Agency and impoliteness in Korean online interactions

References

1. Ahearn, Laura M.
   2001 “Language and agency.” Annual Review of Anthropology30: 109–137. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109
   https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109 [Google Scholar]
2. Ahearn, Laura M.
   2017 Living Language: An Introduction to Linguistic Anthropology (2nd. edn.). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Androutsopoulos, Jannis K.
   2000 “Non-standard spellings in media texts: The case of German fanzines.” Journal of Sociolinguistics4(4): 514–533. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00128
   https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00128 [Google Scholar]
4. Angouri, Jo, and Theodora Tseliga
   2010 “‘you HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!’: From e-disagreement to e-impoliteness in two online fora.” Journal of Politeness Research6(1): 57–82.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Brown, Lucien
   2011 Korean Honorifics and Politeness in Second Language Learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.206
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.206 [Google Scholar]
6. Brown, Lucien
   2013a “‘Mind your own esteemed business’: Sarcastic honorifics use and impoliteness in Korean TV dramas.” Journal of Politeness Research9(2): 159–186. 10.1515/pr‑2013‑0008
   https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2013-0008 [Google Scholar]
7. Brown, Lucien
   2013b “Teaching ‘casual’ and/or ‘impolite’ language through multimedia: the case of non-honorific panmal speech styles in Korea.” Culture and Curriculum26(1): 1–18. 10.1080/07908318.2012.745551
   https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2012.745551 [Google Scholar]
8. Brown, Lucien
   2013c “‘Oppa, hold my purse’: A sociocultural study of identity and indexicality in the perception and use of Oppa ‘Older Brother’ by second language learners.” Korean Language in America18: 1–22.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Brown, Lucien
   2015 “Revisiting ‘polite’ -yo and ‘deferential’ -supnita speech style shifting in Korean from the view point of indexicality.” Journal of Pragmatics79: 43–59. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.009
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.009 [Google Scholar]
10. Brown, Lucien
    2016 “An activity-theoretic study of agency and identity in the study abroad experiences of a lesbian nontraditional learner of Korea.” Applied Linguistics37(6): 807–828.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Brown, Lucien, and Bodo Winter
    2019 “Multimodal indexicality in Korean: Doing deference and performing intimacy through nonverbal behavior.” Journal of Politeness Research15(1): 25–54. 10.1515/pr‑2016‑0042
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2016-0042 [Google Scholar]
12. Brown, Lucien, Bodo Winter, Kaori Idemaru, and Sven Grawunder
    2014 “Phonetics and politeness: Perceiving Korean honorific and non-honorific speech through phonetic cues.” Journal of Pragmatics66: 45–60. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.011 [Google Scholar]
13. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
    1978 “Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena.” InQuestions and Politeness, ed. byEsther N. Goody, 56–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
15. Byon, Andrew S.
    2006 “The role of linguistic indirectness and honorifics in achieving linguistic politeness in Korean requests.” Journal of Politeness Research2(2): 247–276. 10.1515/PR.2006.013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/PR.2006.013 [Google Scholar]
16. Choo, Miho
    2006 “The structure and use of Korean honorifics.” InKorean Language in Culture and Society, ed. byHo-min Sohn, 132–154. Hawaii: University of Hawaii Pres.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Chun, Sun Young
    2014 “Features and strategies of Korean EFL elementary school children’s email discourse.” STEM Journal15(1): 197–217. 10.16875/stem.2014.15.1.197
    https://doi.org/10.16875/stem.2014.15.1.197 [Google Scholar]
18. Cook, Haruko M.
    2011 “Are honorifics polite? Uses of referent honorifics in a Japanese committee meeting.” Journal of Pragmatics43(15): 3655–3672. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.008 [Google Scholar]
