oa Schematization, frame evocation and affect in multimodal ads and campaigns

References

1. Andries, Fien, Katharina Meissl, Clarissa de Vries, Kurt Feyaerts, Bert Oben, Paul Sambre, Myriam Vermeerbergen, and Geert Brône
   2023 “Multimodal stance-taking in interaction — A systematic literature review.” Frontiers in Communication, . 10.3389/fcomm.2023.1187977
   https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1187977 [Google Scholar]
2. Barrett, Lisa Feldman
   2017 How Emotions Are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain. Boston & New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bhatia, Tej K.
   2023 “Emotions, language, and advertising.” InLanguage and Emotion: An International Handbook. Volume 3, ed. byGesine Lenore Schiewer, Jeanette Altarriba, and Bee Chin Ng, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bolognesi, Marianna, and Francesca Strik Lievers
   2018 “How language and image construct synaesthetic metaphors in print advertising.” Visual Communication(): –. 10.1177/1470357218782001
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357218782001 [Google Scholar]
5. Borkent, Mike
   2010 “Illusions of simplicity: A cognitive approach to visual poetry.” English Text Construction(): –. 10.1075/etc.3.2.02bor
   https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.3.2.02bor [Google Scholar]
6. Clough, Patricia Ticineto
   2007 “Introduction.” InThe Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social, ed. byPatricia Ticineto Clough, and Jean Halley, –. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. 10.1215/9780822389606‑001
   https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822389606-001 [Google Scholar]
7. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting
   2017 “Stance and footing.” Supplementary online chapter C ofInteractional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available online at: https://www.cambridge.org/highereducation/books/interactional-linguistics/00F4D2480B28BF06701D05CEF7C23F99/resources/student-resources/6F1649154A080C7ADA3F03CD92D827D8/online-chapters/DAADCE4445138766FE34ED4075C3F8F5. 10.1017/9781139507318
   https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139507318 [Google Scholar]
8. Dancygier, Barbara
   2011 “Modification and constructional blends in the use of proper names.” Constructions and Frames(): –. 10.1075/cf.3.2.03dan
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.3.2.03dan [Google Scholar]
9. Dancygier, Barbara
   2023 “Multimodal media: Framing climate change.” Discourse Studies(): –. 10.1177/14614456231154724
   https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456231154724 [Google Scholar]
10. Dancygier, Barbara, and Eve Sweetser
    2014 Figurative Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Dancygier, Barbara, and Lieven Vandelanotte
    2017 “Image-schematic scaffolding in textual and visual artefacts.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.07.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.07.013 [Google Scholar]
12. Dancygier, Barbara, and Lieven Vandelanotte
    2025a “Embodiment and simulated interaction in online stance expression.” Frontiers in Psychology, . 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1479825
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1479825 [Google Scholar]
13. Dancygier, Barbara, and Lieven Vandelanotte
    2025b The Language of Memes: Patterns of Meaning Across Image and Text. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108950855
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108950855 [Google Scholar]
14. Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner
    1996 “Blending as a central process of grammar.” InConceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language, ed. byAdele Goldberg, –. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner
    2002 The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Fillmore, Charles J.The Linguistic Society of Korea
    1982 “Frame semantics.” InLinguistics in the Morning Calm, ed. byThe Linguistic Society of Korea, –. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Fillmore, Charles J.
    1985 “Frames and the semantics of understanding.” Quaderni di semantica(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Forceville, Charles J.
    1996 Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203272305
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203272305 [Google Scholar]
19. Forceville, Charles, and Eduardo Urios-Aparisi
    (eds.) 2009 Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110215366
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366 [Google Scholar]
20. Fuoli, Matteo, and Samantha Ford
    2025 “One hundred ways to resist corporate branding: Figurative subversion in visual and multimodal communication.” Metaphor and Symbol(): –. 10.1080/10926488.2025.2456850
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2025.2456850 [Google Scholar]
21. Goodwin, Marjorie Harness, Asta Cekaite, and Charles Goodwin
    2012 “Emotion as stance.” InEmotion in Interaction, ed. byAnssi Peräkylä, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730735.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730735.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
22. Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen
    1996 Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
    1980 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
    1999 Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Littlemore, Jeannette, Marianna Bolognesi, Nina Julich-Warpakowski, Chung-hong Danny Leung, and Paula Pérez Sobrino
    2023 Metaphor, Metonymy, the Body and the Environment: An Exploration of the Factors That Shape Emotion-Colour Associations and Their Variation across Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009042468
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009042468 [Google Scholar]
26. Mandler, Jean M., and Cristóbal Pagán Cánovas
    2014 “On defining image schemas.” Language and Cognition(): –. 10.1017/langcog.2014.14
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2014.14 [Google Scholar]
27. McLoughlin, Killian L., William J. Brady, Aden Goolsbee, Ben Kaiser, Kate Klonick, and M. J. Crockett
    2024 “Misinformation exploits outrage to spread online.” Science: –. 10.1126/science.adl2829
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adl2829 [Google Scholar]
28. Ochs, Elinor
    1996 “Linguistic resources for socializing humanity.” InRethinking Linguistic Relativity, ed. byJohn J. Gumperz, and Stephen C. Levinson, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. O’Dowd, Niamh A.
    2025 “The framing effects of metaphor and metonymy in multimodal campaigns about plastic pollution: A solutions-oriented and emotion-oriented study.” Metaphor and Symbol(): –. 10.1080/10926488.2024.2429988
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2024.2429988 [Google Scholar]
30. Pérez-Sobrino, Paula
    2017 Multimodal Metaphor and Metonymy in Advertising. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ftl.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.2 [Google Scholar]
31. Pérez-Sobrino, Paula, Jeannette Littlemore, and Samantha Ford
    2021 Unpacking Creativity: The Power of Figurative Communication in Advertising. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108562409
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108562409 [Google Scholar]
32. Scarantino, Andrea
    2017 “How to do things with emotional expressions: The theory of affective pragmatics.” Psychological Inquiry(): –. 10.1080/1047840X.2017.1328951
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2017.1328951 [Google Scholar]
33. Scarantino, Andrea
    2018 “Emotional expressions as speech act analogs.” Philosophy of Science(): –. 10.1086/699667
    https://doi.org/10.1086/699667 [Google Scholar]
34. Schwarzkopf, Stefan, and Rainer Gries
    (eds.) 2010 Ernest Dichter and Motivation Research: New Perspectives on the Making of Post-war Consumer Culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230293946
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230293946 [Google Scholar]
35. Sweetser, Eve
    2017 “Metaphor and metonymy in advertising: Building viewpoint in multimodal multi-space blends.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.10.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.10.012 [Google Scholar]
36. Sweetser, Eve, and Gilles Fauconnier
    1996 “Cognitive links and domains: Basic aspects of mental space theory.” InSpaces, Worlds, and Grammar, ed. byEve Sweetser, and Gilles Fauconnier, –. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Sweetser, Eve, and Karen Sullivan
    2012 “Minimalist metaphors.” English Text Construction(): –. 10.1075/etc.5.2.01swe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.5.2.01swe [Google Scholar]
38. van Berkum, Jos J. A.
    2022 “A survey of emotion theories and their relevance to language research.” InLanguage and Emotion: An International Handbook. Volume 1, ed. byGesine Lenore Schiewer, Jeanette Altarriba, and Bee Chin Ng, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Wiltschko, Martina
    2024 “Emotions do not enter grammar because they are constructed (by grammar).” Language Under Discussion(): –. 10.31885/lud.7.1.261
    https://doi.org/10.31885/lud.7.1.261 [Google Scholar]