Days of our ‘quarantined’ lives

References

1. Aslan, Erhan
   2021 “When the internet gets ‘coronafied’: Pandemic creativity and humor in internet memes.” InViral Discourse: Doing Discourse Analysis in the Midst of a Pandemiced. byRodney H. Jones, 49–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aslan, Erhan, and Camilla Vásquez
   2018 “‘Cash me ousside’: A citizen sociolinguistic analysis of online metalinguistic commentary.” Journal of Sociolinguistics22(4): 406–431.   10.1111/josl.12303
   https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12303 [Google Scholar]
3. Bayerl, Petra Saskia and Lachezar Stoynov
   2016 “Revenge by photoshop: Memefying police acts in the public dialogue about injustice.” New Media & Society18(6):1006–1026.   10.1177/1461444814554747
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814554747 [Google Scholar]
4. Bischetti, Luca, Paolo Canal, and Valentina Bambini
   2021 “Funny but aversive: A large-scale survey of the emotional response to Covid-19 humor in the Italian population during the lockdown.” Lingua249: 102963.   10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102963
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102963 [Google Scholar]
5. boyd, danah, and Kate Crawford
   2012 “Critical questions for big data.” Information, Communication & Society15(5): 662–679.   10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
   https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878 [Google Scholar]
6. Cauberghe, Verolien, Ini Van Wesenbeeck, Steffi De Jans, Liselot Hudders, and Koen Ponnet
   2020 “How adolescents use social media to cope with feelings of loneliness and anxiety during COVID-19 lockdown.” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking24(4): 250–257.   10.1089/cyber.2020.0478
   https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0478 [Google Scholar]
7. Chiaro, Delia
   2018 The Language of Jokes in the Digital Age. Abingdon: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Chovanec, Jan
   2019 “Early Titanic jokes: a disaster for the theory of disaster jokes?” Humor32(2): 201–225.   10.1515/humor‑2018‑0090
   https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2018-0090 [Google Scholar]
9. Cialdini, Robert. B.
   2009 Influence: Science and Practice (5th edn.). New York: Harper Collins.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dancygier, Barbara, and Lieven Vandelanotte
    2017 “Internet memes as multimodal constructions.” Cognitive Linguistics28(3): 565–598.   10.1515/cog‑2017‑0074
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2017-0074 [Google Scholar]
11. Danesi, Marcel
    2019 Understanding Media Semiotics (2nd edn.). London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dawkins, Richard
    1976 The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Demjén, Zsófia
    2016 “Laughing at cancer: Humour, empowerment, solidarity and coping online.” Journal of Pragmatics101: 18–30.   10.1016/j.pragma.2016.05.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.05.010 [Google Scholar]
14. Denisova, Anastasia
    2019 Internet Memes and Society: Social, Cultural, and Political Contexts. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429469404
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429469404 [Google Scholar]
15. Dundes, Alan
    1987 “At ease, disease – AIDS Jokes as sick humor.” American Behavioral Scientist30(3): 72–81.   10.1177/000276487030003006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/000276487030003006 [Google Scholar]
16. Dynel, Marta
    2016 “‘I has seen image macros!’: Advice animal memes as visual-verbal jokes.” International Journal of Communication10: 660–688. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/4101 (accessed10 July 2019).
    [Google Scholar]
17. Dynel, Marta
    2021 “COVID-19 memes going viral: On the multiple multimodal voices behind face masks.” Discourse & Society32(2): 175–195.   10.1177/0957926520970385
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520970385 [Google Scholar]
18. Dynel, Marta, and Fabio I. M. Poppi
    2018 “In tragoedia risus: Analysis of dark humour in post-terrorist attack discourse.” Discourse & Communication12(4): 382–400.   10.1177/1750481318757777
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481318757777 [Google Scholar]
19. Flecha Ortiz, José A., Maria A. Santos Corrada, Evelyn Lopez, and Virgin Dones
    2021 “Analysis of the use of memes as an exponent of collective coping during COVID-19 in Puerto Rico.” Media International Australia178(1): 168–181.   10.1177/1329878X20966379
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X20966379 [Google Scholar]
20. Freud, Sigmund
    1905 Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious. New York: Norton.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Global Web Index
    Global Web Index (2020, March25). “Coronavirus research, series 4: Media consumption and sport. https://www.globalwebindex.com/hubfs/1.%20Coronavirus%20Research%20PDFs/GWI%20coronavirus%20findings%20April%202020%20-%20Media%20Consumption​%20(Release%204).pdf (accessed25 March 2020).
22. Hatfield, Elaine, John T. Cacioppo, and Richard L. Rapson
    1994 Emotional Contagion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hussein, Ahmed T., and Lina Nabil Aljamili
    2020 “COVID-19 humor in Jordanian social media: A socio-semiotic approach.” Heliyon6(12): e05696.   10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05696
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05696 [Google Scholar]
24. Jewitt, Carey
    2016 “Multimodal analysis.” InHandbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. byAlexandra Georgakopoulou, and Tereza Spillioti, 69–84. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kertcher, Chen and Ornat Turin
    2020 “‘Siege mentality’ reaction to the pandemic: Israeli memes during Covid-19.” Postdigital Science Education2: 581–587.   10.1007/s42438‑020‑00175‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00175-8 [Google Scholar]
26. Knobel, Michelle, and Colin Lankshear
    2007 “Online memes, affinities, and cultural production.” InA New Literacies Sampler, ed. byMichelle Knobel, and Colin Lankshear, 199–229. New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Know Your Meme
    Know Your Meme 2020 “COVID-19 Meme Insights.” https://insights.knowyourmeme.com/covid-19 (accessed6 June 2020).
