Salience management

References

1. Adel, Annelie
   2006 Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Amsterdam: John Benjamin. 10.1075/scl.24
   https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.24 [Google Scholar]
2. Al-Subhi, Aisha Saadi
   2022 “Metadiscourse in online advertising: Exploring linguistic and visual metadiscourse in social media advertisements.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.027
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.027 [Google Scholar]
3. Bax, Stephen, Fumiyo Nakatsuhara, and Daniel Waller
   2019 “Researching L2 writers’ use of metadiscourse markers at intermediate and advanced levels.” System: –. 10.1016/j.system.2019.02.010
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.02.010 [Google Scholar]
4. Capar, Nejat, and Masaaki Katobe
   2003 “The relationship between international diversification and performance in service firms.” Journal of International Business Studies(): –. 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400036
   https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400036 [Google Scholar]
5. Chafe, Wallace
   1976 “Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view.” InSubject and Topic, ed. byCharles N. Li, –. New York: Academic Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chen, Xinren
   2020 “Jiyu yuanyuyong de yuanhuayu fenlei xinni [A new taxonomy of metadiscourse based on metapragmatics].” Waiyu yu Waiyu Jiaoxue [Foreign Language and Education] (): –.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Crismore, Avon, Raija Markkannen, and Margare Steffensen
   1993 “Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students.” Written Communication: –. 10.1177/0741088393010001002
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088393010001002 [Google Scholar]
8. Culpeper, Jonathan, and Michael Haugh
   2014 Pragmatics and the English Language. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑39391‑3
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-39391-3 [Google Scholar]
9. García, Laura
   2017 “Evidentials in advertising: A sample study.” Revista de Linguistica y Lenguas Aplicadas: –. 10.4995/rlyla.2017.7074
   https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2017.7074 [Google Scholar]
10. Gundel, Jeanette, Nancy Hedberg, and Ron Zacharski
    1988 “On the generation and interpretation of demonstrative expressions.” Proceeding of the 12th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: –. 10.3115/991635.991679
    https://doi.org/10.3115/991635.991679 [Google Scholar]
11. Gundel, Jeanette, Nancy Hedberg, and Ron Zacharski
    1989 “Giveness, implicature, and demonstrative expressions in English discourse.” InPapers from the Parasession on Language in Context, ed. byRandolph Graczyk, Bradley Music, and Caroline Wiltshire, –. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Gundel, Jeanette, Nancy Hedberg, and Ron Zacharski
    1990 “Givenness, implicature, and the form of referring expressions in discourse.” Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: –. 10.3765/bls.v16i0.1690
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v16i0.1690 [Google Scholar]
13. Harris, Zellig
    1959 “Linguistic transformations for information retrieval.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific Information:–.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Ho, Victor
    2018 “Using metadiscourse in making persuasive attempts through workplace request emails.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.06.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.06.015 [Google Scholar]
15. Ho, Victor, and Cissy Li
    2018 “The use of metadiscourse and persuasion: An analysis of first year university students’ timed argumentative essays.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes: –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2018.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.02.001 [Google Scholar]
16. Hongladarom, Krisadawan
    2007 “‘Don’t blame me for criticizing you…’: A study of metapragmatics comments in Thai.” InMetapragmatics in Use, ed. byWolfram, Bublitz, and Axel Hübler, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamin. 10.1075/pbns.165.04hon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.165.04hon [Google Scholar]
17. Hyland, Ken
    2005 Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hyland, Ken
    2017 “Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going?” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007 [Google Scholar]
19. Hyland, Ken, and Polly Tse
    2004 “Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal.” Applied Linguistics(): –. 10.1093/applin/25.2.156
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156 [Google Scholar]
20. Jakobson, Roman
    1960 “Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics.” In Style in Language, ed. byThomas Sebeok, –. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Jucker, Andreas, and Sara Smith
