More than advice

References

1. Bickmore, T. W., & Picard, R. W.
   (2005) Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 12(2), 293–327. 10.1145/1067860.1067867
   https://doi.org/10.1145/1067860.1067867 [Google Scholar]
2. Christian, B.
   (2011) The most human human: What talking with computers teaches us about what it means to be alive. Anchor.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Cramer, H., Goddijn, J., Wielinga, B., & Evers, V.
   (2010) Effects of (in) accurate empathy and situational valence on attitudes towards robots. In2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp.141–142). IEEE.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Fischer, K., & Saunders, J.
   (2012, October). Getting acquainted with a developing robot. InInternational Workshop on Human Behavior Understanding (pp.125–133). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑34014‑7_11
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34014-7_11 [Google Scholar]
5. Fischer, K., Jensen, L. C., Zitzmann, N.
   (2022) Sharing the Situational Context Influences a Speaker’s (a Robot’s) Persuasiveness. Interaction Studies – in this volume.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Fischer, K., Niebuhr, O., Jensen, L. C., & Bodenhagen, L.
   (2019) Speech melody matters – How robots profit from using charismatic speech. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI), 9(1), 1–21.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Gonsior, B., Sosnowski, S., Mayer, C., Blume, J., Radig, B., Wollherr, D., & Kühnlenz, K.
   (2011) Improving aspects of empathy and subjective performance for HRI through mirroring facial expressions. In2011 RO-MAN (pp.350–356). IEEE. 10.1109/ROMAN.2011.6005294
   https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2011.6005294 [Google Scholar]
8. Ham, J.
   (2022) Influencing Robot Influence: Personlization of Persuasive Robots. Interaction Studies – in this volume.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Ham, J., Cuijpers, R. H., & Cabibihan, J.-J.
   (2015) Combining robotic persuasive strategies: The persuasive power of a storytelling robot that uses gazing and gestures. International Journal of Social Robotics. 10.1007/s12369‑015‑0280‑4
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0280-4 [Google Scholar]
10. Hone, K.
    (2006) Empathic agents to reduce user frustration: The effects of varying agent characteristics. Interacting with computers, 18(2), 227–245. 10.1016/j.intcom.2005.05.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2005.05.003 [Google Scholar]
11. Jensen, L. C.
    (2018) Effects of Contingent Robot Response to the Situatedness of Human-Robot Interactions. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern Denmark.
12. Leite, I., Castellano, G., Pereira, A., Martinho, C., & Paiva, A.
    (2014) Empathic robots for long-term interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6(3), 329–341. 10.1007/s12369‑014‑0227‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-014-0227-1 [Google Scholar]
13. Leite, I., Pereira, A., Mascarenhas, S., Martinho, C., Prada, R., & Paiva, A.
    (2013) The influence of empathy in human–robot relations. International journal of human-computer studies, 71(3), 250–260. 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.09.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.09.005 [Google Scholar]
14. Lisetti, C., Amini, R., Yasavur, U., & Rishe, N.
    (2013) I can help you change! an empathic virtual agent delivers behavior change health interventions. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS), 4(4), 1–28. 10.1145/2544103
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2544103 [Google Scholar]
15. Liu, B., & Sundar, S. S.
    (2018) Should machines express sympathy and empathy? Experiments with a health advice chatbot. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(10), 625–636. 10.1089/cyber.2018.0110
    https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0110 [Google Scholar]
16. Mercier, H.
    (2020) Not born yesterday: The science of who we trust and what we believe. 10.1515/9780691198842
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691198842 [Google Scholar]
17. Niculescu, A., van Dijk, B., Nijholt, A., Li, H., & See, S. L.
    (2013) Making social robots more attractive: the effects of voice pitch, humor and empathy. International journal of social robotics, 5(2), 171–191. 10.1007/s12369‑012‑0171‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-012-0171-x [Google Scholar]
18. Ochs, M., Pelachaud, C., & Sadek, D.
    (2008) An empathic virtual dialog agent to improve human-machine interaction. InProceedings of the 7th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems-Volume 1 (pp.89–96).
    [Google Scholar]
19. Paiva, A., Leite, I., Boukricha, H., & Wachsmuth, I.
    (2017) Empathy in virtual agents and robots: a survey. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS), 7(3), 1–40. 10.1145/2912150
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2912150 [Google Scholar]
20. Prendinger, H., & Ishizuka, M.
    (2005) The Empathic Companion: A Character-Based Interface That Addresses Users’ Affective States. Applied artificial intelligence, 19(3–4), 267–285. 10.1080/08839510590910174
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08839510590910174 [Google Scholar]
21. Riek, L. D., Rabinowitch, T. C., Chakrabarti, B., & Robinson, P.
    (2009) How anthropomorphism affects empathy toward robots. InProceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction (pp.245–246). 10.1145/1514095.1514158
    https://doi.org/10.1145/1514095.1514158 [Google Scholar]
22. Rosenthal-von der Pütten, A. M., Schulte, F. P., Eimler, S. C., Hoffmann, L., Sobieraj, S., Maderwald, S., Krämer, N. C., & Brand, M.
    (2013) Neural correlates of empathy towards robots. In2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp.215–216). IEEE. 10.1109/HRI.2013.6483578
    https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2013.6483578 [Google Scholar]
23. SociBot
    SociBot: https://wiki.engineeredarts.co.uk/SociBot, last seenMarch 18, 2021
24. Stephan, A.
    (2015) Empathy for artificial agents. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(1), 111–116. 10.1007/s12369‑014‑0260‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-014-0260-0 [Google Scholar]
25. Tapus, A., & Mataric, M. J.
    (2007) Emulating Empathy in Socially Assistive Robotics. InAAAI spring symposium: multidisciplinary collaboration for socially assistive robotics (pp.93–96).
    [Google Scholar]