1887
Volume 8, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2542-3851
  • E-ISSN: 2542-386X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Emojis are mentioned in online child sexual grooming (OCSG) studies. However, research on such emojis in OCSG contexts is still in its infancy. In this investigation, we report the findings of the first linguistic analysis of emojis in OCSG discourse. The data comprise 70 chat logs (103,386 words, 3604 emojis) between offenders and real minors. The analysis, using a corpus-assisted discourse studies approach (Partington 2010), indicates that groomers predominantly use rapport enhancement and maintenance orientated emojis (Spencer-Oatey 2005). This suggests that groomers employ emojis to shape their interactions feigning a false love relationship/friendship with their victims, which reveals their clear manipulation tactics. Finally, an analysis of collocates for two of the most frequent emojis (‘red heart’ and ‘smirking face’) is presented. The results show that they collocate with endearment terms, sexually vague and explicit terms, which highlights that emojis are a strategy employed in groomers’ discourse for a certain purpose.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00126.gar
2025-07-11
2026-05-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Androutsopoulos, Jannis
    2014 “Moments of sharing: Entextualization and linguistic repertoires in social networking.” Journal of Pragmatics731: 4–18. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.07.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.07.013 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bolander, Brooke, and Miriam Locher
    2020 “Beyond the online offline distinction: Entry points to digital discourse.” Discourse, Context & Media351, 100383. 10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100383
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100383 [Google Scholar]
  3. Breinhold, Jeff, and Madeline Brewer
    2020 “Troublesome emojis in criminal cases.” Technology & Marketing Law Blog. https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2020/01/troublesome-emojis-in-criminal-cases-guest-blog-post.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brezina, Vaclav, Pierre Weill-Tessier, and Anthony McEnery
    2020 #Lancsbox v.5.x. [software]. Available atcorpora.lancs.ac.uk/lancsbox (accessed20 March 2023).
  5. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  6. Chiang, Emily, and Tim Grant
    2017 “Online grooming: Moves and strategies.” Language and Law / Linguagem e Direito4(1): 103–141.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2019 “Deceptive identity performance: Offender moves and multiple identities in online child abuse conversations.” Applied Linguistics40(4): 675–698. 10.1093/applin/amy007
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy007 [Google Scholar]
  8. Culpeper, Jonathan
    1996 “Towards an anatomy of impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics25(3): 349–367. 10.1016/0378‑2166(95)00014‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2011Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dainas, Ashley, and Susan Herring
    2021 “Interpreting emoji pragmatics.” InApproaches to Internet Pragmatics, ed. byChaoqun Xie, Francisco Yus, and Hartmut Haberland, 107–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.318.04dai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.318.04dai [Google Scholar]
  11. Danesi, Marcel
    2017The Semiotics of Emoji: The Rise of Visual Language in the Age of the Internet. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 2021 “The law and emojis: Emoji forensics.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law34(4): 1117–1139. 10.1007/s11196‑021‑09854‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-021-09854-6 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ge, Jing, and Susan Herring
    2018 “Communicative functions of emoji sequences on Sina Weibo.” First Monday23(11). 10.5210/fm.v23i11.9413
    https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i11.9413 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gesselman, Amanda, Vivian Ta, and Justin Garcia
    2019 “Worth a thousand interpersonal words: Emoji as affective signals for relationship-oriented digital communication.” PLoS ONE14(8), e0221297. 10.1371/journal.pone.0221297
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221297 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gibson, Will
    2024 “Flirting and winking in Tinder chats: Emoji, ambiguity, and sequential actions.” Internet Pragmatics7(2): 249–271. 10.1075/ip.00107.gib
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00107.gib [Google Scholar]
  16. Graham, Sage
    2019 “A wink and a nod: The role of emojis in forming digital communities.” Multilingua38(4): 377–400. 10.1515/multi‑2018‑0037
    https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2018-0037 [Google Scholar]
  17. Herring, Susan, and Ashley Dainas
    2017 “‘Nice Picture Comment!’: Graphicons in Facebook comment threads.” InProceedings of the Fiftieth Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-50), 2185–2194. Los Alamitos: IEEE Press. 10.24251/HICSS.2017.264
    https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2017.264 [Google Scholar]
  18. Herring, Susan, Anupam Das, and Shashikant Penumarthy
    2005 “CMC act taxonomy.” ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/cmc.acts.html (accessed20 March 2022).
