Semiotic excess in memes

References

1. Barker, Tim
   2011 “Aesthetics of the error: media art, the machine, the unforeseen, and the errant.” Error: Glitch, Noise, and Jam in New Media Cultures, ed. byMark Nunes, 42–58. New York: Continuum.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bauckhage, Christian
   2011 “Insights into internet memes.” Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media5(1): 42–49. 10.1609/icwsm.v5i1.14097
   https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v5i1.14097 [Google Scholar]
3. Benhabib, Seyla
   2002 The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9780691186542
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691186542 [Google Scholar]
4. Blais, Mélissa, and Francis Dupuis-Déri
   2012 “Masculinism and the antifeminist countermovement.” Social Movement Studies11(1): 21–39. 10.1080/14742837.2012.640532
   https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2012.640532 [Google Scholar]
5. Cormode, Graham
   2008 “Key differences between web 1.0 and web 2.0.” First Monday13(6). 10.5210/fm.v13i6.2125
   https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v13i6.2125 [Google Scholar]
6. Cramer, Florian
   2015 “What is ‘post-digital’?” Postdigital Aesthetics: Art, Computation and Design, ed. byDavid Berry, and Michael Dieter, 12–26. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/9781137437204_2
   https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137437204_2 [Google Scholar]
7. Dancygier, Barbara, and Lieven Vandelanotte
   2017 “Internet memes as multimodal constructions.” Cognitive Linguistics28(3): 565–598. 10.1515/cog‑2017‑0074
   https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2017-0074 [Google Scholar]
8. Douglas, Nick
   2014 “It’s supposed to look like shit: The Internet ugly aesthetic.” Journal of Visual Culture13(3): 314–339. 10.1177/1470412914544516
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412914544516 [Google Scholar]
9. Durieux, Valérie
   2010 “Collaborative tagging et folksonomie: l’organisation du web par les internautes [Collaborative tagging and folksonomy: How internet users organise the web].” Les Cahiers du Numérique6(1): 69–80. 10.3166/lcn.6.1.69‑80
   https://doi.org/10.3166/lcn.6.1.69-80 [Google Scholar]
10. Garric, Nathalie, and Valérie Capdevielle-Mougnibas
    2009 “La variation comme principe d’exploration du corpus: intérêts et limites de l’analyse lexicométrique interdisciplinaire pour l’étude du discours [Variation as a principle for corpus exploration: The benefits and limits of interdisciplinary lexicometric analysis applied to discourse studies].” Corpus81: 105–128. 10.4000/corpus.1681
    https://doi.org/10.4000/corpus.1681 [Google Scholar]
11. Ghliss, Yosra, François Perea, and Catherine Ruchon
    2019 “Introduction: les affordances langagières, levier d’une réflexion postdualiste du discours numérique? [Introduction: Linguistic affordances, a lever for a postdualistic take on digital discourse?].” Corela281. 10.4000/corela.8282
    https://doi.org/10.4000/corela.8282 [Google Scholar]
12. Herring, Susan
    2013 “Discourse in web 2.0: Familiar, reconfigured, and emergent.” Discourse 2.0.: Language and New Media, ed. byDeborah Tannen, and Anna Marie Trester, 1–26. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Isom, Deena A., Hunter M. Boehme, Deanna Cann, and Amber Wilson
    2022 “The White Right: A gendered look at the links between ‘victim’ ideology and anti-Black Lives Matter sentiments in the era of Trump.“ Critical Sociology48(3): 475–500. 10.1177/08969205211020396
    https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205211020396 [Google Scholar]
14. Kane, Carolyn
    2019 High-Tech Trash: Glitch, Noise, and Aesthetic Failure. Oakland: University of California Press. 10.1515/9780520974494
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780520974494 [Google Scholar]
15. Laineste, Liisi, and Piret Voolaid
    2016 “Laughing across borders: Intertextuality of internet memes.” The European Journal of Humour Research4(4): 26–49. 10.7592/EJHR2016.4.4.laineste
    https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2016.4.4.laineste [Google Scholar]
16. Martins Ferreira, Dina Maria, and Marco Antônio Vasconcelos
    2019 “Meme discourse: (De)memetizing antifeminist ideology.” Backhtiniana: Revista de Estudos do Discurso14(2): 46–64.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Massanari, Adrienne
    2015 Participatory Culture, Community, and Play. New York: Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑1‑4539‑1501‑1
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-1501-1 [Google Scholar]
18. McSwiney, Jordan, Michael Vaughan, Annett Heft, and Matthias Hoffmann
    2021 “Sharing the hate? Memes and transnationality in the far right’s digital visual culture.” Information, Communication & Society24(16): 2502–2521. 10.1080/1369118X.2021.1961006
