1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Internet Pragmatics
  4. Volume 5, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2542-3851
  • E-ISSN: 2542-386X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper explores how ideological positions associated with food are construed multimodally in Instagram posts produced by everyday social media users. Discourse about food choices is an important site for revealing syndromes of values that characterise the ideological positions that are embedded in everyday life. An example of a highly valued food is the avocado which is an important bonding icon in semantic domains from veganism, clean eating, keto/low-carb eating, ethical/sustainable eating to fitness. We explore how values associated with avocado toast are enacted intermodally through the interplay of meanings made in the images, captions, and tags in a corpus of 64,585 Instagram posts tagged #avotoast. The study draws on previous social semiotic work on visual intersubjectivity and everyday aesthetics in social photography (Zhao and Zappavigna 2018a) to interpret the visual meanings made in these posts. It also draws on research into intermodal coupling (image-text relations) and ambient affiliation (online social bonding) (Zappavigna 2018) to understand how different values are construed in these texts. A modified grounded theory approach is used to isolate and exemplify the visual and textual features at stake, and then to explore ideological positionings through close multimodal analysis. A particularly interesting pattern in the corpus is the interaction of aesthetic and moralising discourses. For instance, a regulative metadiscourse realised through hashtags is used to project an instructional discourse about how to eat and what is considered ethical, sustainable, and nutritious food consumption. Rather than being directly encoded as judgement of behaviour these assessments tended to be expressed as appreciation of food items and their aesthetics or worth (e.g., clean, healthy, etc.).

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00068.rap
2021-02-15
2023-09-30

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ip.00068.rap
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adami, Esterino
    2017 “Pragmatics and the aesthetics of food discourse: Jamie’s Italy.” Anglistica AION: An Interdisciplinary Journal21(1): 53–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen, Michelle, Kacie M. Dickinson, and Ivanka Prichard
    2018 “The dirt on clean eating: A cross sectional analysis of dietary intake, restrained eating and opinions about clean eating among women.” Nutrients10(9): 1266. 10.3390/nu10091266
     https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10091266 [Google Scholar]
  3. Andersson, Helen
    2020 “Nature, nationalism and neoliberalism on food packaging: The case of Sweden.” Discourse, Context & Media34: 100329. 10.1016/j.dcm.2019.100329
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2019.100329 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker, Stephanie A., and Michael J. Walsh
    2020 “You are what you Instagram: Clean eating and the symbolic representation of food.” InDigital Food Cultures, ed. byDeborah Lupton, and Zeena Feldman, 53–68. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429402135‑6
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429402135-6 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
    1981 The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bernstein, Basil
    2003 Class, Codes and Control, vol.2, Applied Studies Towards a Sociology of Language. Abingdon: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Black, Rosalyn, and Lucas Walsh
    2019 Imagining Youth Futures: Imagining Youth Futures. Singapore: Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑13‑6760‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6760-1 [Google Scholar]
  8. Blum, Susan D.
    2017 “Eat food from [here]: The Talismanic semiotics of local food.” Semiotic Review (5). Available at: https://semioticreview.com/ojs/index.php/sr/article/view/2 (accessed15 July 2020).