  19. Herring, Susan, and Jing Ge-Stadnyk
    2024 “Emoji and illocutionarity: Acting on, and acting as, language.” InStructures in Discourse: Studies in Interaction, Adaptability, and Pragmatic Functions in Honour of Tuija Virtanen, ed. byMartin Gill, Aino Malmivirta and Brita Wårvik, 124–155. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.345.07her
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.345.07her [Google Scholar]
  20. Joleby, Malin, Carolina Lunde, Sara Landström, and Linda S. Jonsson
    2021 “Offender strategies for engaging children in online sexual activity.” Child Abuse & Neglect1201, 105214. 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105214
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105214 [Google Scholar]
  21. Jolly, Jennifer
    2023 “World Emoji Day: Celebrate with the most-used emojis of the year — and what’s coming next.” USA Today. https://eu.usatoday.com/story/tech/2023/07/17/world-emoji-day-2023-list-of-most-used-emojies/70419464007/ (accessed20 March 2024).
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kelly, Ryan, and Leon Watts
    2015 “Characterising the inventive appropriation of emoji as relationally meaningful in mediated close personal relationships.” Paper presented atExperiences of Technology Appropriation: Unanticipated Users, Usage, Circumstances, and Design, Oslo, Norway, 20 September 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kinzel, Anina
    2021 “The language of online child sexual groomers: A corpus assisted discourse study of intentions, requests and grooming duration.” PhD dissertation, Swansea University. 10.23889/SUthesis.59027
    https://doi.org/10.23889/SUthesis.59027
  24. Kloess, Juliane, Catherine Hamilton-Giachritsis, and Anthony Beech
    2017 “A descriptive account of victims’ behaviour and responses in sexually exploitative interactions with offenders.” Psychology, Crime & Law23(7): 621–632. 10.1080/1068316X.2017.1293052
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1293052 [Google Scholar]
  25. Konrad, Artie, Susan Herring, and David Choi
    2020 “Sticker and emoji use in Facebook Messenger: Implications for graphicon change.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication25(3): 217–235. 10.1093/jcmc/zmaa003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmaa003 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria
    2023Digital Grooming: Discourses of Manipulation in Cyber-Crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190845193.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190845193.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Craig Evans, and Ruth Mullineux-Morgan
    2023Online Child Sexual Grooming Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009314626
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009314626 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, and Cristina Izura
    2017 “‘cause ur special’: Understanding trust and complimenting behaviour in online grooming discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics1121: 68–82. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.004 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Cristina Izura, and Rocío Pérez-Tattam
    2016 “Understanding grooming discourse in computer-mediated environments.” Discourse, Context & Media121: 40–50. 10.1016/j.dcm.2016.02.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2016.02.004 [Google Scholar]
  30. Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, and Anina Kinzel
    2021 “‘We’ll watch TV and do other stuff’: Corpus-assisted discourse study of vague language use in online child sexual grooming.” InExploring Discourse and Ideology through Corpora, ed. byMiguel Fuster-Márquez, José Santaemilia, Carmen Gregori-Signes, and Paula Rodríguez-Abruñeiras, 189–210. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Anina Kinzel, and Matteo Di Cristofaro
    2020 “The communicative modus operandi of online child sexual groomers: Recurring patterns in their language use.” Journal of Pragmatics1551: 15–27. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.09.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.09.010 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Laura Mercé Moreno-Serrano, Sergio Maruenda-Bataller, and Carmen Pérez-Sabater
    2021 “Ciberacoso sexual a menores (Online Grooming) y pandemia: Actuar con el lenguaje ante la vulneración de los derechos de la infancia [Online sexual grooming of minors and the pandemic: Using language to address violations of children’s rights].” Signo y seña401: 166–187. 10.34096/sys.n40.10507
