When humour backfires

References

1. Akinola, Ayodele J.
   2018 “Pragmatics of crisis-Motivated humour in computer mediated platforms in Nigeria.” Journal of Language and Education4(3): 6–17. 10.17323/2411‑7390‑2018‑4‑3‑6‑17
   https://doi.org/10.17323/2411-7390-2018-4-3-6-17 [Google Scholar]
2. Attardo, Salvatore
   2001 Humorous Texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110887969
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110887969 [Google Scholar]
3. Attardo, Salvatore, and Victor Raskin
   1991 “Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model.” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research4(3–4): 293–348.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Attrill, Alison
   2012 “Sharing only parts of me: Selective categorical self-disclosure across Internet arenas.” International Journal of Internet Science7(1): 55–77.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Baumeister, Roy F.
   1982 “Self-esteem, self-presentation, and future interaction: A dilemma of reputation.” Journal of Personality50(1): 29–45. 10.1111/j.1467‑6494.1982.tb00743.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1982.tb00743.x [Google Scholar]
6. Baumeister, Roy F., and Mark R. Leary
   1995 “The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.” Psychological Bulletin117(3): 497–529. 10.1037/0033‑2909.117.3.497
   https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 [Google Scholar]
7. Baumeister, Roy F., and Dianne M. Tice
   1984 “Role of self-presentation and choice in cognitive dissonance under forced compliance: Necessary or sufficient causes?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology46(1): 5–13. 10.1037/0022‑3514.46.1.5
   https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.1.5 [Google Scholar]
8. Baym, Nancy K.
   1995 “The performance of humor in computer-mediated communication.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication1(2): 0–0. 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.1995.tb00327.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1995.tb00327.x [Google Scholar]
9. Bronstein, Jenny
   2012 “Blogging motivations for Latin American bloggers: A uses and gratifications approach.” InBlogging in the Global Society, ed. byTatyana Dumova, and Richard Fiordo, 200–215. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. 10.4018/978‑1‑60960‑744‑9.ch012
   https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-744-9.ch012 [Google Scholar]
10. Bronstein, Jenny
    2014 “Creating possible selves: Information disclosure behaviour on social networks.” Information Research19(1): 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Brubaker, Pamela, Kris Boyle, and David Stephan
    2017 “The shared cultural experience: A comparison of religious memes created by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, religious media, and church members.” Journal of Media and Religion16(2): 67–79. 10.1080/15348423.2017.1311127
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15348423.2017.1311127 [Google Scholar]
12. Chiaro, Delia
    2018 The Language of Jokes in the Digital Age: Viral Humour. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Dynel, Marta
    2011 “Blending the incongruity-resolution model and the conceptual integration theory: The case of blends in pictorial advertising.” International Review of Pragmatics3: 59–83. 10.1163/187731011X561009
    https://doi.org/10.1163/187731011X561009 [Google Scholar]
14. Dynel, Marta
    2012 “Garden-paths, red lights and crossroads: On finding our way to understanding the cognitive mechanisms underlying jokes.” Israeli Journal of Humor Research: An International Journal1: 6–28.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Dynel, Marta
    2013 “Humorous phenomena in dramatic discourse.” The European Journal of Humor Research1: 22–60. 10.7592/EJHR2013.1.1.dynel
    https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2013.1.1.dynel [Google Scholar]
16. Dynel, Marta
    2016 “‘I has seen image macros!’: Advice Animals memes as visual-verbal jokes.” International Journal of Communication10: 660–688.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Forabosco, Giovannantonio
    1992 “Cognitive aspects of the humor process: The concept of incongruity.” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research5(1–2): 45–68.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Forabosco, Giovannantonio
    2008 “Is the concept of incongruity still a useful construct for the advancement of humor research?” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics4: 45–62. 10.2478/v10016‑008‑0003‑5
    https://doi.org/10.2478/v10016-008-0003-5 [Google Scholar]
19. García-Gómez, Antonio
    2010 “Disembodiment and cyberspace: Gendered discourses in female teenagers’ personal information disclosure.” Discourse and Society21(2): 135–160. 10.1177/0957926509353844
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926509353844 [Google Scholar]
20. Goffman, Erving
    1959 The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Kotthoff, Helga
    2006 “Gender and humor: The state of the art.” Journal of pragmatics38(1): 4–25. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.003 [Google Scholar]
22. Kowalski, Robin M., and Mark R. Leary
    1990 “Strategic self-presentation and the avoidance of aversive events: Antecedents and consequences of self-enhancement and self-depreciation.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology26(4): 322–336. 10.1016/0022‑1031(90)90042‑K
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(90)90042-K [Google Scholar]
23. Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen
    2015 “Jocular mockery in computer-mediated communication: A contrastive study of a Spanish and English Facebook community.” Journal of Politeness Research11(2): 289–327. 10.1515/pr‑2015‑0012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2015-0012 [Google Scholar]
24. Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen
    2018 “Emotional self-presentation on Whats­App: Analysis of the profile status.” Russian Journal of Linguistics22(1): 144–160. 10.22363/2312‑9182‑2018‑22‑1‑144‑160
    https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2018-22-1-144-160 [Google Scholar]
25. Manago, Adriana M., Michael B. Graham, Patricia M. Greenfield, and Goldie Salimkhan
    2008 “Self-presentation and gender on MySpace.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology29(6): 446–458. 10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.001 [Google Scholar]
26. Marone, Vittorio
    2017 “Looping out loud: A multimodal analysis of humour on Vine.” The European Journal of Humour Research4(4): 50–66. 10.7592/EJHR2016.4.4.marone
    https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2016.4.4.marone [Google Scholar]
27. Martin, Rod A.
    2007 The Psychology of Humor: An Integrative Approach. Burlington, MA: Elsevier. 10.1016/B978‑012372564‑6/50024‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012372564-6/50024-1 [Google Scholar]
28. McKenna, Katelyn Y. A., and John Bargh
    2000 “Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the Internet from personality and social psychology.” Personality and Social Psychology Review4(1): 57–75. 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0401_6
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0401_6 [Google Scholar]
29. Newman, David M.
    2019 Sociology: Exploring the Architecture of Everyday Life. New York: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Norrick, Neal R.
