1887
image of Complaining, teasing, and meme-framing
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article explores the pragmatic act of complaining on WeChat Moments (henceforth Moments) focusing on the following question: When complaints are made in a social context where ratified viewers are hard to define, how are such acts constructed and construed? The multimodal data under study come from a project designed to address the under-examined issue of indirect complaints in Chinese social media. Drawing on the conceptualization of frame analysis in pragmatic studies and informed by a conversation analytical approach, this article proposes the concept of , accounting for how Moments users employ it performatively to deal with serious matters, to socialize and to manage rapport with people in their social networks. Teasing, it is found, is often performed in both complaints and responses to the complaints, which manifests Moments users’ flexible positioning strategies in handling interpersonal relations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00077.ton
2021-11-24
2021-11-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed
    2019Pictorial Framing in Moral Politics: A Corpus-Based Experimental Study. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alberts, Janet
    1989 “A descriptive taxonomy of couples’ complaint interactions.” The Southern Communication Journal54(2): 125–143. 10.1080/10417948909372751
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10417948909372751 [Google Scholar]
  3. Arnett, J. Jensen
    2000 “Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties.” American Psychologist55(5): 469–480. 10.1037/0003‑066X.55.5.469
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bamberg, Michael, and Alexandra Georgakopoulou
    2008 “Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis.” Text & Talk28(3): 377–396. 10.1515/TEXT.2008.018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2008.018 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bateman, John A.
    2014Text and Image: A Critical Introduction to the Visual/Verbal Divide. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315773971
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315773971 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bateson, Gregory
    1955 “A theory of play and fantasy.” InThe Game Design Reader, ed. byKatie Salen, and Eric Zimmerman, 314–328. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 1972Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bauman, Richard
    1975 “Verbal art as performance.” American Anthropologist77: 290–311. 10.1525/aa.1975.77.2.02a00030
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1975.77.2.02a00030 [Google Scholar]
  9. Beißwenger, Michael, and Steffen Pappert
    2019 “How to be polite with emojis: A pragmatic analysis of facework strategies in an online learning environment.” European Journal of Applied Linguistics7(2): 225–253. 10.1515/eujal‑2019‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2019-0003 [Google Scholar]
  10. Boxer, Diana
    1993a “Complaining and commiserating: Exploring gender issues.” Text13(3): 371–395.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 1993b “Social distance speech behavior: The case of indirect complaints.” Journal of Pragmatics19: 103–125. 10.1016/0378‑2166(93)90084‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90084-3 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2010 “Complaints. How to gripe and establish rapport.” InSpeech Act Performance: Theoretical, Empirical, and Methodological Issues, ed. byAlicia Martínez-Flor, and Esther Usó-Juan, 163–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.26.10box
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.26.10box [Google Scholar]
  13. Boxer, Diana, and Florencia Cortés-Conde
    1997 “From bonding to biting: Conversational joking and identity display.” Journal of Pragmatics27: 275–294. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(96)00031‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00031-8 [Google Scholar]
  14. Brown, Penelope, and Steven Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  15. Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall
    2005 “Identity and interaction: A socio-cultural linguistic approach.” Discourse Studies7(4–5): 585–614. 10.1177/1461445605054407
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 [Google Scholar]
  16. Burke, Peter J., and Jan E. Stets
    2009Identity Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388275.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388275.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  17. Cohen, Andrew, and Elite Olshtain
    1981 “Developing a measure of socio-cultural competence: The case of apology.” Language Learning31(1): 113–134. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1981.tb01375.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1981.tb01375.x [Google Scholar]
  18. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2011Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
  19. Danesi, Marcel
    2017The Semiotics of Emoji: The Rise of Visual Language in the Age of the Internet. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781474282024
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474282024 [Google Scholar]
  20. Davis, Jenny L., and Nathan Jurgenson
    2014 “Context collapse: Theorizing context collusions and collisions.” Information, Communication and Society17(4): 476–485. 10.1080/1369118X.2014.888458
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.888458 [Google Scholar]
  21. Dayter, Daria
    2016Discursive Self in Microblogging: Speech Acts, Stories and Self-Praise. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.260
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.260 [Google Scholar]
  22. Decock, Sofie, and Ilse Depraetere
    2018 “(In)directness and complaints: A reassessment.” Journal of Pragmatics132: 33–46. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.04.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.04.010 [Google Scholar]