    https://doi.org/10.34096/sys.n40.10507 [Google Scholar]
  33. McMahon, Marilyn, and Elizabeth Kirley
    2019 “When cute becomes criminal: Emoji, threats, and online grooming.” Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology211: 37–92.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Nexø, Louise, and Jacob Strandell
    2020 “Testing, filtering, and insinuating: Matching and attunement of emoji use patterns as non-verbal flirting in online dating.” Poetics831, 101477. 10.1016/j.poetic.2020.101477
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2020.101477 [Google Scholar]
  35. O’Connell, Rachel
    2003 “A typology of child cyberexploitation and online grooming practices [keynote].” Paper presented at2nd Netsafe Conference. Auckland, New Zealand, 9–12 July 2003.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Partington, Alan
    2010 “Modern diachronic corpus-assisted discourse studies (MDCADS) on UK newspapers: An overview of the project.” Corpora5(2): 83–108. 10.3366/cor.2010.0101
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2010.0101 [Google Scholar]
  37. Pérez-Sabater, Carmen
    2019 “Emoticons in relational writing practices on WhatsApp: Some reflections on gender.” InAnalyzing Digital Discourse: New Insights and Future Directions, ed. byPatricia Bou-Franch, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos, 163–189. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑92663‑6_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92663-6_6 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2021 “Moments of sharing, language style and resources for solidarity on social media: A comparative analysis.” Journal of Pragmatics1801: 266–282. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.034
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.034 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2023 “Lo que no sabías de los emojis: Entre risas y criminalidad [What you didn't know about emojis: Between laughter and criminality].” TEDxUPValència. 4 May 2023. Video, 151:48. https://youtu.be/t96F3YBet2Q?si=9dBZLRFDBbGlpg52
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 2024La informalización del discurso digital público. Reflexiones sobre el inglés y el español [The Informalization of Public Digital Discourse: Reflections on English and Spanish]. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781032684628
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032684628 [Google Scholar]
  41. Pérez-Sabater, Carmen, and Andrea García-Montes
    2023 “More than fruits and vegetables: A survey on sexually-oriented graphicons by age and gender [personal communication].” Paper presented at4th Approaches to Digital Discourse Analysis Conference, Klagenfurt, Austria, 12–14 October 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Pérez-Sabater, Carmen, Andrea García-Montes, and Nuria Lorenzo-Dus
    2022 “‘Amor, no me dices nada, no te gusto?’ Implicit sexual language in online child sexual grooming discourse [personal communication].” Paper presented at1st International Seminar on Gender and Discourse, València, Spain, 27–28 October 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 2024 “El discurso de los menores ciberacosados sexualmente en las líneas de ayuda [The discourse of sexually cyberbullied minors in helpline interactions].” Estudios de Lingüística. Universidad de Alicante (ELUA)411: 5–20. 10.14198/ELUA.23549
    https://doi.org/10.14198/ELUA.23549 [Google Scholar]
  44. Ringenberg, Tatiana, Kathryn Seigfried-Spellar, Julia Rayz, and Marcus Rogers
    2022 “A scoping review of child grooming strategies: Pre- and post-internet.” Child Abuse & Neglect1231, 105392. 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105392
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105392 [Google Scholar]
  45. Riordan, Monica
    2017 “Emojis as tools for emotion work: Communicating affect in text messages.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology36(5): 549–567. 10.1177/0261927X17704238
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X17704238 [Google Scholar]
  46. Rodrigues, David, Bernardo Cavalheiro, and Marília Prada
    2022 “Emoji as icebreakers? Emoji can signal distinct intentions in first time online interactions.” Telematics and Informatics691, 101783. 10.1016/j.tele.2022.101783
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101783 [Google Scholar]
  47. Sampietro, Agnese
    2019 “Emoji and rapport management in Spanish WhatsApp chats.” Journal of Pragmatics1431: 109–120. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.009 [Google Scholar]