28. Kuiper, Nicholas A., Sandra D. Mckenzie, and Kristine A. Belanger
    1995 “Cognitive appraisals and individual differences in sense of humor: Motivational and affective implications.” Personality and Individual Differences19: 359–372.   10.1016/0191‑8869(95)00072‑E
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(95)00072-E [Google Scholar]
29. Lefcourt, Herbet M., Karina Davidson, Robert Shepherd, Margory Phillips, Ken Prkachin, and David Mills
    1995 “Perspective-taking humor: Accounting for stress moderation.” Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology14(4): 373–391.   10.1521/jscp.1995.14.4.373
    https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1995.14.4.373 [Google Scholar]
30. Marcus, Olivia Rose and Merrill Singer
    2017 “Loving Ebola-chan: Internet memes in an epidemic.” Media, Culture & Society39(3): 341–356.   10.1177/0163443716646174
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443716646174 [Google Scholar]
31. Martin, Rod A., and Thomas E. Ford
    2018 The Psychology of Humour: An Integrative Approach. Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
32. McCloud, Scott
    1994 Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art. New York: Harper Collins.
    [Google Scholar]
33. McGhee, Paul E.
    1979 Humor: Its Origin and Development. San Francisco: Freeman.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Milner, Ryan
    2013 “Pop polyvocality: Internet memes, public participation, and the Occupy Wall Street movement.” International Journal of Communication7: 2357–2390. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1949/1015 (accessed8 August 2019).
    [Google Scholar]
35. Milner, Ryan
    2016 The World Made Meme: Public Conversations and Participatory Media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262034999.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262034999.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
36. Rim, Y.
    1988 “Sense of humour and coping styles.” Personality and Individual Differences9 (3): 559–564.   10.1016/0191‑8869(88)90153‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(88)90153-5 [Google Scholar]
37. Ross, Andrew S., and Damian J. Rivers
    2017 “Digital cultures of political participation: Internet memes and the discursive delegitimization of the 2016 US Presidential candidates.” Discourse, Context & Media16: 1–11.   10.1016/j.dcm.2017.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.01.001 [Google Scholar]
38. Seiffert-Brockmann, Jens, Trevor Diehl, and Leonhard Dobusch
    2018 “Memes as games: The evolution of a digital discourse online.” New Media & Society20(8): 2862–2879.   10.1177/1461444817735334
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817735334 [Google Scholar]
39. Shifman, Limor
    2012 “An anatomy of a YouTube meme.” New Media & Society14(2): 187–203.   10.1177/1461444811412160
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811412160 [Google Scholar]
40. Shifman, Limor
    2013 “Memes in a digital world: Reconciling with a conceptual troublemaker.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication18(3): 362–377.   10.1111/jcc4.12013
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12013 [Google Scholar]
41. Shifman, Limor
    2014 Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Tyler, Lisa
    2020 ““Regency novel or pandemic life”? Understanding Jane Austen-Related Pandemic Memes.” Persuasions On-Line41(1). jasna.org/publications/persuasions-online/vol-41-no-1/tyler/ (accessed2 January 2021).
    [Google Scholar]
43. Varis, Piia, and Jan Blommaert
    2015 “Conviviality and collectives on social media: Virality, memes, and new social structures.” Multilingual Margins2(1): 31–45.   10.14426/mm.v2i1.55
    https://doi.org/10.14426/mm.v2i1.55 [Google Scholar]
44. Vásquez, Camilla
    2019 Language, Creativity and Humour Online. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315159027
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315159027 [Google Scholar]
45. Vásquez, Camilla, and Erhan Aslan
    2021 “‘Cats be outside, how about meow’: Multimodal humor and creativity in an internet meme.” Journal of Pragmatics171: 101–117.   10.1016/j.pragma.2020.10.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.10.006 [Google Scholar]
46. Wiggins, Bradley E.
    2016 “Crimea River: Directionality in memes from the Russia-Ukraine conflict.” International Journal of Communication10: 451–485. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/4103 (accessed4 March 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
47. Wiggins, Bradley E.
    2019 The Discursive Power of Memes in Digital Culture: Ideology, Semiotics, and Intertextuality. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429492303
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429492303 [Google Scholar]
48. Wiggins, Bradley. E.
    2020 “Memes and the media narrative: The Nike-Kaepernick controversy.” Internet Pragmatics3(2): 202–222.   10.1075/ip.00032.wig
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00032.wig [Google Scholar]
49. Willmore, James and Darryl Hocking
    2017 “Internet meme creativity as everyday conversation.” Journal of Asia-Pacific Pop Culture2(2): 140–166.   10.5325/jasiapacipopcult.2.2.0140
    https://doi.org/10.5325/jasiapacipopcult.2.2.0140 [Google Scholar]
50. Yus, Francisco
    2011 Cyberpragmatics: Internet-Mediated Communication in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.213
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.213 [Google Scholar]
51. Yus, Francisco
    2016 Humour and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/thr.4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.4 [Google Scholar]
52. Yus, Francisco
    2018 “Identity-related issues in meme communication.” Internet Pragmatics1(1): 113–133.   10.1075/ip.00006.yus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00006.yus [Google Scholar]
53. Yus, Francisco
    2019 “Multimodality in memes.” InAnalyzing Digital Discourse: New Insights and Future Directions, ed. byPatricia Bou-Franch, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, 105–131. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑92663‑6_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92663-6_4 [Google Scholar]
54. Yus, Francisco
    2020 “Incongruity-resolution humorous strategies in image macro memes.” Internet Pragmatics1–19.   10.1075/ip.00058.yus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00058.yus [Google Scholar]