“Resident superhero”

References

1. Angouri, Jo
   2016 “Online communities of practice.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. byAlexandra Georgakopoulou, and Tereza Spilioti, 323–338. Abingdon: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Attardo, Salvatore
   2023 Humor 2.0: How the Internet Changed Humor. London: Anthem Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bateson, Gregory
   1953 “The position of humor in human communication.” InCybernetics, Ninth Conference, ed. byHeinz von Foerster, 1–47. New York: Josiah Macey Jr. Foundation.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Baym, Nancy K.
   2003 “Communication in online communities.” InEncyclopedia of Community: From the Village to the Virtual World (Vol. 3), ed. byKaren Christensen, and David Levinson, 1015–1017. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bednarek, Monika
   2017 “Fandom.” InPragmatics of Social Media, ed. byChristian R. Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 545–572. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110431070‑020
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431070-020 [Google Scholar]
6. Bolander, Brook, and Miriam A. Locher
   2020 “Beyond the online offline distinction: Entry points to digital discourse.” Discourse, Context & Media351, 100383. 10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100383
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100383 [Google Scholar]
7. Chiaro, Delia
   2018 The Language of Jokes in the Digital Age. Abingdon: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Chovanec, Jan, and Villy Tsakona
   2018 “Investigating the dynamics of humour: Towards a theory of interactional humour.” InThe Dynamics of Interactional Humour: Creating and Negotiating Humour in Everyday Encounters, ed. byVilly Tsakona, and Jan Chovanec, 1–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/thr.7.01cho
   https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.7.01cho [Google Scholar]
9. Chovanec, Jan, and Villy Tsakona
   2023 “This girl is on fire!’: Interactional humour in YouTube comments on the Notre Dame disaster.” InThe Pragmatics of Humour in Interactive Contexts, ed. byEsther Linares-Bernabéu, 87–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.335.04cho
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.335.04cho [Google Scholar]
10. Danesi, Marcel
    2016 The Semiotics of Emoji: The Rise of Visual Language in the Age of the Internet. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Demjén, Zsofia
    2016 “Laughing at cancer: Humour, empowerment, solidarity and coping online.” Journal of Pragmatics1011: 18–30. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.05.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.05.010 [Google Scholar]
12. Deppermann, Arnulf
    2021 “Social actions.” InThe Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ed. byMichael Haugh, Dániel Z. Kádár, and Marina Terkourafi, 69–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108954105.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108954105.006 [Google Scholar]
13. Dynel, Marta, and Jan Chovanec
    2021 “Creating and sharing public humour across traditional and new media.” Journal of Pragmatics1771: 151–156. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.02.020
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.02.020 [Google Scholar]
14. Fine, Gary Alan, and Michaela de Soucey
    2005 “Joking cultures: Humor themes as social regulation in group life.” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research18(1): 1–22. 10.1515/humr.2005.18.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2005.18.1.1 [Google Scholar]
15. Haugh, Michael
    2014 “Jocular mockery as interactional practice in everyday Anglo-Australian conversation.” Australian Journal of Linguistics34(1): 76–99. 10.1080/07268602.2014.875456
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2014.875456 [Google Scholar]