19. Cook, Haruko M.
    2013 “A scientist or salesman? Identity construction through referent honorifics on a Japanese shopping channel program.” Multilingua32(2): 177–202. 10.1515/multi‑2013‑0009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2013-0009 [Google Scholar]
20. Culpeper, Jonathan, and Michael Haugh
    2014 Pragmatics and the English Language. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑39391‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-39391-3 [Google Scholar]
21. Dunn, Cynthia
    2005 “Pragmatic functions of humble forms in Japanese ceremonial discourse.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology15(2): 218–238.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Duranti, Alessandro
    2004 “Agency in language.” InA Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, ed. byAlessandro Duranti, 451–473. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Dynel, Marta
    2012 “Swearing methodologically: the (im)politeness of expletives in anonymous commentaries on Youtube.” Journal of English Studies10: 25–50. 10.18172/jes.179
    https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.179 [Google Scholar]
24. Eelen, Gino
    2001 A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Graham, Sage
    2007 “Disagreeing to agree: Conflict, (im)politeness and identity in a computer-mediated community.” Journal of Pragmatics39: 742–759. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.017 [Google Scholar]
26. Graham, Sage
    2018 “Impoliteness and the moral order in online gaming.” Internet Pragmatics1(2): 303–328. 10.1075/ip.00014.lam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00014.lam [Google Scholar]
27. Haugh, Michael
    2007 “The discursive challenge to politeness research: An interactional alternative.” Journal of Politeness Research3(3): 295–317.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Haugh, Michael
    2010 “When is an email really offensive?: Argumentativity and variability in evaluations of impoliteness.” Journal of Politeness Research6(1): 7–3. 10.1515/jplr.2010.002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.002 [Google Scholar]
29. Haugh, Michael, and Wei-Lin M. Chang
    2019 “‘The apology seemed (in)sincere’: Variability in perceptions of (im)politeness.” Journal of Pragmatics142: 207–222. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.11.022
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.11.022 [Google Scholar]
30. Harrison, Sandra
    2006 “Transgressions, miscommunication and flames: Problematic incidents in email discussion.” InInternet Research Annual, ed. byMia Consalvo, and Caroline Haythornthwaite, 105–117. New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Herring, Susan C.
    2007 “A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse.” [email protected]4(1). https://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2007/761 (accessed8 March 2016).
    [Google Scholar]
32. Hwang, Juck-ryoon
    1990 “‘Deference’ versus ‘politeness’ in Korean speech.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language82: 41–55.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Ide, Sachiko
    1989 “Formal forms and discernment.” Multilingua8(2): 223–248. 10.1515/mult.1989.8.2‑3.223
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.223 [Google Scholar]
34. Kádár, Dániel Z., and Michael Haugh
    2013 Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139382717
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139382717 [Google Scholar]
35. Kádár, Dániel Z., and Sara Mills
    2011 “Introduction.” InPoliteness in East Asia, ed. byDániel Z. Kádár, and Sara Mills, 1–17. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511977886.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977886.003 [Google Scholar]
36. Kim, Eun Young A., and Lucien Brown
    2014 “Negotiating pragmatic competence in computer-mediated communication: The case of Korean address terms.” CALICO Journal3(3): 264–284. 10.11139/cj.31.3.264‑284
    https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.31.3.264-284 [Google Scholar]
