1887
image of Chronotopic (non)modernity in translocal mobile messaging among Chinese migrants in the UK
  • ISSN 2542-3851
  • E-ISSN 2542-386X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Migration is often seen as crossing both space and time, from the traditional past to the modern present, while leading to perceived changes in migrants themselves. This article draws on data from a large ethnographic project to explore the ways in which Chinese translocal families dispersed between China, Hong Kong and the UK exploit mobile messaging apps to negotiate the post-migration value of Chinese-ness and Chinese tradition in geographically dispersed family and social contexts. Drawing on the concept of the , we show how Chinese families and friends employ textual and multimodal resources to negotiate in translocal mobile messaging interactions. Our discourse analysis focuses on critical junctures at which modernist chronotopic negotiations are most visible. The article contributes to an understanding of the discursive construction of multiple (non)modernities by showing how migrants (re)position themselves along a gradient of chronotopic modernity in everyday mobile messaging encounters.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00043.lyo
2019-12-17
2020-01-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agha, Asif
    2007 “Recombinant selves in mass mediated spacetime.” Language & Communication27: 320–335. 10.1016/j.langcom.2007.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2007.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Androutsopoulos, Jannis, and Florian Busch
    2017 “Digital punctuation: Practices, reflexivity and enregisterment in the case of <.>.” Talk given atAILA World Congress 2017, Rio de Janeiro, July 23–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker, Hugh D. R.
    1993 “Social change in Hong Kong: Hong Kong Man in search of majority.” The China Quarterly136: 864–877. 10.1017/S0305741000032367
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741000032367 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
    1981The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bauman, Richard, and Charles L. Briggs
    2003Voices of Modernity: Ideologies and the Politics of Inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486647
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486647 [Google Scholar]
  6. Berman, Marshall
    1982All That is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity. New York: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Blackledge, Adrian, Angela Creese, and Rachel Hu
    2015 “Voice and social relations in a city market (WP. 2).” https://tlang754703143.files.wordpress.com/2018/08/voice-and-social-relations-in-a-city-market.pdf (accessed28 May 2018).
  8. 2016 “Protean heritage, everyday superdiversity (WP. 13).” https://tlang754703143.files.wordpress.com/2018/08/protean-heritage-everyday-superdiversity.pdf (accessed28 May 2018).
  9. 2017 “Translanguaging, volleyball, and social life (WP. 19).” https://tlang754703143.files.wordpress.com/2018/08/translanguaging-volleyball-and-social-life.pdf (accessed28 May 2018).
  10. 2018 “Translating the city (WP. 34).” https://tlang754703143.files.wordpress.com/2018/08/translating-the-city.pdf (accessed29 January 2019).
  11. Blank, Trevor J., and Robert G. Howard
    (eds.) 2013Tradition in the Twenty-First Century: Locating the Role of the Past in the Present. Boulder, Colorado: University Press of Colorado.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Blommaert, Jan
    2010The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511845307
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845307 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2015 “Chronotopes, scales, and complexity in the study of language in society.” Annual Review of Anthropology44: 105–116. 10.1146/annurev‑anthro‑102214‑014035
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014035 [Google Scholar]
  14. Blommaert, Jan, and Anna De Fina
    2017 “Chronotopic identities: On the timespace organization of who we are.” InDiversity and Super-Diversity: Sociocultural Linguistic Perspectives, ed. byAnna De Fina, and Jeremy Wegner, 1–14. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Burrows Simpson, Peggy
    2003 “Family beliefs about diet and traditional Chinese medicine for Hong Kong women with breast cancer.” Oncology Nursing Forum30(5): 834–840. 10.1188/03.ONF.834‑840
    https://doi.org/10.1188/03.ONF.834-840 [Google Scholar]
  16. Catedral, Lydia
    2018 “Discursive scaling: Moral stability and neoliberal dominance in the narratives of transnational migrant women.” Discourse & Society29(1): 23–42. 10.1177/0957926517726111
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926517726111 [Google Scholar]
  17. Chan, Kwok B.
    1997 “A family affair: Migration, dispersal, and the emergent identity of the Chinese cosmopolitan.” Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies6(2): 195–213. 10.1353/dsp.1997.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1353/dsp.1997.0005 [Google Scholar]
  18. Chan, S. M., Jennifer M. Bowes, and Shirley Wyver
    2009 “Chinese parenting in Hong Kong: Links among goals, beliefs and styles.” Early Child Development and Care179(7): 849–862. 10.1080/03004430701536525
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430701536525 [Google Scholar]