  23. Dresner, Eli, and Susan C. Herring
    2010 “Functions of the non-verbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force.” Communication Theory20(3): 249–268. 10.1111/j.1468‑2885.2010.01362.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01362.x [Google Scholar]
  24. Drew, Paul
    1987 “Po-faced receipts of teases.” Linguistics25: 219–253. 10.1515/ling.1987.25.1.219
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1987.25.1.219 [Google Scholar]
  25. 1998 “Complaints about transgressions and misconduct.” Research on Language and Social Interaction31(3–4): 295–325. 10.1080/08351813.1998.9683595
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.1998.9683595 [Google Scholar]
  26. Drew, Paul, John Heritage, Gene H. Lerner, and Anita Pomerantz
    (eds.) 2015Talking about Troubles in Conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Drew, Paul, and Traci Walker
    2009 “Going too far: Complaining, escalating, and disaffiliation.” Journal of Pragmatics41: 2400–2414. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.046
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.046 [Google Scholar]
  28. Dynel, Marta
    2011 “Joker in the pack: Towards determining the status of humorous framing in conversations.” InThe Pragmatics of Humor across Discourse Domains, ed. byMarta Dynel, 217–241. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.210.15dyn
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.210.15dyn [Google Scholar]
  29. 2016 “‘I has seen image macros!’: Advice animal memes as visual-verbal jokes.” International Journal of Communication10: 660–688.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Edwards, Derek
    2005 “Moaning, whining, and laughing: The subjective side of complaints.” Discourse Studies7(1): 5–29. 10.1177/1461445605048765
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605048765 [Google Scholar]
  31. Ervin-Tripp, Susan M., and Martin Lampert
    2009 “The occasioning of self-disclosure humor.” InHumor in Interaction, ed. byNeal R. Norrick, and Delia Chiaro, 3–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.182.01erv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.182.01erv [Google Scholar]
  32. Fillmore, Charles J.
    1982 “Frame semantics.” InLinguistics in the Morning Calm, ed. byLinguistic Society of Korea, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Georgakopoulou, Alexandra
    2006 “Thinking big with small stories in narrative and identity analysis.” Narrative Inquiry16(1): 122–130. 10.1075/ni.16.1.16geo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.16.1.16geo [Google Scholar]
  34. Goffman, Erving
    1959The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books, Doubleday.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 1974Frame Analysis. New York: Harper & Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 1981Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Gouldner, Alvin W.
    1960 “The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement.” American Sociological Review25(2): 161–178. 10.2307/2092623
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2092623 [Google Scholar]
  38. Graham, Sage L.
    2019 “A wink and a nod: The role of emojis in forming digital communities.” Multilingual38(4): 377–400. 10.1515/multi‑2018‑0037
    https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2018-0037 [Google Scholar]
  39. Gumperz, John J.
    1982Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611834
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834 [Google Scholar]
  40. Haugh, Michael
    2016 “Complaints and troubles talk about the English language skills of international students in Australian universities.” Higher Education Research & Development35(4): 727–740. 10.1080/07294360.2015.1137878
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1137878 [Google Scholar]
  41. 2017 “Teasing.” InHandbook of Language and Humour, ed. bySalvatore Attardo, 204–218. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315731162‑15
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315731162-15 [Google Scholar]
  42. Haugh, Michael, and Jonathan Culpeper
    2018 “Integrative pragmatics and (im)politeness theory.” InPragmatics and its Interfaces, ed. byCornelia Ilie, and Neal R. Norrick, 213–239. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.294.10hau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.294.10hau [Google Scholar]
  43. Haugh, Michael, and Danielle Pillet-Shore
    2017 “Getting to know you: Teasing as an invitation to intimacy in initial interactions.” Discourse Studies2: 246–269.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Heinemann, Trine
    2009 “Participation and exclusion in third party complaints.” Journal of Pragmatics41(12): 2435–2451. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.044
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.044 [Google Scholar]
  45. Heinemann, Trine, and Véronique Traverso
    2009 “Complaining in interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics41: 2381–2384. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.006 [Google Scholar]
  46. Kowalski, Robin M.
    2003Complaining, Teasing, and Other Annoying Behaviors. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Kress, Gunther
    2010Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Kurtyka, Andrezj
    2019 “I complain, therefore I am: On indirect complaints in Polish.” Journal of Pragmatics153: 34–45. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.04.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.04.009 [Google Scholar]
  49. Labov, William
    1972Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Laforest, Marty
    2002 “Scenes of family life: Complaining in everyday conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics34: 1595–1620. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00077‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00077-2 [Google Scholar]
  51. Leech, Geoffrey
    1983Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Locher, Miriam A.