37. Kim, Hyun-Oak A.
    2011 “Politeness in Korea.” InPoliteness in East Asia, eds. byDániel Z. Kádár, and Sara Mills, 176–207. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511977886.010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977886.010 [Google Scholar]
38. Kim-Renaud, Young-Key
    1990 “On Panmal in Korean.” InICKL 7: Papers from the Seventh International Conference on Korean Linguistics, 232–255. Osaka: ICKL and Osaka University of Economics and Law.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Lantolf, James, and Aneta Pavlenko
    2001 “‘(S)econd (l)anguage (a)ctivity theory: understanding second language learners as people.” InLearner Contributions to Language Learning: New Directions in Research, ed. byMichael Breen, 141–158. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Lantolf, James, and Steven Thorne
    2006 Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Lee, Iksop, and Robert Ramsey
    2000 The Korean Language. Albany: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Lee, Jung-bok
    2001 Kweke kyengepep sayong-uy cenlyakcek thukseng [The Characteristics of Korean Honorific Strategic Use]. Seoul: Thaehaksa.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Lee, Jung-bok
    2009 Intheneys thongsin ene-uy hwaksan-kwa hankwuke yenkwu-uy hwaktay [The Spread of Internet Communication and the Expansion of Korean Language Research]. Seoul: Sotong.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Lo, Adrienne
    2009 “Lessons about respect and affect in a Korean heritage language school.” Linguistics and Education20(3): 217–234. 10.1016/j.linged.2009.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2009.07.002 [Google Scholar]
45. Mills, Sara
    2003 Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615238
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615238 [Google Scholar]
46. Mitchell, Nathaniel, and Michael Haugh
    2015 “Agency, accountability and evaluations of impoliteness.” Journal of Politeness Research11(2): 207–238. 10.1515/pr‑2015‑0009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2015-0009 [Google Scholar]
47. Oh, Sun-Young
    2007 “The interactional meanings of quasi-pronouns in Korean conversation.” InPerson Reference in Interaction, ed. byNick J. Enfield, and Tanya Stivers, 203–225. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Oh, Sun-Young
    2010 “Invoking categories through co-present person reference: The case of Korean conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics42(5): 1219–1242. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.019 [Google Scholar]
49. Park, Chongwon
    2010 “(Inter) subjectification and Korean honorifics.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics11(1): 122–147. 10.1075/jhp.11.1.05par
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.11.1.05par [Google Scholar]
50. Pasfield-Neofitou, Sarah
    2007 “Textual features of intercultural Internet chat between learners of Japanese and English.” CALL-EJ Online9(1). callej.org/journal/9-1/pasfield-neofitou.html (accessed2 Mey 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
51. Pomerantz, Anita
    2012 “Do participants’ reports enhance conversation analytic claims? Explanations of one sort or another.” Discourse Studies14(4): 499–505. 10.1177/1461445611434229
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611434229 [Google Scholar]
52. Reiter, Rosina M., and Sara Orthaber
    2018 “Exploring the moral compass: Denunciations in a Facebook carpool group.” Internet Pragmatics1(2): 242–271.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Sinkeviciute, Valeria
    2018 ““Ya bloody drango!!!”: Impoliteness as situated moral judgement on Facebook.” Internet Pragmatics1(2): 272–302. 10.1075/ip.00013.sin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00013.sin [Google Scholar]
54. Strauss, Susan, and Jong Oh Eun
    2005 “Indexicality and honorific speech level choice in Korean.” Linguistics43(3): 611–651. 10.1515/ling.2005.43.3.611
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2005.43.3.611 [Google Scholar]
55. Terkourafi, Marina
    2005 “Beyond the micro-level in politeness research.” Journal of Politeness Research1(2): 237–262. 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.237
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.237 [Google Scholar]
56. Upadhyay, Shiv
    2010 “Identity and impoliteness in computer-mediated reader responses.” Journal of Politeness Research6(1): 105–127. 10.1515/jplr.2010.006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.006 [Google Scholar]
57. Watts, Richard J.
    1989 “Relevance and relational work: linguistic politeness as politic behavior.” Multilingua8(2):131–166. 10.1515/mult.1989.8.2‑3.131
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.131 [Google Scholar]
58. Watts, Richard J.
    2003 Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615184
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184 [Google Scholar]
59. Yeon, Jaehoon, and Lucien Brown
    2011 Korean: A Comprehensive Grammar. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Yoon, Kyung-Joo
    2004 “Not just words: Korean social models and the use of honorifics.” Intercultural Pragmatics1(2): 189–210. 10.1515/iprg.2004.1.2.189
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2004.1.2.189 [Google Scholar]
61. Yoon, Sang-Seok
    2015 “Korean honorifics beyond politeness markers: Change of footing through shifting of speech style.” InInterdisciplinary Perspectives on Im/politeness, ed. byMarina Terkourafi, 97–119. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aals.14.06seo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.14.06seo [Google Scholar]