1887
Volume 4, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN 2406-419x
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4246
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

On formulating reference, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/iprapip.4.1-2.05fox-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/iprapip.4.1-2.05fox
1990-01-01
2019-11-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Clancy, P
    1980 Referential choice in English and Japanese narrative discourse. In W. Chafe (ed.)The Pear Stories. New Jersey: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Du Bois, J
    1980 "Beyond definiteness: The trace of identity in discourse." In W. Chafe (ed.)The Pear Stories. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Duranti, A
    1984 The social meaning of subject pronouns in Italian conversation. Text4: 277-311.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Fillmore, C
    1977 Topics in lexical semantics. In R. Cole (ed.)Current issues in linguistic theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Fox, B
    1987a The noun phrase accessibility hierarchy revisited: subject primacy or the absolutive hypothesis?Language63: 856-870. doi: 10.2307/415720
    https://doi.org/10.2307/415720 [Google Scholar]
  6. 1987bDiscourse Structure and Anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511627767
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627767 [Google Scholar]
  7. Fox, B. and S. Thompson
    1990 "A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversation."Language66: 51-64. doi: 10.1353/lan.1990.0023
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1990.0023 [Google Scholar]
  8. Givon, T
    (ed.) 1983Topic Continuity in Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.3 [Google Scholar]
  9. Goodwin, C
    1979 "The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation." In G. Psathas (ed.)Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Grosz, B
    1977 The representation and use of focus in dialogue understanding. Stanford Research Institute Technical Notes 5.
  11. Linde, C
    1979 Focus of attention and the choice of pronouns in discourse. In T. Givon (ed.)Syntax and Semantics, vol 12. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Prince, E
    1981 Toward a taxonomy of given and new information. In P. Cole (ed.)Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Redecker, G
    1987 Introductions of story characters in interactive and non-interactive narration. In J. Verscheuren and M. Bertucelli-Papi (eds.)The Pragmatic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbcs.5.26red
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbcs.5.26red [Google Scholar]
  14. Reichman, R
    1981Plain speaking: a theory and grammar of spontaneous discourse. Cambridge, Mass: Bolt, Beranek and Newman, report 4681.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Sacks, H
    1972 On the analyzability of stories by children. In J. Gumperz and D. Hymes (eds.)Directions in Sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Sacks, H. and E. Schegloff
    1979 Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In G. Psathas (ed.)Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Schegloff, E
    1972 Notes on a conversational practice: formulating place. In D. Sudnow (ed)Studies in Social Interaction. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Tannen, D
    1979 What's in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations. In R. Freedle (ed.)New Directions in Discourse Processing. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Wertsch, J
    (ed.) 1986Culture, communication, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/iprapip.4.1-2.05fox
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error