisco
    2018 “Identity-related issues in meme communication.” Internet Pragmatics1(1): 113–133. 10.1075/ip.00006.yus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00006.yus [Google Scholar]
  41. Zappavigna, Michele
    2016 “Social media photography: construing subjectivity in Instagram images.” Visual Communication15(3): 271–292. 10.1177/1470357216643220
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357216643220 [Google Scholar]
  42. Zare, Javad
    2016 “Self-mockery: A study of Persian multi-party interactions.” Text and Talk36(6): 789–312. 10.1515/text‑2016‑0034
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2016-0034 [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhao, Sumin, and Michele Zappavigna
    2018 “Beyond the self: Intersubjectivity and the social semiotic interpretation of the selfie.” New Media & Society20(5): 1735–1754. 10.1177/1461444817706074
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817706074 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00035.pag
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00035.pag
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): humour , Instagram , self-denigration , self-deprecation , self-mockery , selfies and ugly selfies
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error