1887
Volume 6, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2542-3851
  • E-ISSN: 2542-386X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper studies some pragmatic and discursive properties of hate words employed in the comment chains of two Italian right-wing politicians’ social media accounts. The analysis focuses on hate speech directed towards two ethnic groups – African migrants and the Chinese – and an individual, the former minister of Agriculture Teresa Bellanova. Hate words are divided into two macrocategories: slurs and insulting epithets. Slurs are expressions that are consistently associated with derogatory attitudes against a group of people based on their origin/descent; insulting epithets are either offensive terms that do not attack specific identity traits or neutral words that, in certain contexts, can be offensive. Data indicate that the use of hate words is guided by pragmatic factors and discursive elements, and it changes according to the individual(s) or the groups being attacked. Hate speech on social media occurs mainly through insulting epithets, thus allowing the authors to avoid moderation and any responsibility for their utterance. The results support the idea that hate speech is a complex speech act that aims not only at derogating or expressing negative emotions but works within the framework of racist discourses as a means of creating and reinforcing political polarisation and in-group values.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00096.ret
2023-09-15
2024-06-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allport, Gordon W.
    1988The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, Luvell, and Ernie Lepore
    2013 “Slurring words.” Noûs471: 25–48. 10.1111/j.1468‑0068.2010.00820.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00820.x [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson, Luvell, and Michael Barnes
    2022 “Hate speech.” InThe Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2022 Edition), ed. byEdward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/hate-speech (accessed30 December 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Assimakopoulos, Stavros, Fabienne H. Baider, and Sharon Millar
    (eds.) 2017Online Hate Speech in the European Union. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑72604‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72604-5 [Google Scholar]
  5. Austin, John L.
    1962How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bergen, Benjamin K.
    2016What the F: What Swearing Reveals about Our Language, Our Brains and Ourselves. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bianchi, Claudia
    2018 “Perspectives and slurs.” InBeyond Semantics and Pragmatics, ed. byGerhard Preyer, 187–198. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198791492.003.0011
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198791492.003.0011 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2021Hate speech, il lato oscuro del linguaggio. [Hate Speech, the Dark Side of Language]. Bari-Roma: Laterza.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bolinger, Renée Jorgensen
    2017 “The pragmatics of slur.” Noûs51(3): 439–462. 10.1111/nous.12090
    https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12090 [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown, Alexander
    2017a “What is hate speech? Part 1: The myth of hate.” Law and Philosophy36(4): 419–468. 10.1007/s10982‑017‑9297‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-017-9297-1 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2017b “What is hate speech? Part 2: Family sesemblances.” Law and Philosophy36(5): 561–613. 10.1007/s10982‑017‑9300‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-017-9300-x [Google Scholar]
  12. 2018 “What is so special about online (as compared to offline) hate speech?” Ethnicities18(3): 297–326. 10.1177/1468796817709846
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796817709846 [Google Scholar]
  13. Butler, Judith
    1997Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Camp, Elisabeth
    2013 “Slurring perspectives.” Analytic Philosophy54(3): 330–349. 10.1111/phib.12022
    https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12022 [Google Scholar]
  15. Cepollaro, Bianca
    2015 “Gli epiteti denigratori: presupposizioni infami [Slurs: Infamous presuppositions].” Esercizi Filosofici10(2): 154–168.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2017 “Slurs as the shortcut of discrimination.” Rivista di estetica641: 53–65. 10.4000/estetica.2063
    https://doi.org/10.4000/estetica.2063 [Google Scholar]
  17. Cohen, Henri, and Claire Lefebvre
    (eds.) 2005Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Croom, Adam
    2014 “The semantics of slurs: a refutation of pure expressivism.” Language sciences41, Part B: 227–242. 10.1016/j.langsci.2013.07.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  19. De Mauro, Tullio
    2016 “Le parole per ferire [Words to wound].” Internazionale, 27 September 2016. https://tinyurl.com/2pz5h2xu (accessed20 August 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Dipoppa, Gemma, Guy Grossman and Stephanie Zonszein
    2023 “Locked down, lashing out: COVID-19 effects on Asian hate-crimes in Italy.” Journal of Politics85(2): 389–404. 10.1086/722346
    https://doi.org/10.1086/722346 [Google Scholar]
  21. Domaneschi, Filippo
    2020Insultare gli altri [Insulting Others]. Torino: Einaudi.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Faloppa, Federico
    2011Razzisti a parole (per tacer dei fatti) [Racists by Words (not to Talk about the Facts)]. Bari-Roma: Laterza.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 2020#ODIO. Manuale di resistenza alla violenza delle parole [#HATE. Handbook of Resistance to the Violence of Words]. Torino: UTET.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Fish, Stanley
    1994There’s No Such Thing as Free Speech and It’s a Good Thing, Too. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Frenda, Simona, Alessandra Teresa Cignarella, Valerio Basile, Cristina Bosco, Viviani Patti, and Paolo Rosso
    2022 “The unbearable hurtfulness of sarcasm.” Expert Systems with Applications1931, 116398. 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116398
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116398 [Google Scholar]
  26. Fumagalli, Corrado
    2019 “Discorsi d’odio come pratiche ordinarie [Hate speech as ordinary practices].” Biblioteca Della Libertà54(224): 3–18. CitetononCRdoi:10.23827/BDL_2019_1_3
    https://doi.org/Cite to nonCR doi: 10.23827/BDL_2019_1_3 [Google Scholar]
  27. Guillén-Nieto, Victoria
    2023Hate Speech: Linguistic Perspectives. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110672619
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110672619 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hart, Christopher
    2010Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/9780230299009
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299009 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hess, Leopold
    2021 “Slurs and expressive commitments.” Acta Analytica361: 263–290. 10.1007/s12136‑020‑00445‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-020-00445-x [Google Scholar]
  30. Hom, Christopher
    2008 “The semantics of racial epithets.” Journal of Philosophy1051: 416–440. 10.5840/jphil2008105834
    https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2008105834 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lakoff, George
    1987Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  32. Langton, Rae, Sally Haslanger, and Luvell Anderson
    2012 “Language and race.” InRoutledge Companion to Philosophy of Language, ed. byGillian Russell, and Delia Graff Fara, 753–767. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lee, Christopher J., and Albert N. Katz
    1998 “The differential role of ridicule in sarcasm and irony.” Metaphor and Symbol13(1): 1–15. 10.1207/s15327868ms1301_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1301_1 [Google Scholar]
