1887
image of Intimate consumptions
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In this paper, I investigate how the structure of and discursive performance on North American YouTube eating shows contribute to the creation of intimacy and informality. In a typical eating show, the performer eats copious amounts of food while talking to their non-copresent audience, making use of interactional registers to ‘break’ from the solitary setting and to build rapport with their viewers. The material for this study is based on two case studies drawn from a corpus of YouTube eating shows. At the heart of the eating show performances lies the persona of a ‘friend’ of the viewer, diverting from their highly structured and technologically-mediated communicative nature. While the language used on eating shows may thus seem spontaneous and unprompted, the videos are not only planned but also edited. The simultaneous presence of selected unedited moments (i.e., slips of the tongue and other mishaps), however, is evidence of a conscious blending of front- and backstage performance ( ).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00070.rud
2021-03-12
2021-05-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abidin, Crystal
    2015 “Communicative ❤ intimacies: Influencers and perceived interconnectedness.” Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology8: n.p. doi:  10.7264/N3MW2FFG
    https://doi.org/10.7264/N3MW2FFG [Google Scholar]
  2. 2018Internet Celebrity: Understanding Fame Online. Bingley: Emerald Publishing. 10.1108/9781787560765
    https://doi.org/10.1108/9781787560765 [Google Scholar]
  3. Adema, Pauline
    2009Garlic Capital of the World: Gilroy, Garlic, and the Making of a Festive Foodscape. Jackson: University of Mississippi Press. 10.14325/mississippi/9781604731200.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.14325/mississippi/9781604731200.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  4. Andersen, Joceline
    2015 “Now you’ve got the shiveries: Affect, intimacy, and the ASMR whisper community.” Television & New Media16(8): 683–700. 10.1177/1527476414556184
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476414556184 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bauman, Richard
    1975 “Verbal art as performance.” American Anthropologist77: 290–311. 10.1525/aa.1975.77.2.02a00030
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1975.77.2.02a00030 [Google Scholar]
  6. Biber, Doug
    1988Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bruno, Antonetta L., and Somin Chung
    2017 “Mŏkpang: Pay me and I’ll show you how much I can eat for your pleasure.” Journal of Japanese and Korean Cinema9(2): 155–171. 10.1080/17564905.2017.1368150
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17564905.2017.1368150 [Google Scholar]
  8. Burgess, Jean, and Joshua Green
    2009YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Choe, Hanwool
    2019 “Eating together multimodally: Collaborative eating in mukbang, a Korean livestream of eating.” Language in Society48(2): 171–208. 10.1017/S0047404518001355
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404518001355 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2020 “Talking the cat: Footing lamination in a Korean livestream of cats mukbang.” Journal of Pragmatics160: 60–79. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.02.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.02.009 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cortés-Conde, Florencia, and Diana Boxer
    2010 “Humorous self-disclosures as resistance to socially imposed gender roles.” Gender & Language4(1): 73–97. 10.1558/genl.v4i1.73
    https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.v4i1.73 [Google Scholar]
  12. Donnar, Glen
    2017 “‘Food porn’ or intimate sociality: Committed celebrity and cultural performances of overeating in meokbang.” Celebrity Studies8(1): 122–127. 10.1080/19392397.2016.1272857
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2016.1272857 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dyer, Richard
    1991 “A star is born and the construction of authenticity.” InStardom: Industry of Desire, ed. byChristine Gledhill, 132–140. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203400425_chapter_11
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203400425_chapter_11 [Google Scholar]
  14. Fairclough, Norman
    1989Language and Power. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Frobenius, Maximiliane
    2014 “Audience design in monologues: How vloggers involve their viewers.” Journal of Pragmatics72: 59–72. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.008 [Google Scholar]
  16. Goffman, Erving
    1959The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books, Doubleday.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Heylighen, Francis, and Jean-Marc Dewaele
    2002 “Variation in the contextuality of language: An empirical measure.” Foundations of Science7: 293–340. 10.1023/A:1019661126744
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019661126744 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hochschild, Arlie Russell
    1983The Managed Heart: Commercialisation of Human Feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Horton, Donald, and R. Richard Wohl
    1956 “Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance.” Psychiatry – Interpersonal and Biological Processes19(3): 215–229. 10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049 [Google Scholar]
  20. Ilie, Cornelia
    2001 “Semi-institutional discourse: The case of talk shows.” Journal of Pragmatics33: 209–254. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00133‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00133-2 [Google Scholar]
  21. Irvine, Judith T.
    1979 “Formality and informality in communicative events.” American Anthropologist81: 773–790. 10.1525/aa.1979.81.4.02a00020
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1979.81.4.02a00020 [Google Scholar]
  22. Ketchum, Cheri
    2005 “The essence of cooking shows: How the Food Network constructs consumer fantasies.” Journal of Communication Inquiry29(3): 217–234. 10.1177/0196859905275972
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859905275972 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kofoed, Jette, and Malene C. Larsen
    2016 “A snap of intimacy: Photo-sharing practices among young people on social media.” First Monday21(11): n.p. doi:  10.5210/fm.v21i11.6905
    https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i11.6905 [Google Scholar]
  24. Koppen, Kim, Mirjam Ernestus, and Margot van Mulken
    2019 “The influence of social distance on speech behavior: Formality variation in casual speech.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory15(1): 139–165. 10.1515/cllt‑2016‑0056
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2016-0056 [Google Scholar]
  25. Labov, William
    1972Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Marwick, Alice E.
