1887
image of Affective practices in asynchronous eating shows

Abstract

This study examines the pragmatics of affect and emotion in asynchronous eating shows, a genre of digital food discourse in which hosts record and share videos of themselves eating, with viewer interaction occurring through deferred comments. While previous research has explored food evaluation as a linguistic and multimodal practice, we argue that in eating shows, taste assessment is also an affective practice that fosters intimacy, engagement, and participation. Through a corpus-assisted discourse analysis of five YouTube eating shows, we investigate how hosts perform affective stances toward food using linguistic, embodied, and audiovisual resources. We also analyze how viewers, despite the asynchronous format, contribute to the co-construction of affect through patterns of evaluative commentary. Our findings show that food assessment in eating shows is not only about describing taste but also about performing and eliciting affective alignment, shaping digital food identities such as expert eaters and lay reviewers.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00137.rud
2026-04-24
2026-05-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/ip.00137.rud/ip.00137.rud.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00137.rud&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Abidin, Crystal
    2018Internet Celebrity: Understanding Fame Online. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing. 10.1108/9781787560765
    https://doi.org/10.1108/9781787560765 [Google Scholar]
  2. Anthony, Laurence
    2018AntConc (3.5.7). Tokyo: Waseda University. www.laurenceanthony.net/software (accessed2 May 2019).
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Arndt, Horst, and Richard W. Janney
    1985 “Politeness revisited: Cross-modal supportive strategies.” IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching(): –. 10.1515/iral.1985.23.1‑4.281
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1985.23.1-4.281 [Google Scholar]
  4. BAAL
    BAAL 2021Recommendations on Good Practice in Applied Linguistics (4th edn.). Available atwww.baal.org.uk
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Blank, Grant
    2007Critics, Ratings, and Society: The Sociology of Reviews. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Calder-Dawe, Octavia, and Maree Martinussen
    2022 “Researching identities as affective discursive practices.” InThe Cambridge Handbook of Identity, ed. byMichael Bamberg, Carolin Demuth, and Meike Watzlawik, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cesiri, Daniela
    2016 “The blog is served: Crossing the ‘expert/non-expert’ border in a corpus of food blogs.” Colloquium: New Philologies(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chik, Alice, and Camilla Vásquez
    2017 “A comparative multimodal analysis of restaurant reviews from two geographical contexts.” Visual Communication(): –. 10.1177/1470357216634005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357216634005 [Google Scholar]
  9. Choe, Hanwool
    2019 “Eating together multimodally: Collaborative eating in mukbang, a Korean livestream of eating.” Language in Society(): –. 10.1017/S0047404518001355
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404518001355 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cronin, James M., Mary McCarthy, and Alan Collins
    2014 “Creeping edgework: Carnivalesque consumption and the social experience of health risk.” Sociology of Health and Illness(): –. 10.1111/1467‑9566.12155
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12155 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dam, Lotte, and Helle Dam Jensen
    2024 “Everyday positivity: An appraisal analysis of online identity in food blogs.” First Monday(). 10.5210/fm.v29i6.13225
    https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v29i6.13225 [Google Scholar]
  12. Diemer, Stefan, and Marie-Louise Brunner
    2020 “‘Tell me about food and I tell you who you are’: Expert identity in intercultural food discourse via Skype.” InTalking About Food: The Social and the Global in Eating Communities, ed. bySofia Rüdiger, and Susanne Mühleisen, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/impact.47.09die
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.47.09die [Google Scholar]
  13. Diemer, Stefan, and Maximiliane Frobenius
    2013 “When making pie, all ingredients must be chilled. Including you: Lexical, syntactic and interactive features in online discourse — A synchronic study of food blogs.” InCulinary Linguistics, ed. byCornelia Gerhardt, Maximiliane Frobenius, and Susanne Ley, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/clu.10.02die
    https://doi.org/10.1075/clu.10.02die [Google Scholar]
  14. Drescher, Martina
    2020 “The moral taste of food: A discourse analysis of social media discussions about vegetarianism and veganism.” InTalking About Food: The Social and the Global in Eating Communities, ed. bySofia Rüdiger, and Susanne Mühleisen, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/impact.47.03dre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.47.03dre [Google Scholar]
  15. Drew, Paul, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
    2014 “Requesting: From speech act to recruitment.” InRequesting in Social Interaction, ed. byPaul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.26.01dre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.26.01dre [Google Scholar]