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1961006 [Google Scholar]
19. Nelson, Robin
    2000 “‘Flexi-narrative’ form and ‘a new affective order’.” Mediated Drama – Dramatized Media, ed. byEckart Voigts-Virchow, 111–118. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Novitskaya, Alexandra
    2017 “Patriotism, sentiment, and male hysteria: Putin’s masculinity politics and the persecution of non-heterosexual Russians.” Norma: International Journal for Masculinity Studies12(3–4): 302–318. 10.1080/18902138.2017.1312957
    https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2017.1312957 [Google Scholar]
21. Oltean, Tudor
    1993 “Series and seriality in media culture.” European Journal of Communication8(1): 5–31. 10.1177/0267323193008001001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323193008001001 [Google Scholar]
22. Paveau, Marie-Anne
    2019 “La resignification: Pratiques technodiscursives de répétition subversive sur le web relationnel [Resignification: Technodiscursvie practices of subversive repetition on the relational web].” Langage et Société167(2): 111–141. 10.3917/ls.167.0111
    https://doi.org/10.3917/ls.167.0111 [Google Scholar]
23. Pelletier-Gagnon, Jérémie, and Axel Pérez Trujillo Diniz
    2021 “Colonizing Pepe : Internet memes as cyberplaces.” Space and Culture24(1): 4–18. 10.1177/1206331218776188
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331218776188 [Google Scholar]
24. Rose, Ellen
    2012 “Hyper attention and the rise of the antinarrative: Reconsidering the future of narrativity.” Narrative Works: Issues, Investigations & Interventions2(2): 92–102.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Rosier, Laurence
    2012 “Insulte, violence verbale, argumentation : Introduction. [Insult, verbal violence, argumentation: An introduction].” Argumentation et Analyse du Discours81. https://journals.openedition.org/aad/1321
    [Google Scholar]
26. Schlaile, Michael P., Theresa Knausberg, Matthias Mueller, and Johannes Zeman
    2018 “Viral ice buckets: A memetic perspective on the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge’s diffusion.” Cognitive Systems Research521: 947–969. 10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.09.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.09.012 [Google Scholar]
27. Shifman, Limor
    2013 “Memes in a digital world: Reconciling with a conceptual troublemaker.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication181: 362–377. 10.1111/jcc4.12013
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12013 [Google Scholar]
28. Wagener, Albin
    2020 “Mèmes, gifs et communication cognitive-affective sur Internet: l’émergence d’un nouveau langage humain [Memes, gifs and cognitivo-affective communication on the Internet: Towards the emergence of a new human language].” Communication37(1). 10.4000/communication.11061
    https://doi.org/10.4000/communication.11061 [Google Scholar]
29. Wagener, Albin
    2021a “The postdigital emergence of mêmes and gifs : Meaning, discourse, and hypernarrative creativity.” Postdigital Science and Education31: 831–850. 10.1007/s42438‑020‑00160‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00160-1 [Google Scholar]
30. Wagener, Albin
    2021b “Hyperconte. Hypernarrativité postdigitale et tectonique du glitch [Hypertale: Postdigital hypernarrativity and glitch tectonics].” Signata121. https://journals.openedition.org/signata/3278
    [Google Scholar]
31. Wagener, Albin
    2022 Mèmologie: Théorie postdigitale des mèmes [Memology: A Postdigital Theory of Memes]. Grenoble: UGA Editions. 10.4000/books.ugaeditions.27751
    https://doi.org/10.4000/books.ugaeditions.27751 [Google Scholar]
32. West, Laura
    2013 “Facebook sharing: A sociolinguistic analysis of computer-mediated storytelling.” Discourse, Context & Media2(1): 1–13. 10.1016/j.dcm.2012.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2012.12.002 [Google Scholar]
33. Wiggins, Bradley E.
    2019 The Discursive Power of Memes in Digital Culture: Ideology, Semiotics, and Intertextuality. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429492303
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429492303 [Google Scholar]
34. Yoon, InJeong
    2016 “Why is it not just a joke? Analysis of Internet memes associated with racism and hidden ideology of colorblindness.” Journal of Cultural Research in Art Education331: 92–123. 10.2458/jcrae.4898
    https://doi.org/10.2458/jcrae.4898 [Google Scholar]
35. Zanette, Maria Carolina, Izidoro Blikstein, and Luca Visconti
    2019 “Intertextual virality and vernacular repertoires: Internet memes as objects connecting different online worlds.” Revista de Administraçao de Empresas59(3): 157–169. 10.1590/s0034‑759020190302
    https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-759020190302 [Google Scholar]