  19. Chao, Ruth K.
    1994 “Beyond parental control and authoritarian parenting style: Understanding Chinese parenting through the cultural notion of training.” Child Development65(4): 1111–1119. 10.2307/1131308
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1131308 [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen, Yu-Chih
    2001 “Chinese values, health and nursing.” Journal of Advanced Nursing36(2): 270–273. 10.1046/j.1365‑2648.2001.01968.x
    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01968.x [Google Scholar]
  21. Chen, Hong
    2019 “Toward traditional or atypical parenting: mediated communication in Chinese transnational families.” International Journal of Communication13: 1805–1824.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Creese, Angela, Adrian Blackledge, and Rachel Hu
    2018 “Translanguaging and translation: The construction of social difference across city spaces.” International Journal of Bilingual Education21(7): 841–852. 10.1080/13670050.2017.1323445
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1323445 [Google Scholar]
  23. Dick, Hilary P.
    2010 “Imagined lives and modernist chronotopes in Mexican nonmigrant discourse.” American Ethnologist37(2): 275–290. 10.1111/j.1548‑1425.2010.01255.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2010.01255.x [Google Scholar]
  24. Georgakopoulou, Alexandra
    2015 “Introduction: Communicating time and place on digital media – multi-layered temporalities and (re)localizations.” Discourse, Context & Media9: 1–4. 10.1016/j.dcm.2015.08.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2015.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  25. 2017 “‘Friendly’ comments: Interactional displays of alignment on Facebook and YouTube.” InSocial Media Discourse, (Dis)identifications and Diversities, ed. byLeppanen, Sirpa, Elina Westinen, and Samu Kytola, 179–207. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Gunraj, Danielle N., April M. Drumm-Hewitt, Erica M. Dashow, Sri Siddhi N. Upadhyay, and Celia M. Klin
    2016 “Texting insincerely: The role of the period in text messaging.” Computers in Human Behavior55: 1067–1075. 10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.003 [Google Scholar]
  27. Harding, Harry
    1993 “The concept of ‘Greater China’: Themes, variations and reservations.” The China Quarterly136: 660–686. 10.1017/S030574100003229X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S030574100003229X [Google Scholar]
  28. Harwitt, Eric
    2017 “WeChat: Social and political development of China’s dominant messaging app.” Chinese Journal of Communication10(3): 312–327. 10.1080/17544750.2016.1213757
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2016.1213757 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hesketh, Therese M., and Wei X. Zhu
    1997 “Health in China: Traditional Chinese medicine: one country, two systems.” British Medical Journal315: 115. 10.1136/bmj.315.7100.115
    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7100.115 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hofstede, Geert
    1980Culture’s Consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Ito, Mizuko, & Daisuke Okabe
    (2005) “Technosocial situations: Emergent structurings of mobile email use.” InMizuko Ito, Daisuke Okabe, and Misa Matsuda (eds.), Personal, Portable, Intimate: Mobile Phones in Japanese Life, 257–76. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. John, Nicholas A.
    2017The Age of Sharing. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kang, Linda C.
    1984 “The use of food to treat and prevent disease in Chinese culture.” Social Science and Medicine18(9): 757–766. 10.1016/0277‑9536(84)90102‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(84)90102-3 [Google Scholar]
  34. Kang, Tingyu
    2012 “Gendered media, changing intimacy: Internet-mediated transnational communication in the family sphere.” Media, Culture & Society34: 146–161. 10.1177/0163443711430755
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443711430755 [Google Scholar]
  35. Karimzad, Farzad, and Lydia Catedral
    2018 “‘No, we don’t mix languages’: Ideological power and the chronotopic organization of ethnolinguistic identities.” Language in Society47(1): 89–113. 10.1017/S0047404517000781
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404517000781 [Google Scholar]
  36. Karimzad, Farzad
    2016 “Life here beyond now: Chronotopes of the ideal life among Iranian transnationals.” Journal of Sociolinguistics20(5): 607–630. 10.1111/josl.12211
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12211 [Google Scholar]
  37. Keane, Webb
    2002 “Sincerity, ‘modernity’, and the protestants.” Cultural Anthropology171: 65–92. 10.1525/can.2002.17.1.65
    https://doi.org/10.1525/can.2002.17.1.65 [Google Scholar]
  38. Knowles, Caroline
    2017 “Reframing sociologies of ethnicity and migration in encounters with Chinese London.” The British Journal of Sociology68(3): 454–473. 10.1111/1468‑4446.12271
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12271 [Google Scholar]
  39. Koven, Michele
    2015 “Narrative and cultural identities: Performing and aligning with figures of personhood.” InHandbook of Narrative Analysis, ed. byAna De Fina, and Alexandra Georgakopoulou, 388–408. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Koven, Michele, and I. Simões Marques
    2015 “Performing and evaluating (non)modernities of Portuguese migrant figures on Youtube: The case of Antonio de Carglouch.” Language in Society44(2): 213–242. 10.1017/S0047404515000056
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404515000056 [Google Scholar]
  41. Latham, Kevin, and Bin Wu
    2013 “Chinese immigration into the EU: New trends, dynamics and implications.” ERCAN: Europe China Research and Advice Network. Available at: https://www.chathamhouse.org/publications/papers/view/190473 (accessed27th June 2019).
