1887
image of Animal personas, ambivalent judgements, and affective effects in social media reels
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper discusses humorous internet reels featuring cute animals voicing critical opinions about human behaviours and lifestyles. The reels are characterised by incongruity between the images of animals and the content of their messages. An analysis of lexical items and pragmatic implications of these messages indicates that a distinct idiolect has been created for the animal personas and that it is not possible to tease out the source of the views expressed in their utterances; the views can be attributed either to groups of people or to the animals themselves, as they are anthropomorphised. This makes for pragmatic indeterminacy which leaves the viewer with the impression of ambivalence at the level of propositional meaning while also giving rise to non-propositional affective effects.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00139.pis
2026-03-13
2026-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bivens, Jennifer
    2018 “Describing Doggo-speak: Features of Doggo meme language.” MA thesis, Graduate Faculty in Liberal Studies, The City University of New York. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3764&context=gc_etds (accessed18 March 2024).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Blackall, Molly
    2020 “David Walliams and Matt Lucas apologise for Little Britain blackface.” The Guardian, June 14. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/14/david-walliams-and-matt-lucas-apologise-for-little-britain-blackface (accessed25 May 2024).
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bury, Beata, and Adam Wojtaszek
    2017 “Linguistic regularities of LOLspeak.” Sino-US English Teaching(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Davies, Christie
    1990Ethnic Humor around the World: A Comparative Analysis. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Forabosco, Giovanantonnio
    2008 “Is the concept of incongruity still a useful construct for the advancement of humor research?” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics(): –. 10.2478/v10016‑008‑0003‑5
    https://doi.org/10.2478/v10016-008-0003-5 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ifantidou, Elly
    2021 “Non-propositional effects in verbal communication: The case of metaphor.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.05.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.05.009 [Google Scholar]
  7. Ifantidou, Elly, and Anna Piata
    2021 “Metaphor and mental shortcuts.” Pragmatics & Cognition(): –. 10.1075/pc.21009.ifa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.21009.ifa [Google Scholar]
  8. Kuipers, Giselinde
    2008 “The sociology of humor.” InThe Primer of Humor Research, ed. byVictor Raskin, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110198492.361
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198492.361 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2014 “Sociology.” InEncyclopedia of Humor Studies, vol. 2, ed by. Salvatore Attardo. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://sk.sagepub.com/ency/edvol/encyclopedia-of-humor-studies/chpt/sociology
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Lind, Miriam
    2024 “Meowmy, Pawrents and Menschenwelpen ‘human puppies’: Linguistic practices of doing interspecies families on German Instagram.” Discourse, Context & Media, . 10.1016/j.dcm.2024.100800
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2024.100800 [Google Scholar]
  11. Lockyer, Sharon, and Michael Pickering
    2005 “The ethics and aesthetics of humour and comedy.” InBeyond the Joke: The Limits of Humour, ed. bySharon Lockyer, and Michael Pickering, –. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230236776_1
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230236776_1 [Google Scholar]
  12. Lou, Adrian
    2017 “Multimodal simile: The ‘when’ meme in social media discourse.” English Text Construction(): –. 10.1075/etc.10.1.06lou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.10.1.06lou [Google Scholar]
  13. Maddox, Jessica
    2021 “The secret life of pet Instagram accounts: Joy, resistance, and commodification in the internet’s cute economy.” New Media & Society(): –. 10.1177/1461444820956345
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820956345 [Google Scholar]
  14. Marwick, Alice, and danah boyd
    2011 “I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience.” New Media & Society(): –. 10.1177/1461444810365313
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313 [Google Scholar]
  15. Piata, Anna
    2020 “Stylistic humor across modalities: The case of classical art memes.” Internet Pragmatics(): –. 10.1075/ip.00031.pia
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00031.pia [Google Scholar]
  16. Pincus, Fred L., and Bryan R. Ellis
    2021Understanding Diversity: An Introduction (3rd edn.). Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Podhovnik, Edith
    2018 “The purrification of English: Meowlogisms in online communities: A qualitative description of a selected #blackcat community on Instagram.” English Today(): –. 10.1017/S0266078418000020
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078418000020 [Google Scholar]
  18. Sperber, Dan
    1996Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
    1995Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd edn.). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Truan, Naomi
    2023 “‘I am a real cat’: French-speaking cats on Twitter as an enregistered variety and community of practice.” Internet Pragmatics(): –. 10.1075/ip.00083.tru
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00083.tru [Google Scholar]
  21. Vázquez, María Simarro, Nabiha El Khatib, Phillip Hamrick, and Salvatore Attardo
    2021 “On the order of processing of humorous Tweets with visual and verbal elements.” Internet Pragmatics(): –. 10.1075/ip.00060.sim
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00060.sim [Google Scholar]
  22. Wilson, Deirdre
    2000 “Metarepresentation in linguistic communication.” InMetarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective, ed. byDan Sperber, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195141146.003.0015
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195141146.003.0015 [Google Scholar]
  23. Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
    1993 “Linguistic form and relevance.” Lingua: –. 10.1016/0024‑3841(93)90058‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(93)90058-5 [Google Scholar]
  24. Włodarczyk, Justyna
    2024 “From animal odd couples to oddkin: Probing visual pepresentations of interspecies friendship through critical cuteness.” European Journal of American Studies(). 10.4000/ejas.21339
    https://doi.org/10.4000/ejas.21339 [Google Scholar]
  25. Yus, Francisco
    2011Cyberpragmatics: Internet-Mediated Communication in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.213
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.213 [Google Scholar]
  26. 2013 “An inference-centered analysis of jokes: The intersecting circles model of humorous communication.” InIrony and Humor: From Pragmatics to Discourse, ed. byLeonor Ruiz Gurillo, and M. Belén Alvarado Ortega, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.231.05yus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.231.05yus [Google Scholar]
  27. 2016Humour and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/thr.4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.4 [Google Scholar]
  28. 2021Smartphone Communication: Interactions in the App Ecosystem. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003200574
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003200574 [Google Scholar]
  29. 2023Pragmatics of Internet Humor. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑31902‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31902-0 [Google Scholar]
  30. Zapata, Gabriela, and Taylor Le Cui
    2024 “Diversity & inclusion research: Unveiling and promoting diversity, inclusion, and access.” Diversity & Inclusion Research, . 10.1002/dvr2.12004
    https://doi.org/10.1002/dvr2.12004 [Google Scholar]
  31. Ziv, Avner
    2010 “The social function of humor in interpersonal relationships.” Society: –. 10.1007/s12115‑009‑9283‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-009-9283-9 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00139.pis
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ip.00139.pis
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error