1887
Volume 8, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2542-3851
  • E-ISSN: 2542-386X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Large, colorful, and dynamic, GIFs are a staple of computer-mediated communication and have been hypothesized to perform similar discursive functions to other graphicons (e.g., emoticons, emoji). This research assesses how individuals interpret the discursive uses of GIFs in one-on-one conversations. Twenty dyads shared four GIF-containing text message conversations and privately indicated which of 14 proposed functions each GIF served. Respondents then selected two predominant functions of each GIF. The results show that GIFs are multi-functional and can perform all functions, although respondents showed a preference for riffing and reaction. Some commonly selected functions were less likely to be selected as predominant uses, such as tone modification and acknowledging the mood of the conversation. In concluding, it is considered whether GIFs and graphicons in general should be viewed as having one predominant or many simultaneous uses and whether fine-grained taxonomies or broad simplified taxonomies should be utilized in future graphicon research.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00129.dai
2025-08-05
2026-07-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Austin, John Langshaw
    1962How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bakhshi, Saeideh, David A. Shamma, Lyndon Kennedy, Yale Song, Paloma de Juan, and Joseph ‘Jofish’ Kaye
    2016 “Fast, cheap, and good: Why animated GIFs engage us.” InCHI ’16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 575–586. New York: ACM. 10.1145/2858036.2858532
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858532 [Google Scholar]
  3. Cha, Yoonjeong, Jongwon Kim, Sangkeun Park, Mun Yong Yi, and Uichin Lee
    2018 “Complex and ambiguous: Understanding sticker misinterpretations in instant messaging.” InProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 21(CSCW), article 30. New York: ACM.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Church, Scott Haden, Jesse King, and Clark Callahan
    2023 “Relating, searching, and referencing: Assessing the appeal of using GIFs to communicate.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies29(3): 730–745. 10.1177/13548565231155075
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565231155075 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cramer, Henriette, Paloma De Juan, and Joel Tetreault
    2016 “Sender-intended functions of emojis in US messaging.” InProceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, 504–509. New York: ACM. 10.1145/2935334.2935370
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2935334.2935370 [Google Scholar]
  6. Dainas, Ashley R.
    2023 “The GIF that keeps on giving: Sender and receiver interpretations and misconstruals of GIFs.” PhD dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.
  7. 2024 “A CMDA approach to studying graphicons.” Language@Internet221: 9–31. 10.14434/li.v22.40793
    https://doi.org/10.14434/li.v22.40793 [Google Scholar]
  8. Dainas, Ashley R., and Susan C. Herring
    2021 “Interpreting emoji pragmatics.” InInternet Pragmatics: Theory and Practice, ed. byChaoqun Xie, Francisco Yus, and Hartmut Haberland, 107–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.318.04dai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.318.04dai [Google Scholar]
  9. Gawne, Lauren, and Gretchen McCulloch
    2019 “Emoji as digital gestures.” Language@Internet171. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/li/article/view/37786. (accessed 20 March 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gürsimsek, Ödül Akyapi
    2016 “Animated GIFs as vernacular graphic design: Producing Tumblr blogs.” Visual Communication15(3): 329–349. 10.1177/1470357216645481
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357216645481 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hautsch, Jessica
    2018 “Tumblr’s supernatural fandom and the rhetorical affordance of GIFs.” Transformative Works and Cultures271. 10.3983/twc.2018.1165
    https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2018.1165 [Google Scholar]
