Volume 21, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1572-0373
  • E-ISSN: 1572-0381
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Arnold, L., Jin Lee, K., & Yip, J. C.
  2. Bartneck, C., & Forlizzi, J.
    (2004) A design-centred framework for social human-robot interaction. InRO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp.591–594). Kurashiki, Japan: IEEE.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bertel, L. B., Rasmussen, D. M., & Christiansen, E.
    (2013) Robots for Real: Developing a Participatory Design Framework for Implementing Educational Robots in Real-World Learning Environments (pp.437–444). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. doi:  10.1007/978‑3‑642‑40480‑1_29
  4. Breazeal, C.
    (2003) Toward Sociable Robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 167–175. 10.1016/S0921‑8890(02)00373‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00373-1 [Google Scholar]
  5. Coeckelbergh, M.
    (2012) Growing Moral Relations – Critique of Moral Status Ascription. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137025968
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137025968 [Google Scholar]
  6. Dautenhahn, K.
    (1998) The art of designing socially intelligent agents: science, fiction, and the human in the loop. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 12(7–8), 573–617. doi:  10.1080/088395198117550
    https://doi.org/10.1080/088395198117550 [Google Scholar]
  7. de Graaf, M., Allouch, S., & Klamer, T.
    (2015) Sharing a life with Harvey: Exploring the acceptance of and relationship-building with a social robot. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 1–14. doi:  10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.030
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.030 [Google Scholar]
  8. Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., & Dautenhahn, K.
    (2003) A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3–4), 143–166. Retrieved fromlinkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S092188900200372X
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Forlizzi, J., & Disalvo, C.
    (2006) Service Robots in the Domestic Environment: A Study of the Roomba Vacuum in the Home. InProceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-robot interaction (HRI) (pp.258–265). New York, USA: ACM. Retrieved fromwww.irobot.com. 10.1145/1121241.1121286
    https://doi.org/10.1145/1121241.1121286 [Google Scholar]
  10. Frennert, S., Eftring, H., & Östlund, B.
    (2013) Older People’s Involvement in the Development of a Social Assistive Robot (pp.8–18). Springer, Cham. doi:  10.1007/978‑3‑319‑02675‑6_2
  11. Gunkel, D. J.
    (2012) The Machine Question: Critical Perspectives on AI, Robots, and Ethics. The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/8975.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8975.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  12. Hannibal, G., & Lindner, F.
    (2018) Transdisciplinary Reflections on Social Robotics in Academia and Beyond. InM. Coeckelbergh, J. Loh, M. Funk, J. Seibt, & M. Nørskov (Eds.), Envisioning Robots in Society–Power, Politics, and Public Space – Proceedings of Robophilosophy/TRANSOR 2018 (pp.23–27). Amsterdam: IOS-Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kahn, P. H., Freier, N. G., Friedman, B., Severson, R. L., & Feldman, E. N.
    (2004) Social and moral relationships with robotic others?RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, (OCTOBER 2004), 545–550. doi:  10.1109/ROMAN.2004.1374819
    https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2004.1374819 [Google Scholar]
  14. Kidd, C. D., & Breazeal, C.
    (2008) Robots at home: Understanding long-term human-robot interaction. In2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (pp.3230–3235). IEEE. doi:  10.1109/IROS.2008.4651113
    https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2008.4651113 [Google Scholar]
  15. Klein, J. T.
    (1990) Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, & Practice. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Meister, M.
    (2014) When is a robot really social? An outline of the Robot Sociologicus. Science, Technology & Innovation Studies, 10(1), 107–134. Retrieved fromwww.sti-studies.de/ojs/index.php/sti/article/view/145/130
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M.
    (1973) Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Sciences (Vol.4). Retrieved fromwww.sympoetic.net/Managing_Complexity/complexity_files/1973_Rittel_and_Webber_Wicked_Problems.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Šabanović, S., Chang, W.-L., Bennett, C. C., Piatt, J. A., & Hakken, D.
    (2015) A Robot of My Own: Participatory Design of Socially Assistive Robots for Independently Living Older Adults Diagnosed with Depression (pp.104–114). Springer, Cham. doi:  10.1007/978‑3‑319‑20892‑3_11
  19. Sharkey, A., & Sharkey, N.
    (2010) Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics and Information Technology, 14(1), 27–40. Retrieved fromlink.springer.com/10.1007/s10676-010-9234-6
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Sparrow, R., & Sparrow, L.
    (2006) In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Minds and Machines, 16(2), 141–161. Retrieved fromlink.springer.com/10.1007/s11023-006-9030-6
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Sung, J., Christensen, H. I., & Grinter, R. E.
    (2009) Robots in the wild: Understanding Long-term Use. Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction – HRI ’09, 45. doi:  10.1145/1514095.1514106
    https://doi.org/10.1145/1514095.1514106 [Google Scholar]
  22. Turkle, S.
    (2010) Alone Together – Why We Expect More From Technology and Less From Each Other. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Introduction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error