  48. 2023a “El auge de los ‘stickers’ en WhatsApp y la evolución de la comunicación digital [The rise of WhatsApp stickers and the evolution of digital communication].” Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación941: 271–285. 10.5209/clac.83860
    https://doi.org/10.5209/clac.83860 [Google Scholar]
  49. 2023bLengua e imagen en la comunicación digital [Language and Imagery in Digital Communication]. Madrid: Arco Libros-La Muralla.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Seymour-Smith, Sarah, and Juliane Kloess
    2021 “A discursive analysis of compliance, resistance and escalation to threats in sexually exploitative interactions between offenders and male children.” British Journal of Social Psychology60(3): 988–1011. 10.1111/bjso.12437
    https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12437 [Google Scholar]
  51. Soldino, Virginia, and Kathryn Seigfried-Spellar
    2024 “Criminological differences between contact-driven and online-focused suspects in online child sexual grooming police reports.” Child Abuse & Neglect1491, 106696. 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106696
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106696 [Google Scholar]
  52. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
    2005 “(Im)Politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: Unpackaging their bases and interrelationships.” Journal of Politeness Research1(1): 95–120. 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.95
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.95 [Google Scholar]
  53. Thomson, Samantha, Emily Kluftinger, and Jocelyn Wentland
    2018 “Are you fluent in sexual emoji? Exploring the use of emoji in romantic and sexual contexts.” The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality27(3): 226–234. 10.3138/cjhs.2018‑0020
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.2018-0020 [Google Scholar]
  54. Troiano, Gianmarco, and Nicola Nante
    2018 “Emoji: What does the scientific literature say about them? — A new way to communicate in the 21th century.” Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment28(4): 528–533. 10.1080/10911359.2018.1437103
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2018.1437103 [Google Scholar]
  55. Vela Delfa, Cristina, and Lucía Cantamutto
    2021Los emojis en la interacción digital escrita [The Emojis in Written Digital Interaction]. Madrid: Arco Libros-La Muralla.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Wagner, Anne, Sarah Marusek, and Wei Yu
    2020 “Emojis and law: Contextualized flexibility of meaning in cyber communication.” Social Semiotics201: 396–414. 10.1080/10350330.2020.1731198
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1731198 [Google Scholar]
  57. Weissman, Benjamin
    2019 “Peaches and eggplants or… something else? The role of context in emoji interpretations.” Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America4(1): 1–6. 10.3765/plsa.v4i1.4533
    https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v4i1.4533 [Google Scholar]
  58. Whittle, Helen, Catherine Hamilton-Giachritsis, and Anthony Beech
    2015 “A comparison of victim and offender perspectives of grooming and sexual abuse.” Deviant Behavior361: 539–564. 10.1080/01639625.2014.944074
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2014.944074 [Google Scholar]
  59. Yus, Francisco
    2011Cyberpragmatics: Internet-Mediated Communication in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.213
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.213 [Google Scholar]
  60. 2022Smartphone Communication: Interactions in the App Ecosystem. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003200574
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003200574 [Google Scholar]
  61. Zappavigna, Michele, and Lorenzo Logi
    2021 “Emoji in social media discourse about working from home 🏠☕💻.” Discourse, Context & Media441, 100543. 10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100543
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100543 [Google Scholar]
  62. 2024Emoji and Social Media Paralanguage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009179829
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009179829 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00126.gar
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00126.gar
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): CADS; digital discourse; emojis; linguistic manipulation; online child sexual grooming
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error