16. Herring, Susan C.
    2019 “The coevolution of computer-mediated communication and computer-mediated discourse analysis.” InAnalyzing Digital Discourse: New Insights and Future Directions, ed. byPatricia Bou-Franch, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, 25–67. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑92663‑6_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92663-6_2 [Google Scholar]
17. Hoffmann, Christian R., and Wolfram Bublitz
    (eds) 2017 Pragmatics of Social Media. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110431070
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431070 [Google Scholar]
18. Idowu-Faith, Bimbola
    2016 “Speaking in the free marketplace of ideas: The stylistics of humour in ‘blogversations’.” InAnalyzing Language and Humor in Online Communication, ed. byRotimi Taiwo, Akinola Odebunmi, and Akin Adetunji, 65–84. Hershey: Information Science Reference. 10.4018/978‑1‑5225‑0338‑5.ch004
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0338-5.ch004 [Google Scholar]
19. KhosraviNik, Majid
    2018 “Social media critical discourse studies (SM-CDS).” InThe Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, ed. byJohn Flowerdew, and John E. Richardson, 582–596. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
20. KhosraviNik, Majid
    (ed 2023 Social Media and Society: Integrating the Digital with the Social in Digital Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.100
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.100 [Google Scholar]
21. Koivisto, Aino, Heidi Vepsäläinen, and Mikko T. Virtanen
    (eds.) 2023 Conversation Analytic Perspectives to Digital Interaction: Practices, Resources, and Affordances. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society. 10.21435/sflin.22
    https://doi.org/10.21435/sflin.22 [Google Scholar]
22. Koivisto, Aino, Mikko T. Virtanen, and Heidi Vepsäläinen
    2023 “Applying conversation analysis to digital interaction.” InConversation Analytic Perspectives to Digital Interaction: Practices, Resources, and Affordances, ed. byAino Koivisto, Heidi Vepsäläinen, and Mikko T. Virtanen, 7–39. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society. 10.21435/sflin.22
    https://doi.org/10.21435/sflin.22 [Google Scholar]
23. Labinaz, Paolo, and Marina Sbisà
    2021 “Speech acts and the dissemination of knowledge in social networks.” InApproaches to Internet Pragmatics: Theory and Practice, ed. byChaoqun Xie, Francisco Yus, and Hartmut Haberland, 145–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.318.05lab
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.318.05lab [Google Scholar]
24. Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger
    1991 Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511815355
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355 [Google Scholar]
25. Linares-Bernabéu, Esther
    (ed) 2023 The Pragmatics of Humour in Interactive Contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.335
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.335 [Google Scholar]
26. Lundquist, Lita
    2020 Humorsocialisering [Humour Socialisation]. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Maranto, Gina, and Matt Barton
    2010 “Paradox and promise: MySpace, Facebook, and the sociopolitics of social networking in the writing classroom.” Computers and Composition271: 36–47. 10.1016/j.compcom.2009.11.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2009.11.003 [Google Scholar]
28. Marone, Vittorio
    2015 “Online humour as a community-building cushioning glue.” European Journal of Humour Research3(1): 61–83. 10.7592/EJHR2015.3.1.marone
    https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2015.3.1.marone [Google Scholar]
29. Marwick, Alice, and danah boyd
    2011 “I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience.” New Media & Society13(1): 114–133. 10.1177/1461444810365313
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313 [Google Scholar]
30. Meierkord, Christiane
    2023 “Society, culture and the speech act of praise – Observations from Ugandan English vis-à-vis British English.” Contrastive Pragmatics. 10.1163/26660393‑bja10095
    https://doi.org/10.1163/26660393-bja10095 [Google Scholar]
31. Meredith, Joanne, David Giles, and Wyke J. P. Stommel
    2021 “Introduction: The microanalysis of digital interaction.” InAnalysing Digital Interaction, ed. byJoanne Meredith, David Giles, and Wyke J. P. Stommel, 1–22. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑64922‑7_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64922-7_1 [Google Scholar]
