1887
Volume 8, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2542-3851
  • E-ISSN: 2542-386X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Emojis play a crucial role in facilitating face-work in online communication. While studies have examined the illocutionary effects of emojis on their co-text in online face management, it remains largely unexplored how face management is achieved through the combined use of politeness strategies realized by emojis and their co-text. Based on a corpus of comments from the Chinese social media platform Bilibili, this study explores how the Doge emoji and its co-text interact to perform face-work regarding illocutionary effects and politeness strategies. Findings reveal that this emoji frequently functions as an illocutionary force indicating device, adjusting verbal speech acts in a positive direction. Meanwhile, it serves as a politeness device, complementing verbal politeness strategies to flatter or maintain the interlocutors’ face. The interaction between the Doge emoji and its co-text is shaped by factors such as social distance, real-life politeness norms, and the speaker’s prioritization of face concerns.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00124.wu
2025-07-29
2026-02-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bateman, John, Janina Wildfeuer, and Tuomo Hiippala
    2017Multimodality: Foundations, Research and Analysis — A Problem-Oriented Introduction. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110479898
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110479898 [Google Scholar]
  2. Beißwenger, Michael, and Steffen Pappert
    2018 “Internetbasierte Kommunikation [Internet-based communication].” InHandbuch Pragmatik [Handbook of Pragmatics], ed. byFrank Liedtke, and Astrid Tuchen, 448–459. Stuttgart: Metzler. 10.1007/978‑3‑476‑04624‑6_44
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04624-6_44 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2019 “How to be polite with emojis: A pragmatic analysis of face work strategies in an online learning environment.” European Journal of Applied Linguistics7(2): 225–254. 10.1515/eujal‑2019‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2019-0003 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  5. Dainas, Ashley R., and Susan C. Herring
    2021 “Interpreting emoji pragmatics.” InApproaches to Internet Pragmatics: Theory and Practice, ed. byChaoqun Xie, Francisco Yus, and Hartmut Haberland, 107–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.318.04dai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.318.04dai [Google Scholar]
  6. Danesi, Marcel
    2016The Semiotics of Emoji: The Rise of Visual Language in the Age of the Internet. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dürscheid, Christa, and Christina M. Siever
    2017 “Jenseits des Alphabets — Kommunikation mit Emojis [Beyond the alphabet — Communication with emojis].” Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik45(2): 256–285. 10.1515/zgl‑2017‑0013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zgl-2017-0013 [Google Scholar]
  8. Escouflaire, Louis
    2021 “Signaling irony, displaying politeness, replacing words: The eight linguistic functions of emoji in computer-mediated discourse.” Lingvisticæ Investigationes44(2): 204–235. 10.1075/li.00062.esc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/li.00062.esc [Google Scholar]
  9. Evans, Vyvyan
    2017The Emoji Code: How Smiley Faces, Love Hearts and Thumbs Up are Changing the Way We Communicate. London: Michael O’Mara Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ge, Jing, and Ulrike Gretzel
    2018 “Emoji rhetoric: A social media influencer perspective.” Journal of Marketing Management34(15–16): 1272–1295. 10.1080/0267257X.2018.1483960
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2018.1483960 [Google Scholar]
  11. Goffman, Erving
    1955 “On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction.” Psychiatry18(3): 213–231. 10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008 [Google Scholar]
  12. He, Juan
    2021 “‘Why attacking the Bureau of Industry and Commerce?’: News value flow to news comments on Chinese social media.” Media, Culture & Society43(4): 733–749. 10.1177/0163443721994433
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443721994433 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2022 “Sharing emotions or/and making allies: Emoji’s interpersonal function in Chinese social media news comments.” Social Semiotics33(5): 1131–1146. 10.1080/10350330.2021.2025355
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2021.2025355 [Google Scholar]