    2006Advice Online: Advice-Giving in an American Internet Health Column. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.149
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.149 [Google Scholar]
  53. Madianou, Mirca, and Daniel Miller
    2012Migration and New Media: Transnational Families and Polymedia. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Martinec, Radam, and Andrew Salway
    2005 “A system for image-text relations in new (and old) media.” Visual Communication4: 337–371. 10.1177/1470357205055928
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357205055928 [Google Scholar]
  55. Marwick, Alice E., and danah boyd
    2010 “I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse and the imagined audience.” New Media and Society13: 114–133. 10.1177/1461444810365313
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313 [Google Scholar]
  56. Marwick, Alice E., and Nicole B. Ellison
    2012 “There isn’t wifi in heaven! Negotiating visibility on Facebook memorial pages.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media56: 378–400. 10.1080/08838151.2012.705197
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.705197 [Google Scholar]
  57. Mey, Jacob
    2001Pragmatics: An Introduction (2nd edn.). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Murphy, Beth, and Joyce Neu
    1996 “My grade’s too low: The speech act of complaining.” InSpeech Acts across Cultures: Challenges to Communication in a Second Language, ed. bySusan M. Gass, and Joyce Neu, 191–216. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Olshtain, Elite, and Liora Weinbach
    1993 “Interlanguage features of the speech act of complaining.” InInterlanguage Pragmatics, ed. byGabriele Kasper, and Shoshana Blum-Kulka, 108–122. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Page, Ruth
    2012Stories and Social Media. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. 2018Narrative Online: Shared Stories in Social Media. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316492390
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316492390 [Google Scholar]
  62. Pomerantz, Anita
    1986 “Extreme cases formulations: A way of legitimizing claims.” Human Studies9(2–3): 219–229. 10.1007/BF00148128
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148128 [Google Scholar]
  63. Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred R.
    1940 “On joking relationships.” Africa13(3): 195–210. 10.2307/1156093
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1156093 [Google Scholar]
  64. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    2007Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  65. Selting, Margret
    2012 “Complaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affect displays.” Journal of Pragmatics44: 387–415. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.01.005 [Google Scholar]
  66. Shifman, Limor
    2014Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
    1995Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd edn.). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Stets, Jan E., and Michael J. Carter
    2006 “The moral identity: A principle level identity.” InPurpose, Meaning, and Action: Control Systems Theories in Sociology, ed. byKent A. McClelland, and Thomas J. Fararo, 293–316. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑10809‑8_12
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-10809-8_12 [Google Scholar]
  69. Straehle, Carolyn A.
    1993 “‘Samuel?’ ‘Yes, dear?’ Teasing and conversational rapport.” InFraming in Discourse, ed. byDeborah Tannen, 210–229. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Tannen, Deborah, and Cynthia Wallat
    1993 “Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination in interview.” InFraming in Discourse, ed. byDeborah Tannen, 57–113. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Thorne, Steven L.
    1999 “An activity theoretical analysis of foreign language electronic discourse.” PhD Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
  72. Vásquez, Camilla
    2011 “Complaints online: The case of TripAdvisor.” Journal of Pragmatics43: 1707–1717. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.007 [Google Scholar]
  73. Wang, Fang, and Jun Wu
    2014 “仪式的抵抗:网络‘吐槽文化’的传播研究 [A protest against rituals: On the spread of ‘tucao culture’ on the internet].” 《现代传播(中国传媒大学学报)》 [Modern Communication (Journal of Communication University of China] 5: 136–139.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Wesch, Michael
    2008 “Context collapse.” mediatedcultures.net/projects/youtube/context-collapse (accessed6 April 2020).
  75. Wiggins, Bradley E.
    2019The Power of Memes in Digital Culture: Ideology, Semiotics, and Intertextuality. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429492303
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429492303 [Google Scholar]
  76. Xie, Chaoqun
    2020 Internet memes we live by (and die by). Internet Pragmatics4(2): 145–173. 10.1075/ip.00066.xie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00066.xie [Google Scholar]
  77. Yus, Francisco
    2016Humour and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/thr.4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.4 [Google Scholar]
  78. 2018 “Identity-related issues in meme communication.” Internet Pragmatics1: 113–133. 10.1075/ip.00006.yus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00006.yus [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00077.ton
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00077.ton
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: multimodality ; internet memes ; WeChat Moments ; social complaints ; teasing ; positioning ; frames
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error