1887
image of “Resident superhero”
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Situated at the intersection of social media communication and pragmatics of language use online, this article will examine the social action of community veneration of a local plumber by members of a neighbourhood Facebook group, the vast majority of whom do not know each other personally (nor necessarily the plumber). Particular attention will be paid to the way in which this veneration is constructed over time through linguistic creativity and humour, such as limericks, exaggeration, and various terms of reverence and hero worship. In addition to these linguistic devices, it will be shown how the participants actively exploit the digital environment to create context-dependent humour through emojis, memes, and other graphics. The selected examples will illustrate how this collaborative veneration and playfulness also strengthen the sense of belonging in this group of online strangers.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00112.mul
2024-06-03
2024-06-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Angouri, Jo
    2016 “Online communities of practice.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. byAlexandra Georgakopoulou, and Tereza Spilioti, –. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Attardo, Salvatore
    2023Humor 2.0: How the Internet Changed Humor. London: Anthem Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bateson, Gregory
    1953 “The position of humor in human communication.” InCybernetics, Ninth Conference, ed. byHeinz von Foerster, –. New York: Josiah Macey Jr. Foundation.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Baym, Nancy K.
    2003 “Communication in online communities.” InEncyclopedia of Community: From the Village to the Virtual World (Vol. 3), ed. byKaren Christensen, and David Levinson, –. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bednarek, Monika
    2017 “Fandom.” InPragmatics of Social Media, ed. byChristian R. Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110431070‑020
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431070-020 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bolander, Brook, and Miriam A. Locher
    2020 “Beyond the online offline distinction: Entry points to digital discourse.” Discourse, Context & Media, . 10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100383
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100383 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chiaro, Delia
    2018The Language of Jokes in the Digital Age. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chovanec, Jan, and Villy Tsakona
    2018 “Investigating the dynamics of humour: Towards a theory of interactional humour.” InThe Dynamics of Interactional Humour: Creating and Negotiating Humour in Everyday Encounters, ed. byVilly Tsakona, and Jan Chovanec, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/thr.7.01cho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.7.01cho [Google Scholar]
  9. 2023 “This girl is on fire!’: Interactional humour in YouTube comments on the Notre Dame disaster.” InThe Pragmatics of Humour in Interactive Contexts, ed. byEsther Linares-Bernabéu, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.335.04cho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.335.04cho [Google Scholar]
  10. Danesi, Marcel
    2016The Semiotics of Emoji: The Rise of Visual Language in the Age of the Internet. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Demjén, Zsofia
    2016 “Laughing at cancer: Humour, empowerment, solidarity and coping online.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.05.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.05.010 [Google Scholar]
  12. Deppermann, Arnulf
    2021 “Social actions.” InThe Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ed. byMichael Haugh, Dániel Z. Kádár, and Marina Terkourafi, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108954105.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108954105.006 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dynel, Marta, and Jan Chovanec
    2021 “Creating and sharing public humour across traditional and new media.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.02.020
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.02.020 [Google Scholar]
  14. Fine, Gary Alan, and Michaela de Soucey
    2005 “Joking cultures: Humor themes as social regulation in group life.” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research(): –. 10.1515/humr.2005.18.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2005.18.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  15. Haugh, Michael
    2014 “Jocular mockery as interactional practice in everyday Anglo-Australian conversation.” Australian Journal of Linguistics(): –. 10.1080/07268602.2014.875456
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2014.875456 [Google Scholar]
