“I’m only half Korean but I can relate to a lot of what you said”

References

1. Androutsopoulos, Jannis
   2013 “Participatory culture and metalinguistic discourse: Performing and negotiating German dialects on YouTube.” InDiscourse 2.0: Language and New Media, ed. byDeborah Tannen, and Anna Marie Trester, 47–71. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Androutsopoulos, Jannis, and Jana Tereick
   2015 “YouTube: Language and discourse practices in participatory culture.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. byAlexandra Gergakopoulou, and Tereza Spilioti, 354–370. Abingdon: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Arminen, Ilkka
   2004 “Second stories: The salience of interpersonal communication for mutual help in Alcoholics Anonymous.” Journal of Pragmatics36(2): 319–347. 10.1016/j.pragma.2003.07.001
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.07.001 [Google Scholar]
4. Ashton, Alison
   2020 “Padma Lakshmi opens up about her early years in America, the strangest food she’s ever eaten, her new Hulu series and more.” Parade, 16 June 2020. https://parade.com/1046302/alisonashton/padma-lakshmi-taste-the-nation/ (accessed20 March 2022).
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bamberg, Michael G.
   1997 “Positioning between structure and performance.” Journal of Narrative and Life History7(1–4): 335–342. 10.1075/jnlh.7.42pos
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.42pos [Google Scholar]
6. Bamberg, Michael G.
   2011 “Narrative practice and identity navigation.” InVarieties of Narrative Analysis, ed. byJames A. Holstein, and Jaber F. Gubrium, 99–124. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bamberg, Michael, and Alexandra Georgakopoulou
   2008 “Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis.” Text & Talk28(3): 377–396. 10.1515/TEXT.2008.018
   https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2008.018 [Google Scholar]
8. Bednick, Gail
   2011 “Digital storytelling and the pedagogy of human rights.” Journal of Cultural Research in Art Education29(1): 37–46. 10.2458/jcrae.4964
   https://doi.org/10.2458/jcrae.4964 [Google Scholar]
9. Bhatia, Aditi
   2018 “Interdiscursive performance in digital professions: The case of YouTube tutorials.” Journal of Pragmatics1241: 106–120. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.11.001
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.11.001 [Google Scholar]
10. Blommaert, Jan
    2019 “From groups to actions and back in online-offline sociolinguistics.” Multilingua38(4): 485–493. 10.1515/multi‑2018‑0114
    https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2018-0114 [Google Scholar]
11. Blommaert, Jan, and Piia Varis
    2015 “Enoughness, accent and light communities: Essays on contemporary identities.” Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies1391: 1–72.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bolander, Brook, and Miriam A. Locher
    2020 “Beyond the online offline distinction: Entry points to digital discourse.” Discourse, Context & Media351, 100383. 10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100383
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100383 [Google Scholar]
13. Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
    2014 “Conflict management in massive polylogues: A case study from YouTube.” Journal of Pragmatics731: 19–36. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.001 [Google Scholar]
14. Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall
    2005 “Identity in interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach.” Discourse Studies7(4–5): 585–614. 10.1177/1461445605054407
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 [Google Scholar]
15. Chou, Wen-Ying Sylvia, Yvonne Hunt, Anna Folkers, and Erik Augustson
    2011 “Cancer survivorship in the age of Youtube and social media: A narrative analysis.” Journal of Medical Internet Research13(1): e7. 10.2196/jmir.1569
    https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1569 [Google Scholar]
16. Chun, Elaine W.
    2001 “The construction of white, black, and Korean American identities through African American vernacular English.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology11(1): 52–64. 10.1525/jlin.2001.11.1.52
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2001.11.1.52 [Google Scholar]
17. Coates, Jennifer
    2011 “‘My mind is with you’: Story sequences in the talk of male friends.” Narrative Inquiry11(1): 81–101. 10.1075/ni.11.1.04coa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.11.1.04coa [Google Scholar]
18. De Fina, Anna
    2016 “Storytelling and audience reactions in social media.” Language in Society45(4): 473–498. 10.1017/S0047404516000051
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404516000051 [Google Scholar]
