1887
image of The conversationality index
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

There has been an explosion in social media use, with Statista estimating that worldwide, Facebook has over 3 billion regular active users, YouTube 2.5 billion, and Instagram and WhatsApp 2 billion (Statista 2023). While social media allows one to connect and interact with a range of people, increased social media use can be associated with feelings of isolation and symptoms of depression and anxiety. This may in part be because it allows users to engage in activities that appear social but that do not provide meaningful social interaction. We developed the Conversationality Index to assess the quality of social media exchanges based on the length, number of participants and how equally the participants contribute to a written online conversation. After calibrating the Conversationality Index using real and surrogate data, we assessed conversations taken from a 33-million-word database and found that the Conversationality Index consistently distinguished between conversations of varying quality.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00119.cot
2025-02-13
2026-03-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahn, Dohyun, and Dong-Hee Shin
    2013 “Is the social use of media for seeking connectedness or for avoiding social isolation? Mechanisms underlying media use and subjective well-being.” Computers in Human Behavior(): –. 10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.022
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.022 [Google Scholar]
  2. Akaike, Hirotugu
    1974 “A new look at the statistical model identification.” InSelected Papers of Hirotugu Akaike, ed. byEmanuel Parzen, Kunio Tanabe, and Genshiro Kitagawa, –. New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4612‑1694‑0_16
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_16 [Google Scholar]
  3. Andreassen, Cecilie Schou, Joël Billieux, Mark D. Griffiths, Daria J. Kuss, Zsolt Demetrovics, Elvis Mazzoni, and Ståle Pallesen
    2016 “The relationship between addictive use of social media and video games and symptoms of psychiatric disorders: A large-scale cross-sectional study.” Psychology of Addictive Behaviors (): –. 10.1037/adb0000160
    https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000160 [Google Scholar]
  4. Atkinson, J. Maxwell, and John Heritage
    (eds.) 1984Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Auer, Peter
    2021 “Turn-allocation and gaze: A multimodal revision of the ‘current-speaker-selects-next’ rule of the turn-taking system of conversation analysis.” Discourse Studies(): –. 10.1177/1461445620966922
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445620966922 [Google Scholar]
  6. Baumeister, Roy F., and Mark R. Leary
    1995 “The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.” Psychological Bulletin(): –. 10.1037/0033‑2909.117.3.497
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 [Google Scholar]
  7. Borra, Erik, Esther Weltevrede, Paolo Ciuccarelli, Andreas Kaltenbrunner, David Laniado, Giovanni Magni, Michele Mauri, Richard Rogers, and Tommaso Venturini
    2014 “Contropedia — the analysis and visualization of controversies in Wikipedia articles.” InOpenSym '14: Proceedings of The International Symposium on Open Collaboration, ed. byDirk Riehle. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. 10.1145/2641580.2641622.
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2641580.2641622 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bou-Franch, Patricia, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
    2012 “Social interaction in YouTube text-based polylogues: A study of coherence.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication(): –. 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2012.01579.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01579.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Burgess, Jean, and Joshua Green
    2018YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture (2nd edn.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Carpenter, Jordan M., Melanie C. Green, and Jeff LaFlam
    2011 “People or profiles: Individual differences in online social networking use.” Personality and Individual Differences(): –. 10.1016/j.paid.2010.11.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.11.006 [Google Scholar]
  11. Clark, Jenna L., Sara B. Algoe, and Melanie C. Green
    2018 “Social network sites and well-being: The role of social connection.” Current Directions in Psychological Science(): –. 10.1177/0963721417730833
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417730833 [Google Scholar]
  12. Clayman, Steven E., and John Heritage
    2021 “Conversation analysis and the study of sociohistorical change.” Research on Language and Social Interaction(): –. 10.1080/08351813.2021.1899717
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2021.1899717 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cotgrove, Louis A.