  12. Herring, Susan C.
    2013 “Relevance in computer-mediated conversation.” InHandbook of Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication, ed. bySusan C. Herring, Dieter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen, 245–268, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214468.245
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214468.245 [Google Scholar]
  13. Herring, Susan C. and Ashley R. Dainas
    2017 “‘Nice picture comment!’: Graphicons in Facebook comment threads.” InProceedings of the Fiftieth Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-50), 2185–2194. Los Alamitos: IEEE Press. 10.24251/HICSS.2017.264
    https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2017.264 [Google Scholar]
  14. Inel, Oana, Sabrina Sauer, and Lora Aroyo
    2018 “A study of narrative creation by means of crowds and niches.” InProceedings of the HCOMP 2018 Works in Progress and Demonstration Papers: Track of the Sixth AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing (HCOMP 2018)21731, 1–4.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Jiang, Jialun “Aaron”, Casey Fiesler, and Jed R. Brubaker
    2018 “‘The perfect one’: Understanding communication practices and challenges with animated GIFs.” InProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2 (CSCW), article 80. New York: ACM. 10.1145/3274349
    https://doi.org/10.1145/3274349 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kelly, Ryan and Leon Watts
    . September20 2015 “Characterising the inventive appropriation of emoji as relationally meaningful in mediated close personal relationships.” Paper presented atthe Workshop on Experiences of Technology Appropriation: Unanticipated Users, Usage, Circumstances, and Design, Oslo, Norway, 20 September.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Lanchantin, Tonia, Aurélie Simoës-Perlant, and Pierre Largy
    2012 “The case of digital writing in instant messaging: When cyber written productions are closer to the oral code than the written code.” PsychNology Journal10(3): 187–214.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee, Eun-Ju, and Soo Youn Oh
    2015Computer-mediated communication. Communication, Oxford Bibliographies Online Datasets. 10.1093/obo/9780199756841‑0160
    https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199756841-0160 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee, Joon Young, Nahi Hong, Soomin Kim, Jonghwan Oh, and Joonhwan Lee
    2016 “Smiley face: Why we use emoticon stickers in mobile messaging.” InProceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct, 760–766. New York: ACM. 10.1145/2957265.2961858
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2957265.2961858 [Google Scholar]
  20. Logi, Lorenzo, and Michele Zappavigna
    2024 “GIFs as social media paralanguage.” Language@Internet221: 32–56. 10.14434/li.v22.40794
    https://doi.org/10.14434/li.v22.40794 [Google Scholar]
  21. Miller, Hannah, Jacob Thebault-Spieker, Shuo Chang, Isaac Johnson, Loren Terveen, and Brent Hecht
    2016 “‘Blissfully happy’ or ‘ready to fight’: Varying interpretations of emoji.” Proceedings of the Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media10(1): 259–268. 10.1609/icwsm.v10i1.14757
    https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v10i1.14757 [Google Scholar]
  22. Miltner, Kate M., and Tim Highfield
    2017 “Never gonna GIF you up: Analyzing the cultural significance of the animated GIF.” Social Media + Society3(3): 1–11. 10.1177/2056305117725223
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117725223 [Google Scholar]
  23. Petersen, Line Nybro
    2014 “Sherlock fans talk: Mediatized talk on Tumblr.” Northern Lights12(1): 87–104. 10.1386/nl.12.1.87_1
    https://doi.org/10.1386/nl.12.1.87_1 [Google Scholar]
  24. Samermit, Patrawat
    2018 “GIF me a break: The influence of reaction GIFs on overhearers’ judgements of humor and irony in computer-mediated communication.” PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.
  25. Sasamoto, Ryoko
    2023 “Perceptual resemblance and the communication of emotion in digital contexts: A case of emoji and reaction GIFs.” Pragmatics33(3): 393–417. 10.1075/prag.21058.sas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21058.sas [Google Scholar]
  26. Schandorf, Michael
    2013 “Mediated gesture: Paralinguistic communication and phatic text.” Convergence19(3): 319–344. 10.1177/1354856512439501
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856512439501 [Google Scholar]
  27. Tang, Ying, and Khe Foon Hew
    2018 “Emoticon, emoji, and sticker use in computer-mediated communications: Understanding its communicative function, impact, user behavior, and motive.” InNew Media for Educational Change: Educational Communications and Technology Yearbook, ed. byLiping Deng, Will W. K. Ma, and Cheuk Wai Rose Fong, 191–201. Singapore: Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑10‑8896‑4_16
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8896-4_16 [Google Scholar]
  28. Tolins, Jackson, and Patrawat Samermit
    2016 “GIFs as embodied enactments in text-mediated conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction49(2): 75–91. 10.1080/08351813.2016.1164391
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1164391 [Google Scholar]
  29. Vandergriff, Ilona
    2014 “A pragmatic investigation of emoticon use in nonnative/native speaker text chat.” Language@Internet111, article 4.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Voida, Amy, and Elizabeth D. Mynatt
    2005 “Six themes of the communicative appropriation of photographic images.” InCHI ’05: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 171–180. New Yokr: ACM. 10.1145/1054972.1054997
    https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1054997 [Google Scholar]
  31. Yus, Francisco
    2014 “Not all emoticons are created equal.” Linguagem em (Dis)curso14(3): 511–529. 10.1590/1982‑4017‑140304‑0414
    https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4017-140304-0414 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00129.dai
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00129.dai
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): discursive functions; GIF interpretations; GIFs; graphicons; pragmatics; surveys
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error