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Li, Jinling, and Kasper Juffermans
    2015 “Polycentric repertoires: Constructing Dutch-Chinese identities in the classroom and online.” InMultilingualism in the Chinese Diaspora Worldwide: Transnational Connections and Local Social Realities, ed. byLi Wei, 32–46, New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315759371‑3
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315759371-3 [Google Scholar]
  43. Li, Wei
    2016 “Transnational connection and multilingual realities: The Chinese diasporic experience in a global context.” InMultilingualism in the Chinese Diaspora Worldwide: Transnational Connections and Local Social Realities, ed. byLi Wei, 1–12. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Lin, Keh-Ming, Milton H. Miller, Russell E. Poland, Inocencia Nuccio, and Mitsue Yamaguch
    1991 “Ethnicity and family involvement in the treatment of schizophrenic patients.” Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease179(10): 631–633. 10.1097/00005053‑199110000‑00008
    https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-199110000-00008 [Google Scholar]
  45. Lisha, Chen, Chin Fei Goh, Sun Yifan, and Amran Rasli
    2017 “Integrating guanxi into technology acceptance: An empirical investigation of WeChat.” Telematics and Informatics34: 1125–1142. 10.1016/j.tele.2017.05.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  46. Liu-Farrer, Gracia
    2016 “Migration as class-based consumption: The emigration of the rich in contemporary China.” The China Quarterly226: 499–518. 10.1017/S0305741016000333
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741016000333 [Google Scholar]
  47. Lyons, Agnieszka, and Caroline Tagg
    2019 “The discursive construction of mobile chronotopes in mobile-phone messaging.” Language in Society48(5): 657–683. doi:  10.1017/S004740451900023X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740451900023X [Google Scholar]
  48. Ma, Lawrence J. C.
    2003 “Space, place, and transnationalism in the Chinese diaspora.” InThe Chinese Diaspora: Space, Place, Mobility and Identity, ed. byLaurence J. C. Ma, and Carolyn Cartier, 1–50. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Madianou, Mirca, and Daniel Miller
    2012Migration and New Media: Transnational Families and Polymedia. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Madianou, Mirca
    2016 “Ambient co-presence: Transnational family practices in polymedia environments.” Global Networks16(2): 183–201. 10.1111/glob.12105
    https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12105 [Google Scholar]
  51. Morley, David
    2000Home Territories: Media, Mobility, Identity. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Noonan, John T.
    2005A Church that Can and Cannot Change: The Development of Catholic Moral Teaching. Elkhart, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Pan, Dengshan
    2004 “Lun e’jiao de buxue xiaoyong. [On the blood nourishing function of Ejiao].” Shaanxi Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine11: 1032–1033.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Papastergiadis, Nikos
    1998Dialogues in the Diasporas. London: Rivers Oram Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Rubdy, Rani, and Lubna Alsagoff
    (eds.) 2014The Global-Local Interface and Hybridity. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Ryan, Louise
    2011 “Transnational relations: Family migration among recent Polish migrants in London.” International Migration49(2): 80–103. 10.1111/j.1468‑2435.2010.00618.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2010.00618.x [Google Scholar]
  57. Sandel, Todd L., Chuyue Ou, Dorji Wangchuk, Bei Ju, and Miguel Duque
    2019 “Unpacking and describing interaction on Chinese WeChat: A methodological approach.” Journal of Pragmatics143: 228–241. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.011 [Google Scholar]
  58. Schegloff, Emanuel A., & Harvey Sacks
    (1973) “Opening up closings.” Semiotica8(4): 289–327. 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 [Google Scholar]
  59. Selka, Stephen
    2007 “Mediated authenticity: Tradition, modernity, and postmodernity in Brazilian Candomblé.” Nova Religio: The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions11(1): 5–30. 10.1525/nr.2007.11.1.5
    https://doi.org/10.1525/nr.2007.11.1.5 [Google Scholar]
  60. Share, Michelle, Cayla Williams, and Liz Kerrins
    2018 “Displaying and performing: Polish transnational families in Ireland Skyping grandparents in Poland.” New Media & Society20(8): 3011–3028. 10.1177/1461444817739272
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817739272 [Google Scholar]
  61. Skeldon, Ronald
    2003 “The Chinese diaspora or the migration of Chinese peoples?” InThe Chinese Diaspora: Space, Place, Mobility and Identity, ed. byLaurence J. C. Ma, and Carolyn Cartier, 51–66. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Sukunawa, Chiho