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Cairns, Kate, and Josée Johnston
    2015 “Choosing health: Embodied neoliberalism, postfeminism, and the ‘do-diet.’” Theory and Society44(2): 153–175. 10.1007/s11186‑015‑9242‑y
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-015-9242-y [Google Scholar]
  10. Caple, Helen
    2012 “Balancing act: Image composition.” InNews Discourse, ed. byMonika Bednarek, and Helen Caple, 160–180. London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Christie, Frances
    2002 Classroom Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Coary, Sean, and Morgan Poor
    2016 “How consumer-generated images shape important consumption outcomes in the food domain.” Journal of Consumer Marketing33(1): 1–8. 10.1108/JCM‑02‑2015‑1337
     https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-02-2015-1337 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cotter, William M., and Mary-Caitlyn Valentinsson
    2018 “Bivalent class indexing in the sociolinguistics of specialty coffee talk.” Journal of Sociolinguistics22(5): 489–515. 10.1111/josl.12305
     https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12305 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cronin, James M., Mary B. McCarthy, and Alan M. Collins
    2014 “Covert distinction: How hipsters practice food-based resistance strategies in the production of identity.” Consumption Markets & Culture17(1): 2–28. 10.1080/10253866.2012.678785
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2012.678785 [Google Scholar]
  15. De Solier, Isabelle
    2013 Food and the Self: Consumption, Production and Material Culture. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350042179
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350042179 [Google Scholar]
  16. Djonov, Emilia, and Sumin Zhao
    2013 Critical Multimodal Studies of Popular Discourse. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203104286
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203104286 [Google Scholar]
  17. Ehgartner, Ulrike
    2018 “Discourses of the food retail industry: Changing understandings of ‘the consumer’ and strategies for sustainability.” Sustainable Production and Consumption16: 154–161. 10.1016/j.spc.2018.08.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  18. Eriksson, Göran, and David Machin
    2020 “Discourses of ‘Good Food’: The commercialization of healthy and ethical eating.” Discourse, Context & Media33: 100365. 10.1016/j.dcm.2019.100365
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2019.100365 [Google Scholar]
  19. Halliday, M. A. K., and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    2004 An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd edn.). London: Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    1986 “The ontogenesis of ideology: An interpretation of mother child talk.” Sydney Studies in Society and Culture3: 125–146.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Hoffman, Christian R.
    2017 “Log in: Introducing the pragmatics of social media.” InPragmatics of Social Media, ed. byChristian R. Hoffman, and Wolfram Bublitz, 1–28. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110431070‑001
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431070-001 [Google Scholar]
  22. Järlehed, Johan, and Máiréad Moriarty
    2018 “Culture and class in a glass: Scaling the semiofoodscape.” Language & Communication62: 26–38. 10.1016/j.langcom.2018.05.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  23. Knight, Naomi K.
    2013 “Evaluating experience in funny ways: How friends bond through conversational humour.” Text & Talk33(4–5): 553–574. 10.1515/text‑2013‑0025
     https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2013-0025 [Google Scholar]
  24. Leaver, Tama, Tim Highfield, and Crystal Abidin
    2020 Instagram: Visual Social Media Cultures. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Leddy, Thomas
    2012 The Extraordinary in the Ordinary: The Aesthetics of Everyday Life. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Lee, Carmen, and Dennis Chau
    2018 “Language as pride, love, and hate: Archiving emotions through multilingual Instagram hashtags.” Discourse, Context & Media22: 21–29. 10.1016/j.dcm.2017.06.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.06.002 [Google Scholar]
  27. Levin, Sam
    2017 “Millionaire tells millennials: If you want a house, stop buying avocado toast.” The Guardian, 15May. https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2017/may/15/australian-millionaire-millennials-avocado-toast-house (accessed18 July 2018).
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Lewis, Tania
    2018 “Digital food: From paddock to platform.” Communication Research and Practice4(3): 212–228. 10.1080/22041451.2018.1476795
     https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2018.1476795 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lupton, Deborah
    2018 “‘I just want it to be done, done, done!’: Food tracking apps, affects, and agential capacities.” Multimodal Technologies and Interaction2(2): 29. 10.3390/mti2020029
     https://doi.org/10.3390/mti2020029 [Google Scholar]
  30. Lupton, Deborah, and Bethaney Turner
    2016 “‘Both fascinating and disturbing’: Consumer responses to 3D food printing and implications for food activism.” InDigital Food Activism, ed. byTanja Schneider, Karin Eli, Catherine Dolan, and Stanley Ulijaszek, 151–167. Abingdon: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Mapes, Gwynne
    2018 “(De) constructing distinction: Class inequality and elite authenticity in mediatized food discourse.” Journal of sociolinguistics22(3): 265–287. 10.1111/josl.12285
     https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12285 [Google Scholar]
  32. 2020 “Marketing elite authenticity: Tradition and terroir in artisanal food discourse.” Discourse, Context & Media34: 100328. 10.1016/j.dcm.2019.100328
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2019.100328 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2021 Elite Authenticity: Remaking Distinction in Food Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780197533444.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197533444.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  34. Mapes, Gwynne, and Andrew S. Ross
    2020 “Making privilege palatable: Normative sustainability in chefs’ Instagram discourse.” Language in Society.   10.1017/S0047404520000895
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404520000895 [Google Scholar]
