On the recontextualization of meme quiddity

References

1. Akenzua, Kemi
   2019 “TikTok: Transforming video-sharing.” Digital Innovation and Transformation: MBA Student Perspectives. https://d3.harvard.edu/platform-digit/submission/tiktok-transforming-video-sharing/ (accessed12 May 2025).
   [Google Scholar]
2. Astapova, Anastasiya
   2021 Humor and Rumor in the Post-Soviet Authoritorian State. London: Lexington Books.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Attardo, Salvatore
   1994 Liinguistic Theories of Humor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Attardo, Salvatore
   2020 The Linguistics of Humor. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198791270.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198791270.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
5. Batchelor, Tom
   2022 “Belarus leader Lukashenko makes baseless claim UK responsible for Bucha atrocities.” Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/lukashenko-belarus-bucha-britain-ukraine-b2056400.html (accessed12 May 2025).
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bateman, John, Janina Wildfeuer, and Tuomo Hiippala
   2017 Multimodality, Foundations, Research and Analysis — A Problem-Oriented Introduction. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110479898
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110479898 [Google Scholar]
7. Bauman, Richard, and Charles L. Briggs
   1990 “Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life.” Annual Review of Anthropology: –. 10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.000423
   https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.000423 [Google Scholar]
8. Beaugrande, Robert de, and Wolfgang Dressler
   1981 Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman. 10.4324/9781315835839
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315835839 [Google Scholar]
9. Bernstein, Basil
   1990 Class, Codes and Control. Vol. 4: The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Boerner, Michaela, Stephen Joseph, and David Murphy
    2017 “The association between sense of humor and trauma-related mental health outcomes: Two exploratory studies.” Journal of Loss and Trauma(): –. 10.1080/15325024.2017.1310504
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2017.1310504 [Google Scholar]
11. Bondi, Marina, Silvia Cacchiani, and Davide Mazzi
    eds. 2015 Discourse in and through the Media: Recontextualizing and Reconceptualizing Expert Discoursee. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Briggs, Charles L., and Richard Bauman
    1992 “Genre, intertextuality, and social power.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology(): –. 10.1525/jlin.1992.2.2.131
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1992.2.2.131 [Google Scholar]
13. Bulatovic, Marina
    2019 “The imitation game: The memefication of political discourse.” European View(): –. 10.1177/1781685819887691
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1781685819887691 [Google Scholar]
14. Bülow, Lars, and Michael Johann
    2023 “Effects and perception of multimodal recontextualization in political Internet memes. Evidence from two online experiments in Austria.” Frontiers in Communication: –. 10.3389/fcomm.2022.1027014
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.1027014 [Google Scholar]
15. Chen, Xu, D. Bondy Valdovinos Kaye, and Jing Zeng
    2020 “#PositiveEnergy Douyin: Constructing ‘playful patriotism’ in a Chinese short-video application.” Chinese Journal of Communication(): –. 10.1080/17544750.2020.1761848
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2020.1761848 [Google Scholar]
16. Conte, Rosaria
    2000 “Memes through (social) minds.” InDarwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science, ed. byRobert Aunger, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Dancygier, Barbara, and Lieven Vandelanotte
    2017 “Internet memes as multimodal constructions.” Cognitive Linguistics(): –. 10.1515/cog‑2017‑0074
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2017-0074 [Google Scholar]
18. Darvin, Ron
    2022 “Design, resistance and the performance of identity on TikTok.” Discourse, Context & Media, . 10.1016/j.dcm.2022.100591
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2022.100591 [Google Scholar]
19. Dawkins, Richard
    2006 The Selfish Gene. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Dynel, Marta
    2024 “The pragmatics of sharing memes on Twitter.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2023.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.12.001 [Google Scholar]
21. Flowerdew, John, and John E. Richardson
    2018 “Introduction.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, ed. byJohn Flowerdew, and John E. Richardson, –. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Gavins, Joanna
    2007 Text World Theory: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748629909
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748629909 [Google Scholar]
