1887
Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2542-3851
  • E-ISSN: 2542-386X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article reviews Cognitive Pragmatics: Mindreading, Inferences, Consciousness

 
978-1-5015-1612-2978-1-5015-0773-1

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00090.xu
2023-03-30
2024-04-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bara, Bruno G.
    2010Cognitive Pragmatics: The Mental Processes of Communication. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262014113.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014113.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  2. 2017 “Cognitive pragmatics.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. byYan Huang, 279–299. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Carston, Robin
    2002 “Linguistic meaning, communicated meaning and cognitive pragmatics.” Mind & Language17(1–2): 127–148. 10.1111/1468‑0017.00192
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00192 [Google Scholar]
  4. Cochrane, Tom
    2018The Emotional Mind: A Control Theory of Affective States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cockburn, David
    2009 “Emotion, expression and conversation.” InEmotions and Understanding: Wittgensteinian Perspectives. ed. byYlva Gustafsson, Camilla Kronqvist, and Michael McEachrane, 126–144. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230584464_9
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584464_9 [Google Scholar]
  6. Enfield, N. J.
    2017How We Talk: The Inner Workings of Conversation. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fodor, Jerry A.
    1983The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/4737.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4737.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  8. Forceville, Charles
    2020Visual and Multimodal Communication: Applying the Relevance Principle. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190845230.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190845230.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Gibbs, Raymond W.
    1998 “The varieties of intentions in interpersonal communication.” InSocial and Cognitive Approaches to Interpersonal Communication, ed. bySusan R. Fussell, and Roger J. Kreuz, 19–37. Mahwah, New Jersy: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 1999Intentions in the Experience of Meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139164054
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164054 [Google Scholar]
  11. Glenberg, Art, and Vittorio Gallese
    2012 “Action-based language: A theory of language acquisition, comprehension and production.” Cortex481: 905–922. 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.010 [Google Scholar]
  12. Grandy, Richard, and Richard Warner
    (eds.) 1986Philosophical Grounds of Rationality: Intentions, Categories and Ends. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Grice, H. Paul
    1989Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Levinson, Stephen. C.
    2006 “On the human ‘interaction engine.’” InRoots of Human Sociality, ed. byN. J. Enfield, and Stephen C. Levinson, 39–69. Oxford: Berg.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Piskorska, Agnieszka
    (ed.) 2020Relevance Theory, Figuration, and Continuity in Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ftl.8
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.8 [Google Scholar]
  16. Schmid, Hans-Jörg
    2012 “Generalizing the apparently ungeneralizable: Basic ingredients of a cognitive-pragmatic approach to the construal of meaning-in-context.” InCognitive Pragmatics, ed. byHans-Jörg Schmid, 3–22. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214215.3
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214215.3 [Google Scholar]
  17. Scott, Kate, Billy Clark, and Robyn Carston
    (eds.) 2019Relevance, Pragmatics and Interpretation: Essays in Honor of Deirdre Wilson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108290593
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108290593 [Google Scholar]
  18. Shiffrin, Richard M., and Schneider Walter
    1984 “Automatic and controlled processing revisited.” Psychological Review91(2): 269–276. 10.1037/0033‑295X.91.2.269
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.91.2.269 [Google Scholar]
  19. Wilson, Deirdre
    2017 “Relevance theory.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. byYan Huang, 79–100. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
    1986 “On defining relevance.” InPhilosophical Grounds of Rationality: Intentions, Categories and Ends, ed. byRichard Grandy, and Richard Warner, 243–258. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Xie, Chaoqun, Hartmut Haberland, and Francisco Yus
    (eds.) 2021Approaches to Internet Pragmatics: Theory and Practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.318
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.318 [Google Scholar]
  22. Xie, Chaoqun, and Francisco Yus
    2021 “Digitally-mediated communication.” InThe Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ed. byMichael Haugh, Dániel Z. Kádár, and Marina Terkourafi, 454–474. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108954105.024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108954105.024 [Google Scholar]
  23. Yus, Francisco
    2019 “An outline of some future research issues for internet pragmatics.” Internet Pragmatics2(1): 1–33. 10.1075/ip.00018.yus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00018.yus [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00090.xu
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error