  35. Martin, J. R.
    2008 “Intermodal reconciliation: Mates in arms.” InNew Literacies and the English Curriculum: Multimodal Perspectives, ed. byLen Unsworth, 112–148. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Martin, J. R., and David Rose
    2008 Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. London: Equinox.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Martin, J. R., and P. R. R. White
    2005 The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  38. Martin, J. R., Michele Zappavigna, Paul Dwyer, and Chris Cléirigh
    2013 “Users in uses of language: Embodied identity in Youth Justice Conferencing.” Text & Talk33(4–5): 467–496. 10.1515/text‑2013‑0022
     https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2013-0022 [Google Scholar]
  39. Matley, David
    2018 “‘This is NOT a #humblebrag, this is just a #brag’: The pragmatics of self-praise, hashtags and politeness in Instagram posts.” Discourse, Context & Media22: 30–38. 10.1016/j.dcm.2017.07.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.07.007 [Google Scholar]
  40. 2020 “‘I can’t believe #Ziggy #Stardust died’: Stance, fan identities and multimodality in reactions to the death of David Bowie on Instagram.” Pragmatics30(2): 247–276. 10.1075/prag.18061.mat
     https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.18061.mat [Google Scholar]
  41. Matwick, Kelsi, and Keri Matwick
    2019 Food Discourse of Celebrity Chefs of Food Network. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑31430‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31430-9 [Google Scholar]
  42. McDonagh, Pierre, and Andrea Prothero
    2005 “Food, markets & culture: The representation of food in everyday life.” Consumption Markets & Culture8(1): 1–5. 10.1080/10253860500068895
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10253860500068895 [Google Scholar]
  43. Middha, Bhavna
    2018 “Everyday digital engagements: Using food selfies on Facebook to explore eating practices.” Communication Research and Practice4(3): 291–306. 10.1080/22041451.2018.1476796
     https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2018.1476796 [Google Scholar]
  44. Orenstein, Jayne
    2016 “How the Internet became ridiculously obsessed with avocado toast.” The Washington Post, 6May. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/05/06/how-the-internet-became-ridiculously-obsessed-with-avocado-toast/ (accessed9 December 2020).
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Paddock, Jessica
    2016 “Positioning food cultures: ‘Alternative’ food as distinctive consumer practice.” Sociology50(6): 1039–1055. 10.1177/0038038515585474
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038515585474 [Google Scholar]
  46. Page, Ruth
    2012 “The linguistics of self-branding and micro-celebrity in Twitter: The role of hashtags.” Discourse & Communication6(2): 181–201. 10.1177/1750481312437441
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481312437441 [Google Scholar]
  47. Pichler, Pia, and Nathanael Williams
    2016 “Hipsters in the hood: Authenticating indexicalities in young men’s hip-hop talk.” Language in Society45(4): 557–581. 10.1017/S0047404516000427
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404516000427 [Google Scholar]
  48. Riley, Kathleen C., and Jillian R. Cavanaugh
    2017 “Tasty talk, expressive food: An introduction to the semiotics of food-and-language.” Semiotic Review5. https://www.semioticreview.com/ojs/index.php/sr/issue/view/1/71
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Ross, Andrew S., and Gwynne Mapes
    2020 “Food, class and ideological political affiliation: Indexical fields in the #secondcivilwarletters tweets.” Language & Communication74: 103–112. 10.1016/j.langcom.2020.06.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2020.06.007 [Google Scholar]
  50. Rousseau, Signe
    2012 Food and Social Media: You are What You Tweet. Lanham: AltaMira Press. 10.5040/9781350042193
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350042193 [Google Scholar]
  51. Schaefer, Sara E., Charlotte Biltekoff, Carolyn Thomas, and Roxanne N. Rashedi
    2016 “Healthy, vague: Exploring health as a priority in food choice.” Food, Culture & Society19(2): 227–250. 10.1080/15528014.2016.1178527
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15528014.2016.1178527 [Google Scholar]
  52. Schneider, Tanja, Karin Eli, Catherine Dolan, and Stanley Ulijaszek
    2017 Digital Food Activism. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315109930
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315109930 [Google Scholar]
  53. Scott, Kate
    2018 “‘Hashtags work everywhere’: The pragmatic functions of spoken hashtags.” Discourse, Context & Media22:57–64.   10.1016/j.dcm.2017.07.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  54. Shugart, Helene A.