    2016 “You may know me from YouTube: (Micro-)celebrity in social media.” InA Companion to Celebrity, ed. byP. David Marshall, and Sean Redmond, 333–350. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Marwick, Alice E., and danah boyd
    2010 “I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience.” New Media & Society13(1): 114–133. 10.1177/1461444810365313
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313 [Google Scholar]
  28. Matwick, Kelsi, and Keri Matwick
    2019Food Discourse of Celebrity Chefs of Food Network. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑31430‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31430-9 [Google Scholar]
  29. Matwick, Keri, and Kelsi Matwick
    2017 “Self-deprecatory humor on TV cooking shows.” Language & Communication56: 33–41. 10.1016/j.langcom.2017.04.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2017.04.005 [Google Scholar]
  30. Mayer-Schönberger, Viktor
    2009Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Mühleisen, Susanne
    2020 “Formality and informality in cooking shows: Paula Deen and the development of a genre.” InTalking about Food: The Social and the Global in Eating Communities, ed. bySofia Rüdiger, and Susanne Mühleisen, 189–207. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/impact.47.10muh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.47.10muh [Google Scholar]
  32. Naccarato, Peter, and Kathleen Lebesco
    2012Culinary Capital. London: Berg. 10.5040/9781350042131
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350042131 [Google Scholar]
  33. OED
    OED. n.d. “informal, adj.” https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/95561 (accessed20 July 2020).
  34. Orange, Michelle
    2017 “Screening the world: Entertainment unboxed.” Virginia Quarterly Review93(3): 182–185https://www.vqronline.org/tv-film-criticism/2017/07/screening-world/ (accessed20 July 2020).
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Page, Ruth
    2019 “Self-denigration and the mixed messages of ‘ugly’ selfies in Instagram.” Internet Pragmatics2(2): 173–205. 10.1075/ip.00035.pag
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00035.pag [Google Scholar]
  36. Papacharissi, Zizi
    2002 “The presentation of self in virtual life: Characteristics of personal home pages.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly79(3): 643–660. 10.1177/107769900207900307
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900207900307 [Google Scholar]
  37. Pihlaja, Stephen
    2017 “More than fifty shades of grey: Copyright on social network sites.” Applied Linguistics Review8(2–3): 213–228. 10.1515/applirev‑2016‑1036
    https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2016-1036 [Google Scholar]
  38. Robinson, Laura
    2007 “The cyberself: The self-ing project goes online, symbolic interaction in the digital age.” New Media & Society9(1): 93–110. 10.1177/1461444807072216
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807072216 [Google Scholar]
  39. Rüdiger, Sofia
    2020 “Dinner for one: The use of language in eating shows on YouTube.” InTalking about Food: The Social and the Global in Eating Communities, ed. bySofia Rüdiger, and Susanne Mühleisen, 145–165. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/impact.47.08rud
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.47.08rud [Google Scholar]
  40. Schau, Hope Jensen, and Mary C. Gilly
    2003 “We are what we post? Self-presentation in personal web space.” Journal of Consumer Research30: 385–404. 10.1086/378616
    https://doi.org/10.1086/378616 [Google Scholar]
  41. Schwämmlein, Eva, and Katrin Wodzicki
    2012 “What to tell about me? Self-presentation in online communities.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication17(4): 387–407. 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2012.01582.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01582.x [Google Scholar]
  42. Schwegler-Castañer, Astrid
    2018 “At the intersection of thinness and overconsumption: The ambivalence of munching, crunching, and slurping on camera.” Feminist Media Studies18(4): 782–785. 10.1080/14680777.2018.1478694
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1478694 [Google Scholar]
  43. Senft, Theresa M.
    2013 “Microcelebrity and the branded self.” InA Companion to New Media Dynamics, ed. byJohn Hartley, Jean Burgess, and Axel Bruns, 346–354. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118321607.ch22
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118321607.ch22 [Google Scholar]
  44. Shulman, David
    2017The Presentation of Self in Contemporary Social Life. Los Angeles: Sage. 10.4135/9781506340913
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506340913 [Google Scholar]
  45. Starr, Rebecca Lurie, Tianxiao Wang, and Christian Go
    2020 “Sexuality vs. sensuality: The multimodal construction of affective stance in Chinese ASMR performances.” Journal of Sociolinguistics24(4): 492–513. 10.1111/josl.12410
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12410 [Google Scholar]
  46. West, Sarah Myers
    2019 “Data capitalism: Redefining the logics of surveillance and privacy.” Business & Society58(1): 20–41. 10.1177/0007650317718185
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650317718185 [Google Scholar]
  47. Zappavigna, Michele
    2020 “Digital intimacy and ambient embodied copresence in YouTube videos: Construing visual and aural perspective in ASMR role play videos.” Visual Communication: Online First. doi:  10.1177/1470357220928102
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357220928102 [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhang, Ge, and Larissa Hjorth
    2019 “Live-streaming, games and politics of gender performance: The case of Nüzhubo in China.” Convergence25(5–6): 807–825. 10.1177/1354856517738160
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517738160 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00070.rud
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00070.rud
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error