When your neighbor becomes a threat

References

1. Aaltola, Mika
   2012 Understanding the Politics of Pandemic Scares: An Introduction to Global Politosomatics. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203805732
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203805732 [Google Scholar]
2. Aaltola, Mika
   2021 Democratic Vulnerability and Autocratic Meddling: The “Thucydidean Brink” in Regressive Geopolical Competition. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑54602‑1
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54602-1 [Google Scholar]
3. Assimakopoulos, Stavros, Fabienne H. Baider, and Sharon Millar
   2017 Online Hate Speech in the European Union: A Discourse-Analytic Perspective. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑72604‑5
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72604-5 [Google Scholar]
4. Caffi, Claudia
   1998 “Metapragmatics.” InConcise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics, ed. byJacob L. Mey, 581–586. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Culpeper, Jonathan
   2010 “Conventionalised impoliteness formulae.” Journal of Pragmatics421: 3232–3245. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.007
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.007 [Google Scholar]
6. Herneaho, Irina
   2018 “Maahanmuuttodiskurssit eduskuntapuolueiden vuoden 2015 vaalimateriaaleissa [Discourses of immigration in parliamentary parties’ political platforms 2015].” Virittäjä21: 187–223. 10.23982/vir.66907
   https://doi.org/10.23982/vir.66907 [Google Scholar]
7. Johansson, Marjut, Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen, and Jan Chovanec
   2021 “Practices of convergence and controversy in digital discourses.” InAnalyzing Digital Discourses: Between Convergence and Controversy, ed. ByMarjut Johansson, Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen, and Jan Chovanec, 1–24. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑84602‑2_1
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84602-2_1 [Google Scholar]
8. Jokinen, Arja, Kirsi Juhila, and Eero Suoninen
   2012 Kategoriat, kulttuuri & moraali: Johdatus kategoria-analyysiin [Categories, Culture & Morality: An Introduction to Category Analysis]. Helsinki: SKS.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Kleinke, Sonja, and Birte Bös
   2015 “Intergroup rudeness and the metapragmatics of its negotiation in online discussion fora.” Pragmatics25(1): 47–71.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Määttä, Simo, Karita Suomalainen, and Ulla Tuomarla
    2020 “Maahanmuuttovastaisen ideologian ja ryhmäidentiteetin rakentuminen Suomi24 –keskustelussa [Constructing anti-immigration ideology and group identity in an online conversation thread on the Suomi24 discussion board].” Virittäjä2/20201: 190–216. 10.23982/vir.81931
    https://doi.org/10.23982/vir.81931 [Google Scholar]
11. Määttä, Simo, Karita Suomalainen, and Ulla Tuomarla
    2021 “Everyday discourse as a space of citizenship: The linguistic construction of in-groups and out-groups in online discussion boards.” Citizenship Studies25(6): 773–790. 10.1080/13621025.2021.1968715
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2021.1968715 [Google Scholar]
12. Márquez Reiter, Rosina
    2021 “Confessions of lockdown breaches: Problematising morality during the Covid-19 pandemic.” Journal of Pragmatics1791: 61–69. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.022
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.022 [Google Scholar]
13. Miles, Matthew B., and A. Michael Huberman
    1994 Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd edn.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Ogbodo, Jude Nwakpoke, Emmanuel Chike Onwe, Joseph Chukwu, Chinedu Jude Nwasum, Ekwutosi Sanita Nwakpu, Simon Ugochukwu Nwanko, Samuel Nwamini, Stephen Elem, and Nelson Iroabuchi Ogbaeja
    2020 “Communicating health crisis: A content analysis of global media framing of COVID-19.” Health Promotion Perspectives10(3): 257–269. https://hpp.tbzmed.ac.ir/Article/hpp-32391. 10.34172/hpp.2020.40
    https://doi.org/10.34172/hpp.2020.40 [Google Scholar]
15. Pälli, Pekka
    2003 “Ihmisryhmä diskurssissa ja diskurssina [Human group in discourse and as discourse].” Academic dissertation, Tampere University Press.
16. Pitkänen, Kati, Olga Hannonen, Stefania Toso, Nick Gallent, Iqbal Hamiduddin, Greg Halseth, C. Michael Hall, Dieter K. Müller, Andrey Treivish, and Tatiana Nefodova
    2020 “Second homes during corona – safe or unsafe haven and for whom? Reflections from researchers from around the world.” Finnish Journal of Tourism Research16(2): 20–39. 10.33351/mt.97559
    https://doi.org/10.33351/mt.97559 [Google Scholar]
17. Pitkänen, Kati, Jenni Lehtimäki, and Riikka Puhakka
    2020 “How do rural second homes affect human health and well-being? Review of potential impacts.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health17(18): 6748. 10.3390/ijerph17186748
    https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186748 [Google Scholar]
18. Tajfel, Henri
    1981 Human Groups and Social Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Tanskanen, Sanna-Kaisa
    2007 “Metapragmatic utterances in computer-mediated interaction.” InMetapragmatics in Use, ed. byWolfram Bublitz, and Axel Hübler, 87–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.165.07tan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.165.07tan [Google Scholar]
20. Tanskanen, Sanna-Kaisa
    2018 “Identity and metapragmatic acts in a student forum discussion thread.” InThe Discursive Construction of Identities On- and Offline: Personal – Group – Collective, ed. byBirte Bös, Sonja Kleinke, Sandra Mollin, and Nuria Hernández, 133–151. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.78.06tan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.78.06tan [Google Scholar]
21. Taylor, John R.
    2003 Linguistic Categorization (3rd edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199266647.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199266647.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
22. Tuomarla, Ulla
    2019 “Vihapuhe ei ole aina vihaista puhetta [Hate speech is not always angry speech].” https://politiikasta.fi/vihapuhe-ei-ole-aina-vihaista-puhetta/ (accessed20 August 2021).
23. Verschueren, Jef
    2000 “Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness in language use.” Pragmatics10(4): 439–456.
    [Google Scholar]