23. Gbadegesin, Victoria O.
    2020 “Gender ideology and identity in humorous social media memes.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities(): –. 10.1093/llc/fqz039
    https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqz039 [Google Scholar]
24. Gruber, Helmut
    2017 “Quoting and retweeting as communicative practices in computer mediated discourse.” Discourse, Context & Media: –. 10.1016/j.dcm.2017.06.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.06.005 [Google Scholar]
25. Gruber, Helmut
    2019 “Genres, media, and recontextualization practices. Re-considering basic concepts of genre theory in the age of social media.” Internet Pragmatics(): –. 10.1075/ip.00023.gru
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00023.gru [Google Scholar]
26. Jenkins, Henry
    2009 “If it doesn’t spread, it’s dead (part two): Sticky and spreadable — two paradigms.” Henry Jenkins. henryjenkins.org/blog/2009/02/if_it_doesnt_spread_its_dead_p_1.html (accessed12 May 2025).
    [Google Scholar]
27. Jewitt, Carey
    2017 “Different approaches to multimodality.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, ed. byCarey Jewitt, –. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kirner-Ludwig, Monika
    2020 “Internet memes as multilayered re-contextualization vehicles in lay-political online discourse.” Internet Pragmatics(): –. 10.1075/ip.00055.kir
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00055.kir [Google Scholar]
29. Klug, Nina-Maria
    2023 “Verstehen auf den ersten Blick — oder doch nicht? Zur (vermeintlichen) Einfachheit kleiner Texte am Beispiel von Internet-Memes [Understanding at first glance — or not? On the (supposed) simplicity of short texts using internet memes as an example].” InTextkomplexität und Textverstehen: Studien zur Verständlichkeit von Texten [Text Complexity and Text Comprehension: Studies on the Understandability of Texts], ed. byAngela Schrott, Johanna Wolf, and Christine Pflüger, –. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783111041551‑008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111041551-008 [Google Scholar]
30. Kramer, Olaf, and Markus Gottschling
    (eds) 2021 Recontextualized Knowledge: Rhetoric — Situation — Science Communication. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Krause, Wolf-Dieter
    2000 “Kommunikationslinguistische Aspekte der Textsortenbestimmung [Communicative-linguistic aspects of text type determination].” InTextsorten. Kommunikationslinguistische Und Konfrontative Aspekte [Text Types: Communicative-Linguistic and Contrastive Aspects], ed. byWolf-Dieter Krause, –. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Kress, Gunther, and Jeff Bezemer
    2023 “Multimodal discourse analysis.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis (2nd edn.), ed. byMichael Handford, and James Paul Gee, –. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003035244‑12
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003035244-12 [Google Scholar]
33. Krieg-Holz, Ulrike, and Lars Bülow
    2019 “Internet-Memes: Praktik oder Textsorte [Internet memes: Practice or text type]?” InPolitische Internet-Memes — Theoretische Herausforderungen und Empirische Befunde [Political Internet Memes — Theoretical Challenges and Empirical Findings], ed. byLars Bülow, and Michael Johann, –. Berlin: Frank & Timme.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Latushko, Pavel
    2021 “EU must step up pressure on Alexander Lukashenko’s regime in Belarus.” Politico. https://www.politico.eu/article/belarus-european-union-alexander-lukashenko-russia/ (accessed on12 May 2025).
