1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Internet Pragmatics
  4. Volume 7, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 7, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2542-3851
  • E-ISSN: 2542-386X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The study aims to examine how the interactional and interactive linguistic aspects are utilized to qualify the discoursal propositions of Arabic clickbaits to secure viewers’ responsive clicks to thumbnails. To this end, one hundred Arabic YouTube clickbait headlines were selected from five Arabic channels that are owned by independent unofficial entertainment institutions. The data came from a period of one year covering 2021. The data covered different domains such as crafts, sports, entertainment, and science. To examine how the headlines are constructed, we drew on two complementary theoretical frameworks, namely, Machin and Mayer’s (2012) framework of verbal processes and participants, and Hyland’s (2005) interactional and interactive meta-discourse framework. It was found that clickbait creators structured their texts interactionally using more enticing attitude and engagement markers, and self-mentions to emphasize a closer relationship with the viewers so as to persuade them to click the baits. This tendency was further heightened by the frequent use of interactive compositional selections attained by deliberately leaving parts of the headlines opaque realized by the frequent use of consecutive dots, cataphoric markers, and viewer-attitude connective signals. Likewise, the discoursal process selection has never been neutral, as clickbait writers frequently used negative mental and material processes to spark viewers’ curiosity to react and click the bait. YouTube clickbait headlines can have the effect of frustrating viewers and/or decreasing their satisfaction. Thus, this research will hopefully contribute to the detection and isolation of clickbaits as a step required to raise viewers’ awareness of the enticing headlines and as a further step to demote them.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00091.ala
2023-05-30
2025-04-26

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ip.00091.ala
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al-Ali, Mohammed
    2018 “Genre-pragmatic analysis of Arabic academic book reviews (ArBRs).” Pragmatics28(2): 159–183.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Ali, Mohammed, and Yara Sahawneh
    2011 “Rhetorical and textual organization of English and Arabic PhD dissertation abstracts in linguistics.” SKY Journal of Linguistics241: 7–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Beckers, Sander F. M., Jenny van Doorn, and Peter Verhoef
    2018 “Good, better, engaged? The effect of company-initiated customer engagement behavior on shareholder value.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science46(3): 366–383. 10.1007/s11747‑017‑0539‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0539-4 [Google Scholar]
  4. Biyani, Prakhar, Kostas Tsioutsiouliklis, and John Blackmer
    2016 “‘8 amazing secrets for getting more clicks’: Detecting clickbaits in news streams using article informality.” InThirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 94–100. Palo Alto: AAAI Press. 10.1609/aaai.v30i1.9966
     https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v30i1.9966 [Google Scholar]
  5. Blom, Jonas, and Kenneth Hansen
    2015 “Click bait: Forward-reference as lure in online news headlines.” Journal of Pragmatics761: 87–100. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.11.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.11.010 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bryant, Christine, Huhebi Guo, Hari, Kirti, and Deng Kathy
    2019 “Content analysis for typographic choices in YouTube video thumbnails for voice assistants.” https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5cf53758311fdd00016e8dc7/t/5dea9c4afb2743301f36a127/1575656522401/FINALPAPERTYPERESEARCH.pdf (accessed9 October 2021).
  7. Chakraborty, Abhijan, Bhargavi Paranjape, Sourya Kakarla, and Niloy Ganguly
    2016 “Stop clickbait: Detecting and preventing clickbaits in online news media.” InIEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, 9–16. San Francisco: IEEE. 10.1109/ASONAM.2016.7752207
     https://doi.org/10.1109/ASONAM.2016.7752207 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cook, Guy
    2001 The Discourse of Advertising. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203978153
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203978153 [Google Scholar]
  9. Fairclough, Norman
    2003 Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203697078
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078 [Google Scholar]
  10. Halliday, Michael
    1994 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Harmeling, Coleen, Jordan Moffett, and Robert Palmatier
    2018 “Conclusion: Informing customer engagement marketing and future research.” InCustomer Engagement Marketing, ed. byRobert Palmatier, V. Kumar, and Coleen Harmeling, 307–323. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑61985‑9_14
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61985-9_14 [Google Scholar]
  12. Hyland, Ken
    2005 Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen
    2006 Reading Images- the Grammar of Visual Design (2nd edn.). Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203619728
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728 [Google Scholar]
  14. Kuiken, Jeffrey, Anne Schuth, Martijn Spitters, and Maarten Marx
    2017 “Effective headlines of newspaper articles in a digital environment.” Digital Journalism5(10): 1300–1314. 10.1080/21670811.2017.1279978
     https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1279978 [Google Scholar]
  15. Leech, Geoffrey
    1966 English in Advertising: A Linguistic Study of Advertising in Great Britain. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Li, Qiwei
    2019 “Clickbait and emotional language in false news.” https://www.ischool.utexas.edu/~ml/papers/li2019-thesis.pdf (accessed9 October 2021).
  17. Machin, David, and Andrew Mayer
    2012 How To Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. London: SAGE Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Manjesh, Suraj, Tushar Kanakagiri, P. Vaishak, Vivek Chettiar, and G. Shobha
    2017 “Clickbait pattern detection and classification of news headlines using natural language processing.” IEEE 2017 2nd International Conference on Computational Systems and Information Technology for Sustainable Solution (CSITSS), 1–5. San Francisco: IEEE. 10.1109/CSITSS.2017.8447715
     https://doi.org/10.1109/CSITSS.2017.8447715 [Google Scholar]
  19. Montgomery, Martin
    2007 The Discourse of Broadcast News: A Linguistic Approach. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203006634
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203006634 [Google Scholar]
  20. Nir, Raphael
    1993 “Discourse analysis of news headlines.” Hebrew Linguistics371: 23–31.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Pujahari, Abinash, and Dilip Sisodia
    2021 “Clickbait detection using multiple categorization techniques.” Journal of Information Science47(1): 118–128. 10.1177/0165551519871822
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551519871822 [Google Scholar]
  22. Tafesse, Wondwesen
    2020 “YouTube marketing: How marketers’ video optimization practices influence video views.” Internet Research30(6): 1687–1707. 10.1108/INTR‑10‑2019‑0406
     https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-10-2019-0406 [Google Scholar]
  23. Tanaka, Keiko
    1999 Advertising Language: A Pragmatic Approach to Advertisements in Britain and Japan. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Tandoc, Edson
    2014 “Journalism is twerking? How web analytics is changing the process of gatekeeping.” New Media and Society16(4): 559–575. 10.1177/1461444814530541
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814530541 [Google Scholar]
  25. Van Dijk, Teun
    2009 News Analysis: Case Studies of International and National News in the Press. New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Van Leeuwen, Theo
    2008 Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  27. Veszelszki, Ágne
    2017 “Linguistic and non-linguistic elements in detecting (Hungarian) fake news.” Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Communication4(1): 7–35. 10.1515/auscom‑2017‑0001
     https://doi.org/10.1515/auscom-2017-0001 [Google Scholar]
  28. Zannettou, Savvas, Sotirios Chatzis, Kostaninos Papadamou, and Michael Sirivianos
    2018 “The good, the bad and the bait: Detecting and characterizing clickbait on YouTube.” 2018 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW), 63–69. San Francisco: IEEE Xplore. 10.1109/SPW.2018.00018
     https://doi.org/10.1109/SPW.2018.00018 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00091.ala
Loading
How to get more views
Internet Pragmatics 7, 272 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00091.ala
/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00091.ala
/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00091.ala
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Arabic clickbait headlines; interactional metadiscourse; interactive metadiscourse; linguistic enticing strategies; participants; verbal processes

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error