  14. Herring, Susan C.
    2004 “Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior.” InDesigning for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, ed. bySasha A. Barab, Rob Kling, and James H. Gray, 338–376. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511805080.016
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805080.016 [Google Scholar]
  15. Herring, Susan C., and Ashley R. Dainas
    2017 “‘Nice picture comment!’: Graphicons in Facebook comment threads.” InProceedings of the Fiftieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2185–2194. Los Alamitos: IEEE Press. 10.24251/HICSS.2017.264
    https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2017.264 [Google Scholar]
  16. Herring, Susan C., Anupam Das, and Shashikant Penumarthy
    2005 “CMC act taxonomy.” ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/cmc.acts.html
  17. Herring, Susan C., and Jing Ge-Stadnyk
    2024 “Emoji and illocutionarity: Acting on, and acting as, language.” InStructures in Discourse: Interaction, Adaptability, and Pragmatic Functions, ed. byMartin Gill, Aino Malmivirta, and Brita Wårvik, 123–154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.345.07her
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.345.07her [Google Scholar]
  18. Hougaard, Tina T., and Marianne Rathje
    2018 “Emojis in the digital writings of young Danes.” InYouth Languages: Current Perspectives of International Research, ed. byArne Ziegler, 773–806. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110472226‑035
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110472226-035 [Google Scholar]
  19. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
    2005 “Politeness in France: How to buy bread politely.” InPoliteness in Europe, ed. byLeo Hickey, and Miranda Stewart, 29–44. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.2307/jj.27710917.6
    https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.27710917.6 [Google Scholar]
  20. Lazar, Michelle M., and Lixin Wan
    2022 “Remediatisation, media interdiscursivity and ideological ambivalence in online news reports on sexual assault.” Discourse, Context & Media481, 100620. 10.1016/j.dcm.2022.100620
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2022.100620 [Google Scholar]
  21. Li, Li, and Yue Yang
    2018 “Pragmatic functions of emoji in internet-based communication — A corpus-based study.” Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education3(1): 1–12. 10.1186/s40862‑017‑0042‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-017-0042-y [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu, Li
    2021 “网络交际中的表情符号使用探究——以新浪微博小叉车超话社区为例 [A research on the use of emoticons in online communication: A case of Sina Weibo Xiao Chache (Forklift) Community].” Master’s thesis, Shanghai International Studies University.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Locher, Miriam A.
    2010 “Introduction: Politeness and impoliteness in computer-mediated communication.” Journal of Politeness Research6(1): 1–5. 10.1515/jplr.2010.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.001 [Google Scholar]
  24. Sampietro, Agnese
    2019 “Emoji and rapport management in Spanish WhatsApp chats.” Journal of Pragmatics1431: 109–120. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.009 [Google Scholar]
  25. Scollon, Ron, and Suzanne Wong Scollon
    1995Intercultural Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Terkourafi, Marina
    2015 “Conventionalization: A new agenda for im/politeness research.” Journal of Pragmatics861: 11–18. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.06.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.06.004 [Google Scholar]
  27. Togans, LaCount J., Thomas Holtgraves, Gyeongnam Kwon, and Tania E. Morales Zelaya
    2021 “Digitally saving face: An experimental investigation of cross-cultural differences in the use of emoticons and emoji.” Journal of Pragmatics1861: 277–288. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.09.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.09.016 [Google Scholar]
  28. Vinagre, Margarita
    2008 “Politeness strategies in collaborative e-mail exchanges.” Computers & Education50(3): 1022–1036. 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  29. Virtanen, Tuija
    2022 “Virtual performatives as face-work practices on Twitter: Relying on self-reference and humour.” Journal of Pragmatics1891: 134–146. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.12.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.12.014 [Google Scholar]
  30. Virtanen, Tuija, and Carmen Lee
    2022 “Face-work in online discourse: Practices and multiple conceptualizations.” Journal of Pragmatics1951: 1–6. 10.1016/j.pragma.2022.03.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.03.013 [Google Scholar]
  31. Xie, Xiaoming, and Runfeng Cheng
    2023新媒体与网络语言的互动研究[Research on the Interaction Between New Media and Internet Language]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Xiong, Simin
    2022 “Pragmatic function of the ‘Doge’ emoji on Weibo.” InProceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Education, Language and Art, 653–658. 10.2991/assehr.k.220131.120
    https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220131.120 [Google Scholar]
  33. Yang, Kun, and Yansheng Mao
    2020 “How to do things with emojis: The pragmatic functions of emojis in teacher-student interaction through Wechat.” Sinología Hispánica: China Studies Review10(1): 51–70. 10.18002/sin.v10i1.6315
    https://doi.org/10.18002/sin.v10i1.6315 [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhang, Yiqiong, Susan C. Herring, and Suifu Gan
    2022 “Graphicon evolution on the Chinese social media platform BiliBili.” InProceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Emoji Understanding and Applications in Social Media, 75–85. 10.18653/v1/2022.emoji‑1.9
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.emoji-1.9 [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhang, Yiqiong, Min Wang, and Ying Li
    2021 “More than playfulness: Emojis in the comments of a WeChat official account.” Internet Pragmatics4(2): 247–271. 10.1075/ip.00048.zha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00048.zha [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00124.wu
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00124.wu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error