1887
Volume 2, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN 2406-419x
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4246
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

The discourse functions of Yiddish expletive es + subject-postposing, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/iprapip.2.1-2.08pri-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/iprapip.2.1-2.08pri
1988-01-01
2019-10-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aissen, J
    (1975) Presentational-THERE insertion: a cyclic root transformation. Papers from the 11th Regional Meeting , CLS.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Birnbaum, S
    (1979) Yiddish: a survey and a grammar.Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bolinger, D
    (1977) Meaning and form. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Clark, H. and Marshall, C
    (1981) Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In Joshi, A.K. , Webber, B.L. , and Sag, I.A. , eds.Elements of discourse understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Davison, A
    (1984) Syntactic markedness and the definition of sentence topic. Language60.797-846. doi: 10.1353/lan.1984.0012
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1984.0012 [Google Scholar]
  6. Erteschik-Shir, N. and Lappin, S
    (1979) Dominance and the functional explanation of island phenomena. Theoretical Linguistics44-86.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Green, G. and Morgan, J.L
    (1981) Pragmatics, grammar, and discourse. In Cole, P ., ed.Radical pragmatics. NY: Academic Press. Pp. 167-81.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Grosz, B
    (1977) Focusing in dialog. SRI International. Technical Note No. 151. July.
  9. (1981) Focusing and description in natural language dialogues. In Joshi, A.K. , Webber, B.L. , and Sag, I.A. , eds.Elements of discourse understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. Pp.84-105.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Grosz, B. , Joshi, A.K. , and Weinstein, S
    (1987) Toward a computational theory of discourse interpretation. Ms.
  11. Gundel, J
    (1974) The role of topic and comment in linguistic theory. Univ. of TexasPh.D. diss.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (1985) 'Shared knowledge' and topicality. Journal of Pragmatics9.1.83-107. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(85)90049‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(85)90049-9 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hankamer, J
    (1973) THERE-insertion and the definiteness of deletion targets. NELS4.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Henningsson, L.-A
    (1987) Existential sentences in Swedish, a question of perspective. Ms.
  15. Horn, L
    (1986) Presupposition, theme, and variations. In Farley, A . et al. , eds.Papers from the 22nd Regional Meeting, CLS. Pp.168-92.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Joshi, A.K. and Weinstein, S
    (1981) Control of inference: role of some aspects of discourse structure-centering. Proc. IJCAI81.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Katz, D
    (1987) Grammar of the Yiddish language. London: Duckworth.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kuno, S
    (1972) Functional sentence perspective: a case study from Japanese and English. Linguistic Inquiry3.269-320.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (1986) Functional syntax: anaphora, discourse, and empathy.Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Mark, Y
    (1978) Gramatik fun der yidisher klal-shprakh. [Grammar of Standard Yiddish.] NY: Congress for Jewish Culture.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Olsvanger, I
    ed. (1947) Royte pomerantsen. [Red oranges.] NY: Schocken Books. Reprinted 1965.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Perlmutter, D. and Zaenen, A
    (1984) The indefinite extraposition construction in Dutch and German. In Perlmutter, D. and Rosen, C ., eds.Studies in relational grammar 2. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press. Pp.171-216.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Platzack, C
    (1986) COMP, INFL, and Germanic word order. In Hellan, L. , and Christensen, K ., eds.Topics in Scandinavian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Prince, E.F
    (1981) Toward a taxonomy of given/new information. In Cole, P ., ed.Radical pragmatics. NY: Academic Press. Pp.223–255.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (1985) Fancy syntax and 'shared knowledge'. Journal of Pragmatics9.65-81. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(85)90048‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(85)90048-7 [Google Scholar]
  26. (1988) On pragmatic change: the borrowing of discourse functions. Journal of Pragmatics. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(88)90045‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(88)90045-8 [Google Scholar]
  27. . (To appear) The ZPG letter: subjects, definiteness, and information-status. In Thompson, S. and Mann, W eds. Discourse description: diverse analyses of a fund raising text. Amsterdam/Phila.: John Benjamins B.V. doi: 10.1075/pbns.16.12pri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.16.12pri [Google Scholar]
  28. . (In prep.) Syntax, discourse, and the notion of 'Centering'.
  29. Rando, E. and Napoli, D.J
    (1978) Definites in THERE-sentences. Language54.300-13. doi: 10.2307/412949
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412949 [Google Scholar]
  30. Reinhart, T
    (1981) Pragmatics and linguistics: an analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica27.53-94. Also 1982. Indiana Univeristy Linguistics Club.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Schaechter, M
    (1986) Laytish mame-loshn. [Correct Yiddish.] NY: League for Yiddish.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Sidner, C
    (1983) Focusing in the comprehension of definite anaphora. In Brady, M. and Berwick, R ., eds.Computational models of discourse. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Pp.265-328.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Taube, M
    . (To appear) The development of aspectual auxiliaries in Yiddish. Word.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Ward, G
    (1985) The semantics and pragmatics of Preposing. Univ. of Penn. Ph.D. diss.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Weinreich, U
    (1971) College Yiddish. 5th revised edition. NY: YIVO.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Zaretski, A
    (1929) Yidishe gramatik. [Yiddish grammar.] Vilna: Vilner Farlag fun B. Kletskin.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Ziv, Y
    (1975) On the relevance of content to the form-function correlation: an examination of extraposed relative clauses. Parasession on Functionalism.CLS 11. Pp.568-79.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. (1981) On some discourse uses of existentials in English, or, Getting more mileage out of existentials in English. Presented at theLSA Annual Meeting, NY.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/iprapip.2.1-2.08pri
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error