1887
image of Becoming #Instafamous
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Drawing on metaphor of stage, this paper considers Instagram a frontstage environment where users are cautious of being watched and attune their performance to how they want to be perceived via strategic self-presentation. This understanding of online performance is particularly pertinent in the discussions of bloggers who turn to Instagram to promote their work to new audiences. Examining the self-presentation practices of three fashion bloggers, this paper argues that to gain popularity on Instagram, bloggers utilize the features of formality and informality in the construction of an authentic and likable self-image. Since in the photographs the bloggers’ professional life is usually depicted as distant from their audience’s reality, the accompanying textual caption serves as a means of providing balance for the overall image the poster seeks to present. Consequently, the caption abounds with features of informality, which connote linguistic immediacy and imitate an intimate conversation with peers.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00069.kov
2021-03-22
2021-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abidin, Crystal
    2015 “Micromicrocelebrity: Branding babies on the Internet.” M/C Journal18(5): n.p.. 10.5204/mcj.1022
    https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.1022 [Google Scholar]
  2. 2016 “Visibility labour: Engaging with influencers’ fashion brands and #OOTD advertorial campaigns on Instagram.” Media International Australia161(1): 86–100. 10.1177/1329878X16665177
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X16665177 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2018Internet Celebrity: Understanding Fame Online. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited. 10.1108/9781787560765
    https://doi.org/10.1108/9781787560765 [Google Scholar]
  4. Barton, David, and Carmen Lee
    2013Language Online: Investigating Digital Texts and Practices. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203552308
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203552308 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bednarek, Monika, and Helen Caple
    2012News Discourse. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bös, Birte, and Sonja Kleinke
    2017 “Publicness and privateness.” InPragmatics of Social Media, ed. byChristian R. Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 83–121. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110431070‑004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431070-004 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  8. Carter, Rebekah
    2019 “How to get on the Instagram Explore page.” https://sproutsocial.com/insights/instagram-explore/ (accessed31 May 2020).
  9. Crystal, David
    2001Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139164771
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164771 [Google Scholar]
  10. Davies, Bryony, Mark Turner, and Julie Udell
    2020 “Add a comment … how fitspiration and body positive captions attached to social media images influence the mood and body esteem of young female Instagram users.” Body Image33: 101–105. 10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.02.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.02.009 [Google Scholar]
  11. Djafarova, Elmira, and Chloe Rushworth
    2017 “Exploring the credibility of online celebrities’ Instagram profiles in influencing the purchase decisions of your female users.” Computers in Human Behavior68: 1–7. 10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.009 [Google Scholar]
  12. Duffy, Brooke Erin
    2017(Not) Getting Paid to Do What You Love. New Haven: Yale University Press. 10.12987/yale/9780300218176.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300218176.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dynel, Marta
    2017 “Participation as audience design.” InPragmatics of Social Media, ed. byChristian R. Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 61–82. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110431070‑003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431070-003 [Google Scholar]
  14. Eisenlauer, Volker, and Christian R. Hoffmann
    2010 “Once upon a blog … Storytelling in weblogs.” InNarrative Revisited: Telling a Story in the Age of New Media, ed. byChristian R. Hoffman, 79–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.199.06eis
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.199.06eis [Google Scholar]
  15. García-Rapp, Florencia
    2016 “The digital media phenomenon of YouTube beauty gurus: The case of Bubzbeauty.” International Journal of Web Based Communities12(4): 360–375. 10.1504/IJWBC.2016.10001832
    https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWBC.2016.10001832 [Google Scholar]
  16. Georgakopoulou, Alex
    2019 “Designing stories on social media: A corpus-assisted critical perspective on the mismatches of story-curation.” Linguistics and Education, 100737. doi:  10.1016/j.linged.2019.05.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  17. Gibbs, Martin, James Meese, Michael Arnold, Bjorn Nansen, and Marcus Carter
    2015 “#Funeral and Instagram: Death, social media, and platform vernacular.” Information, Communication & Society18(3): 255–268. 10.1080/1369118X.2014.987152
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.987152 [Google Scholar]
  18. Goffman, Erving
    1990 [1959]The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Guthrie, Scott
    2019 “Fashion bloggers switching to Instagram says survey.” https://influenceonline.co.uk/2019/03/22/fashion-bloggers-switching-to-instagram-says-survey/ (accessed31 May 2020).
  20. Ismail, Kaya
    2018 “Social media influencers: Mega, macro, micro or nano.” https://www.cmswire.com/digital-marketing/social-media-influencers-mega-macro-micro-or-nano/ (accessed31 May 2020).
  21. Jerslev, Anne
    2016 “In the time of the microcelebrity: Celebrification and the YouTuber Zoella.” International Journal of Communication10: 5233–5251.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Koch, Peter, and Wulf Oesterreicher
    1985 “Sprache der Nähe – Sprache der Distanz: Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte [Language of immediacy – Language of distance: Orality and literacy from the perspective of language theory and linguistic history].” Romanistisches Jahrbuch36: 15–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen
    2006Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203619728
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728 [Google Scholar]
  24. Laestadius, Linnea
    2017 “Instagram.” InThe SAGE Handbook of Social Media Research Methods, ed. byLuke Sloan, and Anabel Quan-Haase, 573–592. London: SAGE Reference.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Landert, Daniela
    2014Personalisation in Mass Media Communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.240
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.240 [Google Scholar]
  26. Landert, Daniela, and Andreas H. Jucker
    2011 “Private and public in mass media communication: From letters to the editor to online commentaries.” Journal of Pragmatics43(5): 1422–1434. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.016 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lee, Carmen
    2014 “Language choice and self-presentation in social media: The case of university students in Hong Kong.” InThe Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet, ed. byPhilip Seargeant, and Caroline Tagg, 91–111. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137029317_5
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137029317_5 [Google Scholar]
  28. Locher, Miriam
    2006Advice Online: Advice-giving in an American Internet Health Column. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.149
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.149 [Google Scholar]
  29. Madianou, Mirca, and Daniel Miller
    2012 “Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication.” International Journal of Cultural Studies16(2): 169–187. 10.1177/1367877912452486
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877912452486 [Google Scholar]
  30. Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen
    2017 “Getting ‘liked.’” InPragmatics of Social Media, ed. byChristian R. Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 575–606. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110431070‑021
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431070-021 [Google Scholar]