    2018 “Das Nottinghamer Korpus Deutscher YouTube-Sprache (the NottDeuYTSch Corpus).” LINDAT/CLARIAH-CZ. hdl.handle.net/11372/LRT-4806.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2023 “New opportunities for researching digital youth language: The NottDeuYTSch Corpus.” InNeue Entwicklungen in Der Korpuslandschaft Der Germanistik, ed. byMarc Kupietz, and Thomas Schmidt, –. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dascalu, Maria-Dorinela, Stefan Ruseti, Mihai Dascalu, Danielle S. McNamara, Mihai Carabas, Traian Rebedea, and Stefan Trausan-Matu
    2021 “Before and during COVID-19: A cohesion network analysis of students’ online participation in Moodle courses.” Computers in Human Behavior, . 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106780
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106780 [Google Scholar]
  16. Dascalu, Mihai, Erol-Valeriu Chioasca, and Stefan Trausan-Matu
    2008 “ASAP: An advanced system for assessing chat participants.” InArtificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, and Applications, ed. byDanail Dochev, Marco Pistore, and Paolo Traverso, –. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑540‑85776‑1_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85776-1_6 [Google Scholar]
  17. Dascalu, Mihai, Danielle S. McNamara, Stefan Trausan-Matu, and Laura K. Allen
    2018 “Cohesion network analysis of CSCL participation.” Behavior Research Methods(): –. 10.3758/s13428‑017‑0888‑4
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0888-4 [Google Scholar]
  18. Deters, Fenne Große, and Matthias R. Mehl
    2013 “Does posting Facebook status updates increase or decrease loneliness? An online social networking experiment.” Social Psychological and Personality Science(): –. 10.1177/1948550612469233
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612469233 [Google Scholar]
  19. Dowell, Nia M. M., Tristan M. Nixon, and Arthur C. Graesser
    2019 “Group communication analysis: A computational linguistics approach for detecting sociocognitive roles in multiparty interactions.” Behavior Research Methods(): –. 10.3758/s13428‑018‑1102‑z
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1102-z [Google Scholar]
  20. Duran, Nicholas D., Alexandra Paxton, and Riccardo Fusaroli
    2019 “ALIGN: Analyzing linguistic interactions with generalizable techNiques — A Python library.” Psychological Methods(): –. 10.1037/met0000206
    https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000206 [Google Scholar]
  21. Dyke, Gregory, Rohit Kumar, Hua Ai, und Carolyn Rose
    2012 “Challenging assumptions: Using sliding window visualizations to reveal time-based irregularities in CSCL processes.” International Conference of the Learning Sciences, –. Sydney: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Eijnden, Regina J. J. M. van den, Jeroen S. Lemmens, and Patti M. Valkenburg
    2016 “The social media disorder scale.” Computers in Human Behavior: –. 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.038
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.038 [Google Scholar]
  23. Fredriksson, Lennart, and Katie Eriksson
    2003 “The ethics of the caring conversation.” Nursing Ethics(): –. 10.1191/0969733003ne588oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/0969733003ne588oa [Google Scholar]
  24. Grice, H. Paul
    1975 “Logic and conversation.” InSpeech Acts, ed. byPeter Cole, and Jerry Morgan, –. New York: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368811_003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hall, Edward Twitchell
    1989Beyond Culture. New York: Anchor Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. ten Have, Paul
    2007Doing Conversation Analysis (2nd edn.). Los Angeles: SAGE. 10.4135/9781849208895
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208895 [Google Scholar]
  27. Henri, France
    1992 “Computer conferencing and content analysis.” InCollaborative Learning through Computer Conferencing, ed. byAnthony R. Kaye, –. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑77684‑7_8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77684-7_8 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hutchby, Ian, and Robin Wooffitt
    1998Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices, and Applications. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
    2004 “Introducing polylogue.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(03)00034‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00034-1 [Google Scholar]
  30. Landauer, Thomas K., and Susan T. Dumais
    1997 “A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge.” Psychological Review(): –. 10.1037/0033‑295X.104.2.211
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211 [Google Scholar]
  31. Landis, J. Richard, and Gary G. Koch
    1977 “The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.” Biometrics(): –. 10.2307/2529310
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310 [Google Scholar]
  32. Li, Hang
    2024 “Latent Dirichlet allocation.” InMachine Learning Methods, ed. byHang Li, –. Singapore: Springer Nature. 10.1007/978‑981‑99‑3917‑6_20
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3917-6_20 [Google Scholar]
  33. Li, Wei, Zhu Hua, and Li Yue
    2001 “Conversational management and involvement in Chinese-English business talk.” Language and Intercultural Communication(): –. 10.1080/14708470108668069
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14708470108668069 [Google Scholar]
  34. Liddicoat, Anthony
    2022An Introduction to Conversation Analysis (3rd edn.). London: Bloomsbury Academic. 10.5040/9781350090675
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350090675 [Google Scholar]
  35. Liu, Chia-Yi, and Chia-Ping Yu
    2013 “Can Facebook use induce well-being?” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking(): –. 10.1089/cyber.2012.0301