    2014 “Food fixations: Reconfiguring class in contemporary food discourse.” Food, Culture & Society17 (2):261–281. 10.2752/175174414X13871910531665
     https://doi.org/10.2752/175174414X13871910531665 [Google Scholar]
  55. Smith, Angela
    2020 “Clean eating’s surprising normalisation: The case of Nigella Lawson.” Discourse, Context & Media35: 100376. 10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100376
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100376 [Google Scholar]
  56. Tovares, Alla, and Cynthia Gordon
    (eds.) 2021 Identity and Ideology in Digital Food Discourse. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350119178
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350119178 [Google Scholar]
  57. Zappavigna, Michele
    2011 “Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter.” New Media & Society13(5): 788–806. 10.1177/1461444810385097
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810385097 [Google Scholar]
  58. 2012 Discourse of Twitter and Social Media. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. 2014a “Ambient affiliation in microblogging: Bonding around the quotidian.” Media International Australia151(1): 97–103. 10.1177/1329878X1415100113
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X1415100113 [Google Scholar]
  60. 2014b “Coffeetweets: Bonding around the bean on Twitter.” InThe Language of Social Media: Communication and Community on the Internet, ed. byPhillip Seargeant, and Caroline Tagg, 139–160. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137029317_7
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137029317_7 [Google Scholar]
  61. 2016 “Social media photography: Construing subjectivity in Instagram images.” Visual Communication15(3): 271–292. 10.1177/1470357216643220
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357216643220 [Google Scholar]
  62. 2017a “Evaluation.” InPragmatics of Social Media, ed. byChristian R. Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 435–459. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110431070‑016
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431070-016 [Google Scholar]
  63. 2017b “‘had enough of experts’: Intersubjectivity and quotation in social media.” InStudies in Corpus-Based Sociolinguistics, ed. byEricson Friginal, 321–343. New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. 2018 Searchable Talk: Hashtags and Social Media Metadiscourse. London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Zappavigna, Michele, and J. R. Martin
    2018 Discourse and Diversionary Justice: An Analysis of Ceremonial Redress in Youth Justice Conferencing. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑63763‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63763-1 [Google Scholar]
  66. Zappavigna, Michele, and Sumin Zhao
    2020 “Selfies and recontextualisation: A social semiotic perspective on the visual structure of Instagram images.” InPhotography and Its Publics, ed. byMelissa Miles and Edward Welch, 207–227. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003103721‑16
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003103721-16 [Google Scholar]
  67. Zhao, Sumin
    2010 “Intersemiotic relations as logogenetic patterns: The time factor in hypertext description.” InNew Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation, ed. byMonika Bednarek, and J. R. Martin, 195–218. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Zhao, Sumin, and Michele Zappavigna
    2018a “Beyond the self: Intersubjectivity and the social semiotic interpretation of the selfie.” New Media & Society20(5): 1735–1754. 10.1177/1461444817706074
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817706074 [Google Scholar]
  69. 2018b “Digital scrapbooks, everyday aesthetics & the curatorial self: Social photography in female visual blogging.” InMultimodality and Aesthetics, ed. byElise S. Tønnessen, and Frida Forsgren, 218–235. New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. 2018c “The interplay of technologies and genre: The case of the selfie.” Social Semiotics28: 665–682. 10.1080/10350330.2018.1504724
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2018.1504724 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00068.rap
Loading
Instagram and intermodal configurations of value
Internet Pragmatics 5, 197 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00068.rap
/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00068.rap
/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00068.rap
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): ambient affiliation; ideology; Instagram; multimodal discourse analysis; social media discourse; social media photography

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error