1887
Volume 4, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2542-3851
  • E-ISSN: 2542-386X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Pragmatics, humour and the internet, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/ip.00067.yus-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00067.yus
2021-02-25
2021-05-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Chiaro, Delia
    2018The Language of Jokes in the Digital Age. Abingdon: Routledge. doi:  10.4324/9781315146348
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315146348 [Google Scholar]
  2. Chovanec, Jan
    2011 “Humor in quasi-conversations: Constructing fun in online sports journalism.” InThe Pragmatics of Humor across Discourse Domains, ed. byMarta Dynel, 243–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/pbns.210.16cho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.210.16cho [Google Scholar]
  3. Fernández Robin, Cristóbal, Scott McCoy, and Diego Yáñez
    2017 “WhatsApp.” InSocial Computing and Social Media: Applications and Analytics, ed. byGabriele Meiselwitz, 82–89. Cham: Springer. doi:  10.1007/978‑3‑319‑58562‑8_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58562-8_7 [Google Scholar]
  4. Hancock, Jeffrey T.
    2004 “LOL: Humor online.” Interactions11(5): 57–58. doi:  10.1145/1015530.1015557
    https://doi.org/10.1145/1015530.1015557 [Google Scholar]
  5. Kuipers, Giselinde
    2006Good Humor, Bad Taste: A Sociology of the Joke. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi:  10.1515/9781501510441
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501510441 [Google Scholar]
  6. Locher, Miriam A., and Brook Bolander
    2015 “Humor in microblogging: Exploiting linguistic humor strategies for identity construction in two Facebook focus groups.” InParticipation in Public and Social Media Interactions, ed. byMarta Dynel, and Jan Chovanec, 135–155. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/pbns.256.06loc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.256.06loc [Google Scholar]
  7. Mak, Chun N.
    2014 “Humor, small talk, and the construction of identity and power in workplace instant messaging.” PhD dissertation, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Marone, Vittorio
    2015 “Online humor as a community-building cushioning glue.” European Journal of Humour Research3(1): 61–83. doi:  10.7592/EJHR2015.3.1.marone
    https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2015.3.1.marone [Google Scholar]
  9. Norrick, Neal R.
    2003 “Issues in conversational joking.” Journal of Pragmatics35(9): 1333–1359. doi:  10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00180‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00180-7 [Google Scholar]
  10. Pennington, Natalie, and Jeffery A. Hall
    2014 “An analysis of humor orientation on Facebook: A lens model approach.” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research27(1): 1–21. doi:  10.1515/humor‑2013‑0053
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2013-0053 [Google Scholar]
  11. Vásquez, Camilla
    2019Language, Creativity and Humour Online. Abingdon: Routledge. doi:  10.4324/9781315159027
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315159027 [Google Scholar]
  12. Weitz, Eric
    2017 “Online and internet humor.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor, ed. bySalvatore Attardo, 504–518. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315731162‑35
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315731162-35 [Google Scholar]
  13. Wiggins, Bradley E.
    2019The Discursive Power of Memes in Digital Culture: Ideology, Semiotics, and Intertextuality. Abingdon: Routledge. doi:  10.4324/9780429492303
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429492303 [Google Scholar]
  14. Yus, Francisco
    2007Virtualidades reales. Nuevas formas de comunidad en la era de Internet [Real Virtualities: New Forms of Community in the Internet Age]. Alicante: University of Alicante, Servicio de Publicaciones.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 2008 “Inferring from comics: A multi-stage account.” InEl Discurs del Còmic (Quaderns de Filologia, Estudis de Comunicació, vol. III), ed. byPelegrí Sancho Cremades, Carmen Gregori Signes, and Santiago Renard, 223–249. Valencia: University of Valencia.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2011Cyberpragmatics: Internet-Mediated Communication in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/pbns.213
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.213 [Google Scholar]
  17. 2016aHumour and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/thr.4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.4 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2016b “Towards a cyberpragmatics of mobile instant messaging.” InYearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2016: Global Implications for Culture and Society in the Networked Age, ed. byJesús Romero-Trillo, 7–26. Cham: Springer. doi:  10.1007/978‑3‑319‑41733‑2_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41733-2_2 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2017 “Incongruity-resolution cases in jokes.” Lingua197: 103–122. doi:  10.1016/j.lingua.2017.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2017.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2018 “Positive non-humorous effects of humor on the internet.” InThe Dynamics of Interactional Humor: Creating and Negotiating Humor in Everyday Encounters, ed. byVilly Tsakona, and Jan Chovanec, 283–304. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/thr.7.12yus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.7.12yus [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00067.yus
Loading
  • Article Type: Introduction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error