    https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0301 [Google Scholar]
  36. Marcoccia, Michel
    2004 “On-line polylogues: Conversation structure and participation framework in internet newsgroups.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(03)00038‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00038-9 [Google Scholar]
  37. Odgers, Candice, and Michaeline Jensen
    2020 “Annual research review: Adolescent mental health in the digital age: Facts, fears, and future directions.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry(): –. 10.1111/jcpp.13190
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13190 [Google Scholar]
  38. Osatuyi, Babajide, Katia Passerini, and Ofir Turel
    2022 “Diminishing returns of information quality: Untangling the determinants of best answer selection.” Computers in Human Behavior, . 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107009 [Google Scholar]
  39. Pantic, Igor
    2014 “Online social networking and mental health.” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking(): –. 10.1089/cyber.2014.0070
    https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0070 [Google Scholar]
  40. Patel, Vikram, Shekhar Saxena, Crick Lund, Graham Thornicroft, Florence Baingana, Paul Bolton, Dan Chisholm,
    2018 “The Lancet Commission on global mental health and sustainable development.” The Lancet(): –. 10.1016/S0140‑6736(18)31612‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31612-X [Google Scholar]
  41. Pittman, Matthew, and Brandon Reich
    2016 “Social media and loneliness: Why an Instagram picture may be worth more than a thousand Twitter words.” Computers in Human Behavior: –. 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.084
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.084 [Google Scholar]
  42. Primack, Brian A., Ariel Shensa, Jaime E. Sidani, Erin O. Whaite, Liu Yi Lin, Daniel Rosen, Jason B. Colditz, Ana Radovic, and Elizabeth Miller
    2017 “Social media use and perceived social isolation among young adults in the U.S.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine(): –. 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.010 [Google Scholar]
  43. Psathas, George
    1995aConversation Analysis: The Study of Talk-in-Interaction. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. 10.4135/9781412983792
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983792 [Google Scholar]
  44. 1995b “‘Talk and social structure’ and ‘studies of work’.” Human Studies(): –. 10.1007/BF01323207
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323207 [Google Scholar]
  45. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.” Language(): –. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  46. Schandorf, Michael
    2013 ‘Mediated gesture: Paralinguistic communication and phatic text’. Convergence(): –. 10.1177/1354856512439501
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856512439501 [Google Scholar]
  47. Scheffler, Tatjana
    2017 “Conversations on Twitter.” InInvestigating Computer-Mediated Communication: Corpus-Based Approaches to Language in the Digital World, ed. byDarja Fišer and Michael Beißwenger, 1–. Ljubljana: Ljubljana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    2015 “Conversational interaction: The embodiment of human sociality.” InThe Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. byDeborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton, and Deborah Schiffrin, –. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118584194.ch16
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch16 [Google Scholar]
  49. Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Harvey Sacks
    1973 “Opening up closings.” Semiotica(): –. 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 [Google Scholar]
  50. Shaffer, David Williamson, Wesley Collier, and Andrew R. Ruis
    2016 “A tutorial on epistemic network analysis: Analyzing the structure of connections in cognitive, social, and interaction data.” Journal of Learning Analytics(): –. 10.18608/jla.2016.33.3
    https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.33.3 [Google Scholar]
  51. Song, Inhwa, Sachin R. Pendse, Neha Kumar, and Munmun De Choudhury
    2024 “The typing cure: Experiences with large language model chatbots for mental health support.” arXiv. arxiv.org/abs/2401.14362.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Statista
    Statista 2023 “Biggest social media platforms 2023.” https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/ (accessed10 October 2013).
  53. Van der Pol, Jakko, Wilfried Admiraal, and P. Robert-Jan Simons
    2006 “The affordance of anchored discussion for the collaborative processing of academic texts.” International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning(): –. 10.1007/s11412‑006‑9657‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-006-9657-6 [Google Scholar]
  54. Van Lange, Paul A. M., Jaap W. Ouwerkerk, and Mirjam J. A. Tazelaar
    2002 “How to overcome the detrimental effects of noise in social interaction: The benefits of generosity.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology(): –. 10.1037/0022‑3514.82.5.768
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.768 [Google Scholar]
  55. Wen, Miaomiao, Diyi Yang, and Carolyn Penstein Rosé
    2014 “Sentiment analysis in MOOC discussion forums: What does it tell us?” Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, ed. byJohn Stamper, Zachary Pardos, Manolis Mavrikis, Bruce M. McLaren, –. London: International Educational Data Mining Society.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00119.cot
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00119.cot
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error