32. Mey, Jacob L.
    2001 Pragmatics: An Introduction (2nd edn.). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Mpofu, Shepherd
    (ed.) 2021 Digital Humour in the Covid-19 Pandemic: Perspectives from the Global South. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑79279‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79279-4 [Google Scholar]
34. Mullan, Kerry
    2020 “Pile of dead leaves free to a good home: Humour and belonging in a Facebook community.” InStudies in Ethnopragmatics, Cultural Semantics, and Intercultural Communication: Ethnopragmatics and Semantic Analysis, ed. byKerry Mullan, Bert Peeters, and Lauren Sadow, 135-159. Singapore: Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑32‑9983‑2_8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9983-2_8 [Google Scholar]
35. Mullan, Kerry
    2022 “On the ‘Dark Side’: Facebook humour used for inclusion and exclusion.” European Journal of Humour Research10(2): 96–115. 10.7592/EJHR2022.10.2.644
    https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2022.10.2.644 [Google Scholar]
36. Mullan, Kerry
    2024 “Humour and creativity in a family of strangers on Facebook.” InInteractional Humor: Multimodal Design and Negotiation, ed. byBéatrice Priego-Valverde, 289–318. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
37. North, Sarah
    2007 “‘The voices, the voices’: Creativity in online conversation.” Applied Linguistics28(4): 538–555. 10.1093/applin/amm042
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm042 [Google Scholar]
38. Nurmikari, Helena
    2023 “The Finnish anteeks(i) mitä ‘sorry what’ as a resource for expressing affect on Twitter.” InConversation Analytic Perspectives to Digital Interaction: Practices, Resources, and Affordances, ed. byAino Koivisto, Heidi Vepsäläinen, and Mikko T. Virtanen, 148–169. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Placencia, Maria Elena, and Amanda Lower
    2017 “Compliments and compliment responses.” InPragmatics of Social Media, ed. byChristian R. Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 633–660. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110431070‑023
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431070-023 [Google Scholar]
40. Riordan, Monica A., and Roger J. Kreuz
    2010 “Cues in computer-mediated communication: A corpus analysis.” Computers in Human Behavior26(6): 1806–1817. 10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.008 [Google Scholar]
41. Sadow, Lauren, and Katie Cox
    2024 “Superheroes, war Heroes, health care heroes: The pragmatics of danger and the discourse of heroism.” InThe Cultural Pragmatics of Danger, ed. byCarsten Levisen, and Zhengdao Ye, 135–156. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.346.05sad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.346.05sad [Google Scholar]
42. Scott, Kate
    2015 “The pragmatics of hashtags: Inference and conversational style on Twitter.” Journal of Pragmatics811: 8–20. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.015 [Google Scholar]
43. Scott, Kate
    2022 Pragmatics Online. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/b22750
    https://doi.org/10.4324/b22750 [Google Scholar]
44. Seargeant, Philip, and Caroline Tagg
    (eds 2014 Language and Social Media: Communication and Community Online. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137029317
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137029317 [Google Scholar]
45. Searle, John
    1969 Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
46. Speer, Susan A.
    2017 “Flirting: A designedly ambiguous action?” Research on Language and Social Interaction50(2): 128–150. 10.1080/08351813.2017.1301297
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2017.1301297 [Google Scholar]
47. Tagg, Caroline
    2015 Exploring Digital Communication: Language in Action. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315727165
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315727165 [Google Scholar]
48. Taiwo, Rotimi, Akinola Odebunmi, and Akin Adetunji
    2016 Analyzing Language and Humor in Online Communication. Hershey: Information Science Reference. 10.4018/978‑1‑5225‑0338‑5
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0338-5 [Google Scholar]
49. Thorne, Steven L., and Rebecca Black
    2011 “Identity and interaction in internet-mediated contexts.” InIdentity Formation in Globalizing Contexts: Language Learning in the New Millennium, ed. byChristina Higgins, 257–278. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110267280.257
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110267280.257 [Google Scholar]
50. Vandergriff, Ilona
    2010 “Humor and play in CMC.” InHandbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction, ed. byRotimi Taiwo, 235–251. Hershey: Information Science Reference. 10.4018/978‑1‑61520‑773‑2.ch015
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-773-2.ch015 [Google Scholar]
51. Vásquez, Camilla
    2019 Language, Creativity and Humour Online. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315159027
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315159027 [Google Scholar]
52. Weitz, Eric
    2016 “Humour and social media.” The European Journal of Humour Research4(4): 1–4. 10.7592/EJHR2016.4.4.weitz
    https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2016.4.4.weitz [Google Scholar]
53. Wenger, Etienne, Richard McDermott, and William M. Snyder
    2002 Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Harvard: Harvard Business School Press.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Xie, Chaoqun, Francisco Yus, and Hartmut Haberland
    (eds) 2021 Approaches to Internet Pragmatics: Theory and Practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.318
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.318 [Google Scholar]
55. Yus, Francisco
    2021 “Pragmatics, humour and the internet.” Internet Pragmatics4(1): 1–11. 10.1075/ip.00067.yus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00067.yus [Google Scholar]
56. Yus, Francisco
    2023 Pragmatics of Internet Humour. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑31902‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31902-0 [Google Scholar]
57. Zappavigna, Michele
    2012 Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781472541642
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472541642 [Google Scholar]