19. Du Bois, John W.
    2007 “The stance triangle.” InStancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. byRobert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.164.07du
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du [Google Scholar]
20. Dynel, Marta
    2014 “Participation framework underlying YouTube interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics731: 37–52. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.001 [Google Scholar]
21. Georgakopoulou, Alexandra
    2015 “Sharing as sescripting: Place manipulations on YouTube between narrative and social media affordances.” Discourse, Context & Media91: 64–72. 10.1016/j.dcm.2015.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2015.07.002 [Google Scholar]
22. Giles, David C., and Julie Newbold
    2013 “‘Is this normal?’: The role of category predicates in constructing mental illness online.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication18(4): 476–490. 10.1111/jcc4.12022
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12022 [Google Scholar]
23. Gordon, Cynthia
    2023 Intertextuality 2.0: Metadiscourse and Meaning-Making in an Online Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780197642689.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197642689.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
24. Gordon, Cynthia, and Hanwool Choe
    2019 “‘What is that smell?’: How Asian Americans’ YouTube ‘lunchbox moment’ stories convey and challenge cultural marginalization.” Paper presented atthe 16th Conference of the International Pragmatics Association. Hong Kong, 9–14 June 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Gordon, Cynthia, and Didem İkizoğlu
    2017 “‘Asking for another’ online: Membership categorization and identity construction on a food and nutrition discussion board.” Discourse studies19(3): 253–271. 10.1177/1461445617701810
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445617701810 [Google Scholar]
26. Guo, Li
    2020 “Together and alone: Telling second stories on the humans of New York Facebook page.” Storytelling, Self, Society16(2): 244–262. 10.13110/storselfsoci.16.2.0244
    https://doi.org/10.13110/storselfsoci.16.2.0244 [Google Scholar]
27. Harrison, Sandra, and Julie Barlow
    2009 “Politeness strategies and advice-giving in an online arthritis workshop.” Journal of Politeness Research5(1): 93–111. 10.1515/JPLR.2009.006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/JPLR.2009.006 [Google Scholar]
28. Herring, Susan C.
    1999 “Interactional coherence in CMC.” Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences: 1-13. 10.1109/HICSS.1999.772674
    https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1999.772674 [Google Scholar]
29. Herring, Susan C.
    2004 “Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior.” InDesigning Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, ed. bySasha A. Barab, Rob Kling, and James H. Gray, 338–376. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511805080.016
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805080.016 [Google Scholar]
30. Herring, Susan C.
    2013 “Discourse in Web 2.0: Familiar, reconfigured, and emergent.” InDiscourse 2.0: Language and New Media, ed. byDeborah Tannen, and Anna Marie Trester, 1–25. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Huang, Eddie
    2013 Fresh off the Boat: A Memoir. New York: Spiegel & Grau.
    [Google Scholar]
32. İkizoğlu, Didem, and Cynthia Gordon
    2021 “‘Vegetables as a chore’: Constructing and problematizing a ‘picky eater’ Identity Online.” InIdentity and Ideology in Digital Food Discourse: Social Media Interactions Across Cultural Contexts, ed. byAlla Tovares, and Cynthia Gordon, 13–32. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350119178.ch‑001
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350119178.ch-001 [Google Scholar]
33. Karrebæk, Martha Sif
    2012 “‘What’s in your lunch box today?’: Health, respectability, and ethnicity in the primary classroom.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology22(1): 1–22. 10.1111/j.1548‑1395.2012.01129.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1395.2012.01129.x [Google Scholar]
34. Kim, Dasol
    2021 “The growing up Asian American tag: An Asian American networked counterpublic on YouTube.” International Journal of Communication15(2): 123–142.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Labov, William
    1972 Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Lakoff, Robin
    2006 “Identity à la carte: You are what you eat.” InDiscourse and Identity, ed. byAnna De Fina, Deborah Schiffrin, and Michael Bamberg, 142–165. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511584459.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511584459.008 [Google Scholar]
37. Lockyer, Sue, and Leah Wingard
    2020 “Reconstructing agency using reported private thought in narratives of survivors of sex trafficking.” Narrative Inquiry30(1): 142–160. 10.1075/ni.18076.loc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.18076.loc [Google Scholar]
