1887
image of Pragmatic approaches to visual discourses in digital interactions

There is no abstract available.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00122.sam
2025-06-03
2025-06-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/ip.00122.sam/ip.00122.sam.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00122.sam&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Adami, Elisabetta
    2015 “What’s in a click? A social semiotic framework for the multimodal analysis of website interactivity.” Visual Communication: –. 10.1177/1470357214565583
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357214565583 [Google Scholar]
  2. Al Rashdi, Fathiya
    2018 “Functions of emojis in WhatsApp interaction among Omanis.” Discourse, Context & Media: –. 10.1016/j.dcm.2018.07.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  3. Albert, Georg
    2020 “Beyond the binary: Emoji as a challenge to the image-word distinction.” InVisualizing Digital Discourse: Interactional, Institutional and Ideological Perspectives, ed. byCrispin Thurlow, Christa Dürscheid, and Francesca Diémoz, –. Belin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781501510113‑004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501510113-004 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bateman, John A.
    2014Text and Image: A Critical Introduction to the Visual/Verbal Divide. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315773971
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315773971 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2016 “Methodological and theoretical issues in multimodality.” InHandbuch Sprache im multimodalen Kontext [Handbook of Language in Multimodal Contexts], ed. byNina-Maria Klug, and Hartmut Stöckl, –. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110296099‑003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110296099-003 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2017 “Triangulating transmediality: A multimodal semiotic framework relating media, modes and genres.” Discourse, Context & Media: –. 10.1016/j.dcm.2017.06.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.06.009 [Google Scholar]
  7. Beißwenger, Michael, and Steffen Pappert
    2019 “How to be polite with emojis: A pragmatic analysis of face work strategies in an online learning environment.” European Journal of Applied Linguistics(): –. 10.1515/eujal‑2019‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2019-0003 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cantamutto, Lucía Marina, and Cristina Vela Delfa
    2019 “Emojis frecuentes en las interacciones por Whatsapp: Estudio comparativo entre dos variedades de español (Argentina y España) [Frequent emojis in WhatsApp interactions: A comparative study of two Spanish varieties (Argentina and Spain)].” Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación(): –. 10.5209/CLAC.63282
    https://doi.org/10.5209/CLAC.63282 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cohn, Neil, and Joost Schilperoord
    2022 “Reimagining language.” Cognitive Science(), . 10.1111/cogs.13174
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13174 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dainas, Ashley R.
    2023 “The GIF that keeps on giving: Sender and receiver interpretations and misconstruals of GIFs.” PhD dissertation, Indiana University. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/gif-that-keeps-on-giving-sender-receiver/docview/2898888470/se-2
  11. Dainas, Ashley R., and Susan C. Herring
    2021 “Interpreting emoji pragmatics.” InApproaches to Internet Pragmatics: Theory and Practice, ed. byChaoqun Xie, Francisco Yus, Hartmut Haberland, –. Amsterdam: John Bernjamns. 10.1075/pbns.318.04dai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.318.04dai [Google Scholar]
  12. Djonov, Emilia
    2007 “Website hierarchy and the interaction between content organization, webpage and navigation design: A systemic functional hypermedia discourse analysis perspective.” Information Design Journal(): –. 10.1075/idj.15.2.07djo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.15.2.07djo [Google Scholar]
  13. Djonov, Emilia, and Theo van Leeuwen
    2018 “The power of semiotic software: A critical multimodal perspective.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. byJohn Flowerdew, and John E. Richardson, –. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Dresner, Eli, and Susan C. Herring
    2010 “Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force.” Communication Theory(): –. 10.1111/j.1468‑2885.2010.01362.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01362.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Elleström, Lars
    2010 “The modalities of media: A model for understanding intermedial relations.” InMedia Borders, Multimodality and Intermediality, ed. byLars Elleström, –. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230275201_2
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230275201_2 [Google Scholar]
  16. Flores-Salgado, Elizabeth, and Michael Witten
    2023 “Illocutionary context and management allocation of emoji and other graphicons in Mexican parent school WhatsApp communities.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2023.03.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.03.013 [Google Scholar]
  17. Ge-Stadnyk, Jing, Susan C. Herring, and Lusha Sa
    2025 “Multimodality in digital discourse: Exploring image-text interrelations in WeChat sticker use.” InExperiencing Digital Discourses: Multimodality, Engagement, Activism, ed. byCamilla Vasquez, and Jan Chovanec. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑77460‑7_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-77460-7_6 [Google Scholar]
  18. Giles, David, Wyke Stommel, and Trena M. Paulus
    2017 “The microanalysis of online data: The next stage.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.02.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.02.007 [Google Scholar]
  19. Giles, David, Wyke Stommel, Trena Paulus, Jessica Lester, and Darren Reed
    2015 “Microanalysis of online data: The methodological development of ‘Digital CA’.” Discourse, Context & Media: –. 10.1016/j.dcm.2014.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2014.12.002 [Google Scholar]