  16. Herring, Susan C.
    2019 “The coevolution of computer-mediated communication and computer-mediated discourse analysis.” InAnalyzing Digital Discourse: New Insights and Future Directions, ed. byPatricia Bou-Franch, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, –. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑92663‑6_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92663-6_2 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hoffmann, Christian R., and Wolfram Bublitz
    (eds) 2017Pragmatics of Social Media. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110431070
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431070 [Google Scholar]
  18. Idowu-Faith, Bimbola
    2016 “Speaking in the free marketplace of ideas: The stylistics of humour in ‘blogversations’.” InAnalyzing Language and Humor in Online Communication, ed. byRotimi Taiwo, Akinola Odebunmi, and Akin Adetunji, –. Hershey: Information Science Reference. 10.4018/978‑1‑5225‑0338‑5.ch004
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0338-5.ch004 [Google Scholar]
  19. KhosraviNik, Majid
    2018 “Social media critical discourse studies (SM-CDS).” InThe Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, ed. byJohn Flowerdew, and John E. Richardson, –. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (ed 2023Social Media and Society: Integrating the Digital with the Social in Digital Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.100
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.100 [Google Scholar]
  21. Koivisto, Aino, Heidi Vepsäläinen, and Mikko T. Virtanen
    (eds.) 2023Conversation Analytic Perspectives to Digital Interaction: Practices, Resources, and Affordances. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society. 10.21435/sflin.22
    https://doi.org/10.21435/sflin.22 [Google Scholar]
  22. Koivisto, Aino, Mikko T. Virtanen, and Heidi Vepsäläinen
    2023 “Applying conversation analysis to digital interaction.” InConversation Analytic Perspectives to Digital Interaction: Practices, Resources, and Affordances, ed. byAino Koivisto, Heidi Vepsäläinen, and Mikko T. Virtanen, –. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society. 10.21435/sflin.22
    https://doi.org/10.21435/sflin.22 [Google Scholar]
  23. Labinaz, Paolo, and Marina Sbisà
    2021 “Speech acts and the dissemination of knowledge in social networks.” InApproaches to Internet Pragmatics: Theory and Practice, ed. byChaoqun Xie, Francisco Yus, and Hartmut Haberland, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.318.05lab
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.318.05lab [Google Scholar]
  24. Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger
    1991Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511815355
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355 [Google Scholar]
  25. Linares-Bernabéu, Esther
    (ed) 2023The Pragmatics of Humour in Interactive Contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.335
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.335 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lundquist, Lita
    2020 Humorsocialisering [Humour Socialisation]. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Maranto, Gina, and Matt Barton
    2010 “Paradox and promise: MySpace, Facebook, and the sociopolitics of social networking in the writing classroom.” Computers and Composition: –. 10.1016/j.compcom.2009.11.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2009.11.003 [Google Scholar]
  28. Marone, Vittorio
    2015 “Online humour as a community-building cushioning glue.” European Journal of Humour Research(): –. 10.7592/EJHR2015.3.1.marone
    https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2015.3.1.marone [Google Scholar]
  29. Marwick, Alice, and danah boyd
    2011 “I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience.” New Media & Society(): –. 10.1177/1461444810365313
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313 [Google Scholar]
  30. Meierkord, Christiane
    2023 “Society, culture and the speech act of praise – Observations from Ugandan English vis-à-vis British English.” Contrastive Pragmatics. 10.1163/26660393‑bja10095
    https://doi.org/10.1163/26660393-bja10095 [Google Scholar]
  31. Meredith, Joanne, David Giles, and Wyke J. P. Stommel
    2021 “Introduction: The microanalysis of digital interaction.” InAnalysing Digital Interaction, ed. byJoanne Meredith, David Giles, and Wyke J. P. Stommel, –. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑64922‑7_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64922-7_1 [Google Scholar]