    [Google Scholar]
35. Ledin, Per, and David Machin
    2018 “Multi-modal critical discourse analysis.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, ed. byJohn Flowerdew, and John E. Richardson, –. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Leeuwen, Theo van
    2008 Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
37. Leeuwen, Theo van, and Ruth Wodak
    1999 “Legitimizing immigration control: A discourse-historical analysis.” Discourse Studies(): –. 10.1177/1461445699001001005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001001005 [Google Scholar]
38. Li, Run
    2024 “Platformisation practice for emancipation or subordination? A multimodal critical discourse study of self-presentations of African-Chinese families on Douyin.” Critical Arts: –. 10.1080/02560046.2024.2402423
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02560046.2024.2402423 [Google Scholar]
39. Machin, David, and Andrea Mayr
    2012 How To Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. London: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Malodia, Suresh, Amandeep Dhir, Anil Bilgihan, Pranao Sinha, and Tanishka Tikoo
    2022 “Meme marketing: How can marketers drive better engagement using viral memes?” Psychology & Marketing(): –. 10.1002/mar.21702
    https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21702 [Google Scholar]
41. Meier-Vieracker, Simon
    2023 “Memefication: Rekontextualisierung politischer Rede in digitalen Diskursen [Memefication: Recontextualizing political speech in digital discourses].” InRemotivierung: Von Der Morphologie Bis Zur Pragmatik [Remotivation: From Morphology to Pragmatics], ed. byIgor Trost, –. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783111031170‑010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111031170-010 [Google Scholar]
42. Mordecai, Chandler
    2023 “#anxiety: A multimodal discourse analysis of narrations of anxiety on TikTok.” Computers and Composition: –. 10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102763
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102763 [Google Scholar]
43. Nieborg, David B., and Thomas Poell
    2018 “The platformization of cultural production: Theorizing the contingent cultural commodity.” New Media & Society(): –. 10.1177/1461444818769694
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818769694 [Google Scholar]
44. O’Halloran, Kay L.
    2006 Multimodal Discourse Analysis: Systemic-functional Perspectives. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Osterroth, Andreas
    2019 “Sprache-Bild-Kommunikation in Imageboards: Das Internet-Meme als multimodaler Kommunikationsakt in alternativen Öffentlichkeiten [Linguistic-pictorial communication in imageboards: The internet meme as a multimodal communicative act in alternative public spheres].” InAlternative Öffentlichkeiten: Soziale Medien Zwischen Partizipation, Sharing und Vergemeinschaftung [Alternative Public Spheres: Social Media Between Participation, Sharing, and Communalization], ed. byStefan Hauser, Roman Opilowski, and Eva L. Wyss, –. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag. 10.1515/9783839436127‑011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839436127-011 [Google Scholar]
46. Rice-Oxley, Mark
    2014 “Belarus: 20 years under dictatorship and a revolution behind the rest of Europe.” The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/09/-sp-belarus-remains-revolution-behind (accessed12 May 2025).
    [Google Scholar]
47. Roshchina, Olena
    2022 “Putin tells Lukashenko about ‘positive changes’ in negotiations with Ukraine.” Ukrainska Pravda. https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2022/03/11/7330390/ (accessed12 May 2025).
    [Google Scholar]
48. Segev, Elad, Asaf Nissenbaum, Nathan Stolero, and Limor Shifman
    2015 “Families and networks of internet memes: The relationship between cohesiveness, uniqueness, and quiddity concreteness.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication: –. 10.1111/jcc4.12120
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12120 [Google Scholar]
49. Shifman, Limor
    2013 “Memes in a digital world: Reconciling with a conceptual troublemaker.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication(): –. 10.1111/jcc4.12013
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12013 [Google Scholar]
50. Shifman, Limor
    2014 Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Tagg, Caroline, and Tereza Spilioti
    2022 “Research ethics.” InResearch Methods for Digital Discourse Analysis, ed. byCamilla Vásquez, –. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Viher, Stina
    2021 Kommunikation in Sozialen Netzwerken via Memes: Zur (Re)Konstruktion sowie damit Verbundener Form und Funktion der Text-Bild-Hybride auf Facebook [Communication in Social Networks via Memes: On the (Re)Construction and Associated Forms and Functions of Text-Image Hybrids on Facebook]. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. 10.14220/9783737012126
    https://doi.org/10.14220/9783737012126 [Google Scholar]
53. Wiggins, Bradley E.
    2020 The Discursive Power of Memes in Digital Culture: Ideology, Semiotics, and Intertextuality. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
    2006 “Relevance Theory.” InThe Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. byLaurence R. Horn, and Gregory Ward, –. Malden: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756959.ch27
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756959.ch27 [Google Scholar]
55. Wittgenstein, Ludwig
    1971 Philosophische Untersuchungen [Philosophical Investigations]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]