  20. Herring, Susan C.
    2019 “The co-evolution of computer-mediated communication and computer-mediated discourse Analysis.” InAnalysing Digital Discourse: New Insights and Future Directions, ed. byPatricia Bou-Franch, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, –. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑92663‑6_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92663-6_2 [Google Scholar]
  21. Herring, Susan C., and Ashley R. Dainas
    2017 “‘Nice picture comment!’: Graphicons in Facebook comment threads.” InProceedings of the Fiftieth Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences HICSS-50. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press. 10.24251/HICSS.2017.264
    https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2017.264 [Google Scholar]
  22. Herring, Susan C., Anupam Das, and Shashikant Penumarthy
    2005 “CMC act taxonomy.” www.slis.indiana.edu/faculty/herring/cmc.acts.html (accessed20 March 2023).
  23. Herring, Susan C., and Jing Ge-Stadnyk
    2024 “Emoji and illocutionarity: Acting on, and acting as, language.” InStructures in Discourse: Interaction, Adaptability, and Pragmatic Functionss, ed. byMartin Gill, Aino Malmivirta, and Brita Wårvik, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.345.07her
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.345.07her [Google Scholar]
  24. Jewitt, Carey
    2009 “Different approaches to multimodality.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, ed. byCarey Jewitt, –. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Jewitt, Carey, and Berit Henriksen
    2016 “Social semiotic multimodality.” InHandbuch Sprache im multimodalen Kontext [Handbook of Language in Multimodal Contexts], ed. byNina-Maria Klug, and Hartmut Stöckl, –. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110296099‑007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110296099-007 [Google Scholar]
  26. Konrad, Artie, Susan C. Herring, and David Choi
    2020 “Sticker and emoji use in Facebook messenger: Implications for graphicon change.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication(): –. 10.1093/jcmc/zmaa003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmaa003 [Google Scholar]
  27. König, Katharina
    2019 “Stance taking with ‘laugh’ particles and emojis — Sequential and functional patterns of ‘laughter’ in a corpus of German WhatsApp chats.” Journal of Pragmatics:–. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.008 [Google Scholar]
  28. 2024 “Transmodal messenger interaction–Analysing the sequentiality of text and audio postings in WhatsApp chats.” Discourse, Context & Media, . 10.1016/j.dcm.2024.100818
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2024.100818 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kress, Gunther
    2010Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen
    2021Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (3rd edn.). Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Lim, Victor
    2019 “Investigating intersemiosis: A systemic functional multimodal discourse analysis of the relationship between language and gesture in classroom discourse.” Visual Communication(): –. 10.1177/1470357218820695
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357218820695 [Google Scholar]
  32. Linares Bernabéu, Esther, and María Belén Alvarado Ortega
    2025 “Unveiling humour in digital discourse: The pragmatic functions of humorous stickers in Spanish Whatsapp chat groups.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics(): –82. 10.1515/lpp‑2024‑0008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2024-0008 [Google Scholar]
  33. Martinec, Radan
    2013 “Nascent and mature uses of a semiotic system: The case of image–text relations.” Visual Communication: –. 10.1177/1470357212471603
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357212471603 [Google Scholar]
  34. Martinec, Radan, and Andrew Salway
    2005 “A system for image–text relations in new and old media.” Visual Communication: –. 10.1177/1470357205055928
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357205055928 [Google Scholar]
  35. O’Halloran, Kay
    (ed.) 2004Multimodal Discourse Analysis: Systemic Functional Perspectives. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. O’Halloran, Kay L.
    2011 “Multimodal discourse analysis.” InThe Bloomsbury Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. byKen Hyland, Brian Paltridge, and Lillian Wong, –. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Padilla, Xose A.