    1989 “Intertextuality in humor.” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research2(2): 117–140. 10.1515/humr.1989.2.2.117
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1989.2.2.117 [Google Scholar]
31. Norrick, Neal R.
    1993 “Repetition in canned jokes and spontaneous conversational joking.” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research6(4): 385–402. 10.1515/humr.1993.6.4.385
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1993.6.4.385 [Google Scholar]
32. Palmer, Jerry
    2003 Taking Humour Seriously. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203380154
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203380154 [Google Scholar]
33. Papacharissi, Zizi
    (ed.) 2011 A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Pennington, Natalie, and Jeffrey A. Hall
    2014 “An analysis of humor orientation on Facebook: A lens model approach.” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research27(1): 1–21. 10.1515/humor‑2013‑0053
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2013-0053 [Google Scholar]
35. Raskin, Victor
    1985 Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht: Reidel.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Sánchez-Moya, Alfonso, and Olga Cruz-Moya
    2015a “‘Hey there! I am using Whats­App’: A preliminary study of recurrent discursive realisations in a corpus of Whats­App statuses.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences212: 52–60. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.298
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.298 [Google Scholar]
37. Sánchez-Moya, Alfonso, and Olga Cruz-Moya
    2015b “Whatsapp, textese, and moral panics: Discourse features and habits across two generations.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences173: 300–306. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.069
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.069 [Google Scholar]
38. Shifman, Limor
    2007 “Humor in the age of digital reproduction: Continuity and change in internet-based comic texts.” International Journal of Communication1(1): 187–2009.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Shifman, Limor
    2014 Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Shultz, Thomas R.
    1972 “The role of incongruity and resolution in children’s appreciation of cartoon humor.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology13(3): 456–477. 10.1016/0022‑0965(72)90074‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(72)90074-4 [Google Scholar]
41. Smith, Grinell
    2008 “Does gender influence online survey participation?: A record-linkage analysis of university faculty online survey response behavior.” ERIC Document Reproduction ServiceNo. ED 501717.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Suls, Jerry H.
    1972 “A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons: An information processing analysis.” InThe Psychology of Humor: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Issues, ed. byJeffrey H. Goldstein, and Paul E. McGhee, 81–100. New York: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑288950‑9.50010‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-288950-9.50010-9 [Google Scholar]
43. Suls, Jerry H.
    1983 “Cognitive processes in humor appreciation.” InHandbook of Humor Research: Basic Issues, Vol.1, ed. byPaul E. McGhee, and Jeffrey H. Goldstein, 39–57. New York: Springer-Verlag. 10.1007/978‑1‑4612‑5572‑7_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5572-7_3 [Google Scholar]
44. Toma, Catalina L., and Jeffrey T. Hancock
    2010 “Looks and lies: The role of physical attractiveness in online dating self-presentation and deception.” Communication Research37(3): 335–351. 10.1177/0093650209356437
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209356437 [Google Scholar]
45. Toma, Catalina L., and Jeffrey T. Hancock
    2011 “A new twist on love’s labor: Self-presentation in online dating profiles.” InComputer-Mediated Communication in Personal Relationships, ed. byKevin B. Wright, and Lynne M. Webb, 41–55. New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Van Dijck, Teun
    2013 “‘You have one identity’: Performing the self on Facebook and LinkedIn.” Media, Culture and Society35(2): 199–215. 10.1177/0163443712468605
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443712468605 [Google Scholar]
47. Wen, Miaomiao, Nancy Baym, Omer Tamuz, Jaime Teevan, Susan T. Dumais, and Adam Kalai
    2015 “OMG UR funny! Computer-aided humor with an application to chat.” InProceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computational Creativity (ICCC 2015), 86–93. Park City, Utah, 29 June-2 July.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Wyer, Robert, and James. E. Collins
    1992 “A theory of humor elicitation.” Psychological Review99(4): 663–688. 10.1037/0033‑295X.99.4.663
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.4.663 [Google Scholar]
49. Yang, Chia-chen, and B. Bradford Brown
    2016 “Online self-presentation on Facebook and self-development during the college transition.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence45(2): 402–416. 10.1007/s10964‑015‑0385‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0385-y [Google Scholar]
50. Yus, Francisco
    2016 Humour and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/thr.4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.4 [Google Scholar]
51. Yus, Francisco
    2017 “Incongruity-resolution cases in jokes.” Lingua197: 103–122. 10.1016/j.lingua.2017.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2017.02.002 [Google Scholar]
52. Zhao, Shanyang, Sherri Grasmuck, and Jason Martin
    2008 “Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships.” Computers in Human Behavior24(5): 1816–1836. 10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.012 [Google Scholar]