  16. Du Bois, John W.
    2007 “The stance triangle.” InStancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. byRobert Englebretson, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.164.07du
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du [Google Scholar]
  17. Gerhardt, Cornelia
    2021 “Constructing veganism against the backdrop of omnivore cuisine: The use of adjectives and modifiers in vegan food blogs.” InIdentity and Ideology in Digital Food Discourse: Social Media Interactions Across Cultural Contexts, ed. byAlla Tovares, and Cynthia Gordon, –. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350119178.ch‑004
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350119178.ch-004 [Google Scholar]
  18. Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie H. Goodwin
    1992 “Assessments and the construction of context.” InRethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. byAlessandro Duranti, and Charles Goodwin, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gordon, Cynthia
    2013 “‘You are killing your kids’: Framing and impoliteness in a health makeover reality TV show.” InReal Talk: Reality Television and Discourse Analysis in Action, ed. byNuria Lorenzo-Dus, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, –. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137313461_12
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137313461_12 [Google Scholar]
  20. Gordon, Cynthia, and Didem İkizoğlu
    2017 “‘Asking for another’ online: Membership categorization and identity construction on a food and nutrition discussion board.” Discourse Studies(): –. 10.1177/1461445617701810
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445617701810 [Google Scholar]
  21. Gülich, Elisabeth
    2003 “Conversational techniques used in transferring knowledge between medical experts and non-experts.” Discourse Studies(): –. 10.1177/1461445603005002005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445603005002005 [Google Scholar]
  22. İkizoğlu, Didem, and Cynthia Gordon
    2020 “‘Vegetables as a chore’: Constructing and problematizing a ‘picky eater’ identity online.” InIdentity and Ideology in Digital Food Discourse: Social Media Interactions Across Cultural Contexts, ed. byAlla Tovares, and Cynthia Gordon, –. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350119178.ch‑001
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350119178.ch-001 [Google Scholar]
  23. Johnston, Josée, and Shyon Baumann
    2010Foodies: Democracy and Distinction in the Gourmet Foodscape. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Karrebæk, Martha Sif
    2012 “‘What’s in your lunch box today’: Health, respectability, and ethnicity in the primary classroom.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology(): –. 10.1111/j.1548‑1395.2012.01129.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1395.2012.01129.x [Google Scholar]
  25. Kendrick, Kobin H., and Paul Drew
    2016 “Recruitment: Offers, requests, and the organization of assistance in interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction(): –. 10.1080/08351813.2016.1126436
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1126436 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kim, Yeran
    2020 “Eating as a transgression: Multisensorial performativity in the carnal videos of mukbang (eating shows).” International Journal of Cultural Studies(): –. 10.1177/1367877920903435
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877920903435 [Google Scholar]
  27. Koh, Gladys
    2017 “Food porn as visual narrative: Food blogging and identity construction.” SARE: Southeast Asian Review of English(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kulick, Don
    2005 “Porn.” InFat: The Anthropology of an Obsession, ed. byDon Kulick, and Anne Meneley, –. New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lupton, Deborah
    2020 “Carnivalesque food videos: Excess, gender and affect on YouTube.” InDigital Food Cultures, ed. byDeborah Lupton, and Zeena Feldman, –. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429402135‑4
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429402135-4 [Google Scholar]
  30. Mapes, Gwynne
    2018 “(De)constructing distinction: Class inequality and elite authenticity in mediatized food discourse.” Journal of Sociolinguistics(): –. 10.1111/josl.12285
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12285 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2021Elite Authenticity: Remaking Distinction in Food Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780197533444.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197533444.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  32. Martin, J. R., and P. R. R. White
    2005The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  33. Matwick, Kelsi, and Keri Matwick
    2019Food Discourse of Celebrity Chefs of Food Network. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑31430‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31430-9 [Google Scholar]
  34. Mondada, Lorenza
    2009 “The methodical organization of talking and eating: Assessments in dinner conversations.” Food Quality and Preference(): –. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.03.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.03.006 [Google Scholar]
  35. Naccarato, Peter, and Kathleen LeBesco
    2013Culinary Capital. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Norrick, Neal R.