38. Lovelock, Michael
    2019 “‘My coming out story’: Lesbian, gay and bisexual youth identities on YouTube.” International Journal of Cultural Studies22(1): 70–85. 10.1177/1367877917720237
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877917720237 [Google Scholar]
39. O’Farrell, Kate
    2022 “‘Completely incapable of logical thought’: Deligitimating the MeToo movement in YouTube comment sections.” Internet Pragmatics5(2): 291–316. 10.1075/ip.00082.far
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00082.far [Google Scholar]
40. Osvaldsson, Karin
    2011 “Bullying in context: Stories of bullying on an internet discussion board.” Children & Society25(4): 317–327. 10.1111/j.1099‑0860.2011.00383.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2011.00383.x [Google Scholar]
41. Page, Ruth
    2010 “Re-examining narrativity: Small stories in status updates.” Text & Talk30(4): 423–444. 10.1515/text.2010.021
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2010.021 [Google Scholar]
42. Page, Ruth
    2011 Stories and Social Media: Identities and Interaction. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Page, Ruth
    2018 Narratives Online: Shared Stories in Social Media. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316492390
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316492390 [Google Scholar]
44. Paulus, Trena M., and Mary Alice Varga
    2015 “‘Please know that you are not alone with your pain’: Responses to newcomer posts in an online grief support forum.” Death Studies39(10): 633–640. 10.1080/07481187.2015.1047060
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2015.1047060 [Google Scholar]
45. Polanyi, Livia
    1981 “Telling the same story twice.” Text & Talk1(4): 315–336. 10.1515/text.1.1981.1.4.315
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1981.1.4.315 [Google Scholar]
46. Sacks, Harvey
    1992 Lectures on Conversation: Volume II, ed. byGail Jefferson and with an introduction by Emanuel A. Schegloff, 249–260. Malden: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Siromaa, Maarit
    2012 “Resonance in conversational second stories: A dialogic resource for stance taking.” Text & Talk32(4): 525–545. 10.1515/text‑2012‑0025
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2012-0025 [Google Scholar]
48. Stommel, Wyke, and Tom Koole
    2010 “The online support group as a community: A micro-analysis of the interaction with a new member.” Discourse studies12(3): 357–378. 10.1177/1461445609358518
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445609358518 [Google Scholar]
49. Tannen, Deborah
    2005 Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk among Friends. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195221817.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195221817.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
50. Tannen, Deborah
    2007 Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618987
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618987 [Google Scholar]
51. Tannen, Deborah
    2008 “‘We’ve never been close, we’re very different’: Three narrative types in sister discourse. Narrative Inquiry18(2): 206–229. 10.1075/ni.18.1.03tan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.18.1.03tan [Google Scholar]
52. Tannen, Deborah
    2013 “The medium is the metamessage: Conversational style in new media interaction.” Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media, ed. byDeborah Tannen, and Anna Marie Trester, 99–118. Washington, D.C: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Veen, Mario, Hedwig te Molder, Bart Gremmen, and Cees van Woerkum
    2010 “Quitting is not an option: An analysis of online diet talk between celiac disease patients.” Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine14(1): 23–40. 10.1177/1363459309347478
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459309347478 [Google Scholar]
54. Vuong, An
    2018 “Lunchbox moment.” Sparks, 12 April 2018. www.sparksmag.com/2018/04/12/lunchbox-moment/ (accessed7 May 2020).
    [Google Scholar]
55. Wiggins, Sally
    2012 “The social life of ‘eugh’: Disgust as assessment in family mealtimes.” British Journal of Social Psychology52(3):489–509. 10.1111/j.2044‑8309.2012.02106.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2012.02106.x [Google Scholar]
56. Zappavigna, Michele
    2014 “CofffeeTweets: Bonding around the bean on Twitter.” InThe Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet, ed. byPhilip Seargeant, and Caroline Tagg, 139–160. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137029317_7
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137029317_7 [Google Scholar]
57. Zappavigna, Michele, and Andrew S. Ross
    2022 “Instagram and intermodal configurations of value: Ideology, aesthetics, and attitudinal stance in #avotoast posts.” Internet Pragmatics5(2): 197–226. 10.1075/ip.00068.rap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00068.rap [Google Scholar]