    1996 “Explicit and implicit ways of enhancing common ground in conversations.” Pragmatics(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kaounides, Lakis
    1999 “Science, technology and global competitive advantage.” International Studies of Management and Organizations(): –. 10.1080/00208825.1999.11656757
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.1999.11656757 [Google Scholar]
23. Kecskes, Istvan
    2008 “Dueling contexts: A dynamic model of meaning.” Journal of Pragmatics(): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.12.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.12.004 [Google Scholar]
24. Kecskes, Istvan
    2010a “Situation-bound utterances as pragmatic acts.” Journal of Pragmatics(): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.008 [Google Scholar]
25. Kecskes, Istvan
    2010b “The paradox of communication: Socio-cognitive approach to pragmatics.” Pragmatics and Society(): –. 10.1075/ps.1.1.04kec
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.1.1.04kec [Google Scholar]
26. Kecskes, Istvan
    2014 Intercultural Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199892655.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199892655.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
27. Kecskes, Istvan
    2017 “The interplay of recipient design and salience in shaping speaker’s utterance.” InReference and Representation in Thought and Language, ed. byMaria de Ponte, and Kepa Korta, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kecskes, Istvan
    2019 English as a Lingua Franca: The Pragmatic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Li, Zhijun, and Jinfen Xu
    2020 “Reflexive metadiscourse in Chinese and English sociology research article introductions and discussions.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.02.003 [Google Scholar]
30. Liu, Ping, and Huiying Liu
    2021 “Salience adjusting: Metapragmatic expressions in complaint responses.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.003 [Google Scholar]
31. Mauranen, Anna
    1993 “Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish-English economics texts.” English for Specific Purposes: –. 10.1016/0889‑4906(93)90024‑I
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(93)90024-I [Google Scholar]
32. Mohammed, Nahar Al-Ali, Meera B. Sahawneh, and Safaa M. Hamzeh
    2023 “How to get more views: An analysis of metadiscoursal and discoursal linguistic cues in Arabic clickbait headlines.” Internet Pragmatics. 10.1075/ip.00091
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00091 [Google Scholar]
33. Mu, Congjun, Lawrence Jun Zhang, John Ehrich, and Huaqing Hong
    2015 “The use of metadiscourse for knowledge construction in Chinese and English research articles.” Journal of English for Academic Purpose: –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2015.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.09.003 [Google Scholar]
34. Pomerantz, Anita
    1978 “Compliment responses: Notes on the co-operation of multiple constraints.” InStudies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, ed. byJim Schenkein, –. New York: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50010‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50010-0 [Google Scholar]
35. Teece, David, Gary Pisano, and Amy Shuen
    1997 “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management.” Strategic Management Journal(): –. 10.1002/(SICI)1097‑0266(199708)18:7<509::AID‑SMJ882>3.0.CO;2‑Z
    https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z [Google Scholar]
36. Vande Kopple, William
    1985 “Some explanatory discourse on metadiscourse.” College Composition and Communication: –. 10.58680/ccc198511781
    https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc198511781 [Google Scholar]
37. Vasquez, Camilla
    2015 “‘Don’t even get me started…’: Interactive metadiscourse in online consumer reviews.” InDigital Business Discourse, ed. byErika Darics, –. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137405579_2
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137405579_2 [Google Scholar]
38. Verschueren, Jef
    2000 “Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness in language use.” Pragmatics(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Wang, Xueyu
    2012 “Guanggao quanshuo zhong de yuanhuayu ziyuan he shenfen jiangou [Metadiscourse and identity construction in advertisements].” Tianjin Waiguoyu Daxue Xuebao [Journal of Tianjin Foreign Studies University] (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Zjakic, Hana, Chong Han, and Xiangdong Liu
    2017 “‘Get fit!’ — The use of imperatives in Australian English gym advertisements on Facebook.” Discourse, Context & Media: –. 10.1016/j.dcm.2017.01.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.01.002 [Google Scholar]