The internet and social media as a theme and channel of humor

References

1. Attardo, Salvatore
   2001 Humorous Texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110887969
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110887969 [Google Scholar]
2. Attardo, Salvatore, and Victor Raskin
   1991 “Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model.” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research4(3–4): 293–347. doi:  10.1515/humr.1991.4.3‑4.293
   https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1991.4.3-4.293 [Google Scholar]
3. Carr, Alan
   2004 Positive Psychology: The Science of Happiness and Human Strengths. Hove: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203506035
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203506035 [Google Scholar]
4. Chiaro, Delia
   1992 The Language of Jokes: Analysing Verbal Play. London: Routlege. 10.4324/9780203327562
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203327562 [Google Scholar]
5. Dynel, Marta
   2012 “Garden paths, red lights and crossroads: On finding our way to understanding the cognitive mechanisms underlying jokes.” Israeli Journal of Humor Research1(1): 6–28.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Forabosco, Giovannantonio
   2008 “Is the concept of incongruity still a useful construct for the advancement of humor research?” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics: 45–62.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Grice, H. Paul
   1975 “Logic and conversation.” InSyntax and Semantics. Vol.3, Speech Acts, ed. byPeter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368811_003
   https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003 [Google Scholar]
8. Jodłowiec, Maria
   2015 The Challenges of Explicit and Implicit Communication: A Relevance-Theoretic Approach. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑05190‑2
   https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-05190-2 [Google Scholar]
9. Kreuz, Roger J., and Sam Glucksberg
   1989 “How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of verbal irony.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General118: 374–386. 10.1037/0096‑3445.118.4.374
   https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.118.4.374 [Google Scholar]
10. Mercier, Hugo, and Dan Sperber
    2017 The Enigma of Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 10.4159/9780674977860
    https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674977860 [Google Scholar]
11. Morreall, John
    1983 Taking Laughter Seriously. New York: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Pilkington, Adrian
    2000 Poetic Effects: A Relevance Theory Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.75
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.75 [Google Scholar]
13. Piskorska, Agnieszka, and Maria Jodłowiec
    2018 “Weak communication, joke targets and the punch-line effect: A relevance-theoretic account.” Studies in Polish Linguistics13: 25–44. doi:  10.4467/23005920SPL.18.002.8464
    https://doi.org/10.4467/23005920SPL.18.002.8464 [Google Scholar]
14. Raskin, Victor
    1985 Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Ritchie, Graeme
    2004 The Linguistic Analysis of Jokes. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203406953
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203406953 [Google Scholar]
16. Sedikides, Constantine, Tim Wildschut, Jamie Arndt, and Clay Routledge
    2008 “Nostalgia past, present, and future.” Current Directions in Psychological Science17(5): 304–307. 10.1111/j.1467‑8721.2008.00595.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00595.x [Google Scholar]
17. Sperber, Dan
    1996 Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
    1995 Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd edn.). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Suls, Jerry M.
    1972 “A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons.” InPsychology of Humor, ed. byJeffrey. H. Goldstein, and Paul.E. McGhee, 81–100. New York: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑288950‑9.50010‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-288950-9.50010-9 [Google Scholar]
20. Thai, Michael, Alex Borgella, and Melanie S. Sanchez
    2019 “It’s only funny if we say it: Disparagement humor is better received if it originates from a member of the group being disparaged.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology85: 103838. doi:  10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103838
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103838 [Google Scholar]
21. Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
    2002 “Truthfulness and relevance.” Mind111: 583–632. 10.1093/mind/111.443.583
    https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/111.443.583 [Google Scholar]
22. Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
    2012 Relevance and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139028370
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028370 [Google Scholar]
23. Yus, Francisco
    2004 “Pragmatics of humorous strategies in El club de la comedia.” InCurrent Trends in the Pragmatics of Spanish, ed. byRosina Márquez-Reiter, and María Elena Placencia, 320–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.123.25yus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.123.25yus [Google Scholar]
24. Yus, Francisco
    2013 “An inference-centered analysis of jokes: The Intersecting Circles Model of humorous communication.” InIrony and Humor: Highlights and Genres, ed. byLeonor Ruiz Gurillo, and M. Belén Alvarado Ortega, 59–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.231.05yus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.231.05yus [Google Scholar]
25. Yus, Francisco
    2016 Humour and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/thr.4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.4 [Google Scholar]
26. Yus, Francisco
    2019 “A cognitive pragmatics of the phatic internet.” InEmotion in Discourse, ed. byLaura Alba, and Lachlan Mackenzie, 161–188. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.302.07yus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.302.07yus [Google Scholar]
27. Ziv, Avner
    2009 “The social function of humor in interpersonal relationships.” Society47(1): 11–18. doi:  10.1007/s12115‑009‑9283‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-009-9283-9 [Google Scholar]