  34. Levinson, Stephen C.
    1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813313
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313 [Google Scholar]
  35. López Rodríguez, Irene
    2009 “Of women, bitches, chickens and vixens: animal metaphors for women in English and Spanish.” Cultura, lenguaje y representación / Culture, Language and Representation71: 77–100.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. MacKinnon, Catharine
    1993Only Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Matsuda, Mari, Charles R. Lawrence, Richard Delgado, and Kimberle W. Crenshaw
    (eds.) 1993Words that Wound: Critical Race Theory, Assaultive Speech and the First Amendment. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Musolff, Andreas
    2012 “Immigrants and parasites: the history of a bio-social metaphor.” InMigrations: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, ed. byMichi Messer, Renée Schroeder, and Ruth Wodak, 249–258. Wien: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑7091‑0950‑2_22
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0950-2_22 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2017 “Dehumanizing metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online media.” InContemporary Discourses of Hate and Radicalism across Space and Genres, ed. byMonika Kopytowska, 41–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bct.93.02mus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.93.02mus [Google Scholar]
  40. Määttä, Simo
    2020 “Syrjivän kielenkäytön rajoilla [On the borders of discriminating language].” Niin&Näin3: 71–77.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Määttä, Simo, Karita Suomalainen, and Ulla Tuomarla
    2021 “Everyday discourse as a space of citizenship: The linguistic construction of in-groups and out-groups in online discussion boards.” Citizenship Studies25(6): 773–790. 10.1080/13621025.2021.1968715
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2021.1968715 [Google Scholar]
  42. Ortner, Sherry B.
    1974 “Is female to male as nature is to culture?” InWoman, Culture and Society, ed. byMichelle Z. Rosaldo, and Louise Lamphere, 68–87. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Pietrandrea, Paola, and Elena Battaglia
    2022 “‘Migrants and the EU’: The diachronic construction of ad hoc categories in French far-right discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics1921: 139–157. 10.1016/j.pragma.2022.02.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.02.012 [Google Scholar]
  44. Potts, Christopher
    2003 “Expressive content as conventional implicature.” InProceedings of the North East Linguistics Society 33, ed. byMakoto Kadowaki, and Shigeto Kawahara, 303–322. UMass Amherst: GLSA.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Richardson, John
    2004(Mis)Representing Islam: The Racism and Rhetoric of British Broadsheet Newspapers. Amsterdam: John Banjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.9 [Google Scholar]
  46. Russo, Ernesto, and Pablo Bernardino Tempesta
    2017 “Categorisation and defence strategies.” InOnline Hate Speech in the European Union, ed. byStavros Assimakopoulos, Fabienne H. Baider, and Sharon Millar, 25–29. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑72604‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72604-5 [Google Scholar]
  47. Schlenker, Philippe
    . “Expressive presuppositions.” Theoretical Linguistics33(2): 237–245. 10.1515/TL.2007.017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TL.2007.017 [Google Scholar]
  48. Tipler, Caroline R., and Janet B. Rusher
    2019 “Dehumanizing representations of women: The shaping of hostile sexist attitudes through animalistic metaphors.” Journal of Gender Studies28(1): 109–118. 10.1080/09589236.2017.1411790
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2017.1411790 [Google Scholar]
  49. Tirrell, Lynne
    2012 “Genocidal language games.” InSpeech and Harm: Controversies over Free Speech, ed. byMaitra Ishani, and Mary Kate McGowan, 174–221. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Whiting, Daniel
    2013 “It’s not what you said, it’s the way you said it: slurs and conventional implicatures.” Analytic Philosophy54(3): 364–377. 10.1111/phib.12024
    https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12024 [Google Scholar]
  51. Wodak, Ruth
    2001 “The discourse historical approach.” InMethods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. byRuth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 63–94. London: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. 2013 “Calculated ambivalence and holocaust denial in Austria.” InAnalysing Fascist Discourse: European Fascism in Talk and Text, ed. byRuth Wodak, and John E. Richardson, 73–96. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203071847
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203071847 [Google Scholar]
  53. Žagar, Igor
    2010 “Topoi in Critical Discourse Analysis.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics6(1): 3–27. 10.2478/v10016‑010‑0002‑1
    https://doi.org/10.2478/v10016-010-0002-1 [Google Scholar]
  54. Ziccardi, Giovanni
    2020Online Political Hate Speech in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 10.4337/9781788113663
    https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788113663 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00096.ret
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00096.ret
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error