  31. Marwick, Alice E.
    2015 “Instafame: Luxury selfies in the attention economy.” Public Culture27(1): 137–160. 10.1215/08992363‑2798379
    https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-2798379 [Google Scholar]
  32. 2016 “You may know me from YouTube: (Micro-)celebrity in social media.” InA Companion to Celebrity, ed. byP. David Marshall, and Sean Redmond, 333–350. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Marwick, Alice E., and danah boyd
    2010 “I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience.” New Media & Society13(1): 114–133. 10.1177/1461444810365313
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313 [Google Scholar]
  34. Matley, David
    2018 “‘Let’s see how many of you mother fuckers unfollow me for this’: The pragmatic function of the hashtag #sorrynotsorry in non-apologetic Instagram posts.” Journal of Pragmatics133: 66–78. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.06.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.06.003 [Google Scholar]
  35. Meese, James, Martin Gibbs, Marcus Carter, Michael Arnold, Bjorn Nansen, and Tamara Kohn
    2015 “Selfies at funerals: Mourning and presencing on social media platforms.” International Journal of Communication9: 1818–1831.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Meinhof, Ulrike Hanna
    1994 “Double talk in news broadcasts: A cross-cultural comparison of pictures and texts in television news.” InMedia Texts: Authors and Readers, ed. byDavid Graddol, and Oliver Boyd-Barrett, 212–223. Clevedon: Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Page, Ruth
    2012 “The linguistics of self-branding and micro-celebrity in Twitter: The role of hashtags.” Discourse & Communication6(2): 181–201. 10.1177/1750481312437441
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481312437441 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2014 “Hoaxes, hacking and humour: Analysing impersonated identity on social network sites.” InThe Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet, ed. byPhilip Seargeant, and Caroline Tagg, 46–64. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137029317_3
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137029317_3 [Google Scholar]
  39. Page, Ruth, David Barton, Johann W. Unger, and Michele Zappavigna
    2014Researching Language and Social Media: A Student Guide. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315771786
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315771786 [Google Scholar]
  40. Puschmann, Cornelius
    2013 “Blogging.” InPragmatics of Computer-mediated Communication, ed. bySusan C. Herring, Dieter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen, 83–108. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214468.83
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214468.83 [Google Scholar]
  41. Schmidt, Jan-Hirnik
    2014 “Twitter and the rise of personal publics.” InTwitter and Society, ed. byKatrin Weller, Alex Bruns, Jean Burgess, Merja Mahrt, and Cornelius Puschmann, 3–14. New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Seargeant, Philip, and Caroline Tagg
    2014 “Introduction: The language of social media.” InThe Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet, ed. byPhilip Seargeant, and Caroline Tagg, 1–20. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137029317_1
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137029317_1 [Google Scholar]
  43. Shulman, David
    2017The Presentation of Self in Contemporary Social Life. Los Angeles: Sage. 10.4135/9781506340913
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506340913 [Google Scholar]
  44. Tagg, Caroline
    2011 “Wot did he say or could u not c him 4 dust? Written and spoken creativity in text messaging.” InTransforming Literacies and Language: Multimodality and Literacy in the New Media Age, ed. byCaroline M. L. Ho, Kate T. Anderson, and Alvin P. Leong, 223–236. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Uzunoğlu, Ebru, and Sema Misci Kip
    2014 “Brand communication through digital influencers: Leveraging blogger engagement.” International Journal of Information Management34(5): 592–602. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.04.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.04.007 [Google Scholar]
  46. van Dijck, José, and Thomas Poell
    2013 “Understanding social media logic.” Media and Communication1(1): 2–14. 10.17645/mac.v1i1.70
    https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v1i1.70 [Google Scholar]
  47. van Driel, Loes, and Delia Dumitrica
    2021 “Selling brands while staying ‘authentic’: The professionalization of Instagram influencers.” Convergence27(1): 66–84. 10.1177/1354856520902136
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856520902136 [Google Scholar]
  48. Vuelio
    Vuelio. n.d. “UK Bloggers Survey 2019: The Definitive Guide to Influencer Marketing.” https://www.vuelio.com/uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/UK-Bloggers-Survey-2019.pdf (accessed31 May 2020).
  49. Weber, Rose-Marie
    1986 “Variation in spelling and the special case of colloquial contractions.” Visible Language20(4): 413–426.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Yang, Chia-chen, and B. Bradford Brown
    2016 “Online self-presentation on Facebook and self development during the college transition.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence45: 402–416. 10.1007/s10964‑015‑0385‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0385-y [Google Scholar]
  51. Zappavigna, Michele
    2011 “Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter.” New Media & Society13(5): 788–806. 10.1177/1461444810385097
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810385097 [Google Scholar]
  52. 2012Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00069.kov
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error