1887
Volume 3, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2406-419x
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4246
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

The Cantonese utterance particle la and the accomplishment of common understandings in conversation, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/iprapip.3.1.02kwo-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/iprapip.3.1.02kwo
1989-01-01
2019-09-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Atkinson, J.M. & Heritage, J
    (eds.) (1984) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown, P. & Levinson, S
    (1978) Universals in language: politeness phenomena. In Goody, E . (ed.), Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 56-311.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chao, Y.R
    (1968) A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Clark, H.H. & Marshall, C.R
    (1981) Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In Joshi, A.K. , Sag, I. & Webber, B . (eds.), Elements in Discourse Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Clark, H.H. & Carlson, T.B
    (1982) Speech acts and hearers' beliefs. In Smith (ed.), Mutual Knowledge,1-36.
  6. Condon, S.L
    (1986) The discourse functions of OK. Semiotica 60(1/2): 73-101. doi: 10.1515/semi.1986.60.1‑2.73
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1986.60.1-2.73 [Google Scholar]
  7. Deuchar, M
    (1987) Sign language research. In Lyons, J . et al . (eds.)New Horizons in Linguistics 2, London: Penguin. 311-335.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Friedman, L.A
    (1976) The manifestation of subject, object, and topic in the American Sign Language. In Li (ed.), 125-148.
  9. Garfinkel, H
    (1984) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press. [First published by Prentice Hall in 1967].
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gibbons, J
    (1980) A tentative framework for speech act description of the utterance particles in conversational Cantonese. Linguistics18:763-775. doi: 10.1515/ling.1980.18.9‑10.763
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1980.18.9-10.763 [Google Scholar]
  11. Goffman, E
    (1974) Frame Analysis. New York: Harper and Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Goldberg, J
    (1982) Discourse particles: an analysis of the role of y'know I mean, well, and actuallv in conversation. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge.
  13. Heritage, J
    (1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In Atkinson & Heritage (ed.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis,299-345.
  14. Higgins, G.V
    (1986) Penance for Jerry Kennedy. New York: Carroll & Graf Publishers, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Huang, P.F.P
    (1970) Cantonese Dictionary. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. James, A.R
    (1983) Compromisers in English: a cross-disciplinary approach to their interpersonal significance. Journal of Pragmatics7:191-203. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(83)90052‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(83)90052-8 [Google Scholar]
  17. James, D
    (1973) Another look at, say, some grammatical constraints on, oh, interjections and hesitations. In Proceedings of the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society . 242-251.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Karttunen, F
    (1975a) The syntax and pragmatics of the Finnish clitic han . Texas Linguistic Forum1, 40-50.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (1975b) More Finnish clitics: syntax and pragmatics. Indiana Linguistics Club Papers, Bloomington.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Karttunen, L. & Peters, S
    (1975) Conversational implicature and Montague grammar. In Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society . 266-78.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Karttunen, L
    (1977) The syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy1:3-44. doi: 10.1007/BF00351935
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00351935 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kwok, H
    (1984) Sentence Particles in Cantonese. Hong Kong: Centre of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kyle, J.G. & Woll, B
    (1985) Sign Language: the Study of Deaf People and their Language. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lakoff, R
    (1972) Hedges: a study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. In Proceedings of the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society . 183-228.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lau, S
    (1977) A Practical Cantonese-English Dictionary. Hong Kong: the Government Printer.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lewis, D
    (1969) Convention. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Li, C.N. & Thompson, S.A
    (1976) Subject and topic: a new typology of language. InSubject and Topic, ed. by Li, C.N . New York: Academic Press. 457-90.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (1981) Mandarin Chinese: a Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Li, Jinxi
    (1955) Xinzhu Guoyu ',Yenta. (A New Grammar of Mandarin Chinese). Shanghai: Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Local, J.K. , Wells, W.H.G. and Sebba, M
    (1985) Phonology for conversation: phonetic aspects of turn delimitation in London Jamaican". Journal of Pragmatics9:309-330. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(85)90029‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(85)90029-3 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lü, Shuxiang & Zhu, Dexi
    (1953) Yufa Xiuci Jianghua. (Talks on Grammar and Rhetoric). Beijing: Zhongguo Qingnian Chubanshe.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Psathas, G
    (1986) Some sequential structures in direction-giving. In Button, G. , Drew, P. , & Heritage, J.C . (eds.), Human Studies, Vol.9, Nos. 2-3. Special double edition on interaction and language use. 231-46. doi: 10.1007/BF00148129
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148129 [Google Scholar]
  33. Sacks, H
    (1974) "An analysis of the course of a joke's telling in conversation". In Bauman, R. & Scherzer, J . (eds.), Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 337-353.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Sacks, H. & Schegloff, E
    (1979) Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction". In Psathas, G . (ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnonzethodolog, New York: Irvington.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Schegloff, E.A
    (1972) Notes on a conversational practice: formulating place. In Sudnow, D .(ed.), Studies in Social Interaction. New York: Free Press. 75-119.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Schegloff, E.A. , Jefferson, G. , & Sacks, H
    (1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language53: 361-82. doi: 10.1353/lan.1977.0041
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041 [Google Scholar]
  37. Schegloff, E.A. & Sacks, H
    (1973) Opening up closings. Senziotica 7.4: 289-327. doi: 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 [Google Scholar]
  38. Schiffer, S.R
    (1972) Meaning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Schiffrin, D
    (1985) Conversational coherence: the role of well . Language61:640-67. doi: 10.2307/414389
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414389 [Google Scholar]
  40. (1987) Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611841
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841 [Google Scholar]
  41. Schubiger, M
    (1972) English intonation and German modal particles: a comparative study. In Bolinger, D (ed.), Intonation. Harmondsworth: Penguin. 175-93.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Smith, N.V
    (ed.) (1982) Mutual Knowledge. London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Stalnaker, R.C
    (1977) Pragmatic presupposition. In Rogers, A. , Wall, B. , & Murphy, J.P . (eds.)Proceedings of the Texas Conference on Performatives, Presuppositions, and Implicatures. Washington: Centre for Applied Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. (1978) Assertion. In Cole, P . (ed.), Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press. 315-32.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Tsuchihashi, M
    (1983) The speech act continuum: an investigation of Japanese sentence final particles. Journal of Pragmatics7:361-387. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(83)90024‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(83)90024-3 [Google Scholar]
  46. Uyeno, T
    (1971) A Study of Japanese Modality: a Performative Analysis of Sentence Particles. Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Linguistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Van Valin, R.D
    (1975) German doch: the basic phenomena. Proceedings of the 11th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 625-637.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Wang, Li
    (1955) Zhongguo Xiandai Yufa. (A Modern Grammar of Chinese). Beijing: Zhonghua.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Wittgenstein, L
    (1953) Philosophical Investigations. (Translated by G.E.M. Anscombe ). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/iprapip.3.1.02kwo
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error