  32. Mey, Jacob L.
    2001Pragmatics: An Introduction (2nd edn.). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Mpofu, Shepherd
    (ed.) 2021Digital Humour in the Covid-19 Pandemic: Perspectives from the Global South. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑79279‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79279-4 [Google Scholar]
  34. Mullan, Kerry
    2020 “Pile of dead leaves free to a good home: Humour and belonging in a Facebook community.” InStudies in Ethnopragmatics, Cultural Semantics, and Intercultural Communication: Ethnopragmatics and Semantic Analysis, ed. byKerry Mullan, Bert Peeters, and Lauren Sadow, -. Singapore: Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑32‑9983‑2_8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9983-2_8 [Google Scholar]
  35. 2022 “On the ‘Dark Side’: Facebook humour used for inclusion and exclusion.” European Journal of Humour Research(): –. 10.7592/EJHR2022.10.2.644
    https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2022.10.2.644 [Google Scholar]
  36. 2024 “Humour and creativity in a family of strangers on Facebook.” InInteractional Humor: Multimodal Design and Negotiation, ed. byBéatrice Priego-Valverde, –. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. North, Sarah
    2007 “‘The voices, the voices’: Creativity in online conversation.” Applied Linguistics(): –. 10.1093/applin/amm042
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm042 [Google Scholar]
  38. Nurmikari, Helena
    2023 “The Finnish anteeks(i) mitä ‘sorry what’ as a resource for expressing affect on Twitter.” InConversation Analytic Perspectives to Digital Interaction: Practices, Resources, and Affordances, ed. byAino Koivisto, Heidi Vepsäläinen, and Mikko T. Virtanen, –. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Placencia, Maria Elena, and Amanda Lower
    2017 “Compliments and compliment responses.” InPragmatics of Social Media, ed. byChristian R. Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110431070‑023
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431070-023 [Google Scholar]
  40. Riordan, Monica A., and Roger J. Kreuz
    2010 “Cues in computer-mediated communication: A corpus analysis.” Computers in Human Behavior(): –. 10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.008 [Google Scholar]
  41. Sadow, Lauren, and Katie Cox
    2024 “Superheroes, war Heroes, health care heroes: The pragmatics of danger and the discourse of heroism.” InThe Cultural Pragmatics of Danger, ed. byCarsten Levisen, and Zhengdao Ye, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.346.05sad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.346.05sad [Google Scholar]
  42. Scott, Kate
    2015 “The pragmatics of hashtags: Inference and conversational style on Twitter.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.015 [Google Scholar]
  43. 2022Pragmatics Online. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/b22750
    https://doi.org/10.4324/b22750 [Google Scholar]
  44. Seargeant, Philip, and Caroline Tagg
    (eds 2014Language and Social Media: Communication and Community Online. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137029317
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137029317 [Google Scholar]
  45. Searle, John
    1969Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
  46. Speer, Susan A.
    2017 “Flirting: A designedly ambiguous action?” Research on Language and Social Interaction(): –. 10.1080/08351813.2017.1301297
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2017.1301297 [Google Scholar]
  47. Tagg, Caroline
    2015Exploring Digital Communication: Language in Action. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315727165
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315727165 [Google Scholar]
  48. Taiwo, Rotimi, Akinola Odebunmi, and Akin Adetunji
    2016Analyzing Language and Humor in Online Communication. Hershey: Information Science Reference. 10.4018/978‑1‑5225‑0338‑5
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0338-5 [Google Scholar]
  49. Thorne, Steven L., and Rebecca Black
    2011 “Identity and interaction in internet-mediated contexts.” InIdentity Formation in Globalizing Contexts: Language Learning in the New Millennium, ed. byChristina Higgins, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110267280.257
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110267280.257 [Google Scholar]
  50. Vandergriff, Ilona
    2010 “Humor and play in CMC.” InHandbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction, ed. byRotimi Taiwo, –. Hershey: Information Science Reference. 10.4018/978‑1‑61520‑773‑2.ch015
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-773-2.ch015 [Google Scholar]
  51. Vásquez, Camilla
    2019Language, Creativity and Humour Online. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315159027
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315159027 [Google Scholar]
  52. Weitz, Eric
    2016 “Humour and social media.” The European Journal of Humour Research(): –. 10.7592/EJHR2016.4.4.weitz
    https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2016.4.4.weitz [Google Scholar]
  53. Wenger, Etienne, Richard McDermott, and William M. Snyder
    2002Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Harvard: Harvard Business School Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Xie, Chaoqun, Francisco Yus, and Hartmut Haberland
    (eds) 2021Approaches to Internet Pragmatics: Theory and Practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.318
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.318 [Google Scholar]
  55. Yus, Francisco
    2021 “Pragmatics, humour and the internet.” Internet Pragmatics(): –. 10.1075/ip.00067.yus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00067.yus [Google Scholar]
  56. 2023Pragmatics of Internet Humour. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑31902‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31902-0 [Google Scholar]
  57. Zappavigna, Michele
    2012Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781472541642
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472541642 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00112.mul
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00112.mul
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: belonging ; veneration ; Facebook ; multimodal ; online community ; humour
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error