    2023 “El código emoji: de la interfaz frecuencia-función a la identidad discursiva digital [Emoji code: From the frequency-function interface to digital discursive identity].” Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación: –. 10.5209/clac.83394
    https://doi.org/10.5209/clac.83394 [Google Scholar]
  38. Pérez-Sabater, Carmen
    2019 ‘Emoticons in relational writing practices on WhatsApp: Some reflections on gender.” InAnalyzing Digital Discourse: New Insights and Future Directions, ed. byPatricia Bou-Franch, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, –. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑92663‑6_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92663-6_6 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2021 “Moments of sharing, language style and resources for solidarity on social media: A comparative analysis.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.034
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.034 [Google Scholar]
  40. 2024La informalización del discurso digital público: Reflexiones sobre el inglés y el español [The Informalization of Public Digital Discourse: Reflections on English and Spanish]. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781032684628
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032684628 [Google Scholar]
  41. Sampietro, Agnese
    2016 “Exploring the punctuating effect of emoji in Spanish Whatsapp chats.” Lenguas Modernas: –. www.lenguasmodernas.uchile.cl/index.php/LM/article/view/45186/47242 (accessed20 March 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 2019 “Emoji and rapport management in Spanish WhatsApp chats.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.009 [Google Scholar]
  43. 2021 “Emojis and the performance of humour in everyday electronically-mediated conversation: A corpus study of Whatsapp chats.” Internet Pragmatics(): –. 10.1075/ip.00062.samp
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00062.samp [Google Scholar]
  44. 2023a “El auge de los stickers en WhatsApp y la evolución de la comunicación digital [The rise of stickers on WhatsApp and the evolution of digital communication].” Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación: –. 10.5209/clac.83860
    https://doi.org/10.5209/clac.83860 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2023bLengua e imagen en la comunicación digital [Language and Image in Digital Communication]. Madrid: Arco/Libros.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 2023c “More than laughter: Multimodal humour and the negotiation of in-group identities in mobile instant messaging interactions.” InInteractional Humor: Multimodal Design and Negotiation, ed. byBéatrice Priego-Valverde, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110983128‑010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110983128-010 [Google Scholar]
  47. Sampietro, Agnese, Samuel Felder, and Beat Siebenhaar
    2022 “Do you kiss when you leave? Exploring the use of the kissing emojis in three Whatsapp corpora.” Intercultural Pragmatics(): –. 10.1515/ip‑2022‑2002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2022-2002 [Google Scholar]
  48. Sasamoto, Ryoko
    2022 “Perceptual resemblance and the communication of emotion in digital contexts.” Pragmatics(): –. 10.1075/prag.21058.sas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21058.sas [Google Scholar]
  49. Siefkes, Martin
    2015 “How semiotic modes work together in multimodal texts: Defining and representing intermodal relations.” 10plus1: Living Linguistics: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Siever, Christina M., and Torsten S. Siever
    2020 “Emoji-text relations on Instagram: Empirical corpus studies on multimodal uses of the iconographetic mode.” InShifts towards Image-centricity in Contemporary Multimodal Practices, ed. byHartmut Stöckl, Helen Caple, and Jana Pflaeging, –. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429487965‑10
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429487965-10 [Google Scholar]
  51. Stöckl, Hartmut
    2004 “In between modes: Language and image in printed media.” InPerspectives on Multimodality, ed. byEija Ventola, Charles Cassily, and Martin Kaltenbacher, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ddcs.6.03sto
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ddcs.6.03sto [Google Scholar]
  52. 2015 “From text linguistics to multimodality: Mapping concepts and methods across domains.” InBuilding Bridges for Multimodal Research: International Perspectives on Theories and Practices of Multimodal Analysis, ed. byJanina Wildfeuer, –. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Tagg, Caroline, and Agnieszka Lyons
    2022Mobile Messaging and Resourcefulness: A Post-digital Ethnography. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429031465
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429031465 [Google Scholar]
  54. Unsworth, Len
    2008 “Multiliteracies and metalanguage: Describing image/text relations as a resource for negotiating multimodal texts.” InHandbook of Research on New Literacies, ed. byJulie Coiro, Michele Knobel, Colin Lankshear, and Donald J. Leu, –. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Vela Delfa, Cristina
    2020 “Una aproximación semiótica al estudio de los emojis [A semiotic approach to the study of emojis].” Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación: –. 10.5209/clac.69723
    https://doi.org/10.5209/clac.69723 [Google Scholar]
  56. Yus, Francisco
    2022Smartphone Communication: Interactions in the App Ecosystem. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003200574
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003200574 [Google Scholar]
  57. 2023Pragmatics of Internet Humor. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. 2025Emoji Pragmatics. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑73723‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-73723-7 [Google Scholar]
  59. Zappavigna, Michele, and Lorenzo Logi
    2021 “Emoji in social media discourse about working from home.” Discourse, Context & Media, . 10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100543
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100543 [Google Scholar]
  60. 2024Emoji and Social Media Paralanguage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009179829
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009179829 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00122.sam
Loading
  • Article Type: Introduction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error