    1983 “Technical instructions.” InAnglistik & Englischunterricht, Vol., ed. byHans-Jürgen Diller, –. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Pihlaja, Stephen
    2017 “More than fifty shades of grey: Copyright on social network sites.” Applied Linguistics Review (): –. 10.1515/applirev‑2016‑1036
    https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2016-1036 [Google Scholar]
  38. Rüdiger, Sofia
    2020 “Dinner for one: The use of language in eating shows on YouTube.” InTalking About Food: The Social and the Global in Eating Communities, ed. bySofia Rüdiger, and Susanne Mühleisen, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/impact.47.08rud
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.47.08rud [Google Scholar]
  39. 2021 “Digital food talk: Blurring immediacy and distance in YouTube eating shows.” Anglistik(): –. 10.33675/ANGL/2021/2/9
    https://doi.org/10.33675/ANGL/2021/2/9 [Google Scholar]
  40. 2022 “Intimate consumptions: YouTube eating shows and the performance of informality.” Internet Pragmatics(): –. 10.1075/ip.00070.rud
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00070.rud [Google Scholar]
  41. Sacks, Harvey
    1992Lectures on Conversation. Malden: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
    2011 “Conceptualising ‘the relational’ in pragmatics: Insights from metapragmatic emotion and (im)politeness comments.” Journal of Pragmatics(): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.009 [Google Scholar]
  43. Strand, Mattias, and Sanna Aila Gustafsson
    2020 “Mukbang and disordered eating: A netnographic analysis of online eating broadcasts.” Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry: –. 10.1007/s11013‑020‑09674‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-020-09674-6 [Google Scholar]
  44. Szatrowski, Polly
    (ed.) 2014aLanguage and Food: Verbal and Nonverbal Experiences. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.238
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.238 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2014b “Modality and evidentiality in Japanese and American English taster lunches: Identifying and assessing an unfamiliar drink.” InLanguage and Food: Verbal and Nonverbal Experiences, ed. byPolly Szatrowski, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.238.06sza
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.238.06sza [Google Scholar]
  46. Tannen, Deborah
    2007Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse (2nd edn.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618987
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618987 [Google Scholar]
  47. Vásquez, Camilla, and Yaqian Jiang
    2025 “Digital discourse analysis.” InResearch Methods in Linguistics (3rd edn.), ed. byLia Litosseliti, –. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Vásquez, Camilla, and Alice Chik
    2015 “‘I am not a foodie’: Culinary capital in online reviews of Michelin restaurants.” Food and Foodways(): –. 10.1080/07409710.2015.1102483
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07409710.2015.1102483 [Google Scholar]
  49. VoyageLA
    VoyageLA 2019 “Meet Hyunee Kim of HyuneeEats in Anaheim.” VoyageLA Local Stories, 17 September 2019. voyagela.com/interview/meet-hyunee-kim-hyuneeeats-anaheim/ (accessed22 April 2021).
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Wetherell, Margaret
    2012Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding. London: SAGE. 10.4135/9781446250945
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250945 [Google Scholar]
  51. Wiggins, Sally
    2002 “Talking with your mouth full: Gustatory mmms and the embodiment of pleasure.” Research on Language and Social Interaction(): –. 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3503_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3503_3 [Google Scholar]
  52. 2013 “The social life of ‘eugh’: Disgust as assessment in family mealtimes.” British Journal of Social Psychology(): –. 10.1111/j.2044‑8309.2012.02106.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2012.02106.x [Google Scholar]
  53. Wiggins, Sally, and Jonathan Potter
    2003 “Attitudes and evaluative practices: Category vs. item and subjective vs. objective constructions in everyday food assessments.” British Journal of Social Psychology(): –. 10.1348/014466603322595257
    https://doi.org/10.1348/014466603322595257 [Google Scholar]
  54. Zappavigna, Michele
    2023 “Digital intimacy and ambient embodied copresence in YouTube videos: Construing visual and aural perspective in ASMR role play videos.” Visual Communication(): –. 10.1177/1470357220928102
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357220928102 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00137.rud
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00137.rud
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error