    2014 “Virtual ie: A three-generational household mediated by webcam interactions.” Journal of Pragmatics69: 63–81. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.012 [Google Scholar]
  63. Sun, Shun-Chih
    2014 “A research on Chang Chien’s reform ideas.” Global Journal of Human-Social Science (F)14(4): 55–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Sun, Wanning
    2002Leaving China: Media, Migration, and Transnational Imagination. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Sun, Wanning, and Haiqing Yu
    2016 “Digital/social media and the Chinese community in Australia.” Media Asia43(3–4): 165–168. 10.1080/01296612.2016.1277826
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01296612.2016.1277826 [Google Scholar]
  66. Tabora, Betty L., and Jacquelyn H. Flaskerud
    1997 “Mental health beliefs, practices, and knowledge of Chinese American immigrant women.” Issues in Mental Health Nursing18(3): 173–189. 10.3109/01612849709012488
    https://doi.org/10.3109/01612849709012488 [Google Scholar]
  67. Tagg, Caroline, and Agnieszka Lyons
    2018 “Mobile messaging by migrant micro-entrepreneurs in contexts of superdiversity.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Superdiversity, ed. byAngela Creese, and Adrian Blackledge, 312–328. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315696010‑23
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315696010-23 [Google Scholar]
  68. Tibi, Bassam
    2000Der Islam und Deutschland: Muslime in Deutschland [Islam and Germany: Muslims in Germany]. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Triandis, Harry C.
    1995Individualism and Collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Tsagarousianou, Roza
    2004 “Rethinking the concept of diaspora: Mobility, connectivity and communication in a globalized world.” Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture1(1): 52–65. 10.16997/wpcc.203
    https://doi.org/10.16997/wpcc.203 [Google Scholar]
  71. Taylor, Charles
    1989Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Vertovec, Steven
    2004 “Cheap calls: The social glue of migrant transnationalism.” Global Networks4(2): 219–224. 10.1111/j.1471‑0374.2004.00088.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2004.00088.x [Google Scholar]
  73. Xiao, Ge, and Jai-Ok Kim
    2009 “The investigation of Chinese consumer values, consumption values, life satisfaction, and consumption behaviors.” Psychology & Marketing26(7): 610–624. 10.1002/mar.20291
    https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20291 [Google Scholar]
  74. Yu, Qian, Peiyang Huang, and Liming Liu
    2017 “From ‘connected presence’ to ‘panoptic presence’: Reframing the parent–child relationship on mobile instant messaging uses in the Chinese translocal context.” Mobile Media & Communication5(2): 123–138. 10.1177/2050157916688348
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157916688348 [Google Scholar]
  75. Zhang, Ge, and Wilfred Yang Wang
    2019 “‘Property talk’ among Chinese Australians: WeChat and the production of diasporic space.” Media International Australia173(1): 53–65. doi:  10.1177/1329878X19837669
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X19837669 [Google Scholar]
  76. Zhao, Sumin, and Rosie Flewitt
    2019 “Young Chinese immigrant children’s language and literacy practices on social media: A translanguaging perspective.” Language and Education. Online first: 1–19. doi:  10.1080/09500782.2019.1656738.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2019.1656738 [Google Scholar]
  77. Zhao, Xinyu
    2019 “Disconnective intimacies through social media: Practices of transnational families among overseas Chinese students in Australia.” Media International Australia173(1): 36–52. doi:  10.1177/1329878X19837684
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X19837684 [Google Scholar]
  78. Zhou, Baohua, and Miao Xiao
    2016 “Locative social media engagement and intergenerational relationships in China.” InThe Routledge Handbook of New Media in Asia, ed. byLarissa Hjorth, and Olivia Khoo, 219–228. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Zhou, Yanqui R., Lisa Watt, William D. Coleman, Evelyne Micollier, and Jacqueline Gahagan
    2019 “Rethinking ‘Chinese community’ in the context of transnationalism: The case of Chinese economic immigrants in Canada.” Journal of International Migration and Integration20: 537–555. 10.1007/s12134‑018‑0622‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-018-0622-9 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00043.lyo
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00043.lyo
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: migration; chronotope; modernity; ethnography; mobile communication
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error